New Mexico

New Mexico State Auditor orders special audit of Doña Ana County and Sheriff’s Office

Published

1 year ago

April 20, 2025

New Mexico State Auditor orders special audit of Doña Ana County and Sheriff’s Office

The New Mexico Office of the State Auditor initiated a special audit of Doña Ana County and the Doña Ana County Sheriff’s Office as the relationship between the two entities has frayed in recent months.

“The apparent lack of trust amongst County departments and staff is highly disconcerting to me and the situation appears to be at an impasse,” read a letter from the office of State Auditor Joseph Maestas.

“Consequently, all allegations of potential waste and abuse of public resources and funds, including any potential violations of laws, regulations, rules, policies and procedures in connection with the operation of the Doña Ana County Sheriff’s Office, to include DASO’s interactions with other County departments, elected County officials, County administrative leadership, and County staff must be fully examined and reported without any delay or avoidance,” an April 14, 2025, designation letter from the OSA to county leadership read.

In February 2025, the Doña Ana County Board of County Commissioners approved an external audit of DASO that was prompted by a petition filed by the county against Sheriff Kim Stewart, who refused to commission recent academy graduates as deputies.

The State Auditor’s office will provide oversight of the audit, at the request of both Stewart and the county, according to Maestas.

In an email sent Feb. 11, Stewart said she would not commission the cadets because she lacked the power to decommission, according to emails obtained by the Sun-News. In a Facebook post, Stewart recounted events from her perspective and also said the county’s human resources department informed her that several cadets did not pass their psychological exams.

In addition to the possibility of waste and abuse and a lack of communication and trust between the county and DASO, the designation letter also referenced a potential legal risk. There are several cases filed against the county and the sheriff for violations of the Whistleblower Protection Act, with the most recent filed by one of the deputies Stewart intended to decommission.

“After multiple requests, I was told the sheriff would not meet with anyone from county management, so I am left to put together the pieces of information that I have available,” County Attorney Cari Neill said during a presentation of legal proceedings of the writ in February. “And what appears to me to be happening is misdirection, smoke screens, confusion and deflection. Is it possible that HR got some pieces wrong? Of course. Is it also possible that the full blame is being placed on HR when HR was not fully to blame? Of course.”

While communication between the county and DASO appears to have broken down, Stewart seemingly agrees with an external audit in a March 13, 2025 letter to his office, but asking for oversight, “so that DASO and I may be treated fairly and equally.”

“Sheriff Stewart was first out of the shoot with a letter to us, basically outlining some of her areas of concern,” Maestas said. “She has issues with certain actions by human resources, and certain issues with the county legal counsel.

“She was very forceful in her letter. She did outline some of her concerns.”

Stewart did not respond to a request for comment by the Sun-News.

Maestas described the special audit as an opportunity to establish a pause in the trading of allegations between the involved parties.

“We are dealing with public safety here in a fairly large and significant county,” Maestas said. “I think it’s incumbent on all of the elected officials involved to demonstrate professionalism, tact and diplomacy in working together and establishing a good effective working relationship.

“If they don’t then the voters are going to take notice and say we elected folks that are just incapable of doing that. To avoid risking the wrath of voters, I’m confident in the county commission and administration, as well as the sheriff’s office will work together.”

The county also sent a letter to the auditor’s office requesting the state’s involvement, Maestas said.

“I’m looking forward to the audit and seeing what an auditor may find for opportunities for improvement and things where we have performed well,” District 5 Commissioner Manuel Sanchez said. “It will give us an opportunity to correct those issues and hopefully create a more productive relationship between county elected officials, the county administration and departments and DASO.

“My belief is that during an audit, they are trying to test and look at how strong our processes are and if you find something, it gives you a chance to get better and fix it. My concern is if you find the same issues year after year.”

The county will bear the cost of the audit and will be required to secure an independent public accountant from the state’s approved firm list to perform the audit.

Maestas said a special audit could normally take up to a year to complete, but he hopes to finish this particular audit sooner. The first meeting between the parties to determine to scope of the audit is scheduled for April 21, 2025.

“Part of the rebuilding of the bridge between Sheriff Stewart’s office and the county commission and county administration is jointly working on the scope of this audit,” Maestas said. “That way both sides are confident that their concerns will be addressed.”

Source link

Click to comment

New Mexico

New Mexico DOJ data: Shell-casing tracking links shootings in Doña Ana County

Published

6 hours ago

May 9, 2026

Press Room

LAS CRUCES, N.M (KFOX14/CBS4) — A gun-tracking program that uses shell casings to connect shootings is already helping investigators link crimes in Doña Ana County, according to new numbers released by the New Mexico Department of Justice.

The effort is part of New Mexico’s Crime Gun Intelligence Center, which uses ballistic evidence such as shell casings to track guns believed to be used in multiple crimes. The program relies on the National Integrated Ballistic Information Network, or NIBIN, a national database that compares ballistic evidence to determine whether shell casings may have come from the same weapon.

In April, New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez described how the technology can connect cases across jurisdictions.

“There may be a shooting that occurs in Deming that’s actually connected to a crime gun that’s recovered in Las Cruces. We may find shell casings in Silver City that are connected to something that happened in T or C,” Torrez said.

Four months into the program, the Department of Justice said 210 bullet casings have been analyzed in Doña Ana County. Those casings helped link 32 incidents to 13 guns.

Jordan Salas reports on New Mexico DOJ data: Shell-casing tracking links shootings in Doña Ana County (Credit: KFOX14)

Statewide, more than 700 casings have been entered into the system, connecting 74 shootings to 31 guns.

One person reacting to the numbers said, “That’s crazy. Honestly, all those shootings all coming from that little amount of weapons is crazy.”

New Mexico officials say the system is designed to help law enforcement share information faster and build cases more efficiently.

Also in April, Doña Ana County Sheriff Kim Stewart pointed to a local case she said the technology helped resolve quickly.

“We resolved a homicide with a suspect arrest in four days. We know that those casings may lead to another 1 or 2 incidents in another city,” Stewart said.

Some residents said the technology alone will not solve gun violence, but they see it as a step forward. One person said, “I mean, growing up, like hearing gunshots in the distance. That wasn’t something crazy. I have stories of, like, friends who’ve gone to parties that had guns go off there. So, yeah, I would say guns are a problem there.”

Another person said, “I would think that it’s a good thing. I’m personally like, just anything to help the gun crimes, you know?”

KFOX14/CBS4 contacted Las Cruces police and the Doña Ana County Sheriff’s Office to ask how the leads are being used in local investigations, but we are awaiting a response.

RECOMMENDED: New statewide crime gun intelligence center delivers leads, officials say in Las Cruces

RECOMMENDED: Las Cruces farmers warn tight margins, rising fuel and fertilizer costs threaten future

Source link

New Mexico

New Mexico AG seeks $3.7B from Meta over alleged ‘public nuisance’ claims

Published

18 hours ago

May 8, 2026

Press Room

New Mexico AG seeks .7B from Meta over alleged ‘public nuisance’ claims

(Photo Credit: FotoField/Shutterstock)

Who: New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez brought a lawsuit against Meta Platforms Inc.
Why: The state claims Meta misrepresented harms to minors and created a public nuisance through its social media platforms.
Where: The lawsuit is pending in New Mexico state court.
How to get help: Has social media impacted the mental health of you or your child? You may qualify to join a social media lawsuit against the platform.

New Mexico’s attorney general is asking a state court to order Meta to pay approximately $3.7 billion to address what the state describes as a “public nuisance” caused by the company’s social media platforms.

The request comes after a jury previously found Meta misrepresented the risks its platforms — including Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp — pose to underage users. The jury also imposed a $375 million penalty in the first phase of the trial.

The case has now moved into a second phase, where the court will determine what additional remedies, if any, Meta must provide.

According to the state, the proposed $3.712 billion abatement plan would fund a 15-year effort to address the alleged harms caused by Meta’s platforms. The plan includes funding for public education, school resources, law enforcement support and mental health services for children affected by issues, such as online bullying and sexual exploitation.

“This request recognizes the scope of the public nuisance that Meta has caused,” counsel for the state argued in court.

The lawsuit alleges Meta concealed or downplayed the extent of harmful activity on its platforms while publicly portraying them as safe for younger users.

Meta disputes liability, challenges proposed abatement plan

Meta denies the allegations and argues there is no legal basis for the sweeping relief requested by the state.

Attorneys for the company contend the proposed abatement plan does not directly address or stop the alleged harmful conduct and instead seeks compensation for downstream effects.

“What no court has ever allowed … is payment for the downstream effects,” Meta’s counsel argued, describing the request as “damages masquerading as something else.”

The court is expected to hear additional testimony during the second phase of the trial before determining whether to approve any form of injunctive relief or financial remedies.

In March, a California jury found Meta and Google liable for mental health harms suffered by plaintiff Kaley G.M., who became addicted to Instagram and YouTube as a child, awarding $6 million in damages, including $3 million in compensatory damages and $3 million in punitive damages.

What do you think about the claims against Meta in this case? Let us know in the comments.

The state is represented by Raul Torrez of the New Mexico Office of the Attorney General and Donald Migliori, Linda Singer, Michael Pendell and David Ackerman of Motley Rice LLC.

The Meta lawsuit is New Mexico v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al., Case No. D-101-CV-2023-02838, in the First Judicial District Court of New Mexico.

Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements: