Two German travelers came to Hawaii seeking sun, sand, and spontaneous adventure. What they found instead was handcuffs, a detention center, and deportation from the U.S.—a story that, since we were the first U.S. outlet to report it, has now made headlines around the world.

But the story that unfolded in our comment section is where the real fallout lives, offering insight and emotion no one else came close to capturing. It’s for that reason Beat of Hawaii was just interviewed by CBS News Los Angeles affiliate KNX to discuss the global fallout from the deportation case and what it means for Hawaii tourism.

New revelations from Germany.

The original article detailed how 18-year-old Maria and 19-year-old Charlotte arrived from New Zealand, planning to backpack across Hawaii and the U.S. mainland. But new reporting from Germany’s Ostsee-Zeitung—a respected regional paper in their hometown of Rostock—adds critical context.

According to that newspaper, after hours of questioning in a Honolulu back room, the young women were escorted—without being told their destination—to what turned out to be a deportation jail. There, they were strip-searched, issued green prison uniforms, and held overnight in a shared cell with other detainees. They were ultimately returned not to Germany, but to Japan at their request.

The women told that publication they had proof of funds, a valid ESTA, and a booked return flight from the mainland. What they lacked was a pre-booked Hawaii itinerary—still standard for at least some young backpackers, but flagged as suspicious by U.S. border officials.

Additional details just shared in a German magazine further challenge some assumptions. According to that report, the travelers had booked lodging for their initial Hawaii nights, showed bank statements to officials, were already enrolled in university for the upcoming term, and held tickets to California to visit family. They also claimed the interrogation transcript misquoted them—changing “travel and visit family” into “work for accommodation and pocket money.”

According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the travelers were denied entry—not deported—based on suspicions they intended to work illegally during their stay. Officials cited their lack of pre-booked accommodations for a five-week trip as contributing to those concerns. CBP emphasized that while the travelers held valid ESTA travel authorization, such approval does not guarantee entry, which is ultimately determined by border officials at the port of arrival, in this case Honolulu.

Shock, sympathy, anger, and something deeper.

The hundreds of comments we received showed just how strongly readers around the world reacted—and how far-reaching the implications of this story may be.

Many expressed disbelief that two young tourists from a wealthy European country could be treated so harshly. Tim H wrote, “It’s difficult to imagine what national security threat was perceived by CBP from these two young women.”

Marie added, “I traveled to the US 10 years ago, and it was already exactly like this. The arrogance and rudeness of US Border staff always stunned me.”

Rhonda C said, “It’s heartbreaking to see the damage the current US administration is doing to one of our favorite places to visit—Hawaii. It’s definitely not the Aloha spirit that envelops Hawaii in normal times.”

But not everyone agreed. Jonas L, writing from the EU, defended the process: “These rules have been in place for decades…If this was 1998 or 2005, the same thing would have happened.”

He noted that during his recent trip to the U.S., having a clear itinerary and documentation made for a smooth experience.

Others, including regular commenter Kyle S, questioned why anyone would travel without a plan at all: “Who on Earth goes to a foreign country that doesn’t speak your native language without booking hotels?”

For some, the reaction wasn’t about cruelty or injustice, but about the enforcement of long-standing travel norms.

Rather than finding consensus, the comments revealed just how divided people are—not only about what happened in Honolulu, but about what kind of travel feels safe, fair, and possible in the United States right now.

“We’re not coming anymore” – Hawaii travel plans canceled.

While the national media focused on the political flashpoints, our readers zeroed in on something else entirely: canceled Hawaii trips, second thoughts, and lingering sadness about this special place that many had always dreamed of visiting.

Rhonda C shared, “We have cancelled our annual month-long visit this year—mostly out of protest, but also because of the growing unease.” Loes added, “Visiting Hawaii has been on my bucket list for over 40 years. It no longer is.”

Across hundreds of comments, one thing stood out—no one said this made them more eager to visit Hawaii. And with Hawaii’s economy still reliant on international visitors, particularly from Japan, Canada, Australia, and Europe, stories like this risk creating lasting reputational damage.

How a country divided looked towards Hawaii.

The comments also highlighted how deeply split the public is on this issue, among others. Alice L, focused on the treatment: “If they don’t want them to enter the U.S., just let them wait at the airport. No need to humiliate.”

Another reader, Adrian, offered a more personal take: “I used to visit several times a year for work or holidays, and I have a deep love of your country. At the moment, I don’t think I will ever return. I prefer to remember it the way it was.”

In contrast, Mike C pushed back: “If it were rampant, don’t you think you would have heard more? If you don’t like Trump and don’t want to visit, that is fine.”

Hawaii Travel dreams meet border rules.

At the heart of this story is more than just policy—it’s a culture clash. In much of the world, especially Europe, spontaneous, long-term travel appears to remain a rite of passage. Booking lodging as you go may still be a common practice for some. In the U.S., that same behavior can now appear risky, however.

“These girls were circumnavigating the globe,” wrote Thomas H. “Young, curious, from a wealthy country—not fitting the ‘burden on paradise’ profile.”

And yet, under the U.S. security lens, border officials often default to caution—even at the cost of public goodwill.

Does Hawaii send mixed signals?

Hawaii welcomes the world with a smile in its ads—but for at least these travelers, that greeting ended at immigration. Cheryl asked, “What happened to aloha?” while Niles questioned, “No one should be strip-searched and jailed for visiting Hawaii without a hotel reservation.”

For a state that depends on tourism for more than one-quarter of its economy, incidents like this, so widely disseminated, quietly undermine the image Hawaii works hard to project. Some readers said they now see a contradiction between Hawaii’s warm, welcoming exterior and the cold reality that these international visitors faced on arrival. Others pointed out that even if the policies are federal, the perception sticks to Hawaii—and that matters.

A lasting impact is still unfolding.

Since publishing our original article nearly two weeks ago, we have continued to receive more comments—many thoughtful, some heartbreaking, and a good number too toxic in either direction to publish. They came from across the globe, from seasoned Hawaii travelers and first-time visitors alike. Hawaii always strikes a cord and this remains true now.

The story may have started with two young women and a denied entry. But the fallout continues—with Hawaii’s image, its economy, and the way the world perceives travel to the islands and the U.S. all on the line.

Has this changed how you see Hawaii travel? Will you still visit? Let us know.