Connect with us

Hawaii

Now We Know The Scale Of Pay-To-Play Politics In Hawaii. It's Long Past Time To Act

Published

on

Now We Know The Scale Of Pay-To-Play Politics In Hawaii. It's Long Past Time To Act


Companies that get government contracts can’t give directly to campaigns but their owners, officers and family members can. That’s long been an enormous loophole that legislators just failed to address — again.

A Civil Beat/New York Times report published last week unveiled just how deeply the pay-to-play culture is ingrained in Hawaii politics.

By examining hundreds of thousands of campaign contributions and more than 70,000 government contracts, reporters discovered that nearly $1 out of every $5 donated to politicians came from people tied to companies doing business with state and local governments.

And when some companies were on the verge of winning big government contracts, people connected to them donated larger amounts of money to the relevant officials.

Advertisement

Even though those contributors generally didn’t acknowledge their connections to the companies, they were not violating Hawaii law, which only prohibits donations directly from the firms.

“Everyone gets very upset with pay-to-play, but it’s legal,” said Kristin Izumi-Nitao, executive director of the Hawaii Campaign Spending Commission.

What’s especially galling is that the commission proposed measures to close the gaping loophole this session and they were ignored by the Judiciary chairs in the House and the Senate, never even receiving a public hearing.

Now that the gargantuan scale of the problem has been defined, that has to change when the Legislature reconvenes in 2025.

Stopped Dead in the Judiciary Committees

The commission was clearly aware of the issue when it proposed Senate Bill 2214 and House Bill 1849, but after reading the Civil Beat/New York Times report, even Izumi-Nitao found that “the numbers were a bit surprising. And if the bill had been in effect, I believe those numbers would not be as high.”

Advertisement

The identical measures introduced in the House and Senate would have expanded a 2006 ban on campaign contributions from government contractors to include the officers and immediate family members of the company owners. It also would have applied the same prohibitions to recipients of government grants.

They were modified versions of a measure that unanimously passed the House and Senate in 2023 but died during the secretive conference committee period when disagreements between the two chambers must be resolved if a bill is to become law.

Far less love was shown to the proposal this session by the Judiciary chairs, Rep. David Tarnas and Sen. Karl Rhoads.

Tarnas had said during a pre-session interview that when it came to government reform measures, he would prioritize consideration of bills that had made it to conference committee the previous year.

The House of Representatives David Tarnas answers a question about legalizing recreational cannabis after opening day the legislative session Wednesday, Jan. 17, 2024, in Honolulu. (Kevin Fujii/Civil Beat/2024)
Rep. David Tarnas didn’t give the measure a hearing this session before his House Judiciary Committee. (Kevin Fujii/Civil Beat/2024)

That didn’t happen with HB 1849, and Tarnas didn’t respond to a Civil Beat request to explain why.

For his part, Rhoads said he didn’t give SB 2214 a hearing in his committee because he thought his measure to offer full public financing of political campaigns “was more important.”

Advertisement

Full public campaign financing would go a long way toward reforming the pay-to-play landscape, but accepting the public money instead of continuing to solicit private funds would be voluntary. And even though it passed the Senate unanimously, Tarnas led the effort to kill that measure when it got to his committee.

Credit Rhoads for his efforts on behalf of public campaign financing, but this shouldn’t have been a one-or-the-other matter — he didn’t have to derail the effort to turn off the tap on political contributions tied to government contracts.

Chair Judiciary Karl Rhoads during mail in ballot hearing held in room 016 at the Capitol.Chair Judiciary Karl Rhoads during mail in ballot hearing held in room 016 at the Capitol.
Sen. Karl Rhoads said his priority this session was a measure for full public financing of campaigns. (Cory Lum/Civil Beat/2019)

‘I Will Look At The Issue With More Urgency’

Rhoads also expressed concern that if SB 2214 had passed, candidates would have no way of knowing they were accepting illegal contributions. He’s apparently developed those concerns since last year’s session, when his committee unanimously approved a similar measure.

Still, the senator acknowledged that the number of pay-to-play contributions documented in the recent report is “surprisingly high,” and added, “with this new information, I will look at the issue with more urgency next session.”

Urgency. Government reform efforts seemingly achieved that two years ago after a series of public scandals — including the bribery convictions of two former legislators — led to the creation of a special state commission that proposed numerous good government measures.

Some were adopted by the Legislature, but the major ones — including closing the loophole on contractor contributions — were not.

Advertisement
Campaign Spending Commission Director Kristin Izumi-Nitao said the proposal to expand restrictions on contributions by people connected to government contractors and grantees will be back next session. (Blaze Lovell/Civil Beat/2019)

So here we sit with a well-documented culture of political pay-to-play and a Campaign Spending Commission that is so understaffed that it would have a hard time enforcing new restrictions on campaign contributions even if the Legislature had the courage to approve them.

Izumi-Nitao said the commission will “absolutely” propose restrictions on pay-to-play donations again next session. Presumably it will also again seek an appropriation to enlarge its staff of 5, which hasn’t grown since it was established in 1973 even as it struggles to regulate more and more candidates and campaign committees.

Before that will come an election in which voters can deliver their own message about the need for reform in state and local government.

The Civil Beat/New York Times report broke new ground in connecting campaign contributions to the people who benefit from government contracts. Over the last 2 years, our “Let the Sunshine In” project has lit up many other dark corners of political dysfunction.

Our collective eyes are open wider now. It shouldn’t take another round of scandals to re-energize momentum for reform.





Source link

Hawaii

Hawaii DOH warns of raw milk cheese recall over E. coli | Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Published

on

Hawaii DOH warns of raw milk cheese recall over E. coli | Honolulu Star-Advertiser


1/2

Swipe or click to see more

Advertisement

COURTESY FDA

COURTESY FDA

2/2

Swipe or click to see more

Advertisement

COURTESY FDA

Advertisement
COURTESY FDA
COURTESY FDA
Advertisement

The Hawaii Department of Health is alerting residents to a nationwide raw milk cheddar cheese recall due to potential contamination with E. coli.

The recall is for RAW FARM brand cheddar cheese, including both shredded and block products, after federal investigations found they may be contaminated with E. coli O157:H7.

DOH says the products were distributed to a small number of specialty grocery stores in Hawaii, including Down to Earth and Hanalei Market and is following up to ensure they are no longer available for sale.

Advertisement

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration requested RAW FARM of Fresno, Calif., issue the voluntary recall, and the business did so under protest.

The FDA continues to investigate a multi-state outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 infections linked to RAW FARM-brand faw dairy products.

The recalled products include:

>> 8 oz. lightly salted cheddar block, with expiration date 8/23/2026

>> 80 oz. lightly salted cheddar block, with expiration date 8/11/2026

>> 16 oz. lightly salted cheddar block, with expiration date 8/23/2026

>> 80 oz. bag of original cheddar shred, with expiration date 5/6/2026

Advertisement

>> 16 oz. Jalapeno cheddar block, with expiration date 9/24/2026

>> 8 oz. lightly salted cheddar shred, with expiration date 5/13/2026

>> 8 oz. Jalapeno Cheddar Block, with expiration date 9/24/2026

Any batches produced prior to the dates listed above are also under recall.

As of today, nine people infected with the E. coli strain have been reported from three states, including California, Texas and Florida, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Three have been hospitalized.

Advertisement

More than half of illnesses are in children under age 5.

No illnesses or adverse events from the product have been reported in Hawaii.

Symptoms include severe stomach cramps, diarrhea, fever, nausea and/or vomiting. They can begin anywhere from a few days after consuming contaminated food to up to nine days later.

“Although most healthy adults can recover completely within a week, some infections can cause severe bloody diarrhea and may lead to life-threatening conditions such as a type of kidney failure called hemolytic uremic syndrome,” said DOH in a news release. “HUS is most likely to occur in young children and the elderly.”

Infections with this strain may also lead to the development of high blood pressure, chronic kidney disease, and neurologic problems.

Advertisement

Anyone exhibiting symptoms after having consumed the recalled products should contact their health care provider immediately.

Consumers with questions may contact RAW FARM https://rawfarmusa.com/contact.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Hawaii

State bills would raise tax on pricey Hawaii home sales | Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Published

on

State bills would raise tax on pricey Hawaii home sales | Honolulu Star-Advertiser




Source link

Continue Reading

Hawaii

Gov. Green nominates new Hawaii Supreme Court chief justice

Published

on

Gov. Green nominates new Hawaii Supreme Court chief justice


HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) – Gov. Josh Green on Thursday announced he has nominated Vladimir Devens to serve as chief justice of the Hawaii Supreme Court.

The chief justice is responsible for administering the statewide court system, including oversight of court operations, judicial assignments, and efforts to improve efficiency and access to justice.

Devens, who has served as an associate justice since 2024, brings more than three decades of legal experience to the role, including extensive work in civil litigation and public service.

Green said Devens “brings something that is essential in this moment — real-world experience, a deep understanding of working people and a grounded, salt-of-the-earth perspective that reflects the values of our communities. At a time when families are focused on affordability, housing and stability, we need continuity and steady leadership in our courts. Justice Devens is the right person to lead with fairness, independence and a clear understanding of how decisions impact everyday people.”

Advertisement

If confirmed by the Hawaii State Senate, Devens will serve as the state’s highest-ranking judicial officer, overseeing the administration of the judiciary and guiding the work of the Supreme Court.

He would succeed Chief Justice Mark Recktenwald, who retired last September after reaching the state’s mandatory retirement age of 70.

“I am deeply honored by Governor Green’s nomination and grateful for the opportunity to continue serving the people of Hawaii,” Devens said. “Throughout my career, I have worked alongside individuals and families navigating real challenges and I carry those experiences with me. If confirmed, I will focus on ensuring our courts remain fair, accessible and responsive to the needs of all communities, while upholding the rule of law and maintaining public trust.”

Devens received a bachelor’s degree in economics, graduating magna cum laude and earning Phi Beta Kappa honors from the University of California, Berkeley. He earned his Juris Doctor from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law (formerly Boalt Hall), where he served as an Associate Editor of the Industrial Relations Law Journal.

Prior to his appointment, Devens worked in private practice for more than 30 years, where he concentrated on civil litigation across multiple practice areas. He also served on the Hawaii State Bar Association board of directors and on various HSBA committees.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending