California
Will California meet the moment on homelessness?
In abstract
Politicians have made guarantees and voters have acted, however is California officialdom actually prepared and capable of confront the state’s worst-in-the-nation homelessness disaster?
Get California information in your inbox, totally free.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom is fond — maybe overly so — of the phrase “meet the second.”
It interprets roughly into willingness to deal with urgent points and, in fact, he makes use of it largely to explain his personal resolve.
So, one would possibly ask, are Newsom, the Legislature, and metropolis and county officers actually prepared to confront California’s worst-in-the-nation epidemic of homelessness that provides its cities a 3rd world atmosphere?
Whether or not or not Newsom intends to pursue his political profession past the state, he is aware of that its squalid city pictures undermine his oft-voiced characterization of California as a shining mannequin of progressive governance.
The tough actuality is that regardless of spending billions of federal, state and native taxpayers’ {dollars} on applications aimed toward sheltering the unsheltered and ameliorating underlying elements, the variety of homeless folks on the streets, sidewalks and parks of California cities continues to climb and at a minimal approaches 200,000.
Repeatedly, California voters disgusted by the filth and/or moved by compassion inform pollsters that homelessness is a disaster that politicians should tackle. Los Angeles voters simply elected a brand new mayor, Karen Bass, on her promise to wash up the town and handed a brand new tax on actual property transactions that may elevate a whole lot of tens of millions of {dollars} to make it occur. A newly re-elected Newsom says it will likely be the very best precedence of his second time period.
The specifics of what they or different political figures would possibly do are murky, since there’s little, if any, consensus on what approaches could be best, and the strains of duty among the many numerous ranges of presidency are equally blurry. One apparent drawback is that whereas homelessness is most evident inside cities, well being and welfare applications are largely administered by counties, utilizing state and federal funds.
That battle could be very evident in Sacramento, the state capital, the place metropolis and county officers have sparred continuously over who’s accountable. Sacramento metropolis voters simply handed a brand new legislation banning homeless encampments on public property — however provided that the town and county can agree on new shelters or campgrounds.
It’s one in all a slew of recent legal guidelines handed by both voters or native officers to limit the place the homeless can camp. Newsom, in the meantime, is clamping down on encampments alongside state-owned roadways.
Intergovernmental wrangling surfaced publicly simply earlier than the election when Newsom rejected all plans to scale back homelessness submitted by native officers who had been attempting to qualify for a brand new pot of state cash.
He complained that the plans would search solely a 2% decline in homelessness, including, “Everybody has to do higher — cities , counties and the state included. We’re all on this collectively.”
He was much more pointed in a Los Angeles Instances interview, saying, “Ship rattling outcomes. … It’s a disaster. Act prefer it. Everyone step up. I’m not the mayor. You need me to come back in? I’ll do the job. I’ll do it. Fortunately. I’ve been going into cities cleansing up encampments. Has anybody gotten the trace? If somebody did that to me after I was mayor, I’d be like, ‘OK, I acquired it.’”
Later, he met with a delegation of native officers they usually emerged with pledges to change into extra aggressive in coping with the problem. Nevertheless, native officers are nonetheless reluctant to make commitments for applications with out assurances of long-term monetary help.
California officialdom could possibly be poised for a giant campaign on homelessness. However will it meet the second, or proceed to throw cash on the drawback — a bit of right here, a bit of there — with out coordinated and sustained motion whereas the squalor, the human distress and the political finger-pointing proceed?