Connect with us

Denver, CO

Best Divorce Lawyers Denver, CO Of 2024

Published

on

Best Divorce Lawyers Denver, CO Of 2024


Divorces are rarely simple, and you need to follow specific steps to finalize a dissolution of marriage in Colorado. Below we’ll go over the general requirements to process a divorce in Denver.

Colorado Divorce Requirements

In order to file for divorce in Colorado, at least one spouse must have been a state resident for 91 or more days prior to filing. This establishes that the courts has jurisdiction over your case. It is not necessary for both spouses to meet the residence requirement.

Types of Divorce and Separation in Colorado

Relationships can be unique, and Colorado offers a variety of legal divorce and separation paths depending on your situation. These include:

  • No-fault divorce. Under Colorado law, all divorces are no-fault. This means that there is no requirement for a spouse to prove wrongdoing by the other spouse in order for a divorce to proceed. The only requirement is a finding that the marriage is “irretrievably broken”.
  • Uncontested divorce. An uncontested divorce occurs when you and your spouse agree on all of the terms and conditions for your divorce, including division of property and child responsibilities.
  • Contested divorce. A contested divorce occurs when you and your spouse are unable to agree on some of the issues involved in the dissolution of your marriage. For example, you would need to go through a contested divorce process if you and your spouse cannot agree on how to divide your assets.
  • Annulment. An annulment declares that a valid marriage never existed. In Colorado, annulment is called a Declaration of Invalidity. An annulment can be granted for reasons including lack of proper consent to the marriage, fraud and duress.
  • Legal separation. If you are seeking to separate from your partner, but wish to remain married for personal or financial reasons then you may want to look into legal separation. A legal separation commits the parties to separating assets, dividing debts and establishing child custody rules. It does not end the marriage, but it can help formalize things when a couple wants to try living apart before divorcing or is opposed to divorce.

Child Custody, Support and Visitation in Colorado

Colorado divorce law does not automatically favor one parent over the other when determining child custody, support or visitation rights. Courts processing your divorce with kids will take into consideration the best interests of the child in each of these areas:

  • Child custody. Custody, called parental responsibility in Colorado, is divided into two categories: physical and legal. Physical custody defines when a parent will spend time with a child. Legal custody refers to the right to make significant decisions for the child, such as where they attend school or receive healthcare.
  • Child support. Both parents are expected to provide financial support for their child’s upbringing. When calculating child support, the court considers each parent’s income and may adjust to account for child care costs, medical expenses or physical care arrangements.
  • Visitation. Colorado courts will encourage parents to work out a parenting plan that meets the family’s needs and schedules. The court will only establish a plan for visitation rights if the parents cannot agree.

Property Division in Colorado

Marital property is divided in Colorado using the principle of equitable distribution. Colorado is not a community property state. The equitable distribution system instead seeks to divide property fairly, rather than equally. This takes into account factors such as the length of the marriage and how each spouse contributed. For example, a lower-earning spouse might be granted a greater percentage of marital property to help them maintain a similar standard of living after the divorce.

Colorado law only divides property that was obtained during the marriage. Any assets owned prior to marriage, or gifts received by only one spouse, are considered as separate property that is not subject to division.

Advertisement

Alimony, called spousal maintenance in Colorado, is also allowed in some divorce cases. These payments can be temporary or permanent and are meant to avoid unfair economic impacts for lower-earning or non-earning spouses. Spousal maintenance can be changed over time if either of your circumstances change.

Filing and Serving Your Divorce Papers

Filing for divorce in Colorado requires that you complete specific court documents, deliver those documents to your spouse, and then file the documents with the court. Start by completing a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage or Legal Separation and a Summons for Dissolution of Marriage or Legal Separation.

Once these documents are completed, you must serve them on your spouse. The documents can be served by any person over age 18 who is not a party to the action. Many people choose to hire a private process server who can ensure the documents are served properly and provide you with written proof of service. A divorce lawyer will assist you with completing and serving your divorce documents.

Finalizing Your Divorce

After you complete and file your divorce forms with the court and serve your spouse, the case will move forward to a trial or end with an agreement. From there, the divorce can only be finalized after a 91-day waiting period has expired. The waiting period applies even if you and your spouse agree on all terms for the divorce.

Advertisement



Source link

Denver, CO

‘The math just doesn’t work’: Little India to close in West Highland

Published

on

‘The math just doesn’t work’: Little India to close in West Highland


Little India will close its West Highland location in the coming months, owner Simeran Baidwan told BusinessDen.

It marks the end of a five-year run at the corner of 32nd Avenue and Lowell Street for the local Indian chain.

“We opened to preserve jobs because we didn’t have enough revenue,” he said of the pandemic days when restaurants were struggling.

The 3496 W. 32nd Ave. store helped keep dozens of chefs and servers in Baidwan’s “Little India family,” he said. Those workers will now have the opportunity to work at his other restaurants.

Advertisement

“Five years later, the question isn’t whether people love the food,” he continued. “It’s whether independent restaurants can survive the compounding pressures and expenses, especially in Denver.”

Baidwan, who opened the first and still-running Little India at Sixth and Grant alongside his parents in 1998, singled out rising minimum wage, insurance, delivery fees and credit card processing fees as factors contributing to the closure.

“I think what it is, is a Denver restaurant industry story, it’s not just our one restaurant story,” he said. “I think what’s happened, in this day and time, is that life has become really expensive. There’s no margins. The math just doesn’t work.”

Being in the Highlands was also a factor, Baidwan said. The desirable location comes with high rent as well as skyrocketing property taxes he’s been responsible for. Add in dwindling consumer spending and Baidwan said his hand was forced.

“Busy doesn’t always mean profitable,” he said. “A lot of people look through the window and assume the restaurant is good, and we have the several locations too. But it just isn’t like that anymore.”

Advertisement

Baidwan said there’s no plan to close his three other locations, in Cap Hill, Central Park and off Downing Street near the University of Denver. But that doesn’t mean he hasn’t been making tweaks.

At the original store off Sixth, he started operating 24/7 about eight months ago, something he’s thinking about for his other neighborhood restaurants. He’s also added entertainment, like jazz music and dancing, to help get more customers through the door.

Baidwan himself has also returned to the floor as a server — the first job he had at his parent’s store. But having the owner-operator model is difficult for his sprawling Little India empire since he can only be in so many places at once.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Denver, CO

How Denver’s Ballpark District now has ties to Chicago’s Wrigleyville

Published

on

How Denver’s Ballpark District now has ties to Chicago’s Wrigleyville


DENVER — A new Rockies season is on deck, with the team’s first game of the 2026 campaign set for Friday night in Miami. The home opener is next Friday at Coors Field.

It’s also a new season for the Ballpark neighborhood’s General Improvement District (GID) and its street ambassadors.

PREVIOUS COVERAGE:

Those ambassadors, dressed in maroon shirts and jackets, patrol the streets around Coors Field and the Ballpark neighborhood. They are tasked with helping with cleaning, maintenance, security, outreach to those experiencing homelessness, and general hospitality for neighbors and visitors.

Advertisement

How Denver’s Ballpark District now has ties to Chicago’s Wrigleyville

This week, Denver7 spoke with Kate McKenna, who stepped in as the GID’s executive director last summer. McKenna said while she works in the office, the district has six full-time ambassador employees through programming partner block by block. She said the team patrols the area year-round, but adds staffing for big events like St. Patrick’s Day and Rockies home games.

McKenna comes to Denver from a similar role in Wrigleyville, the iconic neighborhood outside Wrigley Field in Chicago. She said that serves as a source of inspiration for the future, but adds that Denver’s ballpark neighborhood has its own unique advantages.

Advertisement

“All of our businesses are independently-owned and operated,” McKenna told Denver7. “There is no chain, there is no commercial sort of large entity here in Ballpark that you’re going to see… To have a true small, hyper-local-owned economy is what really sets this district apart, both in Denver and then nationwide.”

Even after the Rockies set a franchise record with 119 losses in 2025, McKenna said the on-field product does not make the District’s job harder.

“I like to think win or lose, they’re the best neighbor you could possibly have, regardless of their season,” McKenna said. “They continually have one of the highest attendance rates for home games, as well as walk-up ticket sales.

McKenna said there continues to be good conversations between the district and local businesses. Property owners pay a fee based on property value that goes into the GID’s annual budget.

“Folks are coming out. Folks are patronizing local businesses. They’re bringing their families down here, and they’re enjoying their time, which is all you can really ask for in terms of community… Bringing people together is at the core of what we’re doing here.”

Advertisement

Denver7 | Your Voice: Get in touch with Ryan Fish

Denver7’s Ryan Fish covers stories that have an impact in all of Colorado’s communities, but specializes in covering artificial intelligence, technology, aviation and space. If you’d like to get in touch with Ryan, fill out the form below to send him an email.





Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

State says video shows Denver assisted living center took 13 minutes to find, begin CPR on resident; “He didn’t have a chance”

Published

on

State says video shows Denver assisted living center took 13 minutes to find, begin CPR on resident; “He didn’t have a chance”


A state investigation has found that a Denver assisted living facility took 13 minutes to locate a resident who collapsed and begin CPR — failures regulators say placed all residents in “immediate jeopardy.”

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment concluded that The Argyle assisted living facility violated multiple rules in connection with the January death of 73-year-old Robert Dutkevitch. The violations were classified at the CDPHE’s most serious level, indicating 125 Argyle residents were at immediate risk of harm, according to the agency.

Robert Dutkevitch

Advertisement

CBS


The findings stem in part from the facility’s own surveillance video system, which captured the events leading up to Dutkevitch’s death. CBS Colorado obtained copies of the same videos reviewed by state investigators.

According to police reports, video footage, interviews and the state investigation, Dutkevitch — who used a wheelchair — went outside to a designated smoking patio at about 8:30 p.m. on Jan. 6. Roughly 2 minutes later, the video shows him slumping forward and falling from his wheelchair onto the ground. He remained there for about 8 minutes before another resident noticed him and alerted staff. Surveillance footage shows several staff members arriving at the patio and determining Dutkevitch had no pulse. However, investigators say staff did not begin CPR immediately, waiting approximately five additional minutes before attempting lifesaving measures.

In total, 13 minutes passed from the time Dutkevitch collapsed to the start of CPR.

State investigators cited the delay as a critical deficiency, noting that trained staff are required to provide CPR promptly. According to Denver police call logs obtained by CBS Colorado, one staff member told a 911 operator she did not want to perform chest compressions because she had the flu.

Advertisement

After CPR was finally initiated, Denver Fire personnel arrived and continued lifesaving efforts for approximately 30 minutes before Dutkevitch was pronounced dead.

emergency.jpg

CDPHE


The death was later classified as natural, with acute coronary syndrome and atherosclerosis listed as the immediate causes, according to the death certificate.

Colorado investigators finds monitoring problems 

The state investigation also found problems with how the facility monitored its outdoor smoking area.

Advertisement

A surveillance camera was positioned on the patio, but The Argyle said the video feed was not continuously monitored. State regulations require that designated smoking areas “shall be monitored whenever residents are present.”

According to the report, the facility administrator acknowledged there was “no official process” in place to monitor the area. The administrator told investigators he was unaware of the regulation and said the facility did not have enough staff to continuously monitor the patio.

The department concluded the facility failed to meet CPR requirements because it “failed to require all staff certified in CPR to provide CPR services promptly.”

Investigators found gaps in training and preparedness. One staff member was described in the CDPHE report as “unaware of how to respond,” while others said they had not been trained on what to do if a resident becomes unresponsive.

“I did not respond very well, I’m sorry,” one staff member told investigators.

Advertisement

CPR delay leaves widow devastated

Dutkevitch’s widow, Sharon Dutkevitch, said the delay in care has left her devastated.

“My heart aches. I cry every night,” she said. “Every second that went by, he didn’t have a chance that way. I wish I had been there to help him.”

After watching the surveillance video, she questioned why staff did not act immediately.

“I don’t understand why caregivers stand around and do not give him CPR,” she said. “Those people are standing around him doing nothing to help him. That’s what really hurts.”

sharon-dutkevitch.jpg

Sharon Dutkevitch

Advertisement

CBS


 She believes her husband might have survived if CPR had been started sooner.

“You’re losing brain cells every second that goes by without CPR,” she said.

Dutkevitch had been a resident at The Argyle since 2022 and, according to his wife, generally liked living there. He had several health conditions, including high blood pressure and cognitive decline.

He also had written directives on file stating that he wanted life-saving measures, including CPR, performed in an emergency.

Advertisement

Anita Springsteen, an attorney representing Sharon Dutkevitch, said the response by staff fell far short of expectations.

“They took so long to respond and didn’t seem to be aware there was an emergency going on,” Springsteen said. “Once they were aware, they lingered around and didn’t do anything, didn’t immediately give CPR, didn’t do the things you would think a facility like that — with trained staff — would do on an immediate basis.”

interview.jpg

CBS Colorado’s Brian Maass interviews Anita Springsteen, an attorney who represents Sharon Dutkevitch.

CBS


Springsteen said a lawsuit is likely.

Advertisement

“It seems like there was a window in there where something could have been done — he could have been saved,” she said.

The state issued an immediate $2,500 fine and ordered The Argyle to correct multiple deficiencies related to the case.

A spokesperson for the facility said those issues were addressed by Feb. 12 and that the “immediate jeopardy” designation was lifted that day.

The Argyle challenges some of state report’s conclusions

Since Dutkevitch’s death, the facility says it is no longer accepting residents who smoke and now closes its outdoor smoking patio each night at 10 p.m.

The Argyle administrators declined an on-camera interview request from CBS Colorado. In a written statement, administrators said they take resident safety and regulatory compliance “extremely seriously” and have implemented additional training, communication protocols, and oversight measures.

Advertisement

The facility said some conclusions in the state report are being challenged.

Argyle officials maintained that staff members who were CPR-certified responded promptly once they became aware of Dutkevitch’s condition, contacted emergency services immediately, and followed instructions from 911 operators.

The Argyle also defended its training practices, saying it maintains comprehensive onboarding and ongoing instruction in CPR certification and emergency response procedures, and is reinforcing those processes.

Regarding the “immediate jeopardy” designation, the facility said it does not reflect the overall safety and care provided and noted it was lifted shortly after the state required the addition of an “Unresponsive Resident Policy.”

argyle.jpg

Advertisement

CBS


The facility also disputed findings related to monitoring the smoking area, stating that regulators agreed a camera system could be sufficient for monitoring during discussions about the rule.

A spokesperson for the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment said the investigation is continuing.

“The investigation of Argyle Living Residence is still ongoing,” said spokesperson Alexandrea Kallin. “Until it’s complete, we cannot provide any additional information. Investigations vary in their complexity and can take some time to complete.”

Sharon Dutkevitch said she chose to speak publicly in hopes of preventing similar incidents.

Advertisement

She said she wants accountability and change — “so no one else goes through this.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending