Connect with us

Oregon

What Dana Altman, Jackson Shelstad, Nate Bittle said after Oregon beat Liberty in NCAA Tournament

Published

on

What Dana Altman, Jackson Shelstad, Nate Bittle said after Oregon beat Liberty in NCAA Tournament


SEATTLE — No. 5 seed Oregon defeated No. 12 seed Liberty 81-52 in the first round of the NCAA Tournament on Friday.

Oregon coach Dana Altman, guard Jackson Shelstad and center Nate Nittle spoke after the game.

Below is a transcript of Oregon’s postgame press conference.

Advertisement

DANA ALTMAN: I thought the fellas came out with a lot of energy. The early threes kind of got us going, but I thought our defensive activity was really, really good. We moved the ball. We made some plays for each other there. Jackson and Kee, Nate hit some threes. I thought the plays that Jackson made right before half, we went 2 for 11 there mand he got a 15-footer down mand then he made a really good play diving on a loose ball and picking it up.

So then the second half we just — when we went into Nate, a lot of good things happened, 14 points, 10 boards. So all in all, I thought our energy was really good, our activity defensively was good. This is a team that you don’t win 28 games by accident, and they can really shoot it, but I thought our activity and our challenging their shots kind of got ‘em out of their rhythm. Their ball movement wasn’t the same as it’s been throughout the year.

THE MODERATOR: Questions for the student-athletes, please.

Q. Jackson, take us through you that sequence at the end of the half that Coach just referred to because it kind of epitomized just how big a gap there was in talent and game IQ tonight. At what point did you realize after the first jumper that when they’re trying to neutralize the 2 for 1 by taking the time on the inbound, that you can make a play defensively?

JACKSON SHELSTAD: I saw him throw the ball in. He kind of rolled it, so I knew if I dove on it, I could get there, so I just jumped on it, and I think they were trying to save some time on the clock, but we got the ball, then we got another possession, hit a shot. So it was just a good way to go into the second half.

Advertisement

Q. Jackson, that effort transition three you had, I think it was on your guys’ third possession or so, what’s it feel like to hit that shot and get that rhythm early and was that a shot that Dana liked from you? It kind of seemed like he yelled something at you after that.

JACKSON SHELSTAD: Yeah, I thought I had space, just tried to get my feet set. I work on those shots a lot, so just try to trust it. And then, yeah, when you hit your first couple shots, obviously it just gives you some confidence, and my teammates did a really good job just getting me open looks as well.

Q. Nate, you knew you would be bigger than anybody on the floor tonight, but you had the one sequence in particular where you just bulldozed right through a man. You don’t get to do that very much in the Big Ten. What did that feel like here and in this venue with the home crowd to literally just push your way through people tonight?

NATE BITTLE: It’s a physical game. Altman tells us all the time that growing up, if your mom told you it’s not a physical sport, it is. So we take that into consideration and it’s just one of those games where they didn’t have anybody that was bigger than 6′-8″, 6′-9″, so I knew that crashing the glass and going to the rim aggressively was what I needed to do.

Q. Jackson, the last game you guys played in March was that Creighton game. How much was that in your mind during this game and how much was it just about tonight?

Advertisement

JACKSON SHELSTAD: Yeah, I mean, that one definitely hurt. We had our chances. We had Dante and Jermaine really leading us and just trying to carry over that leadership from the experience I got last year in the tournament. We have a lot of guys first time playing in the tournament, so me, Bam, TJ, just got to bring leadership from last year with our experience.

Q. Guys, your first initial thoughts on an old friend, Arizona, in the second round, meeting them?

NATE BITTLE: Yeah, we know what we were going to have to do to beat them. It starts with defense and rebounding. We got to fight through screens like we did tonight, active hands, contest shots, deflections, and everything like that. I think if we play defense, everything will fall into place.

Q. Nate, you guys over the last several weeks, couple of months, have been playing just unreal basketball. I’ve seen nine out of the last 10 games you guys have won. I know obviously every team in this tournament is great, but do you feel like with the way you guys are playing, that you can beat any team at this moment at this stretch right now for the next couple of games that you guys continue to move on?

NATE BITTLE: Yeah, we went on that streak because we were playing defense, getting after people defensively, contesting shots, stuff like that, I just said. But the key to winning games is rebounding the ball and playing defense. Shots aren’t going to fall every night, but we can bring that defense and get aggressive and make their ball handlers dribble the ball full court against pressure and stuff like that. So if we’re active on the defense, it’s something that’s helped us win a lot of games this year.

Advertisement

THE MODERATOR: All right. We’ll let the players go and take questions for Coach Altman.

Q. To hold one of the top shooting teams in the country to, by far, a season low until garbage time a season low from 3 up until the very end there, how do you feel about your defensive effort when you knew that would be such a focal point?

DANA ALTMAN: I thought our activity was really good. We felt like if we could get some hands on some balls and disrupt their rhythm, that we could really take away some of the really good looks they have been getting. I think the first five, six minutes we had seven deflections, and that’s where we jumped out to that 18-2 lead. In that, they had one open three. They got one right in front of our bench there. But I thought our defensive activity was really good.

And then to start the second half they got a couple easy ones, but then I think TJ had, like, three steals in a row and kind of got our defense going again.

So they are a rhythm team. Just watching ‘em shoot before the game, I mean, they just — their shooting strokes, they just throw ‘em in. So I’m glad we were able to take ‘em out of their rhythm and give ourself a chance.

Advertisement

Q. At that under 12 timeout in the first half, you subbed out four to five guys. Didn’t look too pleased on the sideline. What was your thinking there? What was you looking to have changed at that point that you called that timeout and made the wholesale changes there?

DANA ALTMAN: You know, I’m not sure which timeout, but I just thought at times our ball movement wasn’t what it should be. We did have 14 turnovers. Most of ‘em were just trying to go too quick. They just got a little too much optimism with what they were doing. We need to be a little bit more patient at times.

When we got that thing moving, they really had a hard time keeping up with us. If we just get it on one side and try to attack early — I want to be aggressive, but we got to be smart. 14 turnovers is way too many. Again, it was either lack of activity or the turnovers. Those, at times, I thought we just let up just a little bit activity-wise defensively. And then, again, I would just — I thought we made too many mistakes with the 14 turnovers.

Q. The play that was referenced earlier where Jackson made the jumper, dove right before halftime to get the ball back, is that sort of — can that be sort of a — does that kind of embody the spirit you need to play with this time of year and how do you feel as a coach when you see that level of going all out?

DANA ALTMAN: Well, I sure got excited, I mean, to see him layout like that and go after that ball. No, those are the kind of plays coaches like. I’m glad he hit the three then because now he’ll do it again.

Advertisement

But, no, that was a heck of a play. It really was. We took the timeout there. We had a couple bad possessions right before then. They hit a three. I think it was 39-20. We went 2 for 1. I think we had 43 three or 44 seconds, and we just let Jackson penetrate and pop up and hit one. That was the call. We wanted to get a stop and get it back. So they realized what we were doing and tried to slow roll one in there, and Jackson picked up on it and just made a tremendous play.

So, no, it was something that I think any coach would love to see.

Q. What do you say at the half in a game like this? Do you have to say a lot?

DANA ALTMAN: Well, we were really pleased with our activity. I can’t remember — I think we were up 9 or 10 on the boards, so you compliment ‘em on things that we emphasize. We wanted to be up on the boards and we were. Our activity was good defensively. Got on ‘em a little bit about the turnovers. I think we had seven or eight at halftime, so we got to handle the ball a little bit better. Talked about the importance of the first five minutes, not letting ‘em get going and get a bunch of easy shots.

So nothing different. We try to stay consistent with the same things we do during the season, same way we prepare. We don’t change much. This was like a neutral game that we play in November. The guys realize the stakes and the media attention and everything, but as coaches, we try to keep it as consistent as possible and try to emphasize the same things we emphasize throughout the season.

Advertisement

Q. You’ve talked about the bench already throughout the season, but 11 of your players scored, nine had at least five points. What kind of a luxury is it to go to a bench that deep in March?

DANA ALTMAN: Well, you know, when we had the game in hand there, I didn’t want to play anybody too many minutes. We got a game on Sunday, and the transition that Arizona exhibited today, you know, we’re going to have a lot of running. I mean, they were pushing the tempo. We’ve played them a number of times over the last 14 years, so we know the pressure they’re going to put on in transition. And so we’re a little fortunate there that we didn’t have to play guys 35 minutes.

Q. You talked earlier this week about some of your seniors getting a first opportunity to play in the tournament, can you explain the anticipation you had for them and also I saw you at the end of the game smiling with Jason got the layup and Mookie a couple times. Can you reflect on those guys that don’t get to play a lot getting their first crack at the tournament?

DANA ALTMAN: You know, one of the hardest things is, Mookie is really talented, Jamari is talented, our walk-ons, Jason, Drew and Coop, they have been tremendous. I can’t play 12, 13 guys. It’s hard when you’re talented not to get the opportunity. We played nine extended minutes, but it’s hard to play 10 or 11. Those two are the lease experienced guys we got, so never questioned their talent, it’s just that we don’t have injuries this year, we could have sure used Mookie last year when he was out all year and Jamari, those guys would have played a lot for us last year, just it’s amazing how different seasons are. But those guys, to hang with it, be great team members, it says a lot about their character, and they have been great, whether it’s the scout team, whether it’s energy on the bench. It’s difficult when you’re talented and feel like you want to play, it’s really hard to show that character, because you’re going through adversity and you want to play more, so they have done a tremendous job.



Source link

Advertisement

Oregon

Lake scores 16, Oregon State knocks off Montana State 67-57

Published

on

Lake scores 16, Oregon State knocks off Montana State 67-57


CORVALLIS, Ore. (AP) — Josiah Lake’s 16 points helped Oregon State defeat Montana State 67-57 on Saturday.

Lake had eight rebounds and six assists for the Beavers (6-5). Dez White added 12 points while shooting 4 for 11, including 2 for 7 from beyond the arc while he also had five rebounds. Isaiah Sy shot 4 for 8, including 3 for 7 from beyond the arc to finish with 12 points.

The Bobcats (4-7) were led in scoring by Patrick McMahon, who finished with 17 points and seven rebounds. Jeremiah Davis added nine points for Montana State.

Advertisement

Oregon State used a 10-2 run in the second half to build a 10-point lead at 63-53 with 2:02 left in the half before finishing off the win.

___

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

How Oregon’s Defense Ranks Compared To James Madison

Published

on

How Oregon’s Defense Ranks Compared To James Madison


While the No. 5 Oregon Ducks offense has been the glue of the team’s success this season, their defense has also played a pivotal role in helping them earn a spot in the College Football Playoff for a second consecutive year.

Advertisement

Entering their first-round home playoff matchup against the No. 12 James Madison Dukes, Oregon aims to capitalize on defense, which is crucial in their goal of making a run at its first National Championship in program history. Oregon enters the playoff as one of the highest-ranked at-large teams behind the No. 2 Ohio State Buckeyes.

Where Does Oregon’s Defense Stack Up Against James Madison, CFP Field?

Advertisement

Oregon outside linebacker Matayo Uiagalelei, left, and Oregon defensive back Dillon Thieneman bring down Washington running back Jonah Coleman as the Oregon Ducks take on the Washington Huskies on Nov. 29, 2025, at Husky Stadium in Seattle, Washington. | Ben Lonergan/The Register-Guard / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Advertisement

Despite the Ducks being an overwhelming 21.5-point favorite over James Madison, according to ESPN BET Sportsbook, the first-round playoff matchup in Eugene will be a battle between two dominant defenses.

James Madison is second in the country in total defense behind Ohio State, allowing 247.6 yards per game. The Ducks’ defense is ranked No. 4 in total defense, allowing 251.6 yards per game.  

Oregon’s defense has several contributors who have led the team under defensive coordinator Tosh Lupoi this season, including Matayo Uiagalelei and A’Mauri Washington up front on the defensive line. Bryce Boettcher and Teitum Tuioti have also been dominant players at linebacker this season for the Ducks.

Boettcher leads the Ducks with 103 total tackles, one interception, and one sack this season. Dillon Thieneman, Brandon Finney Jr., and Aaron Flowers have been key contributors in the secondary with four interceptions combined.

Advertisement

MORE: Weather Concerns Begin For Oregon’s Playoff Game vs. James Madison

Advertisement

MORE: Three Reasons Why Oregon Could Be The Most Dangerous Playoff Team

MORE: Oregon Ducks Projected to Make Program History In 2026 NFL Draft 

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER HERE!

When it comes to scoring defense, the Ducks are ranked No. 6 among the other 12 playoff teams, allowing 14.8 points per game.

Advertisement

The five playoff teams that rank above the Ducks in scoring defense include No. 2 Ohio State (8.2), No. 1 Indiana (10.8), No. 4 Texas Tech (10.9), No. 10 Miami (13.8), and No. 8 Oklahoma (13.9). Oregon’s first round opponent, James Madison, is ranked one spot below the Ducks at No. 7 in scoring defense, allowing 15.9 points per game. 

Oregon’s Defense Strengths and Weaknesses

Advertisement

Oregon outside linebacker Teitum Tuioti, left, defensive lineman A’Mauri Washington and outside linebacker Matayo Uiagalelei celebrate a sack by Tuioti as the Oregon Ducks host the Minnesota Golden Gophers on Nov. 14, 2025, at Autzen Stadium in Eugene, Oregon. | Ben Lonergan/The Register-Guard / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Advertisement

If the Ducks beat James Madison in the first round of the playoff, they’ll face the No. 4 Texas Tech Red Raiders in the CFP Quarterfinals at the Orange Bowl on Jan. 1. A potential matchup between the Red Raiders and the Ducks in the Orange Bowl could come down to whichever defense performs better. While Oregon’s pass defense has been dominant throughout the season, its rush defense could jeopardize the Ducks’ quest for a championship. 

The Ducks rank No. 8 among playoff teams in rushing defense, allowing 107.3 yards per game. Texas Tech ranks No. 1, allowing 68.5 yards per game. The Red Raiders’ rush defense’s ability to shut down Oregon’s dominant running back trio of Noah Whittington, Jordon Davison, and Dierre Hill Jr. will be one of the biggest keys in a potential Orange Bowl matchup.

Advertisement

Sep 5, 2025; Louisville, Kentucky, USA; James Madison Dukes running back Wayne Knight (3) runs the ball against the Louisville Cardinals during the first half at L&N Federal Credit Union Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jamie Rhodes-Imagn Images | Jamie Rhodes-Imagn Images

Advertisement

It’ll be interesting to see how Oregon’s defense holds up against a talented James Madison offense that will have a chip on its shoulder as a massive underdog. The Dukes’ offense, led by quarterback Alonza Barnett III and star running back Wayne Knight, will challenge Oregon’s defense early on, but expect the Ducks to win convincingly.

Oregon will host James Madison at Autzen Stadium to open up the CFP on Dec. 20, with the kickoff scheduled for 4:30 p.m. PT. The game broadcast will be on TNT, HBO Max, and truTV.

  • Game odds refresh periodically and are subject to change. 
  • If you or someone you know has a gambling problem and wants help, call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Recommended Articles

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Longtime Oregon lawmaker repeatedly broke ethics laws to secure hefty raise, commission finds

Published

on

Longtime Oregon lawmaker repeatedly broke ethics laws to secure hefty raise, commission finds


Longtime Republican lawmaker Greg Smith broke Oregon ethics laws when he used his office to try to secure a $109,000 raise for his work as executive director of an eastern Oregon economic development agency, then maneuvered to get a $66,000 pay hike and make it retroactive, the Oregon ethics commission concluded Friday.

In a unanimous vote, commissioners endorsed an investigator’s finding that Smith, the longtime executive director of the federally funded Columbia Development Authority, repeatedly failed to declare a conflict of interest and used the power of his office for personal financial gain.

Smith got his salary raised from $129,000 to $195,000 without his bosses’ authorization and directed the employee in charge of his agency’s finances that the pay hike be made retroactive to April 2024, the investigator found. When the development authority board learned of Smith’s misrepresentations, it voted in September of that year to rescind the raise, records show. But he has not repaid it, ethics commission investigator Casey Fenstermacher wrote in her report dated Thursday.

Smith now has the option to request a hearing on his case before an administrative law judge or to work with the ethics agency to reach a settlement, including any fine or other punishment. He did not take part in Friday’s hearing nor did he respond to a request for comment left with his legislative chief of staff Friday afternoon.

Advertisement

Staffers at the Oregon Government Ethics Commission will formally propose a settlement with Smith, including financial penalties, by early January, commission director Susan Myers told The Oregonian/OregonLive Friday. The maximum fine her agency can propose is $10,000, she said, but the nine-member state ethics commission could vote to authorize a higher penalty.

The ethics commission did just that in 2018 when it rejected an agency proposal to fine former Gov. John Kitzhaber $1,000 for ​​ethics violations that allowed his fiancée, Cylvia Hayes, to secure lucrative consulting contracts during her time as first lady. Commissioners instead proposed a $50,000 fine and ultimately struck a deal with the four-term governor to pay $25,000.

Smith, who holds a key role on the Legislature’s powerful budget-writing committee, was elected in 2024 to a 13th term in the House, making him its longest serving member.

The ethics commission dinged him earlier this year for failing to disclose a key client of his consulting business on his required annual financial disclosure form. That client, Harney County, had paid him $7,000 a month to represent its interests at the Legislature.

In that case, Smith acknowledged the omission in his filing and later amended it. The commission closed that case, as it has other cases or incomplete financial filings, by issuing Smith a formal letter of education, Myers said.

Advertisement

According to the Salem Reporter, Smith is also under investigation in two other state ethics proceedings. Investigators are examining whether Smith broke the law when he claimed pay for working for the development authority at the same time he was performing private consulting work or working as a state legislator, the Salem newsroom reported.

The Columbia Development Authority, based in Boardman, is made up of several eastern Oregon governmental entities including the Port of Morrow and is in charge of redeveloping a former military base.

Once the ethics commission formally notifies Smith of its proposed settlement and his right to request a hearing, he will have 21 days to decide which option to pursue, Myers said. Nearly 99% of officials presented with that option choose to pursue a settlement, she said.

The commission normally takes into account both aggravating factors, such as the size of the financial windfall and whether the official repeatedly broke the law, and mitigating factors, such as whether an official acted on the advice of a government lawyer or quickly paid restitution, Myers said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending