Connect with us

Montana

Gianforte targets education, tax and energy policy in State of the State address

Published

on

Gianforte targets education, tax and energy policy in State of the State address


Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte rolled out an agenda of tax cuts and conservative social reforms Monday evening in his State of the State address.

The recently reelected Republican governor called for hundreds of millions in income tax cuts, along with a reduction in state property taxes on primary residences. He urged restrictions on child access to social media, including a cellphone ban in public schools.

Gianforte also used the speech to double down on criticisms of the Montana judiciary and tout efforts that seek to enforce strict sex and gender binaries in many aspects of public life — two salient political issues for the Montana GOP. 

The address came at the start of the 69th legislative session, and Gianforte needs the support of majority-Republican lawmakers to pass his priorities. Though the evening began with members of “The Nine” — a bipartisan group that led a week-long shutdown of Senate committee work — escorting Gianforte onto the House floor.

Advertisement

The escorts were selected by Senate President Matt Regier, R-Kalispell, who lost control of the Senate’s first week to nine lawmakers who balked at being assigned to a committee of questionable purpose. One of the nine, former Senate President Jason Ellsworth, R-Hamilton, quipped that he was selected “I assume, out of respect.”

Regier told the press last week that Gianforte hadn’t played a role in the committee dustup, which shut down bill progress as Republican leaders attempted to work through reassignments. 

The governor led with tax cuts but pivoted quickly to his proposed budget, which combines tax cuts with investments in public safety, teacher pay and housing infrastructure.

Gianforte discussed several of his spending pitches during the hour-long address, including a $100 million ask to provide low-interest loans to help pay for sewer lines and other infrastructure. Gianforte said the money would support new urban housing, expanding an effort he championed during the 2023 Legislature.

The income tax cut Gianforte proposed would extend his prior income tax reductions by lowering the state’s top-bracket rate from 5.9% to 4.9% and modestly expand a tax credit benefiting lower-income working families. According to the Legislative Fiscal Division, the top-bracket rate cut would reduce state tax collections by about $350 million a year and the tax credit for lower-wage earners would reduce their taxes by about $20 million a year.

Advertisement

The governor also asked lawmakers to fast-track his flagship “homestead” property tax proposal, which would increase taxes on second homes in order to lower tax bills on primary homes owned or rented by Montanans. Passing that proposal by mid-February, Gianforte said, would give state tax officials the ability to implement it this year instead of next.

Gianforte said the homestead proposal would reduce homeowner taxes by about 15%. MTFP estimated previously that the tax bill for the state’s median residential property rose by 21% between 2022 and 2023. 

​​“I don’t believe, for example, that a Californian who drops into Montana to ski once in a while near their Montana mansion should get a property tax cut. It’s not fair. It’s not fair to Montanans who own their homes and live here and who invest their lives in their communities,” Gianforte said.

While the state is again heading into a legislative session with a sizable surplus, Gianforte didn’t call Monday for tax rebates along the lines of the income and property tax rebates he and Republican legislators authorized in 2023.

The governor also avoided several significant policy issues during the wide-ranging speech, including abortion, the reauthorization of Medicaid expansion and child care — none of which received specific mention. The governor also did not address state relations with sovereign tribal nations.

Advertisement

MORE MONEY FOR TEACHER PAY, SCHOLARSHIPS

Public education netted Gianforte his first standing ovation of the night, nearly half an hour into his address, as he singled out the $100 million proposed in his budget to raise teacher pay. The money targets low wages, the most-cited challenge to recruiting and retaining educators across the state. Gianforte’s plan would buttress an effort by several Republican lawmakers to embed pay increases directly into Montana’s public school funding formula. 

“As a son and father of teachers, I’m well aware that teaching is one of the most noble professions,” Gianforte said. “For too long, though, Montana teachers, especially those just beginning their careers, have not been compensated properly for their work.”

In addition to heightened funding for teacher pay, Gianforte announced his intention to increase state support for STEM and trades-based education as well as a proposed $6 million boost to the Big Sky Scholarship Program, a dollar-for-dollar tax credit for private donations supporting public school programs and private school scholarships. 

The governor also reiterated a commitment to “creating a distraction-free learning environment” for students by banning or restricting smartphones in schools. Gianforte’s budget includes $1 million to fund state grants incentivizing local districts to adopt such policies. Hellgate Elementary School District Superintendent Molly Blakely, who has imposed a cellphone-free policy, was a governor’s guest.

Gianforte proposed requiring parental consent for child use of social media and a ban on companies selling data about children using social media. He also called on legislators to empower the state government to investigate companies that violate the law. 

Advertisement

“We should require default privacy settings for minors on social media,” Gianforte said. “We should have a curfew, a blackout, on social media overnight for kids. Kids need more rest. Not more reels on Instagram. They need more sleep. Not more Snapchat.” 

COURT CRITICISMS AND GENDER LAWS

Gianforte spent a portion of his remarks focusing on Republican losses before Montana judges on laws related to transgender Montanans. 

The governor chastised state courts for alleged liberal bias and credited “extreme-left, dark-money groups who devise clever names to hide their intent” with electing sympathetic judges. Montana’s two newly elected state Supreme Court justices sat beneath Gianforte as he spoke, alongside other members of the bench.

Gianforte backed partisan judicial races, a major change from current nonpartisan elections. The Legislature will consider that proposal in the coming days. Newly elected Chief Justice Cory Swanson declined to comment about the governor’s remarks.

Democrats remained seated during many of the governor’s comments about sex and gender laws, while their Republican colleagues rewarded Gianforte with several standing ovations. One member of the minority party who was not present in the chamber was Rep. Zooey Zephyr, D-Missoula, a transgender lawmaker and outspoken advocate for the LGTBQ+ community.

Advertisement

“The Governor used his speech to repeatedly attack trans Montanans & push for further restrictions on our ability to exist in public,” Zephyr wrote in a later comment on social media. “These continued unconstitutional attacks have no place in Montana.”

‘ALL-OF-THE-ABOVE’ ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE INITIATIVES

Gianforte also touched on energy production and consumer energy bills, using the address as an opportunity to draw a comparison between his vision for the United States’ energy future and soon-to-be-former President Joe Biden’s.

“The heavy hand of the federal government has thwarted energy development. We need affordable, reliable power, and we need the federal government’s support, not obstruction. We need to unleash Montana and America’s all-of-the-above energy production,” Gianforte said, going on to announce his Unleashing Energy Task Force, which he said would build on the Legislature’s energy-related work.

Over the past four years, Gianforte has frequently criticized the Biden administration for its focus on limiting emissions of climate-warming greenhouse gases. In late November, Gianforte issued a statement denouncing the Bureau of Land Management’s moratorium on new coal leases in the Powder River Basin, which holds the country’s largest recoverable coal reserves. Within two weeks, Wyoming and Montana sued the BLM over the moratorium.

During his tenure as governor, Gianforte has supported a variety of energy companies and projects, including the Colstrip power plant and the coal mine that fuels it, a nearly $1 billion eastern Montana wind farm, a new high-voltage transmission line, and a biofuel refinery that Montana Renewables, a subsidiary of Calumet, opened in Great Falls in 2021. 

Advertisement

Gianforte did not use the word “climate” in his address Monday, but he did mention funding goals geared toward making the state more resilient to natural disasters, such as the siphon failures that last June left northern Montana communities dependent on the St. Mary River for drinking water and irrigation in a lurch.

Gianforte highlighted two items in his budget oriented toward such infrastructure: a $100 million one-time allocation for state projects “that reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property from natural disasters like aging levees and canals that might fail,” and a $10 million annual boost in bridge repairs.

REBUTTALS FROM DEMOCRATS, FREEDOM CAUCUS

Democrats highlighted a number of shared political priorities with Gianforte, including affordable housing and education. The minority party balked at Gianforte’s call for partisan judicial races. 

“Democrats will be working hard to make Montana fair by bringing tax [relief] and renewing Medicaid,” Sen. Shane Morigeau, D-Missoula, said in his address.

Sen. Shane Morigeau from Missoula delivers the Democratic Party’s rebuttal to Gov. Greg Gianforte’s State of the State address at the state Capitol in Helena on Monday, Jan. 13, 2025. Credit: John Stember / MTFP

Morigeau identified the well-being of Native American communities in Montana as one of the Democratic caucus’ focus areas. In an interview after the address, Morigeau also cast doubt on Gianforte’s rosy picture of Montana’s financial future.

Advertisement

“People can say, ‘we’re going to reduce taxes,’ but how much is that for you, how much is that for big corporations and how much of that is that for working Montanans?”

Gianforte’s speech received mixed reactions from the conservative Montana Freedom Caucus, a mix of hyper-conservative Republican lawmakers from the House and Senate, some of whom did not attend the governor’s remarks. 

In a press conference after the speech, caucus chair and Rep. Jerry Schillinger, R-Circle, said the group is prioritizing property tax reductions, a limited state budget, election and border security and judicial reform. He also advocated for ending Medicaid expansion and curtailing abortion. 

The group said it appreciated Gianforte’s calls for tighter laws regulating the judiciary and could see some places where their members’ proposals for property tax reductions could live alongside the governor’s homestead exemption.

“Let’s pass them both,” said Sen. Carl Glimm, R-Kila. “Why not?” 

Advertisement

latest stories

Feds look to expand Montana’s largest coal mine

Montana’s largest coal mine is set for an expansion that could increase its coal production by 19 million tons.


Bills of fare 

For 90 days every two years, the Montana Legislature — “the people’s branch” — descends on Helena to set state policy and pass a biennial budget. As House and Senate members from all over the state make the Queen City their temporary abode, these public servants and the crowds that follow them need to eat. So what is a typical diet of a Montana legislator?


EPA releases plan for cleanup of Columbia Falls Superfund site

The EPA’s plan for the Columbia Falls Aluminum Company site along the Flathead River comes 15 years after the plant closed and eight years after it was added to the national Superfund list. The plan largely reflects a draft version that was criticized by a local group that wanted the EPA to force the site’s owner, mining giant Glencore, to completely remove the contaminated soil.


Advertisement



Source link

Montana

Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case – Transnational Litigation Blog

Published

on

Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case – Transnational Litigation Blog


Image by Clker-Free-Vector-Images from Pixabay

The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act discourages forum shopping in child custody disputes by assigning subject-matter jurisdiction to the court located in the “home state” of the child. In Allen v. Allen, decided on April 21, 2026, the Montana Supreme Court had to determine whether the child’s “home state” was Montana or the Netherlands. This case shines an important spotlight on the importance of timing in international child custody disputes. The left-behind parent’s likelihood of success is strongly correlated with how quickly he or she acts to vindicate their legal rights.

Facts

Jonathan Edward Allen (Father) and Petronella Gerline (Van Oosterom) Allen (Mother) were married in Colorado in 2009. Father is a United States citizen. Mother is a dual citizen of the United States and the Netherlands. Their child (R.A.A.) was born in 2015. In 2020, the family moved from Colorado to Montana.

In August 2023, after Father and Mother began having marital difficulties, Mother and R.A.A. relocated to the Netherlands. In February 2024, Mother filed a petition for divorce and custody with the District Court of Central Netherlands (Netherlands District Court).

Advertisement

In January 2025, Father filed a petition with the District Court of The Hague seeking the return of R.A.A. pursuant to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. This petition was denied. Although the court held that R.A.A. had been wrongfully removed from the United States, the court reasoned that the one-year automatic return period had passed and that R.A.A. had become settled in her new environment in the Netherlands. This decision was affirmed on appeal.

In September 2025, Father filed an Emergency Motion for Temporary Custody and Petition for Permanent Parenting Plan in Montana state court. That court dismissed the petition on the grounds that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. Specifically, it held that it lacked the power to adjudicate the dispute because Montana was no longer the “home state” of R.A.A. Father, acting pro se, appealed to the Montana Supreme Court.

Analysis

The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) assigns exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction to courts located in the child’s “home state” when it comes to matters relating to child custody. The “home state” is “the state in which a child lived with a parent or a person acting as parent for at least 6 consecutive months immediately before the commencement of a child custody proceeding.” The UCCJEA specifically provides that courts “shall treat a foreign country as if it were a state of the United States” for purposes of resolving these disputes.

On the facts presented in Allen v. Allen, the Montana Supreme Court correctly held that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to consider Father’s emergency motion. Mother and R.A.A. relocated to the Netherlands in August 2023. Six months later—in February 2024—R.A.A.’s home state shifted to the Netherlands. The Dutch courts—rather than the Montana courts—now had exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction to resolve custody disputes involving R.A.A. Father did not file his motion in Montana until September 2025, which was nineteen months too late.

Conclusion

If Father had filed his suit in Montana before February 2024, he could have shown that Montana was R.A.A.’s “home state” because the child had not yet resided in the Netherlands for six months. The suit was, however, not filed until September 2025.

Advertisement

If Father had filed suit in the Netherlands before August 2024, he could have argued that R.A.A. should be returned to the United States pursuant to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction because the child had not yet resided in the Netherlands for a year. The suit was, however, not filed until January 2025.

The key takeaway of Allen v. Allen is the need for speed in international child custody cases. The timelines baked into the relevant laws and treaties mandate that the left-behind parent move quickly to assert their rights. If they are slow off the mark, they be forced to litigate in foreign courts under less favorable legal rules.



Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Clark Fork River remains central to Missoula’s identity, conservation groups say

Published

on

Clark Fork River remains central to Missoula’s identity, conservation groups say


The Clark Fork River has long been a defining feature of Missoula, shaping the city’s culture, economy and outdoor lifestyle.

The river is so closely tied to the area that it helped inspire the well-known book and film “A River Runs Through It.” But local conservation advocates say its importance goes far beyond scenery.

“Without the Clark Fork River, Missoula would just be another town,” said Lisa Ronald, Northern Rockies associate conservation director for American Rivers. “We wouldn’t be the River City. I think we’re known in Montana as Missoula the River City, and it’s really because of the Clark Fork River and its central role in business, in economics, in recreation, that really makes Missoula the town that it is.”

Carmen Murill, a field organizer with Wild Montana, said the river is deeply woven into daily life for people who live in Missoula.

Advertisement

“A lot of us would wonder what to do on a beautiful or a rainy summer day,” Murill said. “I mean, it’s really a lifeforce of town. And I think it’s pretty unique that Missoula, as a community is living and breathing on both sides of the river. It’s really like two downtowns but connected by the Clark Fork.”

Conservation groups say protecting the river begins with community involvement.

Advocates encourage residents and visitors to spend time outdoors, whether on a trail, in the woods or along the river, and to learn how they can become better stewards of the environment.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Montana

Forstag secures democratic nomination for Western Montana Congressional District

Published

on

Forstag secures democratic nomination for Western Montana Congressional District


MISSOULA — Sam Forstag edged out Ryan Busse to secure the Democratic nomination in Montana’s 1st Congressional District.

Busse conceded the race to Forstag on Wednesday morning. Forstag had trailed behind Busse Tuesday evening, but he made up ground as the votes were counted into the early hours of Wednesday morning. The other two candidates in the race, Russl Cleveland and Matt Rains, are sitting at third and fourth, respectively.

Forstag leads in close race for Montana’s 1st Congressional District

Advertisement

Forstag spent eight years as a wildland firefighter, including four as a smokejumper, and he’s been vice president of the local National Federation of Federal Employees union. Last week, U.S. House of Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-New York, held a rally in Missoula to support Forstag’s campaign.

He told MTN on Tuesday that his campaign has been for the working class.

“We got a whole lot of people here that have been working their tail off to finally get some working-class representation in Washington,” Forstag noted. “So proud of everything we’ve done and so grateful.”

Forstag further noted he wants Montanans to be able to afford groceries, have universal free childcare and restore and expand Affordable Health Care Act subsidies.

Advertisement

“Hearing people’s stories and struggles and commonalities in the ways that we’re all fighting in the system that does not serve us so often, and the government serves corporations and the richest people in this country more than working people. It has been frustrating and saddening, but it has also inspired so much hope in me, like the fixes we can actually make,” he told MTN.

The 1st Congressional District covers much of western Montana, including Kalispell, Missoula, Butte and Bozeman. It is currently held by Rep. Ryan Zinke, R-Montana, who chose not to seek reelection.

By securing the nomination, Forstag is slated tol face off against Libertarian candidate Nick Sheedy and Republican candidate Aaron Flint in November. 





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending