Connect with us

Nevada

New FEC reports reveal Nevada House members’ strength — and challengers who pose a threat – The Nevada Independent

Published

on

New FEC reports reveal Nevada House members’ strength — and challengers who pose a threat – The Nevada Independent


Campaign finance documents submitted to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) last week are beginning to reveal what the 2026 midterms will look like in Nevada’s four congressional districts — including the incumbents’ strength, the challengers to watch and the sources of funding voters might want to know about. 

What stands out in the October quarterly filings is the sheer number of self-funders taking on Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV) and Rep. Steven Horsford (D-NV) in the 3rd and 4th Districts, respectively. Though these seats look swingy on paper, Republicans have not won either of them in a decade. A nominee who can pour hundreds of thousands of dollars of their own money into ousting the incumbents would take some of the investment pressure off the party apparatus. Several candidates fit the bill.

Advertisement

Of course, for self-funded candidates, high numbers do not indicate broad support. One way to better gauge early interest in candidates is the amount of unitemized donations they report. The FEC requires candidates to itemize donors’ contributions when they exceed $200, so unitemized contributions can be a good proxy for small-dollar donations.

Here’s what we noticed in each district. 

Lee has lots of cash — and will need it

Lee posted strong fundraising numbers this quarter, bringing in $612,000 and ending the quarter with $1.7 million total, the most she’s ever had on hand at this point in the election cycle. Her team said that the median contribution was just $11, which signals widespread grassroots support, as does her volume of unitemized donations.

Advertisement

Lee’s fundraising encompasses thousands of dollars from House colleagues, especially members of the Democratic Women’s Caucus, and $5,000 from the leadership PAC of Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear (D), a possible 2028 presidential contender. 

Andreessen Horowitz venture capitalists Ben Horowitz and Chris Dixon contributed as well. Horowitz surprised many when he endorsed President Donald Trump last summer before giving to Vice President Kamala Harris. Dixon this year attended a White House crypto summit and announced a major investment in Kalshi, a prediction market of the sort Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) has criticized. Lee also received $1,000 from travel guide writer Rick Steves.

As one of just 13 Democrats to win a Trump-voting district last year, Lee is considered the state’s most vulnerable Democrat and will likely need money for an expensive campaign. She has attracted the widest field of Republican challengers, and the spendiest. 

It includes numerous self-funders, such as neurosurgeon Dr. Aury Nagy, who loaned his campaign $1 million on the last day of the third quarter. That amount was dwarfed by the $3 million video game composer Marty O’Donnell gave his own campaign back in the spring, but O’Donnell only added a little more this quarter, making a $7,000 contribution. Former Las Vegas mayoral candidate Tera Anderson and businessman Joshua Walters are investing thousands in their campaigns as well.

Advertisement

Those aren’t Lee’s only notable opponents. Since she was elected in 2018, Lee has not faced a primary challenger who reported raising any money. Cardiologist Dr. James Lally (D) changed that this month by raising $90,000, including $32,000 in unitemized donations. 

His website slams Lee’s “bipartisan approach,” accusing her of voting with MAGA and taking money from casino bosses and lobbyists for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Lee received $5,000 from the committee this quarter and thousands more from gaming industry figures including former Las Vegas Mayor Jan Jones Blackhurst (D), Shawn Cardinal, Diana Bennett and Yvette Landau. Lally counts political commentator and former congressional candidate Krystal Ball (D-VA) among his donors.

Horsford’s fundraising dips, but he’s still got big money

Horsford is the only Nevada House Democrat who has seen his fundraising fall and his cash on hand drop compared to this point last cycle — he raised a little more than half a million dollars and has $573,000 on hand. The difference might have to do with the fact Horsford is no longer the Congressional Black Caucus chair. But his fundraising this year is still strong, just closer to what it was before. 

Advertisement

More than half of his donations came from PACs, including thousands of dollars from House colleagues and Beshear’s PAC. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D), another possible presidential hopeful, donated $7,000. Horsford also received $5,000 from BET Media Group CEO Scott Mills, $2,500 from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, $1,000 from Clark County Commissioner Tick Segerblom (D), and money from Horowitz and Dixon. 

Horsford’s biggest individual spend was a $40,000 list purchase from BCom; such lists can help candidates reach the voters they want to. He spent tens of thousands more paying Sena Kozar Strategies and the Strathdee Group.

The congressman has drawn two Republican challengers who have poured six figures of their own money into their campaigns, small-business owners David Flippo and Cody Whipple. They now trail Horsford in fundraising, but both have gotten support from elected officials, though from different wings of the GOP.

Flippo brought in $191,000 this quarter and has $375,000 on hand, much of which he loaned himself. His website advertises a campaign rally with Nevada GOP Chairman Michael McDonald and former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) in Las Vegas this Saturday. He also has endorsements from Reps. Paul Gosar (R-AZ), Trent Kelly (R-MS) and former Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-SC). Jim Chilton, an Arizona rancher who spoke about illegal immigration at the Republican National Convention last year, also donated to his campaign. Flippo has been spending on radio ads on The Steve Sanchez Show and donating to groups such as the Las Vegas Young Republicans, the Republican Jewish Coalition and the Texas-based Latinos for America First. 

Whipple raised $55,000 this quarter and has $185,000 after loaning himself $100,000 last quarter. His site boasts endorsements from Rep. Celeste Maloy (R-UT), former Rep. Cresent Hardy (R-NV) and retired Esmeralda County Sheriff Ken Elgan. The latter two gave to his campaign this quarter. Elgan’s wife, Cindy, a Republican elections clerk who Trump supporters targeted after 2020, gave to the campaign as well, as did the Agricultural Retailers Association PAC and the National Chicken Council PAC.

Advertisement

Titus brings in the medium bucks

Rep. Dina Titus (D-NV) is not known for posting gangbuster numbers in non-election years, and the $172,000 she raised this quarter in the 1st District is respectable, if not impressive. What’s more striking is her $610,000 cash on hand, which is the most she’s ever had by October of an off-year.

The bulk of her money, more than $81,000, came from other political committees. Much like her Democratic colleagues, she received money from other House members and from Beshear’s PAC.

Titus has already attracted several challengers, but the standout is state Sen. Carrie Buck (R-Henderson), whose fundraising fell just short of the congresswoman’s with $146,000 raised. 

Advertisement

More than a fifth of that sum, $32,000, came from unitemized donations, indicating Buck could see wide support from voters. Former congressional candidate Flemming Larson (R), who lost the 2024 GOP primary in this district, donated the maximum $7,000 allowed to Buck’s campaign. Several real estate and education professionals gave as well. 

Amodei sitting pretty

In the safely Republican 2nd District, quarterly fundraising reports show little for Rep. Mark Amodei (R-NV) to worry about. 

He raised $175,000 this quarter and is sitting on a bigger war chest than he’s ever had at this point in the election cycle, $521,000. The two other 2nd District candidates who filed statements of candidacy, Kathy Durham (D) and Heath Fulkerson (R), did not submit quarterly reports.

Advertisement

Amodei received about a third of his money this quarter from PACs, including ones associated with the National Rifle Association to the Environmental Defense Action Fund. One of his donors is Jonathan Evans, president and CEO of Lithium Americas. Amodei has supported the company’s Thacker Pass project as it renegotiated a deal with the federal government this fall. 

The congressman’s spending includes $1,000 transfers from his campaign committee to committees for Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-IA) and Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA), both of whom announced Senate bids. Amodei also ordered fundraiser supplies in late July from two cigar companies. His campaign has spent money on at least one of the two every year since 2015.



Source link

Nevada

Nevada nonprofit, BCP challenging PUCN over NV Energy’s daily demand charge

Published

on

Nevada nonprofit, BCP challenging PUCN over NV Energy’s daily demand charge


LAS VEGAS (KTNV) — A Nevada nonprofit organization and the Attorney General’s Bureau of Consumer Protection are challenging the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada in court after the organization approved new NV Energy policies.

Vote Solar is a nonprofit advocacy group that focuses on state policies affecting solar and clean energy solutions.

WATCH | Darcy Spears breaks down challenge against PUCN

Advertisement

Nevada nonprofit, BCP challenging PUCN over NV Energy’s daily demand charge

According to their petition for judicial review, they are questioning the PUCN’s decision to approve two separate policies:

  • A new daily demand charge for residential and small business customers in Southern Nevada
  • A new 15-minute net metering policy for rooftop solar customers in Northern Nevada

In the petition, Vote Solar officials claim the PUCN’s final decisions are:

  • In violation of constitutional or statutory provisions
  • In excess of the statutory authority of the Commission
  • Made upon unlawful procedure
  • Affected by other error of law
  • Clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative and substantial evidence on the record
  • Arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion

“The PUCN’s decision is a major step backward for Nevada’s clean energy future,” said Chauntille Roberts, Regional Director at Vote Solar. “Nevada deserves energy policies that protect consumers, expand access to solar, and move our state forward—not backward.”

The Attorney General Office’s Bureau of Consumer Protection has filed a separate petition for judicial review.

“The demand charge rate structure (if permitted to be implemented), the 15-minute NEM netting methodology, and the approved affiliate charges result in rates that are unjust, unreasonable, and unlawful in contravention of NRS 704.040, and undermine the Commission’s fundamental duty under NRS 704.001 to provide utility ratepayers with just and reasonable rates,” the filing states in part.

Advertisement

The filing also states commissioners approved $2.7 million worth of affiliate charges that ratepayers would cover.

“The Commission’s decision concerning affiliate charges is belied by the record as the evidence in this docket demonstrates that NPC failed to provide any evidence, let alone substantial evidence, sufficient to support the recovery of an aggregate of $2.7 million,” the filing states. “Not only is the $2.7 million in affiliate charges unsupported by actual charges, it is also unreasonable and an unsupported monetary number, resulting in the Commission’s decision being arbitrary and capricious.”

No future court hearings have been scheduled for that case, as of Friday morning.

Channel 13 has reached out to NV Energy and the PUCN to see if they would like to comment on the petition.

NV Energy sent the following statement to us.

Advertisement

“NV Energy believes the changes that were approved and reaffirmed by the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada are consistent with state law, and we will be following this filing closely.

The demand charge more accurately captures the cost of energy delivery. It also helps to fix inequities between rooftop solar and non-rooftop solar customers. Because of the current billing structure, rooftop solar customers pay less than non-rooftop solar customers for the cost of service, shifting costs to non-rooftop solar customers.

Between 2018 and 2024, the total cost shift born by non-rooftop solar customers in Southern Nevada is $424 million. The total subsidy in Southern Nevada in 2025 is expected to grow by an additional $80 million, based on expected growth for the rest of the year.

The recently approved demand charge helps fix the inequities caused by the current system, and helps ensure that customer bills more accurately reflect the cost it takes to provide them with service.”

NV Energy Spokesperson

As of the time this article was published, we have not heard back from the PUCN.

Advertisement

In September, the PUCN approved the new rate model, which has sparked controversy among many Southern Nevadans who claim this will make their energy bills continue to go up.

“It’s painful. I just wanted to express concern as a private citizen that corporate America is going to do what it’s going to do to maintain profits and dividends,” Las Vegas local Joel Tauber told us in October.

“Why can a monopoly, a utility monopoly, dictate how I live in my residence,” retiree Jody Rodarmal told us in September. “If you believe there’s not going to be any increase, then why go to a new style of billing?”

SEPTEMBER 2025: NV Energy’s new billing structure sparks concern among Las Vegas residents

Advertisement

NV Energy’s new billing structure sparks concern among Las Vegas residents

How would the daily demand charge work?

According to NV Energy, the daily demand charge will be calculated by taking the highest amount of energy used in a 15-minute period each day and multiplying it by the current kilowatt-per-hour rate.

That charge will then be added to your bill. For the average customer, NV Energy estimates this will amount to roughly $20 per month.

Advertisement

WATCH: Ryan Ketcham explains NV Energy’s new daily demand charge

NV Energy is adding a ‘daily demand charge’ to power bills. What does that mean for consumers?

In past statements to Channel 13, NV Energy officials have stressed the rate increase requests are intended to recoup the costs of projects it undertakes to shore up the power grid.

Advertisement

However, there have been questions about that over the last year after scandals involving overcharging customers and trying to pass on the costs of things like luxury hotels, travel, and liquor to ratepayers, including a $1.2 million tab at Red Rock Resort.

According to NV Energy, Nevada customers already pay a lower average rate than the rest of the country. Through June 2025, the company says its rates were 22% lower than the U.S. average and 60% lower than in California.

Do you have a concern or question about something happening in the valley? Email Darcy.Spears@ktnv.com.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

DOJ sues Nevada for allegedly withholding voter registration information

Published

on

DOJ sues Nevada for allegedly withholding voter registration information


The Department of Justice filed a federal lawsuit against Nevada on Friday, alleging that the state failed to provide statewide voter registration lists when requested, according to a news release.

Colorado, Hawaii, and Massachusetts were also sued, bringing the total to 18 states now facing lawsuits from the Justice Department. The department’s Civil Rights Division filed the complaints.

Francisco Aguilar, Nevada secretary of state, was charged with violating the Civil Rights Act after he responded on Aug. 21 to a letter from U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, saying there was no basis for her request for certain voter information, asserting privacy concerns, according to the lawsuit.

According to the complaint, Aguilar provided a link to the state’s computerized voter registration list. However, the version shared contained incomplete fields, including registrants’ full names, dates of birth, addresses, driver’s license numbers, and the last four digits of their Social Security numbers.

Advertisement

Aguilar’s Aug. 21 letter said his office would follow up, but the attorney general never received the list containing all the requested fields, the lawsuit said.

According to the news release, Congress assigns the attorney general primary responsibility for enforcing the National Voter Registration Act and the Help America Vote Act, both enacted to ensure that states maintain accurate and effective voter registration systems.

The attorney general also has authority under the Civil Rights Act of 1960 to request, review, and analyze statewide voter registration lists, according to the release.

“States have the statutory duty to preserve and protect their constituents from vote dilution,” Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon said in the release. “At this Department of Justice, we will not permit states to jeopardize the integrity and effectiveness of elections by refusing to abide by our federal elections laws. If states will not fulfill their duty to protect the integrity of the ballot, we will.”

Contact Akiya Dillon at adillon@reviewjournal.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Police: Deadly crash closes all lanes at I-15, Charleston

Published

on

Police: Deadly crash closes all lanes at I-15, Charleston


LAS VEGAS (FOX5) — A deadly crash has closed all lanes at I-15 and Charleston Boulevard, police say.

Nevada State Police posted on social media after 7 p.m. about the crash. Police say drivers in the area should use other routes.

Police have not immediately shared details about the victim or if other people are involved. It’s not yet confirmed if impairment is suspected.

This is a developing story. Check back later for details.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending