Connect with us

Idaho

Idaho Supreme Court rules on Thomas Creech’s last state appeal to avoid death penalty – East Idaho News

Published

on

Idaho Supreme Court rules on Thomas Creech’s last state appeal to avoid death penalty – East Idaho News


BOISE (Idaho Statesman) — Idaho’s high court dismissed a final state appeal from Thomas Creech on Wednesday, leaving the federal courts to decide whether Idaho can try again to execute its longest-serving death row prisoner after a failed attempt earlier this year.

The Idaho Supreme Court unanimously rejected Creech’s arguments that a second execution attempt would represent cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. In February, the execution team was unable after nearly an hour to find a vein in Creech’s body suitable for an IV to lethally inject him, and prison leaders called off the execution.

Creech became the first-ever prisoner to survive an execution in Idaho and just the sixth in U.S. history to survive one by lethal injection, according to the Washington, D.C.-based Death Penalty Information Center.

Creech alleged in his appeal that another lethal injection attempt, this time possibly with a stepped-up method known as a central line IV, which uses a catheter through a jugular in the neck, or vein in the upper thigh or chest, would violate his constitutional rights. A lower state court ruled against the claim last month.

Advertisement

“The application does not support, with any likelihood, the conclusion that the pain other inmates purportedly suffered in other states establishes an ‘objectively intolerable’ risk of pain for Creech, as required under the Eighth Amendment,” Idaho Chief Justice G. Richard Bevan wrote for the court.

Idaho’s five justices also ruled against Creech in a similar appeal earlier this month.

The court’s ruling Wednesday sided with Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador’s office and was determined on legal briefs alone. No oral arguments were scheduled in the appeal.

Justice Colleen Zahn recused herself from Creech’s appeal and was replaced by Senior Justice Roger Burdick, who retired from the court in 2021. Zahn cited her decadelong tenure in the Attorney General’s Office before her appointment to the Supreme Court bench, state courts spokesperson Nate Poppino previously told the Idaho Statesman.

The State Appellate Public Defender’s Office, which represented Creech in the case, did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Idaho Statesman. The Attorney General’s Office declined to comment Wednesday after the ruling.

Advertisement

The Federal Defender Services of Idaho, which represents Creech in three other active appeals in federal court, did not immediately respond to a request for comment, including over its own federal appeal with the same legal arguments as the case just dismissed by the Idaho Supreme Court.

Creech was set to be executed earlier this month after he was served with a death warrant from Ada County Prosecuting Attorney Jan Bennetts’ office. A federal judge issued a stay and hit pause on the scheduled execution timeline before Idaho could follow through on the state’s first execution in more than a dozen years.

Creech, 74, has been incarcerated for 50 years on five murder convictions, including three victims in Idaho. His standing death sentence stems from the May 1981 beating death of fellow prisoner David D. Jensen, 23, for which Creech pleaded guilty. Before that, Creech was convicted of the November 1974 shooting deaths of two men in Valley County in Idaho, and later the shooting death of a man in Oregon and another man’s death by strangulation in California.

Arizona judge to decide federal appeals

Presiding over Creech’s three pending federal lawsuits is visiting U.S. District Judge G. Murray Snow from the District of Arizona. He stepped in after U.S. District Judge Amanda Brailsford for the District of Idaho was forced to recuse herself from one of Creech’s cases over her decadeslong friendship with Bennetts.

Snow, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, is no stranger to death penalty cases. He has handled several in Arizona, which, like Idaho, maintains capital punishment — though Arizona’s Democratic governor issued a pause on all executions last year.

Advertisement

In a 2016 case, Snow ruled that witnesses to an execution must be allowed to see the entirety of the execution. That includes when a prisoner is brought into the execution chamber and strapped down to a gurney, as well as when chemicals are administered during a lethal injection.

Idaho’s prison system recently revamped its execution chamber to add an “execution preparation room” and cameras with closed-circuit live video and audio feeds to meet similar legal requirements for witnesses. The renovation, associated with possible use of a central line IV, cost the state $314,000.

In another Arizona case in 2017, Snow ruled that prison officials did not have to reveal their suppliers of lethal injection drugs or the credentials of anyone who participates in an execution. The identities of suppliers and members of the execution team are protected pieces of information under Arizona law.

Snow rationalized in his decision that some suppliers may not sell the drugs to the state if they were not granted anonymity, the Associated Press reported. Lethal injection drugs have in recent years become difficult to buy for corrections systems across the U.S., because of mounting public pressure and drug manufacturers prohibiting sales to prisons for use in executions.

Faced with its own challenges obtaining lethal injection drugs, Idaho approved a similar law in 2022 that shields any potential identifying information about drug suppliers, as well as the identities of execution participants, from public disclosure. The next year, Idaho prison officials paid $50,000 to acquire lethal injection drugs for the first time in several years, but withheld from where, citing the new law. The going retail price for the drugs is about $16,000, a doctor of pharmacy declared in court records.

Advertisement
Thomas Creech, left, is Idaho’s longest-service death row prisoner, including after a failed execution by lethal injection in February 2024. He married his wife, LeAnn Creech, in 1998 while incarcerated. | Courtesy Federal Defender Services of Idaho

Idaho prison officials later bought a second round of lethal injection drugs for $100,000, but those expired, court records showed. That led to another $50,000 purchase, according to an invoice obtained by the Statesman through a public records request, in the weeks leading up to Creech’s scheduled execution.

Already, Snow has issued rulings in favor of Creech, including the stay of execution in one case. He also granted a doctor who specializes in assessing trauma the ability to evaluate Creech. Labrador’s office opposed the evaluation while Creech’s death warrant was active.

=htmlentities(get_the_title())?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=get_permalink()?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=htmlentities(‘For more stories like this one, be sure to visit https://www.eastidahonews.com/ for all of the latest news, community events and more.’)?>&subject=Check%20out%20this%20story%20from%20EastIdahoNews” class=”fa-stack jDialog”>





Source link

Advertisement

Idaho

Gov. Little signs bill ending license plate registration stickers in Idaho

Published

on

Gov. Little signs bill ending license plate registration stickers in Idaho


Gov. Brad Little has signed House Bill 533, which would remove the need for license plate stickers on Idaho vehicles.

The legislation, introduced earlier this session by Rep. Jon Weber (R) of Boise, eliminates the requirement for registration stickers on Idaho license plates. Weber stated during the bills intorduction that officers can verify the status of license plates without the stickers, potentially saving the state around $300,000.

During the bill’s introduction, some lawmakers argued that it could increase the workload for law enforcement.

Comment with Bubbles
Advertisement

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

The new law is set to take effect in July.



Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Idaho resolution opposing same-sex marriage advances

Published

on

Idaho resolution opposing same-sex marriage advances


For the second year in a row, House lawmakers will consider urging the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn its ruling legalizing same-sex marriage.

The nonbinding resolution, which carries no legal weight, says the decision in Obergefel v. Hodges violates the longstanding religious definition of marriage between one man and one woman.

“The current definition of marriage that allows for same-sex marriages is a defilement of the word marriage,” said Rep. Tony Wisniewski (R-Post Falls), who sponsors the measure.

The resolution further states that the Obergefel decision “arbitrarily and unjustly” rejects the historical definition of marriage.

Advertisement

Idaho voters passed a constitution amendment in 2006 that defines marriage as between one man and one woman, which was invalidated by the Obergefel ruling.

Wisniewski said regulating marriages should be a power left to the states.

Rep. Brent Crane (R-Nampa) agrees.

“If you want to get things … closer to the people with respect to some of these more complex social issues, I think the best place for those things to happen is in the states,” Crane said.

Doing so is a risk, he said.

Advertisement

“You may have states that choose to acknowledge [polyamorous relationships]. You may have states that choose to have relationships between adults and younger children,” Crane said.

Cities in neighboring Oregon and Washington, for example, are considering giving those in polyamorous relationships legal recognition.

But he said that risk is worth it to allow other states that choose to only recognize traditional marriages.

Four lawmakers on the House State Affairs Committee opposed the resolution.

Rep. Erin Bingham (R-Idaho Falls) said she’s tried to balance her own religious beliefs with those of others while considering the measure.

Advertisement

“I do feel like that it is important for us to work together, to find ways to compromise and to live together in peace and mutual respect,” Bingham said.

The resolution now goes to the House floor for consideration.

House lawmakers last year passed a similar measure, but it never received a hearing in a Senate committee.

Copyright 2026 Boise State Public Radio

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

University of Idaho professor awarded $10M after TikTok tarot influencer claimed she ‘ordered’ quadruple murders

Published

on

University of Idaho professor awarded M after TikTok tarot influencer claimed she ‘ordered’ quadruple murders


A University of Idaho professor won a $10 million judgment after a tarot TikTok influencer publicly pushed false claims that she was behind the savage quadruple slayings of four college students.

A Boise jury in US District Court ordered fortune-telling Texas TikToker Ashley Guillard on Friday to pay $10 million after concluding she falsely accused professor Rebecca Scofield of having a secret romance with one of the four victims and orchestrating their killings, the Idaho Statesman reported.

Following the verdict, Scofield thanked the jury and said she hopes the case sends a clear warning that making “false statements online have consequences in the real world.”

Ashley Guillard posted TikTok videos falsely linking a University of Idaho professor to the Idaho college murders, leading to a defamation lawsuit. TikTok/ashleyisinthebookoflife4

“The murders of the four students on November 13, 2022, were the darkest chapter in our university’s history,” Scofield told Fox News.

Advertisement

“Today’s decision shows that respect and care should always be granted to victims during these tragedies. I am hopeful that this difficult chapter in my life is over, and I can return to a more normal life with my family and the wonderful Moscow community.”

Scofield, the university’s history department chair, filed the lawsuit in December 2022 — just weeks after Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were brutally stabbed to death at an off-campus rental home in Moscow, Idaho, on Nov. 13, 2022.

Guillard began uploading videos to her more than 100,000 TikTok followers in late November 2022, accusing Scofield of a secret relationship with one of the students and claiming she had “ordered” the killings, garnering millions of views across the social media platform.

The complaint states that Scofield had never met the victims and was out of state when the murders occurred.

Idaho murder victims Madison Mogen, 21, top left, Kaylee Goncalves, 21, bottom left, Ethan Chapin, 20, center, and Xana Kernodle, 20, right, and their two surviving roommates.

Even after being served with cease-and-desist letters and after police publicly confirmed Scofield had no connection to the murders, the Houston-based tarot reader continued posting videos, the history professor’s legal team argued.

Advertisement

Guillard doubled down on her accusations against Scofield after being sued, posting a defiant video saying, “I am not stopping,” and challenging why Scofield needed three lawyers to sue her “if she’s so innocent.”

The professor’s legal team argued the defamatory accusations painted her as a criminal and accused her of professional misconduct that could derail her career.

Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty to the savage slayings in July 2025 in a plea deal that took the death penalty off the table. AP

Bryan Kohberger, then studying criminology at Washington State University, pleaded guilty in July 2025 to the quadruple murders in a deal that took the death penalty off the table. He is currently serving four consecutive life sentences in Idaho.

In June 2024, Chief US Magistrate Judge Raymond Patricco found Guillard’s statements legally defamatory, leaving damages to be decided by a jury.

During the damages trial, Scofield described the anguish of seeing her name tied to the murders online, the Idaho Statesman reported.

Advertisement
The off-campus home where four University of Idaho students were stabbed to death on Nov. 17, 2022, in Moscow, Idaho. James Keivom

However, Guillard, acting as her own attorney, insisted her comments were simply beliefs based on tarot card readings.

She claimed to have psychic powers and testified that she relied on tarot cards to try to solve the shocking homicides that shook the rural college town and sparked global attention.

It took jurors less than two hours to return their verdict, the outlet reported.

The jury awarded Scofield $7.5 million in punitive damages in addition to $2.5 million in compensatory damages.

With Post wires

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending