Connect with us

Nevada

Trump won’t win the Nevada primary. Here’s why he will still be the state’s 2024 nominee.

Published

on

Trump won’t win the Nevada primary. Here’s why he will still be the state’s 2024 nominee.


Donald Trump is going to lose Nevada’s Republican primary election next month, and the victory instead will likely go to Nikki Haley. Or maybe just “none of these.”

Confused? You’re not the only one.

Tens of thousands of Nevada GOP voters are discovering Trump’s name is absent from the primary ballots they’re receiving in the mail.

Instead of running in the Feb. 6 primary, Trump is participating in party-run caucuses two days later. Only the caucus results count toward selecting the state’s 26 Republican National Convention electors, but state law still requires a primary.

Advertisement

Voters can participate in both contests but candidates had to pick one or the other.

Nevada Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar said even his own friends are calling him up to complain, though his office been alerting voters about the dueling contests for months, sending out postcards, posting signs and speaking to the media.

“It’s one of those things where people aren’t paying attention until now,” he said. “I don’t know what else we could do.”

Why does Nevada have both a caucus and a primary election?

Normally, states hold either government-run primary elections or party-run caucuses, but not both.

Advertisement

Under a 2021 state law, Nevada is required to hold presidential primary elections as long as there are at least two candidates for a party’s nomination.

But Republican Party officials ‒ many of whom participated in a 2020 effort to subvert the presidential election results in Trump’s favor ‒ decided last year to hold a binding caucus. They also tried unsuccessfully to stop the state from holding the primary.

“Why is there a caucus? Because the state Republican Party thinks that will help Trump,” said Dan Lee, an associate professor of political science at the University of Nevada Las Vegas.

Advertisement

What did the Nevada Republican Party say about having caucuses?

In a statement, the Nevada GOP said it considered the primary election a waste of taxpayer dollars, and that party business should be funded and conducted by the party itself. Caucus supporters say they’re the best way to test a candidate’s appeal to the party faithful, and require candidates to demonstrate they can organize and turn out voters.

“Simply put, candidates who participate in an illegitimate process cannot expect to earn legitimate delegates to the Republican National Convention,” the party said.

To learn more: When is the next presidential election? Everything to know about Election Day 2024.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis was participating in the caucuses until he dropped out earlier this month, while former Vice President Mike Pence chose to run in the primary, until he dropped out at the end of October. Like Tim Scott, the South Carolina senator who also ended his campaign, Pence will still appear on the primary ballot because the ballots were finalized before he quit the race.

How are the Nevada caucuses and primary different?

Because party officials get to set their own caucus rules, Nevada GOP officials are requiring in-person participation and ID verification at the caucuses, which they argue provides better election security and saves taxpayer funds.

Advertisement

In a taxpayer-funded primary election, run by Aguilar’s office and county clerks, voters can cast their ballots by mail or in person. It’s also open to military members serving overseas.

Aguilar said primary elections are typically considered more inclusive than caucuses because more voters can participate, instead of only those able to attend on Feb. 8. And it’s typically easier for a candidate to qualify for the primary ballot.

Why did Haley decide to run in the Nevada primary?

Because Trump supporters control the Nevada GOP, Haley never stood a chance of winning the caucuses, which tend to draw the most die-hard party supporters, Lee said. Instead, Haley likely hopes she’ll win enough votes in the primary to show she has broad support.

Also, candidates who wanted to participate in the caucus had to pay the state party $55,000 or host a fundraiser on its behalf, making it an expensive proposition for candidates lacking Trump’s massive fundraising apparatus.

Advertisement

“In these early states, it’s not about winning delegates per se. We’re all small states, so it’s about setting, or meeting and exceeding expectations to help build momentum,” Lee said. “It’s easier to cast a wider net by running in the primary ‒ she was doing it to try build a narrative, to display her support among primary voters. Early on in the race, everyone is just trying to be the runner-up to Trump.”

What are Republicans saying about the dueling Nevada caucus and primary?

Gov. Joe Lombardo and Lt. Gov. Stavros Anthony have both said they plan to caucus for Trump and vote for “none of these candidates” in the primary.

Trump is set to visit Las Vegas on Jan. 27 for a ” commit to caucus” rally.

Given the situation, Lee, the UNLV professor, said it’s possible Haley could lose the primary even though Trump isn’t in it: “It could be the case that ‘none of these candidates’ gets the most votes.”

Advertisement



Source link

Nevada

Nevada inmate’s death ruled as homicide, coroner says

Published

on

Nevada inmate’s death ruled as homicide, coroner says


LAS VEGAS (FOX5) — An offender within the Nevada Department of Corrections system has died from a stabbing, officials said.

According to a press release from NDOC, Dylan Walters, 33, died at University Medical Center on Oct. 27. He was serving 16 to 40 months at High Desert State Prison for attempted grand larceny.

Officials said he came to NDOC on April 18 last year from Clark County. According to the coroner, he died from multiple stab wounds, and his manner of death was ruled as a homicide.

,

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Lee: Trump ‘cruel’ for ending SNAP funding, Nevada ‘complicit’ for not doing more

Published

on

Lee: Trump ‘cruel’ for ending SNAP funding, Nevada ‘complicit’ for not doing more


Democratic U.S. Rep. Susie Lee on Tuesday criticized Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo for not doing more to provide substitute benefits to the hundreds of thousands of Nevadans who are supposed to receive Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits next month but who won’t because of the government shutdown. Lee first called it “cruel” of the Trump […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada attorney general joins multi-state lawsuit over SNAP benefit cuts during government shutdown

Published

on

Nevada attorney general joins multi-state lawsuit over SNAP benefit cuts during government shutdown


LAS VEGAS (KTNV) — Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford announced Tuesday he is joining a multi-state lawsuit against the Trump administration over cuts to federal food assistance benefits amid the ongoing government shutdown.

As the shutdown enters its fourth week, approximately 500,000 Nevadans who rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, face uncertainty about their November benefits. Our state typically receives around $90 million per month in federal SNAP funding.

WATCH | Anyssa Bohanan breaks down some of the ways the shutdown is affecting Southern Nevadans

Advertisement

Nevada SNAP to go without funding as government shutdown stretches on

The U.S. Department of Agriculture says on their website that SNAP benefits will not be distributed starting Nov. 1, stating “the well has run dry” and pointing to Senate Democrats as the reason for the shutdown. Nationally, SNAP helps approximately 42 million Americans.

WATCH | Scripps News speaks with USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins about the ongoing shutdown, impact to SNAP benefits

Advertisement

Agriculture secretary says emergency fund isn’t enough to cover SNAP benefits

However, attorneys general from 23 states and the District of Columbia argue the USDA is making a “deliberate” decision to withhold contingency funds that exist for exactly this scenario.

RELATED STORY | DoorDash, restaurants offer free help as SNAP funding lapses during shutdown

“The Trump Administration’s choice to cut SNAP benefits is not only a deliberate, cruel and extraordinarily harmful decision, it is unlawful. And the reason it cites — the ongoing federal government shutdown — is inadequate,” Ford said in a news release.

Advertisement

In an agency memo obtained by Scripps News, the USDA says they are saving more than $5 billion in contingency funds for more immediate emergencies like “hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods, that can come on quickly and without notice.” Further, the agency says the appropriations for regular monthly benefits do not exist anymore due to the shutdown, and they will not reimburse states who try providing benefits themselves.

“Contingency funds exist for this exact scenario, yet the USDA has decided to abdicate its responsibility to Nevadans and refused to fund SNAP benefits. I understand the stress of not knowing where your next meal is coming from, because I’ve lived it. I don’t wish that stress on any Nevadan, and I’ll fight to be sure nobody in our state goes hungry. I urge Governor Lombardo to do the same and to work with his party and President Trump to ensure that Nevadans receive their SNAP benefits,” Ford continued.

Gov. Joe Lombardo has urged the federal government to end their standstill, citing its harmful effects on Nevada in letters sent our federal delegation, specifically over SNAP.

In the 51-page lawsuit, attorneys general claim the lapse in SNAP benefits would bring more harm beyond just those who rely on the program, but also local governments, school systems and food pantries as their supplies can’t meet the spike in demand.

WATCH | Steve Sebelius speaks with local food pantry over the SNAP benefit crisis

Advertisement

Members of Congress, Governor Trade Letters Over SNAP amid Shutdown

Ford joins attorneys general from Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin in the lawsuit. The governors of Kansas, Kentucky and Pennsylvania have also joined the suit.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending