Connect with us

Hawaii

‘It was biased’: Controversy over Hawaii public school lesson on presidential candidates

Published

on

‘It was biased’: Controversy over Hawaii public school lesson on presidential candidates


KAPOLEI (HawaiiNewsNow) – The race for the White House is reaching local classrooms and one lesson has some parents raising their eyebrows.

The controversy is over a two page document that was handed out to classrooms at Kapolei Middle School.

It broke down where the U.S. presidential candidates — Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris and Republican former President Donald Trump — stand on the issues.

The state Department of Education confirms the document was put together by a group of teachers at the school who simplified the information in a candidate comparison article in the New York Times.

Advertisement

The material given out to students lists six issues.

Examples:

Crime:

Harris: “Gives money to police”

Trump: “Sends soldiers to cities”

Advertisement

Democracy:

Harris: “Wants to keep our country a democracy”

Trump: “Tried to overturn the 2020 election

Immigration:

Harris: “Hires more people to watch the border”

Advertisement

“Limits how many people can move to the U.S.

Trump: “Finds and catches people in the U.S. illegally”

“Takes children away from their parents”

The lesson is upsetting some parents like Angel Morales, who felt it was biased against the former president.

“Very upset,” Morales said. “I think teachers should do their job as teachers stick to education and not politics.”

Advertisement

The Hawaii DOE said in a statement:

The Department aims to engage students in civic topics thoughtfully and impartially. Recently a Kapolei Middle sixth grade class used an exercise called “It’s a Match,” adapted from a New York Times article, to help students understand the candidates’ positions on key issues.

Teachers simplified this information to make it accessible for young students, striving to remain factual and unbiased. The intent was to encourage independent thinking and discussion among students, not to promote any particular view. We acknowledge that the interpretation and simplification of complex issues can sometimes result in perceived imbalances, particularly when presenting nuanced political topics to younger audiences, but we remain committed to maintaining a balanced learning environment.

Reactions from parents at other schools were mixed.

“It doesn’t bother me. I actually value that because its important to teach students, how do we make informed decisions when we go to the ballot box,” said Christine Russo, a parent at Ewa Elementary.

Advertisement

“I thought it was a little biased. I don’t think that it is right especially at that age level,” said Natasha Heffernan, another public school parent.

The teachers attempts to breakdown the complex issues are being defended by the Hawaii State Teachers Association.

In a statement it said:

“Both the HSTA, Board of Education and the DOE support student discussion of issues that may generate opposing points of view as an important part of the learning process. Age-appropriate civic education helps students develop a meaningful awareness and respect for the U.S. Constitution and individual rights. It fosters students’ recognition of individual freedom and social responsibility to vote. Teachers create lessons to allow students to study, investigate, process, and develop their own opinions about the world and themselves.”

The DOE has not said if the teachers involved face any disciplinary action or if there would be any chances to policy but did forward us the current policy which said DOE staff are expected to teach on an “objective, and factual basis.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Hawaii

Few state bills this year face potential veto – West Hawaii Today

Published

on

Few state bills this year face potential veto – West Hawaii Today






Source link

Continue Reading

Hawaii

Hawaii displays historic photos of Martin Luther King Jr. wearing flower lei during Selma march

Published

on

Hawaii displays historic photos of Martin Luther King Jr. wearing flower lei during Selma march


HONOLULU — Photographs of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. adorned with flower lei from Hawaii residents who traveled to Selma, Alabama, to join him on a pivotal Civil Rights march went on public display Tuesday in the state Capitol in Honolulu.

The Selma-to-Montgomery marches galvanized passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which did away with most barriers such as poll taxes and other forms of voter discrimination targeting Black Americans in the Deep South.

A delegation of five people brought dozens of flower lei with them from Hawaii to Alabama in March 1965. Images of King wearing lei, garlands that are synonymous with Hawaiian culture, have been previously published — but most of the photos displayed in Hawaii’s new exhibit have never been seen before. Some photos have subtle variations, while others include figures who may have been deemed unimportant at the time. The exhibit runs through July 7.

One of the lei-bearers was Charles Campbell, a high school teacher and chairman of the Hawaii Civil Rights Conference, who a March 20, 1965 article in The Honolulu Advertiser quoted as saying: “Selma has the capability of becoming a real sore that could affect the entire nation.”

Advertisement

King was photographed wearing lei about two weeks after the event known as Bloody Sunday when state troopers violently attacked Civil Rights marchers on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma on March 7, 1965.

The photos were taken by Civil Rights photographer Matt Herron, whose widow donated them to Hawaii’s Department of Accounting and General Services for the state’s archives.

After the photos were unveiled, Steven Springel stared at a photo of his mother, Nona Ferdon, who was a divorced mother of two children and a graduate student when she traveled to Selma.

This photo provided by Jeannine Herron shows Charles Campbell, who traveled to Alabama for the march from Selma to Montgomery, placing a lei on Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. at Brown Chapel AME in Selma, Ala., March 21, 1965. Credit: AP/Matt Herron

Springel remembers he was just about to turn 7 and only realized as an adult how important her trip was. Growing up in Hawaii, “we never experienced segregation or racial inequality,” he said of his and his sister’s childhood. Ferdon died in 2021.

Advertisement

The exhibit, part of Hawaii’s programming to mark the 250th anniversary of the United States, is a reminder people from the Aloha State participated in an important event in history, said Keith Regan, who oversees the department as the state’s comptroller and presided over the photo unveiling as acting governor while Gov. Josh Green is out of state.

The small delegation traveled thousands of miles “to be a part of the Civil Rights movement, to show ‘aloha’ to the world that Hawaii was there holding hands with our fellow brothers and sisters to ensure equality and justice were heard throughout the nation,” he said.

The Hawaii members also wore lei during first day of the 50-mile (80.46-kilometer) march. Mothers of Kawaiahaʻo Church in Honolulu strung together fragrant plumeria plucked from church grounds to assemble the lei.

This photo provided by Jeannine Herron shows Nona Ferdon, a...

This photo provided by Jeannine Herron shows Nona Ferdon, a graduate student who accompanied the Hawaii delegation that traveled to Alabama in 1965 for the march for voting rights, attends the march in Selma, Ala., March 21, 1965. Credit: AP/Matt Herron

Giving lei, a word that is both singular and plural in the Hawaiian language, continues to be a way to share the “aloha” spirit. People in Hawaii give and receive lei for all kinds of reasons, including to celebrate birthdays and promotions, or to show appreciation or recognition.

Tomi Knaefler, who had traveled with the delegation as a reporter with the Honolulu Star-Bulletin, planned to attend Tuesday’s news conference. But at 96 years old, she wasn’t feeling up to it, said her daughter, Pamela MacDonald, who did attend.

Advertisement

MacDonald said she was 14 when her mother went on the assignment, “the one that she holds dearest to her heart.”

The exhibit comes at the end of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2026 term, which included a ruling gutting the remaining piece of the Voting Rights Act, setting off a wave of partisan gerrymandering in states in the South and endangering generations of gains in Black political representation.



Source link

Continue Reading

Hawaii

Maunakea Access Road proposals include toll booth, cultural center | Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Published

on

Maunakea Access Road proposals include toll booth, cultural center | Honolulu Star-Advertiser


STAR-ADVERTISER

John De Fries

Advertisement
Advertisement

Two years after the
Hawaii Supreme Court ruled that the access road to the Maunakea summit had been illegally seized and designated as state property in 2018 by the state Department of Transportation, plans to manage it going forward are under discussion.

The state Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, which the court determined is the rightful manager of the land on which a four-mile stretch of the road is located, has received several proposals for projects on the road and surrounding area.

The ideas include installation of a toll booth and charging for access to the summit, construction of a gift shop and cultural center, operation of educational tours, and environmental restoration efforts, among others.

The Maunakea Stewardship and Oversight Authority — the state agency tasked with taking over management of the summit region from the University of Hawaii — earlier this month discussed partnering with DHHL and other groups to help determine the best path forward.

“Early indications are that there will be a working group comprised of the authority, (the Center for Maunakea Stewardship, the Department of Land and Natural Resources), DHHL and other immediate stakeholders who can look at what the potential would be on a holistic comprehensive basis,” MKSOA Executive
Director John De Fries said. “And in the meantime, DHHL is obligated to continue in the process of reviewing the proposals that they have
received.”

Advertisement

DHHL planning office staff members have presented two proposals and preliminary feedback before the Hawaiian Homes Commission meeting. Both proposals came from DHHL beneficiaries in the form of land-use requests under DHHL’s Aina Mauna Legacy Program, which was developed to oversee the trust’s lands surrounding Maunakea.

One of the proposals was submitted by the Waimea Hawaiian Homesteaders Association, also known as Waimea Nui. The group’s proposal includes building a cultural center, having trained cultural stewards on site and community and youth development opportunities. It would be funded in part by an access fee, but the presentation did not include cost or revenue estimates.

Advertisement

The other proposal is from Koa Kia‘i, a Native Hawaiian group led by Kalani­akea Wilson, a local tour company operator. It suggests installing a toll booth, parking lot, bathrooms, gift shop, playground, workout area and food truck along the access road, as well as operating astronomy, cultural and environmental tours. The proposal also includes cultural monitoring and ecological restoration measures.

The applicants estimate a cost of $1.5 million to implement the proposal, and a revenue of $1.75 million from the toll and parking fees in the first year of
operation.

A survey of DHHL beneficiaries suggested preference for the Waimea Nui plan, but respondents also expressed desire for the two organizations to find a way to work together.

While it will ultimately be up to DHHL to make a decision, MKSOA Board Chair John Komeiji said the authority could serve in an advisory capacity and help align the proposals with broader management plans for the mauna.

“They have to make the decision. There are two beneficiary groups that are making the proposals, so they are … duty-bound to consider both proposals,” he said during the June 18 board meeting. “But I think our job is to figure out, give them an overall holistic view of what is occurring now, how that might interface with whatever proposal.”

Advertisement

De Fries said he had
invited a DHHL planning
office staff member to join
MKSOA’s Joint Management Committee meeting this week to further discuss the project and potential working group.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending