Your guide to Proposition 31 on the 2022 California midterm ballot

Whereas contemplating the ban, state legislators cited a 2018 Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention examine that discovered that 67% of highschool college students and 49% of center college college students who used tobacco merchandise within the prior 30 days reported utilizing a flavored tobacco product throughout that point.

Lindsey Freitas-Norman, advocacy director for the Marketing campaign for Tobacco Free Children, stated passing Proposition 31 is crucial to stopping the sale of merchandise she describes because the trade’s manner “to hook a brand new technology.”

“These youth are drawn in by the flavors however hooked by the nicotine,” Freitas-Norman stated. “This coverage is admittedly about defending our youngsters from an trade that sees them as greenback indicators and nothing extra.”

The “Sure on 31” marketing campaign is supported by Newsom, the California Democratic Occasion, the California Lecturers Assn. and a slew of organizations representing medical doctors, dentists, nurses and public well being professionals.

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and Philip Morris USA are supporting the marketing campaign towards Proposition 31, and the California Republican Occasion endorsed a “no” vote towards the initiative.

Beth Miller, a spokesperson for the “no” marketing campaign, referred to as Proposition 31 a “sweeping ban” on merchandise which might be already closely regulated.

“What Proposition 31 would do is take this grownup alternative of what adults wish to select away from them,” Miller stated. “We consider that prohibition doesn’t work.”