Connect with us

Nevada

NEVADA VIEWS: On the Golden Knights, the Aces and the stifling patriarchy

Published

on

NEVADA VIEWS: On the Golden Knights, the Aces and the stifling patriarchy


The recent NHL championship garnered by the Vegas Golden Knights gives Las Vegans, and all Americans, a unique opportunity to look at ourselves in relation to how we view women’s accomplishments in our society.

Many of us have perhaps forgotten that, only nine months ago, the Las Vegas Aces became the first major professional sports team in Las Vegas history to earn a championship. A major U.S. city will rarely have such a unique opportunity to look around and compare its community’s reactions to two such similar events; two major professional sports championships only nine months apart. The only substantial difference between the two events is that one was an accomplishment by a team of women and the other was an accomplishment by a team of men.

There were two parades. How did they compare, both in community support and attendance?

What did the road to the championship look like at your workplace? Were you encouraged to wear jerseys or team fan attire? In workplaces with dress policies, did supervision provide allowances to celebrate our local teams with a similar frequency or level? Was fan attire simply allowed or did leadership really promote it?

Advertisement

How many of your friends will tell you, “I never watched hockey until the Golden Knights became successful”? If this is the threshold for taking on a new interest, are they now WNBA fans as well?

Las Vegas Mayor Carolyn Goodman bestowed keys of the city on the Golden Knights. Did she do the same for the Aces?

How many thousands of Golden Knights bumper stickers, license plates and flags do you see around Las Vegas right now? Have you ever noticed a Las Vegas Aces license plate? Apparently the Nevada DMV doesn’t offer one, but they do offer a Las Vegas Raiders license plate, and I have little doubt someone is contemplating one for the Las Vegas Athletics.

I think Americans’ entertainment consumption habits are a complex subject. Why some of us become positively rabid in regard to one home team and regard another with indifference is something we should each probably reflect on. Did I become a hockey fan overnight? If the Aces had been an NBA team winning a championship, how would I have responded?

Most of us know the simple truth: A mediocre or losing men’s professional sports team is more coveted than a championship women’s team. The Raiders illustrate this. I’m not sure how to change this. How would I convince people to buy tickets to an event they have no interest in watching, or to tune into a channel they wouldn’t normally watch?

Advertisement

But I find it impossible to view our collective attitude toward men’s professional sports as anything other than another societal double standard that celebrates the accomplishments of our sons while simply pretending to do so for our daughters. This perhaps would not be so problematic if we did not hold our sports heroes in such high regard. We place them on pedestals and hail them as national heroes, in the company of kings and presidents. So many of our society’s pedestals were built specifically for men. And when we do build a pedestal specifically for women, it is so often in the shadow of the pedestal built for men.

There is another aspect to all of this. Many of the community responses to these two events were sanctioned by community leaders, government agencies and workplace managers. With mindful policy decisions and public relations initiatives, these entities have the power to highlight and celebrate the accomplishments of women and men. Particularly in government organizations, managers should be as excited about getting people to wear their Aces jerseys as they are about getting people to wear their Golden Knights jerseys.

And if your workplace likes to fly sports team flags, the Aces flag should fly the highest. They were the first, after all.

Eric McCammond writes from Las Vegas.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nevada

Nevada Gov. Lombardo seeks stiffer penalties for theft, faster election results

Published

on

Nevada Gov. Lombardo seeks stiffer penalties for theft, faster election results


Striking an optimistic tone and urging bipartisanship, Gov. Joe Lombardo delivered a State of the State address Wednesday night with proposals to finish vote counting on Election Day, make more thefts qualify as felonies, and get more homes and apartments built.

“The state of our state is steadily improving,” he said. “We are certainly headed in the right direction and the outlook is positive.”

“Combining the collective will of the 63 of you and me, we can build more than houses; we can convert Nevada’s promise into reality, a place where every family can thrive, every community can grow, and every dream can find a home,” Lombardo said, referencing the number of state Senate and Assembly members. “That’s the Nevada way.”

Advertisement

The Republican governor’s desire to work together this year comes as no surprise given that in 2023, the majority-Democrat Legislature called Lombardo’s bluff by passing bills the governor said he wouldn’t sign. He delivered a record 75 vetoes.

After November’s election, he still faces a Legislature where Democrats dominate but do not hold a supermajority, making his veto pen a real threat in negotiations. Bipartisanship will be required to get approval for significant bills.

His remarks were greeted with punctuations of applause from lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle. Along with frequent water-bottle breaks, he got looser as he went along, smiling, addressing people in the gallery and going off-script to make a few jokes.

He announced a $12.7 billion budget that he said would make teacher pay raises permanent and extend them to charter school teachers.

Advertisement

The next legislative session starts Feb. 3 and officially lasts 120 days.

Nevada Gov. Lombardo’s top 5 proposals

Lombardo, a former Clark County sheriff, summarized five priorities he plans to push in the Legislature.

Before announcing them, he told the gallery of lawmakers at the Nevada Assembly, “I would ask that before some of you say ‘No,’ work with me, collaborate with my agency heads, ask questions, give input, offer alternatives and set aside partisan politics.”

• Nevada Housing Attainability Act: Lombardo said this proposal would streamline permits, reduce building fees and prioritize state funding that will support $1 billion in new “attainable” housing units across Nevada, rather than the buzzword of “affordable.”

Advertisement

He blamed Nevada’s housing crisis on the federal government’s reluctance to release some of its land — it controls more than 80% of the state — and said that he expects President-elect Donald Trump to help make that happen “but, while we press for federal action, we’re not waiting.” 

Also highlighted was the recent approval of a $200 million public-private partnership to provide homeless services called the Campus for Hope.

• Nevada Healthcare Access Act: Lombardo noted that, “With some of the lowest provider-to-patient ratios in the nation, far too many Nevadans are left waiting for care or worse, going without it.”

To partly address this, he said, he would propose that by 2028, all health insurance plans in Nevada will be required to adopt standardized and digitized prior authorization plans, reducing delays for patients and providers.

He said he would double the state’s investment in graduate medical education and incentivize providers to set up in underserved areas. The plan would also create an Office of Mental Health to expand access to behavioral health services and improve coordination of care.

Advertisement

• Nevada Accountability in Education Act: Lombardo said he would revisit his efforts to expand school choice, after noting he’s unsatisfied with Nevada consistently ranking near the bottom nationally on education measurements.

“No child should be trapped in a failing school because of their ZIP code or held down because of how much their parents or grandparents earn,” he said.

He added his bill proposal would include “transportation support” to help families choose other schools for their children.

• Nevada Safe Streets and Neighborhoods Act: This would reduce the amount of a theft that would trigger a felony charge and increase penalties for repeat offenders.

It would also prohibit the use of diversion courts for offenders who commit crimes against children or the elderly.

Advertisement

• Economic Development Policy Reform Act: Earlier in his remarks, Lombardo mentioned Nevada’s highest-in-the-nation unemployment rate of 5.7%. His economic plan would give tax credits to childcare facilities so that they could potentially charge lower rates and help more people enter the workforce.

• Creating More Government Effectiveness: He vowed to evaluate each of the state government’s more than 300 boards and commissions to see which ones have outlived their usefulness.

Democratic responses to Gov. Lombardo

Speaker of the Nevada Assembly, Democrat Steve Yeager, gave a recorded response to Lombardo’s State of the State.

“This past November, Nevada voters again overwhelmingly voted for Democrats to lead our state Legislature,” he said.

Advertisement

Asking the governor not to break his veto record from the previous session, he urged that Lombardo work with Democrats while also emphasizing differences with Republicans.

Democratic legislators, he said, will:

  • Strongly reject any Republican efforts to restrict abortion rights.
  • Oppose any proposal that would make it harder to vote — despite lopsided support for a voter ID law in November.
  • Prioritize “common sense gun violence prevention measures because guns are all too often used in violent crime.”

In response to Lombardo’s crime proposal, Yeager said, “We must not backtrack to the failed ‘tough on crime’ legislation of the 1990s that was expensive, wasteful and ineffective without making us any safer.”

Democratic groups also released statements criticizing Lombardo.

Nevada State Democratic Party executive director Hilary Barrett sent out a lengthy, detailed memo criticizing Lombardo’s first two years in office.

“When it comes to housing, health care, education and public safety, Nevadans are measurably worse off due to the actions of Lombardo and his commitment to prioritizing powerful special interests and his own political self-interest,” she said.

Advertisement

Laura Martin, executive director of the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, said corporate landlords are artificially inflating housing costs and that the governor’s proposal to use federal land for more housing will make things worse.

“Lombardo’s plan that promotes urban sprawl as a solution to the housing crisis will only exacerbate the existing climate crisis, when we should be prioritizing infill,” she said.

“We should be investing in the future of Nevada by making sure our aging communities and schools are climate resilient, not with another stadium, movie studio, or mass deportations.”

Mark Robison is the state politics reporter for the Reno Gazette Journal, with occasional forays into other topics. Email comments to mrobison@rgj.com or comment on Mark’s Greater Reno Facebook page.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Watch the Nevada State of the State address here at 6 p.m. – Carson Now

Published

on

Watch the Nevada State of the State address here at 6 p.m. – Carson Now


This evening, Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo will provide the 2025 State of the State address ahead of the incoming 83rd legislative session, which begins Feb. 3, 2025.

Lombardo is anticipated to cover a number of topics including the economy, inflation, education, housing, and more.

In addition, Carson City 5th grade choir students will be performing at the address, and a Seeliger Elementary student will be singing a solo.

Watch the full address here, which will begin at 6 p.m.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Kelsey is a fourth-generation Nevadan and holds BAs in English Literature and Anthropology from Arizona State University, and a MFA in Creative Writing from the University of Nevada, Lake Tahoe. She is…
More by Kelsey Penrose



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada governor to deliver address ahead of legislative session

Published

on

Nevada governor to deliver address ahead of legislative session


CARSON CITY — Gov. Joe Lombardo will give his 2025 State of the State Address at 6 p.m. today in Nevada’s capital, where he will share his goals and priorities ahead of the upcoming legislative session.

“I look forward to sharing the progress my administration has made since my inaugural address, and I’m excited to outline my common-sense vision for our state ahead of the upcoming legislative session,” Lombardo said in a statement, highlighting efforts to keep taxes low, balance the state budget and bring investments to education and the workforce.

“As we look ahead, I’m eager to build on our progress in education, economic development, healthcare, housing, and public safety,” he said.

Every biennium, two weeks ahead of the legislative session, the governor delivers a State of the State Address that outlines his agenda and provides a framework for what lawmakers can expect over the course of the 120-day session.

Advertisement

In last November’s election, Lombardo successfully fended off a possible Democratic supermajority in both chambers that would have allowed Democrats to override any of his vetoes, greatly reducing his power. While Democrats still hold majorities in both the Assembly and Senate and can set their own agenda, any bill they pass must ultimately be signed into law by Lombardo, who is accustomed to wielding his veto power — having vetoed a record 75 bills in the 2023 session.

Ahead of the governor’s address, the Nevada State Democratic Party launched an ad titled “Expensive,” accusing Lombardo of raising costs for families due to his 2023 vetoes. The party pointed to housing bills that would have capped rent increases for seniors and would have established a new summary eviction procedure for tenants, as well as bills that would have guaranteed school meals to public school students and lowered the price of Medicare-negotiated prescription drugs.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Contact Jessica Hill at jehill@reviewjournal.com and McKenna Ross at mross@reviewjournal.com. Follow @jess_hillyeah and @mckenna_ross_ on X.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending