Connect with us

Denver, CO

Denver Broncos GM: ‘Door is open’ for Russell Wilson to return in 2024

Published

on

Denver Broncos GM: ‘Door is open’ for Russell Wilson to return in 2024


When Denver Broncos benched quarterback Russell Wilson for the final two games of the regular season, the prevailing opinion was a divorce during the offseason was the next step.

Not so fast, say the Broncos. Head coach Sean Payton, general manager George Paton and owner Greg Penner left the door open for Wilson to return in 2024 during their end-of-the-season media availability on Monday.

Payton said he met with Wilson on Monday and told reporters that a path does exist for the quarterback to return for a third season in Denver, but management is mulling over options and a final decision has not been made.

“Yeah, otherwise it would have been like ‘hey, goodbye,’” Payton told reporters. “… We’ll look at all the scenarios and try to do what’s best for the Broncos. .,. that final decision hasn’t been made.”

Advertisement

Payton said he told Wilson the decision-making process will not take very long.

“I told him I don’t think it’s going to be a long, drawn-out process,” Payton told reporters. “But it hasn’t been decided relative to what our plans are and that as soon as we know something that certainly he would be the first to know.”

Broncos’ general manager George Paton said the “door is open” to a reconciliation that would keep Wilson in Denver, adding, “I’ve talked to Russ. He’s open to returning.”

While the Broncos say they are considering keeping Wilson for the 2024 season, the consensus is they will release him at some point during the offseason.

Wilson’s $39 million salary in 2024 is guaranteed whether he plays for the Broncos or not. If they decide to release him, they would incur a record-breaking $85 million in dead cap charges over the next two years.

Advertisement

“Obviously, the financial part of it is a significant component in terms of how this works out in the future, but that’s not what will drive this decision,” Penner told reporters. “The decision will be driven on what’s in the best interests of this football team winning games.”

Some observers will question Penner’s credibility after what happened when Wilson was benched in favor of backup Jarrett Stidham in Week 17 of the regular season.

Wilson claimed the Broncos approached him midway through the season about adjusting his contract and threatened to bench him if he didn’t. He said the team came to him and broached the subject of renegotiating his contract, specifically the $37 million (his 2025 salary) he would be guaranteed to receive if he could not pass a physical on the fifth day of the new league year in March.

Wilson declined and started in the next in the next seven games before he was benched. Payton and Paton indicated there wasn’t a threat to bench Wilson and the benching was a “football decision.”

“During the bye week, I did reach out to Russ’ agent in a good faith and a creative attempt, to adjust his contract. We couldn’t get a deal done, and we moved on with our season,” Paton told reporters. “Fast-forward to Week 17, Sean makes a change at the quarterback position. This was a football decision made by Sean, what he thought was in the best interest of the team. This was completely independent of any conversations I had with the agent. Again, it was a football decision, made by Sean.

Advertisement

“We made a good faith attempt to adjust his contract; we handled ourselves professionally. I’ll just leave it at that.”

The fallout transformed Wilson, who wasn’t very popular in the locker room after his first season in Denver, into a sympathetic figure at the end of the second season, according to a report from espn.com’s Jeff Legwold.

There are some players who don’t believe a word coming out either Payton or Paton’s mouth and they expect Wilson will not be with the Broncos in 2024.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Denver, CO

2 career prosecutors square off in Denver District Attorney race

Published

on

2 career prosecutors square off in Denver District Attorney race


One of the primary elections that may not be on your radar, but maybe should be, is the race for Denver District Attorney.

Even if you live outside the city, Denver has a large representation in the state legislature, so statewide criminal justice policy is often in response to what’s happening in Denver.

Leora Joseph, who worked as a prosecutor in Massachusettes for 25 years, served as chief of staff for the Colorado Attorney General’s Office and led Colorado’s Behavioral Health Agency, is facing off against John Walsh, former assistant U.S. attorney in Los Angeles and former U.S. Attorney for the District of Colorado.

Beth McCann, Denver’s current DA, said last year that she won’t seek another term.

Advertisement

Both have racked up endorsements from big-name Democrats. Joseph and Walsh agree on a lot, but where they split is on the issue of so-called safe injection sites — locations where drug users have access to clean needles and health services.

Proponents say the sites help reduce the spread of infectious diseases, help wean people off addictions and often have staff or volunteers on site who can address overdoses. Opponents say they encourage illegal drug use and make it easier for people with addictions to access drugs.

Both candidates have generally expressed opposition to the sites, but Walsh said he’d be open to a pilot program with one site if approved by the city council.

Sara Donegan, the mother of Carter Higdon, and her husband, Jim Donegan, join prosecutors and District Attorney George Brauchler as they discuss the 18-year sentence for Almeda Sullivan who gave Carter Higdon the drugs that killed him.
Sara Donegan, center, and her husband Jim leave the Arapahoe County Courthouse with prosecuting attorney Leora Joseph on May 1, 2015.

Kathryn Scott Osler/The Denver Post via Getty Images

Advertisement


Political analysts Dick Wadhams, a Republican, and Mike Dino, a Democrat, joined CBS News Colorado political specialist Shaun Boyd to discuss the district attorney’s race in last week’s installment of Left, Right, Center.

Dino doesn’t think the race will hinge on the issue of safe injection sites but has more to do with representation.

“You’re right, I think they do agree on a lot of things or have a similar stance on issues,” he told Boyd. “I actually think we do have a woman DA, I do think Denver voters are bent on looking for getting more women into elected office in Denver and I think that would probably favor Leora Joseph.”

Wadhams says McCann’s endorsement of Walsh will likely weigh heavily in the race, but not as much as the candidates’ stances on issues such as the safe injection sites.

Metro Gang Task Force
John Walsh, U.S. Attorney for the District of Colorado, talks during a press conference on June 25, 2015.

Advertisement

Andy Cross/The Denver Post via Getty Images


“It wouldn’t be a very strong endorsement from my standpoint. But I think she’s held in high regard by Democrats in Denver. So I think probably does help,” he said. “But I’ll tell you what; I do agree with Joseph on the safe injection. I think she’s dead right about that. That would influence my vote if I were a Democrat and if I lived in Denver, which I don’t.”

As the lead prosecutor for whatever judicial district they serve, district attorneys are tasked with overseeing criminal prosecutions and are often blamed when crime goes up and credited with reductions in crime rates when they go down.

“We’ve seen the car thefts go down significantly in Denver, so that’s been good, and violent crime has also seen a reduction,” Dino said. “They haven’t really been running on, you know, being the toughest crimefighter. That’s not their style. And, again, safe injection sites. I do think, by and large, Denver voters aren’t against them.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Denver police take barricaded suspect into custody after report of gunfire downtown

Published

on

Denver police take barricaded suspect into custody after report of gunfire downtown


DENVER — Police in Denver took a barricaded suspect into custody after a report of shots fired downtown led to street closures and a shelter-in-place order Monday afternoon.

Police said the suspect was arrested after officers deployed less-lethal equipment that sounded like gunfire.

The incident began after police received reports of gunfire in the 1700 block of Curtis Street around 11 a.m.

Officers arriving on scene closed off a one-block radius and issued a shelter-in-place for people in the area while they investigated.

Advertisement

The suspect was apprehended about two hours later. It’s unclear what charges the suspect is facing.

There are no reports of injuries at this time.

Denver police said the shelter-in-place order and street closures will be lifted.


The Follow Up

What do you want Denver7 to follow up on? Is there a story, topic or issue you want us to revisit? Let us know with the contact form below.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Denver lacks comprehensive approach to cybersecurity risks, city auditor says

Published

on

Denver lacks comprehensive approach to cybersecurity risks, city auditor says


Denver lacks a comprehensive program to assess potentially disastrous cybersecurity risks, City Auditor Tim O’Brien said in a new report.

The city’s current approach can best be described as “informal,” O’Brien said, particularly when it comes to oversight of independent city agencies or cultural facilities — like the Denver Art Museum and Denver Zoo — that operate on subnetworks tied into the city’s broader system.

O’Brien cataloged his office’s findings in an audit report released Thursday.

The report is the product of a review of city data, processes and planning efforts over two years — from Jan. 1, 2022, through Dec. 31, 2023.

Advertisement

The audit team found that city staff did not consistently complete quarterly mandatory cybersecurity training. The city also lacks a specific training regime for employees responsible for citywide information technology risk management.

O’Brien is urging Denver Technology Services — the city department tasked with overseeing and managing all physical and virtual technology that touches the city’s network — to overhaul its approach and create clear guidelines for how every wing of city government handles data and technology risks.

“Through awareness of cybersecurity risks and clear expectation-setting for appropriate use of technology, the city can trust its employees to do their part in protecting data and information,” O’Brien said in a statement.

The auditor’s office recommended seven steps that Technology Services should take to remedy Denver’s shortcomings.

Those include:

Advertisement
  • Developing a citywide risk assessment process
  • Developing risk management training
  • Creating information-exchange agreements that would require independent agencies and facilities to share information about high-level technology risks with the department

Sumana Nallapati, Denver’s chief information officer, accepted all seven recommendations in a response letter sent to the auditor’s office on June 7. Mayor Mike Johnston hired her in September.

Many facets of what O’Brien recommends are already underway, Nallapati wrote in her response letter.

“(Technology Services) intends to create a robust and holistic organizational risk management structure identifying roles, responsibilities, documentation, risk assumption, identification of training for necessary roles and escalation processes associated to technical risk,” Nallapati wrote in part.

Her letter acknowledged the administration’s limited power to influence independent city agencies. While Technology Services accepted the recommendation to pursue information exchange agreements, Nallapati wrote that her department plans to reach out to independent agencies to see whether they would be willing to sign memorandums of understanding — or MOUs — focused on risk assessment.

“(Technology Services) cannot commit to a completion date for any such efforts, or that a successful MOU will ever be reached,” she wrote.

The audit report cites officials with Denver County Court as specifically asserting that they have the legal authority to operate independently as the judicial branch of city government. Court officials argue that they should not be required to formally communicate potential cyber security risks to Technology Services, the report says.

Advertisement

“But this assertion of independence with limited collaboration undermines the greater good of protecting the city from costly and damaging cyberattacks…” the audit team wrote.

Denver’s approach leaves the city more vulnerable to equipment failures, service disruptions and cyberattacks, the auditor’s office found. Those risk factors could cost Denver millions of dollars per day if any of them were ever to lead to full city network failure, according to the report.

In a statement to The Denver Post, Nallapati said her department is “committed to working across the city enterprise on continuous improvement of technology risk management strategies.”

Colorado has seen its share of high-profile cyberattacks in recent years.

In 2018, a ransomware attack temporarily knocked the Colorado Department of Transportation’s back-end operations offline. It cost the state between $1 million and $1.5 million just to bring the agency’s functionality back to 80% of normal in the months that followed.

Advertisement

Earlier this year, a cyberattack hobbled the Office of the Colorado State Public Defender and delayed hundreds of court hearings. The agency acknowledged that personal data including clients’ Social Security numbers may have been compromised during that episode.

Stay up-to-date with Colorado Politics by signing up for our weekly newsletter, The Spot.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending