Josh Osher: Livestock industry’s war on wildlife at Montana Legislature

These ranchers need Montana to be the final greatest place completely for his or her sheep and cattle, on the expense of native wildlife and their habitat and the individuals who worth Montana’s distinctive treasures.

Take, for instance, Senate Invoice 295, which is heading to Gov. Gianforte for his signature. It authorizes Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks to situation open-ended grizzly bear kill permits for ranchers anywhere in Montana, together with public land. The one requirement is a declare {that a} bear was threatening their livestock.

However the invoice doesn’t outline the phrase threatening, doesn’t require any pro-active deterrent measures by the producer, doesn’t embody any closing dates on the kill allow and doesn’t embody any requirement that the allow holder solely kill the bear that was supposedly threatening their livestock. It’s mainly a particular license to kill grizzly bears — for ranchers solely.

What does the general public get for this? In brief, nothing.

For reference, federal land administration businesses cost a pittance for livestock grazing. It’s at the moment the mandated minimal of $1.35 per cow/calf pair or 5 sheep, in comparison with market charges round $30. The federal grazing program loses about $120 million yearly. The federal government (taxpayers) additionally foots the a lot of the invoice for tens of millions of miles of wildlife-killing barbed wire fencing, water developments and invasive weed management.

Selections about how, the place and when grazing happens, that are speculated to be a public course of that’s evaluated each 10 years, are sometimes rubber-stamped every decade with no consideration of impacts to wildlife, failing land well being requirements or public enter.

If this feels like a sweetheart deal for the rancher, it’s. Practically free forage for his or her livestock, little to no oversight by the businesses which can be speculated to handle the land for the good thing about all Individuals, and a complete host of taxpayer funded goodies and subsidies to maintain all of it going.

Nevertheless it’s a foul deal for these pesky “downside” bears who will probably be killed by ranchers for attempting to entry extremely appropriate habitat on public lands. The ranchers dismiss the truth that every a type of bears is price way more to Montana’s financial system than the forage the ranchers get from public lands to feed their livestock. They ignore the truth that the bears are solely preying upon livestock as a result of the native wildlife has been displaced by their cows and sheep in addition to the habitat degradation that outcomes. And so they fully disregard the truth that that is public land, not their personal property.

If it wasn’t sufficient for the Legislature to go after grizzly bears, this session additionally focused different native wildlife like bison, elk, mule deer and pronghorn antelope.

The Legislature has already handed SJ 14, an anti-wildlife decision to ban bison reintroduction on the Charles M. Russell Nationwide Wildlife Refuge, which would offer myriad advantages for the lands, different native wildlife and folks.

The Legislature additionally killed a bipartisan invoice that might have merely required the consideration of wildlife-friendly fencing on state-owned lands which can be leased for grazing with a view to scale back mortality of elk, deer and antelope whereas enhancing migratory corridors.

This heavy-handled management over public lands by just a few backed ranchers exhibits their aim — to sterilize the land of native wildlife to make room for his or her cattle and sheep. Montanans of all stripes received’t stand for this and want to talk out towards this unprecedented assault on our valued native wildlife.