Connect with us

Hawaii

Candidate Q&A: Office Of Hawaiian Affairs At-Large Trustee — Peter Apo

Published

on

Candidate Q&A: Office Of Hawaiian Affairs At-Large Trustee — Peter Apo


“A pivotal part of any self-governance dialogue has to include reconciling the illegal overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom in 1893.”

Editor’s note: For Hawaii’s Nov. 8 General Election, Civil Beat asked candidates to answer some questions about where they stand on various issues and what their priorities will be if elected.

The following came from Peter Apo, candidate for Office of Hawaiian Affairs at-large trustee. The other candidates include Keli’i Akina, Lei Ahu Isa, Leona Kalima, Larry Kawaauhau, Brendon Kalei’aina Lee and Patty Kahanamoku-Teruya.

Go to Civil Beat’s Election Guide for general information, and check out other candidates on the General Election Ballot.

Advertisement

1. What do you see as the most pressing problem facing Native Hawaiians, and what will you do about it?

OHA has an obligation to address the underlying purpose of the constitutional amendment that created OHA to serve as a center of gravity in framing a statewide discussion among Hawaiians and their institutions on how to pursue “Ea,” defined here as self-determination.

For many Hawaiians, self-determination translates to self-governance. Unexplained is why OHA apparently abandoned “Ea” as a major policy objective sometime after 2020. This flies in the face of why OHA was created in the first place. A pivotal part of any self-governance dialogue has to include reconciling the illegal overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom in 1893 which led to the annexation of Hawaii to the United States.

In the decades-long struggle to establish itself as a unified native community, OHA’s plight begs extraordinary and visionary leadership. It should be noted that the shaping of a unified Hawaiian future cannot come at the expense of the rest of Hawaii society. Whatever the model, it must, in many respects, unify all Hawaii.

2. Should OHA be subject to oversight by the Hawaii State Ethics Commission?

Advertisement

Yes.

3. Do you support the construction of the TMT atop Mauna Kea? Why or why not? Could the new management structure help to resolve long-standing disputes?

Yes, I support the TMT, which is no longer proposed “atop Mauna Kea.” It was moved to a lower slope absent any sacred sites to avoid the cultural complaint that “any intrusion in the airspace above the summit is a cultural injury.”

There has been no validating body of authority to rule on such a cultural claim since the demise of the Hawaiian “priesthood” after the Battle of Kuamo’o in 1819. A second claim is any digging into the mountain is a cultural injury. How can that be when Hawaiians for centuries maintained a deep rock quarry to mine the best stone for tools and weapons?

Mauna Kea erupted into a network of issues. A complex of 13 telescopes by UH with no end in sight. Hawaiians are merging the TMT issue with the unreconciled overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom in 1893.

Advertisement

I support the TMT because studying the universe of stars is a sacred Hawaiian cultural practice supported by the chant history and archaeological research. Hawaiian star gazers sat on mountain tops for centuries observing star patterns. The new management structure has a great opportunity to create a body politic or system of reviewing claims and ruling on their legitimacy.

4. What role should the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands play in reducing homelessness?

The question puzzles me. The DHHL already has thousands on their waiting list, many of whom have died after years of waiting. It would seem insane to add the thousands of homeless to the list.

The Homestead Act, for Hawaiians only, framed by the Congress with the state assuming responsibility, would have to be amended to add a second beneficiary group of the homeless.

5. Why do you think Hawaiians are disproportionately represented in our prisons and jails? What can be done about it?

Advertisement

This is not an easy question to answer. One-hundred thirty years of transgenerational trauma. Since the overthrow of 1893, the Republic of Hawaii, and then annexation, Hawaiians have been deeply imbedded and struggling with the transgenerational trauma of losing their homelands, their culture, their religion, their language, their pride and dignity — and — two-thirds of their population to Western diseases for which they had no immunity. The entire society collapsed.

I would reframe your question to include the homelessness question, education, family income and so forth. I don’t have a lot of data but I think I’m safe in saying a significant percentage of the Hawaiian population dominates many of the negative quality of life statistics such as housing, income, education and so forth.

Perhaps the expanded question needs to be added to the first question about what is OHA’s most pressing problem?

6. What are your views regarding Hawaiian self-determination?

Answered in question No. 1.

Advertisement

7. Is OHA getting its fair share of ceded-land revenues from the state?

Yes and no. It’s up to each state department that manages trust lands to individually determine how to calculate the 20% of leased lands they manage which they must share with OHA.

The Department of Transportation apparently is the most honest model in its calculations. Most other departments do not fully comply with a full measure of the 20% mandate. I’m guessing that OHA is short-changed by about half of what it is entitled.

8. Is OHA fulfilling its mandate to serve the Hawaiian people?

OHA is struggling to fully understand its mandate.

Advertisement

9. Is Hawaii managing its tourism industry properly? What should be handled differently?

Hawaii’s tourism model is predatory and wallet-driven where visitors are kept separated from the visited (locals) by a wall of commerce centered around airlines, hotels, travel desks and offshore marketing.

A vast majority of tourists have their Hawaii vacation fully booked before they even leave their hometown. Growth is largely driven by global corporate brands and almost entirely built on a marketing framework.

County governments, particulary Oahu and Maui, seem to support the proliferation of hotel and visitor shopping center complexes with little thought or dialogue about carrying capacity of an island or any part of an island. The proliferation of the bed and breakfast business model made every residential community in Hawaii susceptible to strangers constantly moving in and out of neighborhoods.

While I sound anti-tourism, I am not. I support tourism as do many fellow Hawaiians. What we don’t support is the predatory business model. This model creates a bimodal distribution of wealth. Rich and poor, no in-between.

Advertisement

The industry was built on Hawaiians and their aloha. OHA needs to give serious thought to engaging the industry through investment and developing a Hawaiian-based tourism model with a cultural framework to guide the business model.

10. How would you make OHA more transparent and accessible to the public and the Hawaiian people?

OHA should consider shifting its governance model away from a trust fund framework to a legislative framework and revisit the Kanaioluwalu attempt to establish a Hawaiians-only registration process (no state money involved) which can function as a voter registration initiative.

A trust fund governance model and operating culture functions more like a parent-child relationship. The trustees are the parents and the children are defined as “beneficiaries.” The trust fund model separates the parents from the children by a well-defined line of demarcation where the children have little to say about how they are being governed even though trustees are directly elected and not appointed.

The idea of revamping the model to replicate a legislative framework would elevate the Hawaiian beneficiaries to the status of being considered “citizens” in a democratic framework. The legislative model affords the “citizens” a more direct say on how they are being governed.

Advertisement

This governance shift would dramatically implant a long-term objective for OHA to transition into a self-governing legislative body, perhaps increasing the number of trustees? This model would still operate under the legal umbrella of statehood, but create an expectation and sense of Hawaiian nationhood.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Hawaii

Volcano Watch: A hui hou to a giant of volcanology – West Hawaii Today

Published

on

Volcano Watch: A hui hou to a giant of volcanology – West Hawaii Today


In 2025, professor Bruce Houghton retired from the University of Hawaii at Manoa after 25 years as the Gordon A. Macdonald chair of volcanology. He was only the second person to hold the position in the past half century. With his retirement, let’s reflect on a career that helped shape how scientists understand explosive eruptions, volcanic hazards, and how communities live with active volcanoes.

Born and educated in New Zealand, Houghton established himself as a leading volcanologist at the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences New Zealand before joining the University of Hawaii in 2000. In Hawaii, he became not only a researcher and professor, but also the state volcanologist.

Much of Houghton’s scientific work focused on a deceptively simple question: what can volcanic deposits tell us about the processes that created them? His answer is that the details matter. The textures and densities of erupted volcanic particles, their organization in volcanic deposits, and how they travel in the atmosphere are not just measurements. They are clues to how magma rises, releases gas, interacts with the vent environment, and ultimately erupts.

Houghton also pioneered the application of high-speed, high-resolution imaging of active volcanoes to quantify eruption processes with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution. The impact of this work is reflected in a research record that includes more than $8 million in research funding since 2000, 291 journal publications, and nearly 20,000 references to his work.

Advertisement

His research challenged the common perception that basaltic volcanoes such as Kilauea and Mauna Loa are relatively simple compared with explosive volcanoes elsewhere in the world. Houghton showed that basaltic eruptions can display a remarkable range of explosive behavior, from exceptionally weak bubble bursts to powerful explosive activity. Basaltic eruptions can shift rapidly and reversibly through a spectrum of styles in a single event, from pulsating gas emission and episodic bursts to Hawaiian fountaining and more explosive eruptions. His work demonstrated that these changes often depend on shallow conduit processes and the vent environment, not just magma composition.

Houghton remained deeply connected to Hawaii’s volcanoes and communities. He worked closely with scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey Hawaiian Volcano Observatory and participated in the scientific response to both the 2008-2018 summit lava lake eruption and the 2018 lower East Rift Zone eruption of Kilauea.

His influence extended far beyond his own research through the generations of students he mentored — 17 doctoral students at the University of Hawaii, four in New Zealand, and two in Iceland — many of whom now work in universities, geological surveys, volcano observatories, and emergency management organizations around the world. During the 2018 eruption, many former and current University of Hawaii students who trained under Houghton played important roles in the response, demonstrating the lasting impact of his commitment to education, mentorship, and public service.

Houghton also refused to separate volcano science from the human world around it. He championed the idea that volcanic crises are not purely scientific events; decisions by residents, emergency managers, planners, and elected officials can strongly influence how communities experience volcanic hazards.

Throughout his career, he advocated for closer collaboration between volcanologists, social scientists, emergency managers, and educators. As science director of the National Disaster Preparedness Training Center at the University of Hawaii, he helped develop training programs connecting volcanic science with emergency preparedness and public safety.

Advertisement

The scientific community recognized Houghton’s contributions through numerous honors. In 2017, he received the Thorarinsson Medal, the highest award in international volcanology. He was also elected a fellow of the American Geophysical Union, the Geological Society of America, and the Royal Society of New Zealand.

In 2025, he was named the world’s second-highest-ranked physical volcanologist based on publications, citations, awards, and impact. He was president of the Geological Society of New Zealand (at age 28!) and deputy secretary-general of the International Association of Volcanology.

Although Houghton has retired from his roles in Hawaii and returned to New Zealand, his connections to volcanology here remain strong. His continuing collaborations, including studies of Kilauea’s ongoing episodic lava-fountaining eruption, ensure that his influence extends well beyond his years at the University of Hawaii. As volcanic activity continues in Hawaii, many of the scientists, ideas, and approaches that guide our understanding of eruptions will continue to reflect the lasting influence of Bruce Houghton.

Volcano Activity Updates

Kilauea has been erupting episodically within the summit caldera since Dec. 23, 2024. Its USGS Volcano Alert level is ADVISORY.

Advertisement

Episode 49 of summit lava fountaining happened for 7.5 hours on June 14. Summit region inflation since the end of episode 49 indicates that another fountaining episode is possible. Models currently indicate that episode 50 is most likely to occur between June 25-27. No unusual activity has been noted along Kilauea’s East Rift Zone or Southwest Rift Zone.

Mauna Loa is not erupting. Its USGS Volcano Alert Level is at NORMAL.

Eight earthquakes were reported felt in the Hawaiian Islands during the past week. Those above magnitude-3 are: a M3.6 earthquake 14 km (8 mi) S of Volcano at 7 km (4 mi) depth on June 24 at 8:29 a.m., a M3.2 earthquake 13 km (8 mi) SSE of Fern Forest at 6 km (3 mi) depth on June 23 at 9 a.m. HST, a M3.8 earthquake 21 km (13 mi) S of Honaunau-Napoopoo at 5 km (3 mi) depth on June 22 at 6:20 a.m., and a M3.1 earthquake 12 km (7 mi) SSE of Volcano at 6 km (3 mi) depth on June 20 at 7:55 p.m.

Please visit HVO’s website for past Volcano Watch articles, Kilauea and Mauna Loa updates, volcano photos, maps, recent earthquake information, and more. Email questions to askHVO@usgs.gov.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Hawaii

Famed Beach Is Disappearing. Should Hawaii Save It?

Published

on

Famed Beach Is Disappearing. Should Hawaii Save It?



Hawaii’s Kaanapali Beach is a famed tourist destination with a problem: The beach itself is gradually disappearing. Now a major debate is underway in Maui about how, or whether, to save it, reports SFGate. Photos from the late 1980s show a much wider beach, one that has narrowed to a sliver in some places. In short, it “still looks spectacular, but there is less of it,” is how the Beat of Hawaii puts it. And it’s not always so spectacular: “Exposed rock and drainage pipes are sometimes seen jutting out from the sand, while orange plastic fencing blocks access to erosion-impacted areas,” per SFGATE. A long-planned state-backed effort to pump offshore sand back onto the beach cleared environmental review, but the state’s land board pulled its funding in 2023 after residents blasted the price tag and raised alarms over marine impacts.


Now hotel and condo owners are reviving the project themselves. Through a new nonprofit, they’re pitching a “nature-based” plan to rebuild the beach to roughly its 1988 width, restore dunes, and plant natives, with applications headed to the state in coming months. Supporters frame it as a way to keep Kaanapali usable and accessible. Opponents like community advocate Kai Nishiki say the real fix is “managed retreat”—moving buildings inland and letting the shoreline migrate naturally. In her view, the real issue is that hotels and condos were built decades ago on dunes too close to the shorefront, without much thought to the long-term ecological impact.

Advertisement

“The problem is the structures, not the beach,” Nishiki tells SFGATE. “The beach is completely fine and healthy if we would just support the coastal ecosystem and support the landward migration of our beaches.” Beachfront owners disagree, and their renewed proposal will trigger another state review and public hearing. In the meantime, “Kaanapali remains a quintessentially beautiful and worthwhile destination, but visitors arriving this year should come with adjusted expectations,” per the Beat of Hawaii.





Source link

Continue Reading

Hawaii

University of Hawaii study finds San Andreas Fault stress at 1,000-year high | Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Published

on

University of Hawaii study finds San Andreas Fault stress at 1,000-year high | Honolulu Star-Advertiser


LOS ANGELES >> Stress on the San Andreas Fault system has reached a 1,000-year high, according to new research from the University of Hawaii.

Higher stress on a fault means the pressure that causes earthquakes is building.

“Our results show that stress levels on multiple fault segments are now at or above the highest values seen in the past millennium and that the region may be capable of a large through-going rupture involving both fault systems,” said lead author Liliane Burkhard, research affiliate in the Hawai‘i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology at the UH-Manoa School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology and a scientist at the University of Bern, Switzerland.

“We also found that Cajon Pass may act as an ‘earthquake gate:’ sometimes blocking large ruptures from crossing between the faults, and sometimes allowing them to pass through and involve both systems in a single event,” Burkhard said in a UH news release.

Advertisement

Multi-fault ruptures, where earthquakes continue from one fault to another, have occurred in multiple recent earthquakes, including the 2011 Tohoku, Japan, earthquake and became a part of the U.S. Geological Survey’s earthquake forecasting model in 2015.

This type of quake would be possible if the Cajon Pass, which is between the San Bernardino and San Gabriel mountains in Southern California, allows an earthquake to pass through it, meaning rather than affecting the area along one fault line, a quake could continue along a second fault and affect a larger area.

Advertisement

But Kate Scharer, a co-author of the study and a seismologist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Pasadena, said there’s no reason for California residents to be significantly more concerned than they were before hearing about the study.

While the stress has reached a milestone, the pressure was already high and the fault has been overdue for a large earthquake for some time, according to the study.

It has been over 100 years since a major tectonic rupture has affected the greater Los Angeles area, which means stress on the tectonic plates has been building, according to the study.

The 1857 Fort Tejon earthquake was the most recent “big one” to affect Southern California, while the San Jacinto Fault saw moderate earthquakes in 1918, 1968 and 1987, according to the study. A long period without seismic activity “raised concern that the next slip event in this region could be both large and complex,” the study says.

As more time passes, an earthquake becomes more likely because built-up energy needs to be released.

Advertisement

“We know for the southern San Andreas and the San Jacinto fault that they were just a little bit over the average (time between earthquakes) from looking at the geologic record,” Scharer said.

Those two faults are at highest risk for an earthquake because they are the fastest moving, she said.

The study looked at a geologic record of earthquake activity across the past 1,000 years, giving a new perspective on the total stress the San Andreas and San Jacinto fault systems are under. Tectonic plates are always moving and accumulating stress, save for those few seconds where an earthquake is happening.

When an earthquake releases built-up stress from hundreds to thousands of years of an interseismic period, energy is felt in the form of an earthquake, Scharer said.

Earthquake forecast models from the U.S. Geological Survey are “a reminder that damaging earthquakes are inevitable for California,” and the new study highlights just how much stress the fault systems are under as Californians prepare for the “big one,” according to the USGS.

Advertisement

The study’s importance is with the calculations of stress the researchers did. After a geologic record, which looks at prehistoric earthquakes and is assembled by digging trenches across faults and looking at layers that have been offset in the past, is created, the researchers were able to determine that the stress on the San Andreas fault is at a 1,000-year high.

The stress level could influence if the Cajon Pass facilitates an earthquake spreading from one fault to another, or if it stops an earthquake from doing so. When the stress levels on both faults are similar, both faults appear to rupture jointly, according to the study.

Using a physics-based computer model, the researchers found that that the stress that would normally be released in large earthquakes has continued to accumulate and is at unprecedented levels.

The Cajon Pass, the study suggests, could facilitate a joint rupture of both the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults simultaneously, which could be “significantly more damaging than a single-fault event,” affecting densely populated areas including Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside and the Coachella Valley, according to the UH news release.

“This is not a prediction of when an earthquake will happen,” Burkhard said. “However, studies like this are important contributions to national and global earthquake hazard research in that we are using rigorous, quantitative science to better understand the risk facing millions of people. What we can say is that the system is critically stressed, and that physics-based models like this one give us a clearer picture of the range of scenarios we should be prepared for. That information matters for hazard assessments, infrastructure planning, and emergency preparedness.”

Advertisement

Honolulu Star-Advertiser staff contributed to this report.




Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending