Connect with us

Hawaii

Hawaii Traveler Just Found This 186% Hawaiian Airlines Fee Hike

Published

on

Hawaii Traveler Just Found This 186% Hawaiian Airlines Fee Hike


A reader booking a Hawaii flight just found and wrote to us about one fee that nearly tripled this week, from $35 to $100. But the bigger story is what else readers are finding at booking and onboard, from fees to meals, as Hawaiian’s old terms get replaced with ones the new airline can actually afford to keep.

This $35 fee just became $100.

Hawaiian’s longtime interisland cabin pet fee was $35, a price well below the rest of the airline industry. The cabin pet fee is now $100, whether flying interisland or between Hawaii and the mainland. Checked pets on interisland flights are listed at $60, so even that option now costs more than the old cabin fee many residents and repeat visitors knew. Moving from $35 to $100 is a 186% increase, and a quick interisland roundtrip with a pet now costs $130 more.

The new fee is closer to what mainland carriers already charge for pets in the cabin, where $100 to $150 has long been common. That doesn’t make the increase easier for longtime Hawaii travelers who booked expecting the old Hawaiian price, which was unusually low when measured against the larger airline system Alaska brought with it.

The reader who found out at booking.

One reader put it plainly after finding the new price while trying to make a pet reservation. The frustration was not just the dollar amount. It was the timing, the lack of warning, and another familiar Hawaiian practice that pulled the rug out from under travelers still assuming the old rules applied.

Advertisement

“Alaska is not better in another way. Today I discovered that taking a pet on an inter island flight is now $100 as opposed to $35 with Hawaiian. Had I made my pet reservation just 2 days ago I would have saved $65 per way. Outrageous! This is not in the spirit of Aloha.”

For a traveler making a short island hop, the pet fee can now approach or exceed the passenger fare itself, depending on route, timing, and when the ticket was booked.

The meal that still isn’t.

The pet fee is one data point, and meals are another. Readers are describing gaps between what they expected from Hawaiian and what they received on flights, part of a longer pattern of small Hawaiian touches changing, being repriced, reduced, or still unclear during this week’s transition.

One reader booked a mainland flight under the Hawaiian name and reported the meal didn’t match what was promised.

“I just flew on a ‘Hawaiian’ flight from Hawaii to the mainland and having doubts about service changes, I checked 2 weeks, and then 72 hours in advance to pre-order a meal in premier class seating. It stated meals for that flight were complimentary but we got a bag of snack mix only. It is disappointing to experience these inconsistent changes among the Alaska takeover.”

Comments we have received at Beat of Hawaii say that complimentary meals are still being phased out. Readers are reporting, and employee accounts are pointing in the same direction. Food that once defined Hawaiian’s mainland and long-haul service is being reduced, reworked, or shifted. Alaska sent us a different message this week when we wrote about Hawaiian Air meal service:

“There are no changes to our complimentary meal service in our main cabins. During our PSS transition, several dual‑brand content updates were made to our webpages, and the link referenced in your post was unintentionally directing to an Alaska Airlines pre‑order page. We’re working to correct that now.

Two days later, however, there’s no sign on Hawaiian’s own food page of what complimentary meals in economy still exist. The page only refers to business class meals.

Advertisement

A reader says what BOH has been reporting.

One longtime BOH reader put it in harsher terms than we would have chosen. The loss did not begin on one date. It came through smaller moves, thinner service, and a pricing model that kept asking the question of whether the old Hawaiian Air experience could survive as a standalone airline model.

“I am having trouble understanding why people are mourning the loss of Hawaiian Airlines. It died years ago making incremental changes to their image and service. Flying Hawaiian airlines in their heyday was a special experience. But, like many other things in life right now, there’s little left of what we once knew.”

The old Hawaiian experience had been fading long before Alaska took control, even while many travelers still hoped the brand, the food, the service style, and the Hawaii-specific aspects they still remember fondly would remain intact. Alaska did not create the problems Hawaii travelers are feeling, but the acquisition is forcing the pricing and service reset into public view in a big way. The $35 pet fee moving to $100 is just another example.

The longhaul issues also come into focus.

One reader just described a much 10,000 mile trip on Hawaiian this week, where the food issue became harder to understand because of the route length and total travel time.

“I just got off a 9hr flight from Sydney Australia. We had a light meal on that flight…. a 3hr stop over and now am on a 9-10hr flight to JFK and now I have to purchase food and drinks. Absolutely pathetic for such a long flight.”

The undoubtedly soon to be resolved pattern has three points: an interisland fee increase, a premier-class meal gap, and a long-haul food complaint. Travelers are bringing old Hawaiian expectations into a new system where fees, meals, and what’s included are being reset.

We’ve experienced this ourselves in countless mileage upgrades from economy to business/first class on Hawaiian flights. These were offered at pricing too low to be sustainable, and compared with the rest of the industry. Those cheap mileage upgrades are now gone.

Advertisement

That kind of value built loyalty. But it also created an obvious question for any acquiring airline. Cheap fees, too generous upgrades, included meals, and other unique offerings helped Hawaiian feel different. They also left Hawaiian in terrible financial straits. And they leave Alaska with plenty of places where the larger airline can raise, remove, or reprice things.

Why the old Hawaiian couldn’t last.

For longtime Hawaiian travelers, this part is still uncomfortable. Many of the things people loved were real, but they were priced in a way that was hard to defend commercially once Hawaiian was no longer standing by itself. A bigger carrier absorbs a smaller one and necessarily looks for alignment. The cheaper system moves toward the more expensive one, and not the other way around.

Hawaiian’s “Aloha discount” is what the merger ended. The brand still appears, the Pualani paint job remains, and the word Hawaiian still carries deep meaning for many travelers. But the pricing system underneath is changing. That is how the pet fee increase connects to the meal complaints, the upgrade math, and more.

Hawaiian’s standalone pricing was not sustainable, and that reality is part of what made the acquisition necessary. Travelers can be angry about the loss and still see why the old setup wasn’t going to survive once a larger airline took over.

What to expect.

Don’t assume legacy Hawaiian terms still apply just because the flight is to, from, or within Hawaii. Check at booking, especially pets, bags, seats, food, and upgrade options. Check again too before departure, because readers are already finding gaps between what they expected, what they saw online, and what they report happened onboard.

Advertisement

For meals on mainland and long-haul flights, don’t rely on memory from past Hawaiian trips. Look closely at what is included, what must be pre-ordered, and what may now be sold onboard. If the site and the airline say one thing and the cabin delivers another, that’s the gap readers are now reporting.

Have you booked a Hawaii flight, interisland or mainland, since the merger took hold? What did you expect based on past Hawaiian service, and what did you actually get?

Get Breaking Hawaii Travel News

Advertisement





Source link

Hawaii

Volcano Watch: A hui hou to a giant of volcanology – West Hawaii Today

Published

on

Volcano Watch: A hui hou to a giant of volcanology – West Hawaii Today


In 2025, professor Bruce Houghton retired from the University of Hawaii at Manoa after 25 years as the Gordon A. Macdonald chair of volcanology. He was only the second person to hold the position in the past half century. With his retirement, let’s reflect on a career that helped shape how scientists understand explosive eruptions, volcanic hazards, and how communities live with active volcanoes.

Born and educated in New Zealand, Houghton established himself as a leading volcanologist at the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences New Zealand before joining the University of Hawaii in 2000. In Hawaii, he became not only a researcher and professor, but also the state volcanologist.

Much of Houghton’s scientific work focused on a deceptively simple question: what can volcanic deposits tell us about the processes that created them? His answer is that the details matter. The textures and densities of erupted volcanic particles, their organization in volcanic deposits, and how they travel in the atmosphere are not just measurements. They are clues to how magma rises, releases gas, interacts with the vent environment, and ultimately erupts.

Houghton also pioneered the application of high-speed, high-resolution imaging of active volcanoes to quantify eruption processes with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution. The impact of this work is reflected in a research record that includes more than $8 million in research funding since 2000, 291 journal publications, and nearly 20,000 references to his work.

Advertisement

His research challenged the common perception that basaltic volcanoes such as Kilauea and Mauna Loa are relatively simple compared with explosive volcanoes elsewhere in the world. Houghton showed that basaltic eruptions can display a remarkable range of explosive behavior, from exceptionally weak bubble bursts to powerful explosive activity. Basaltic eruptions can shift rapidly and reversibly through a spectrum of styles in a single event, from pulsating gas emission and episodic bursts to Hawaiian fountaining and more explosive eruptions. His work demonstrated that these changes often depend on shallow conduit processes and the vent environment, not just magma composition.

Houghton remained deeply connected to Hawaii’s volcanoes and communities. He worked closely with scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey Hawaiian Volcano Observatory and participated in the scientific response to both the 2008-2018 summit lava lake eruption and the 2018 lower East Rift Zone eruption of Kilauea.

His influence extended far beyond his own research through the generations of students he mentored — 17 doctoral students at the University of Hawaii, four in New Zealand, and two in Iceland — many of whom now work in universities, geological surveys, volcano observatories, and emergency management organizations around the world. During the 2018 eruption, many former and current University of Hawaii students who trained under Houghton played important roles in the response, demonstrating the lasting impact of his commitment to education, mentorship, and public service.

Houghton also refused to separate volcano science from the human world around it. He championed the idea that volcanic crises are not purely scientific events; decisions by residents, emergency managers, planners, and elected officials can strongly influence how communities experience volcanic hazards.

Throughout his career, he advocated for closer collaboration between volcanologists, social scientists, emergency managers, and educators. As science director of the National Disaster Preparedness Training Center at the University of Hawaii, he helped develop training programs connecting volcanic science with emergency preparedness and public safety.

Advertisement

The scientific community recognized Houghton’s contributions through numerous honors. In 2017, he received the Thorarinsson Medal, the highest award in international volcanology. He was also elected a fellow of the American Geophysical Union, the Geological Society of America, and the Royal Society of New Zealand.

In 2025, he was named the world’s second-highest-ranked physical volcanologist based on publications, citations, awards, and impact. He was president of the Geological Society of New Zealand (at age 28!) and deputy secretary-general of the International Association of Volcanology.

Although Houghton has retired from his roles in Hawaii and returned to New Zealand, his connections to volcanology here remain strong. His continuing collaborations, including studies of Kilauea’s ongoing episodic lava-fountaining eruption, ensure that his influence extends well beyond his years at the University of Hawaii. As volcanic activity continues in Hawaii, many of the scientists, ideas, and approaches that guide our understanding of eruptions will continue to reflect the lasting influence of Bruce Houghton.

Volcano Activity Updates

Kilauea has been erupting episodically within the summit caldera since Dec. 23, 2024. Its USGS Volcano Alert level is ADVISORY.

Advertisement

Episode 49 of summit lava fountaining happened for 7.5 hours on June 14. Summit region inflation since the end of episode 49 indicates that another fountaining episode is possible. Models currently indicate that episode 50 is most likely to occur between June 25-27. No unusual activity has been noted along Kilauea’s East Rift Zone or Southwest Rift Zone.

Mauna Loa is not erupting. Its USGS Volcano Alert Level is at NORMAL.

Eight earthquakes were reported felt in the Hawaiian Islands during the past week. Those above magnitude-3 are: a M3.6 earthquake 14 km (8 mi) S of Volcano at 7 km (4 mi) depth on June 24 at 8:29 a.m., a M3.2 earthquake 13 km (8 mi) SSE of Fern Forest at 6 km (3 mi) depth on June 23 at 9 a.m. HST, a M3.8 earthquake 21 km (13 mi) S of Honaunau-Napoopoo at 5 km (3 mi) depth on June 22 at 6:20 a.m., and a M3.1 earthquake 12 km (7 mi) SSE of Volcano at 6 km (3 mi) depth on June 20 at 7:55 p.m.

Please visit HVO’s website for past Volcano Watch articles, Kilauea and Mauna Loa updates, volcano photos, maps, recent earthquake information, and more. Email questions to askHVO@usgs.gov.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Hawaii

Famed Beach Is Disappearing. Should Hawaii Save It?

Published

on

Famed Beach Is Disappearing. Should Hawaii Save It?



Hawaii’s Kaanapali Beach is a famed tourist destination with a problem: The beach itself is gradually disappearing. Now a major debate is underway in Maui about how, or whether, to save it, reports SFGate. Photos from the late 1980s show a much wider beach, one that has narrowed to a sliver in some places. In short, it “still looks spectacular, but there is less of it,” is how the Beat of Hawaii puts it. And it’s not always so spectacular: “Exposed rock and drainage pipes are sometimes seen jutting out from the sand, while orange plastic fencing blocks access to erosion-impacted areas,” per SFGATE. A long-planned state-backed effort to pump offshore sand back onto the beach cleared environmental review, but the state’s land board pulled its funding in 2023 after residents blasted the price tag and raised alarms over marine impacts.


Now hotel and condo owners are reviving the project themselves. Through a new nonprofit, they’re pitching a “nature-based” plan to rebuild the beach to roughly its 1988 width, restore dunes, and plant natives, with applications headed to the state in coming months. Supporters frame it as a way to keep Kaanapali usable and accessible. Opponents like community advocate Kai Nishiki say the real fix is “managed retreat”—moving buildings inland and letting the shoreline migrate naturally. In her view, the real issue is that hotels and condos were built decades ago on dunes too close to the shorefront, without much thought to the long-term ecological impact.

Advertisement

“The problem is the structures, not the beach,” Nishiki tells SFGATE. “The beach is completely fine and healthy if we would just support the coastal ecosystem and support the landward migration of our beaches.” Beachfront owners disagree, and their renewed proposal will trigger another state review and public hearing. In the meantime, “Kaanapali remains a quintessentially beautiful and worthwhile destination, but visitors arriving this year should come with adjusted expectations,” per the Beat of Hawaii.





Source link

Continue Reading

Hawaii

University of Hawaii study finds San Andreas Fault stress at 1,000-year high | Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Published

on

University of Hawaii study finds San Andreas Fault stress at 1,000-year high | Honolulu Star-Advertiser


LOS ANGELES >> Stress on the San Andreas Fault system has reached a 1,000-year high, according to new research from the University of Hawaii.

Higher stress on a fault means the pressure that causes earthquakes is building.

“Our results show that stress levels on multiple fault segments are now at or above the highest values seen in the past millennium and that the region may be capable of a large through-going rupture involving both fault systems,” said lead author Liliane Burkhard, research affiliate in the Hawai‘i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology at the UH-Manoa School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology and a scientist at the University of Bern, Switzerland.

“We also found that Cajon Pass may act as an ‘earthquake gate:’ sometimes blocking large ruptures from crossing between the faults, and sometimes allowing them to pass through and involve both systems in a single event,” Burkhard said in a UH news release.

Advertisement

Multi-fault ruptures, where earthquakes continue from one fault to another, have occurred in multiple recent earthquakes, including the 2011 Tohoku, Japan, earthquake and became a part of the U.S. Geological Survey’s earthquake forecasting model in 2015.

This type of quake would be possible if the Cajon Pass, which is between the San Bernardino and San Gabriel mountains in Southern California, allows an earthquake to pass through it, meaning rather than affecting the area along one fault line, a quake could continue along a second fault and affect a larger area.

Advertisement

But Kate Scharer, a co-author of the study and a seismologist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Pasadena, said there’s no reason for California residents to be significantly more concerned than they were before hearing about the study.

While the stress has reached a milestone, the pressure was already high and the fault has been overdue for a large earthquake for some time, according to the study.

It has been over 100 years since a major tectonic rupture has affected the greater Los Angeles area, which means stress on the tectonic plates has been building, according to the study.

The 1857 Fort Tejon earthquake was the most recent “big one” to affect Southern California, while the San Jacinto Fault saw moderate earthquakes in 1918, 1968 and 1987, according to the study. A long period without seismic activity “raised concern that the next slip event in this region could be both large and complex,” the study says.

As more time passes, an earthquake becomes more likely because built-up energy needs to be released.

Advertisement

“We know for the southern San Andreas and the San Jacinto fault that they were just a little bit over the average (time between earthquakes) from looking at the geologic record,” Scharer said.

Those two faults are at highest risk for an earthquake because they are the fastest moving, she said.

The study looked at a geologic record of earthquake activity across the past 1,000 years, giving a new perspective on the total stress the San Andreas and San Jacinto fault systems are under. Tectonic plates are always moving and accumulating stress, save for those few seconds where an earthquake is happening.

When an earthquake releases built-up stress from hundreds to thousands of years of an interseismic period, energy is felt in the form of an earthquake, Scharer said.

Earthquake forecast models from the U.S. Geological Survey are “a reminder that damaging earthquakes are inevitable for California,” and the new study highlights just how much stress the fault systems are under as Californians prepare for the “big one,” according to the USGS.

Advertisement

The study’s importance is with the calculations of stress the researchers did. After a geologic record, which looks at prehistoric earthquakes and is assembled by digging trenches across faults and looking at layers that have been offset in the past, is created, the researchers were able to determine that the stress on the San Andreas fault is at a 1,000-year high.

The stress level could influence if the Cajon Pass facilitates an earthquake spreading from one fault to another, or if it stops an earthquake from doing so. When the stress levels on both faults are similar, both faults appear to rupture jointly, according to the study.

Using a physics-based computer model, the researchers found that that the stress that would normally be released in large earthquakes has continued to accumulate and is at unprecedented levels.

The Cajon Pass, the study suggests, could facilitate a joint rupture of both the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults simultaneously, which could be “significantly more damaging than a single-fault event,” affecting densely populated areas including Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside and the Coachella Valley, according to the UH news release.

“This is not a prediction of when an earthquake will happen,” Burkhard said. “However, studies like this are important contributions to national and global earthquake hazard research in that we are using rigorous, quantitative science to better understand the risk facing millions of people. What we can say is that the system is critically stressed, and that physics-based models like this one give us a clearer picture of the range of scenarios we should be prepared for. That information matters for hazard assessments, infrastructure planning, and emergency preparedness.”

Advertisement

Honolulu Star-Advertiser staff contributed to this report.




Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending