Connect with us

Colorado

Colorado secretary of state urges swift U.S. Supreme Court action in Trump ballot case filing – Colorado Newsline

Published

on

Colorado secretary of state urges swift U.S. Supreme Court action in Trump ballot case filing – Colorado Newsline


Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold on Tuesday became the latest party in a landmark case seeking to block former President Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 ballot to formally request a prompt review by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Griswold’s brief, submitted on her behalf by the office of Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, asks the nation’s highest court to grant a so-called writ of certiorari, a formal order issued by the Supreme Court when it agrees to take up a case.

In a historic ruling issued Dec. 19, the Colorado Supreme Court ordered Griswold not to place Trump on the ballot, siding with plaintiffs who argued that he is ineligible for the office of president under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Section 3 of the Amendment, ratified in the wake of the Civil War, prohibits a person who “engaged in insurrection” after taking an oath to support the Constitution from holding office again.

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

“I urge the Supreme Court to act swiftly in providing a resolution to this case,” Griswold, a Democrat, wrote in an X post Wednesday.

Advertisement

Though an outspoken critic of Trump, Griswold was named as the defendant in the lawsuit, which was filed in September by six Colorado Republican and unaffiliated voters, backed by the nonprofit Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. The plaintiffs argued that it would be a “wrongful act” for Griswold to certify Trump’s candidacy in the state’s 2024 Republican presidential primary, since Colorado’s election code requires officials to ensure that only eligible candidates appear on the ballot.

Griswold declined throughout court proceedings late last year to take a formal position on the ballot issue, inviting the courts to weigh in first. But she has since said the Colorado Supreme Court “got it right” in ruling that Trump is disqualified.

The court stayed its decision pending a likely U.S. Supreme Court appeal, meaning that Trump’s name will still appear on GOP primary ballots if the court agrees to review the case before the ballot certification deadline on Friday, Griswold has said.

The Colorado Republican Party, granted so-called intervenor status during state court proceedings, on Dec. 28 became the first to appeal the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. A separate appeal by Trump’s attorneys is widely expected but had not yet been filed as of midday Wednesday, according to the U.S. Supreme Court’s docket.

In their filing, attorneys for Griswold echoed the position taken by the plaintiffs in a brief filed earlier Tuesday, asking the court to weigh in on two key questions raised by the case — whether Section 3 of the 14th Amendment applies to the president, and whether it can be enforced by a state without congressional action — but decline to review a third question presented by the Colorado Republican Party, asking whether denying it the ability to nominate “the candidate of its choice” in an election violates the First Amendment.

Advertisement

Citing previous Supreme Court rulings, Griswold’s brief called the Colorado GOP’s argument “squarely contrary to this Court’s precedent.”

“To the extent the Court is inclined to revisit any of that precedent, this case presents a poor vehicle for doing so,” Griswold’s attorneys wrote.

“This case presents several novel and weighty questions of constitutional interpretation that merit this Court’s attention,” the brief continued. “Whether the Republican Party has a constitutional right to place an ineligible candidate on Colorado’s ballot is not one of them.”



Source link

Advertisement

Colorado

Eagle Rock Ranch

Published

on

Eagle Rock Ranch


When Dave and Jean Gottenborg met as teenagers wrangling horses in Estes Park, they dreamed of one day running a ranch together. That dream fell by the wayside for decades until 2012, when the couple purchased Eagle Rock Ranch in the Tarryall Valley.

Talking about the Gottenborg’s ranch means deliberately avoiding words like “owners” and “ownership.” The couple “manage” their land — their preferred term — through the conservationist lens of thinkers like Wendell Berry and Aldo Leopold. Visitors are welcome on the land (see some basic guidelines here), and they sell their beef by the cut, box and share at their family-owned mercantile in Fairplay.



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Where to watch Colorado Rockies vs Los Angeles Angels: TV channel, start time, streaming for Jun. 02

Published

on

Where to watch Colorado Rockies vs Los Angeles Angels: TV channel, start time, streaming for Jun. 02


play

The 2026 MLB season has surpassed the quarter mark, and after each team’s first 40 games, there’s plenty of reasons to tune in all summer long.

Chicago White Sox slugger Munetaka Murakami has already proven doubters wrong by launching 17 home runs, Pittsburgh’s Paul Skenes consistently looks like the best version of himself on the mound and Milwaukee ace Jacob Misiorowski is throwing harder than any starter in the majors.

Advertisement

The MLB action continues on Tuesday as the Colorado Rockies visit the Los Angeles Angels.

Here’s everything you need to know to tune in for the first pitch.

See USA TODAY’s sortable MLB schedule to filter by team or division.

What time is Colorado Rockies vs Los Angeles Angels?

First pitch between the Los Angeles Angels and Colorado Rockies is scheduled for 9:38 p.m. (ET) on Tuesday, Jun. 02.

How to watch Colorado Rockies vs Los Angeles Angels on Tuesday

All times Eastern and accurate as of Tuesday, June 2, 2026, at 6:33 a.m.

Advertisement

Watch MLB all season long with Fubo

MLB regional blackout restrictions apply

MLB scores, results

MLB scores for Jun. 02 games are available on usatoday.com . Here’s how to access today’s results:

See scores, results for all of today’s games.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Colorado

Major Northern Colorado cities warn lack of power generation could temporarily stunt region’s projected growth

Published

on

Major Northern Colorado cities warn lack of power generation could temporarily stunt region’s projected growth


Rapid growth across parts of Northern Colorado is colliding with a growing challenge — being able to access enough electricity to support new homes and businesses.

Local leaders in Greeley say demand for power has increased significantly in recent decades. This is as technology becomes more integrated into everyday life, and it creates pressure on an electric grid that is struggling to keep pace with population growth and development.

“We are growing pretty rapidly,” said Don Threewitt, interim community and economic developer for the city of Greeley.

Threewitt said the state’s electric demand has shifted dramatically in the last decade, as residents rely more heavily on technology. From smartphones and electric vehicles to increasingly connected homes and workplaces, the demand for electricity is rising faster than Colorado’s ability to generate and deliver power.

Advertisement

“I don’t think the average Coloradan realizes how much more power is needed to accommodate the lifestyle, the work life and sort of how we live today,” Threewitt told CBS Colorado.

CBS


Greeley officials say the city has many of the ingredients needed to continue attracting growth, including available land, water resources and a stable workforce. However, Threewitt said access to electricity has emerged as one of the biggest obstacles to accommodating more growth.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Republican U.S. Rep. Gabe Evans said the issue extends beyond Greeley and is affecting communities throughout Colorado.

“We don’t have enough power,” Evans told CBS Colorado.

Evans said power limitations are already influencing economic development decisions.

“I know of hundreds of jobs that Colorado has lost because a company that wanted to locate here couldn’t get the power,” Evans said.

Without additional electrical capacity, Evans warned that growth could slow substantially.

Advertisement

“(Without more power export) we can’t attract businesses; we can’t build new houses,” Evans said. “Really, growth comes to a screeching halt.”

Evans said he is working on legislation aimed at streamlining the process of generating and distributing power throughout the state, primarily through easing the process to receiving permits. Still, local leaders say addressing the challenge will require coordination among local governments, utilities, state officials and federal policymakers.

“It takes time, and it takes deliberate effort on a large group of people,” Threewitt said. “Let’s identify the need, provide the resources, and then get out of the way so it can get done.”

The challenge is particularly pressing in Greeley, where city officials say the population is growing between 1.5% and 3% annually. At the same time, planning and constructing the power lines needed to expand the electric grid can take between five and eight years.

Even those infrastructure projects depend on utilities having enough power available to distribute to customers.

Advertisement

In a statement, a spokesperson for Xcel Energy said the company is investing heavily to meet Colorado’s growing energy needs. The utility plans to invest $17.6 billion in Colorado through 2030 to modernize and expand the electric grid and add new energy resources.

The spokesperson said Xcel’s “Colorado Distribution System Plan” includes new substations, transformers and feeder projects in the Greeley area. The company is also adding 400 megawatts of dispatchable power at Fort St. Vrain and another 100 megawatts at Fort Lupton, both of which serve Greeley and Weld County.

According to the statement, Xcel has identified resource adequacy as a growing concern for several years and has proposed multiple solutions, including a near-term procurement plan designed to add 3,800 megawatts of new generation capacity. The company said the plan could save customers nearly $3 billion by utilizing expiring tax credits.

Xcel also plans to file additional proposals addressing both short-term and long-term power needs. The utility company said it remains committed to working with regulators, local communities and policymakers to ensure reliable electric service while supporting economic growth across Colorado.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending