Connect with us

California

The top 10 California colleges where students earn back their tuition within a year – and number one makes complete sense

Published

on

The top 10 California colleges where students earn back their tuition within a year – and number one makes complete sense


College costs a pretty penny these days, especially in California.

Instead of spending a King’s Ransom, prospective students should take a look at this list of colleges, carefully tabulated by a research conducted by a consulting agency that’s focused on college access, value and economic mobility.

Cost-effective, each of these Golden State-based colleges also offer a payoff within five months of graduation – providing not only a college degree, but an important economic foothold.

The analysis, from the HEA Group and the College Futures Foundation, essentially shows where a college degree pays off – quickly – in California. 

Advertisement

A new analysis from the HEA Group and the College Futures Foundation shows where a college degree pays off – quickly – in California. Each of the school provide a payoff within six months of students’ receiving their degree. Pictured, Stanford University in Stanford, California

1. Stanford

Stanford stole the show in terms of HEA and College Futures’ study, taking home the top spot in dominant fashion.

That’s because it basically takes no time at all to recoup your college losses after walking, according to the nonprofit and research firm.

That’s largely due to the wage premium given to Stanford grads, who on average earn about $74,000 more a year than high school grads, because of the school’s prestige.  

Advertisement

That’s around $110,000 annually, compared with $36,000 for people with only high school degrees.

Stanford stole the show in HEA and College Futures' study, taking home the top spot in terms of return on investment in dominant fashion

Stanford stole the show in HEA and College Futures’ study, taking home the top spot in terms of return on investment in dominant fashion

While pricey at $57,693 a year, the study found an undergrad degree at Stanford is unarguably useful. However, like other top-rated colleges, it’s tough to get into, with a slim acceptance rate of 3.91 percent. 

That comes in stark detriment to low- and moderate-income students, the study found – important due to the fact that both sample-sets were the focus of the firm’s analysis.

HEA Group founder Michael Itzkowitz cited state schools as a better alternative in most cases, and told CBS MoneyWatch how a school like Stanford may not be for everyone.

Advertisement

‘There are many state schools that are often the best option for students to consider,’ HEA Group founder Michael Itzkowitz told CBS MoneyWatch this week of how a school like Stanford may not be as worth it for families making under $75,000.

He added, ‘[State school] oftentimes include in-state tuition, which is much less expensive than out-of-state tuition, and they can offer generous scholarships and provide strong economic opportunities.’

2. University of California, San Bernardino

Speaking of state schools, the runner-up on HEA and College Futures’ was none other than University of California, San Bernardino, which is nothing less than a bargain.

It costs $7,679 for students in-state and $14,311 for out-of-state attendees, and is on average about $4,000 cheaper than other Cali state schools. For students coming from out of state, the tuition is also cheaper than average by a whopping $13,000. 

Advertisement

Neither include room and board, which will cost an additional $13,500 a year.

The runner-up on HEA and College Futures' list was none other than University of California, San Bernardino, which is truly a bargain

The runner-up on HEA and College Futures’ list was none other than University of California, San Bernardino, which is truly a bargain

While not as selective as some of the entries on this list, University of California, San Bernardino is still a respected school, boasting an abundance of programs and departments. 

More importantly, it will only take the average in-state student about two months to make their tuition back after graduating – with the average earnings for a post-grad pegged at around $27,644 higher than those with only a high school diploma.

That’s about $60,000 – a respectable take-home salary for your first year of work. 

3. California State University, Los Angeles

Advertisement

A slightly more expensive state school, California State University, Los Angeles grads will make their tuition back in essentially the same as UC San Bernardino, give or take a few days.

Better known as UCLA, the school sports a year-to-recoup cost rate of 0.2, according to the just-released study – meaning it will take less than two-and-half months, on average, for grads to make their money back.

The school costs $11,564 to attend for attendees from California – roughly the average for most California schools – and a slightly more pronounced $18,685 for those hailing from out of state – almost $10,000 below the national average cost for a year of college.

A slightly more expensive state school, California State University, Los Angeles grads will make their tuition back in essentially the same as UC San Bernardino, give or take a few days

A slightly more expensive state school, California State University, Los Angeles grads will make their tuition back in essentially the same as UC San Bernardino, give or take a few days

The study found that grads on average make just a few dollars less than their California State counterparts north in San Bernardino, raking in $27,620 more a year than high school grads with their first post-college job.

That would cover the cost of tuition in no time at all, the study’s authors said – leaving the rest of the year’s salary for other expenses.

Advertisement

4. Pitzer College

Fourth on HEA and College Futures’ college list was none other than Pitzer College, a private liberal arts college set in a scenic suburb of Los Angeles.

Located just 30 miles away in the idyllic foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains, the college costs around $64,000 to attend – a sum that’s the same for both in- and out-of-state students.

That’s not including room and board, making it one of the more pricey entries on this list.

Fourth on HEA and College Futures' college list was none other than Pitzer College, a private liberal arts college set in a scenic suburb of Los Angeles

Fourth on HEA and College Futures’ college list was none other than Pitzer College, a private liberal arts college set in a scenic suburb of Los Angeles

However it boasts the third-best return on investment among California schools, the research found, thanks to students making well more than their peers after graduation.

Advertisement

That’s thanks to an average salary of around $64,000 more than high school grad after graduation – and a slew of grants and scholarships offered to low- and medium-income students, at a school known for its social justice culture and experimental approach.

One of the Claremont Colleges, the college also has a curricular emphasis on behavioral sciences, international programs and media studies.

5. California State University, Fullerton

Another state school located in LA, California State University, Fullerton offers graduates a complete return on their tuition investment within four months, according to the study.

That’s thanks in large part to in-state tuition only costing $5,742 – a third of the price of its room and board, which will run you about $16,700 per year.

Advertisement

For Los Angeles, that’s not bad, and tuition for those coming from out-of-state is only $17,622 as well.

Another state school located in LA, California State University, Fullerton offers graduates a complete return on their tuition investment within four months, according to the study

Another state school located in LA, California State University, Fullerton offers graduates a complete return on their tuition investment within four months, according to the study

Moreover, grads immediately command a salary of nearly $32,000 higher than their high school graduate counterparts – making paying off any loans a walk in the park.

It’s also a top source of bachelor’s and master’s degrees for Hispanics in the state of California, and was awarded the Institutional Equity Award in 2022, for recruiting and retaining underrepresented racial groups into the historical discipline.

And academically, it’s no slouch either, with a selective 67 percent acceptance rate and plethora of programs.

6. Pomona College

Advertisement

Like Pitzer, Pomona college is a private liberal arts school in Claremont, a half hour’s drive from LA.

The annual tuition to attend is $58,818 – a sum that, while expensive, is a small price to pay considering grads on average make that back in four months.

The school is highly respected, with a low 7 percent acceptance rate, and offers a slew of scholarships and opportunities for medium- and low-income students from families.

Like Pitzer, Pomona college is a private liberal arts school in Claremont, a half hour's drive from LA. The annual tuition to attend is $58,818 - a sum that, while expensive, is a small price to pay considering grads on average make that back in four months

Like Pitzer, Pomona college is a private liberal arts school in Claremont, a half hour’s drive from LA. The annual tuition to attend is $58,818 – a sum that, while expensive, is a small price to pay considering grads on average make that back in four months

This allows grads who make an average of $46,159 a year more than their high school diploma counterparts to pay off their four years of tuition also within four months.

The cost there is the same for both in-state and out-of-state students, and Room and board fees will run applicants an additional $19,358. 

Advertisement

For educational purposes, it boasts one of the best bachelor’s programs in the state, with its most popular majors being social sciences, biological and biomedical sciences, and computer and information sciences.

7. California Institute of Technology

Perhaps the most prestigious schools to make the list, the California Institute of Technology, better known as Caltech, was founded in 1891 as Throop University, before receiving its current name in 1920 – and later its abbreviation. 

The annual tuition to attend is $58,479 – not much considering the salaries grads command upon entering the job market.

That stands at around $100,000, according to the study – a sum achieved thanks to the engineering and tech expertise people who study there typically possess.

Advertisement
Perhaps the most prestigious schools to make the list, The California Institute of Technology, better known as Caltech, was founded in 1891 as Throop University, before receiving its current name in 1920 - and later its abbreviation

Perhaps the most prestigious schools to make the list, The California Institute of Technology, better known as Caltech, was founded in 1891 as Throop University, before receiving its current name in 1920 – and later its abbreviation

That said, the school has one of the lowest acceptance rates on this list, at 2.7 percent, and is definitely not cheap. 

 The cost is the same for both in-state and out-of-state students, and room and board costs demand an additional $18,606. 

With all these fees considered, the expected total cost to attend California Institute of Technology on a full-time basis is $83,598 – not bad considering grads will pay off just their tuition within four months. 

8. San Diego State University

Another school with great bang for your buck is San Diego State University, which costs just $5,742 a year to attend for students coming from The Golden State.

Advertisement

Undergrad tuition at its sun-soaked campus will cost students a still-affordable $17,622 – small change considering they will make more than $60,000 after graduating, the study found.

Graduates in both categories typically command salaries $33,000 higher than their high school diploma-holding counterparts, with room and board running them an additional $19,714 per year.

Another school with great bang for your buck is San Diego State University, which costs just $5,742 a year to attend for students coming from The Golden State

Another school with great bang for your buck is San Diego State University, which costs just $5,742 a year to attend for students coming from The Golden State

It also sports a respectable 39.3 percent acceptance rate and is the third-oldest university and southernmost in the 23-strong California State University (CSU) system.

As its placement her indicates, it repeatedly ranks in lists charting colleges with the best value economically, and in 2021, tied for 143rd overall in a list of 389 national universities, compiled by the research publication US News & World Report.

9. Sonoma State University

Advertisement

Nestled between the gentle sloping hills of Sonoma County and the rocky mountains of the Sierra Nevadas sits the next entry on HEA’s list, Sonoma State University.

With just 9,300 students, it is one of the smallest members of the California State University system, and asks a small sum when it comes to tuition as well. 

Undergraduate students residing in California will have to fork over $5,742 their first year, room and board not included.

nestled between the hills of Sonoma County and the rocky mountains of the Sierra Nevadas sits the next entry, Sonoma State University. With 9,300 students, it is one of the smallest members of the California State University system, and asks a small sum for tuition as well

nestled between the hills of Sonoma County and the rocky mountains of the Sierra Nevadas sits the next entry, Sonoma State University. With 9,300 students, it is one of the smallest members of the California State University system, and asks a small sum for tuition as well

Undergraduate tuition for out-of-state students, meanwhile, is around $17,622 – a number that equates to roughly a fourth of grads’ first-year salaries.

That compensation, researchers found, is on average $70,000, a take home allowing for a full tuition payoff within five months.

Advertisement

It also one of the easiest schools on this list to get into, with a forgiving 94 percent acceptance rate.

10. Claremont McKenna University

Last and definitely not least was Claremont McKenna University, the third school to rank located in the quaint LA suburb for which it’s named.

It’s a private school, so it’s a great deal more expensive than other entries, but it makes up for it with the substantial salaries grads command right after the close of their college careers.

It costs about $60,480 a year to attend – a sum that’s the same for both in-state and out-of-state students.

Advertisement

As was the case with Stanford and CalTech, grads on average make just over $70,000 more than those who graduate just high school – good for a six-figure salary in your first year post-school.

Last and definitely not least was Claremont McKenna University, the third school to rank located in the quaint LA suburb for which its named. It costs about $60,480 a year to attend - a sum that's the same for both in-state and out-of-state students

Last and definitely not least was Claremont McKenna University, the third school to rank located in the quaint LA suburb for which its named. It costs about $60,480 a year to attend – a sum that’s the same for both in-state and out-of-state students

This, study’s authors said, allows for a complete return on investment for tuition within five months – pretty good considering 20 percent of the US’s roughly 4,000 higher education programs offer no such return, authors found.

Instead, students at those school will work essentially endlessly to offset the cost of attendance, as their earnings are likely to stay lower than those of high school grads, the researchers concluded.

Their study examined families earning $75,000 or less, given that these students may be more likely to skip higher education in fear of resigning themselves to such a fate.



Source link

Advertisement

California

Newsom signs law to shield California elections from federal interference

Published

on

Newsom signs law to shield California elections from federal interference


Gavin Newsom, California’s governor, signed legislation Wednesday that aims to shield California elections from federal interference, saying he expected Donald Trump’s administration to try to meddle in the midterms this year.

The law, which took effect immediately and came days before next Tuesday’s primary, prohibits any person – including federal agents – from accessing voter rolls or election technology without a court order. Law enforcement officers are restricted from disrupting election workers, except in public safety emergencies.

Trump administration officials so far have said they have no plans to send immigration agents to polling locations across the US, a concern raised this year by several Democratic secretaries of state. But Newsom warned “we have to be prepared for everything” because “there’s no rules any more with the Trump administration”.

Voting is already under way in California’s closely watched primary for governor, where a crowded field of Democrats and two viable Republicans are vying for just two spots on the November ballot. Under the state’s open primary system, only the top two vote-getters advance to the general election, regardless of party affiliation.

Advertisement

Newsom, who cannot seek a third term, said the election law is a response to “legitimate anxiety” about Trump’s tactics, primarily in Democratic-led states, where the president has deployed federal agents over the objections of local leaders. The Democratic governor warned against underestimating someone who “doesn’t believe in free and fair elections”.

“I expect the worst with Trump because he’s done the worst,” he said at a news conference.

White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson told the Associated Press later Wednesday that Trump is committed to ensuring that Americans have full confidence in the administration of elections.

“Instead of levying false attacks at the President, Newscum should look in the mirror,” she said in a statement, using Trump’s derogatory nickname for Newsom.

In an interview last year with Vanity Fair, Susie Wiles, the White House chief of staff, knocked down the idea that Trump would deploy the military to suppress voting, saying it was “categorically false”.

Advertisement

The California law also makes it a crime to knowingly take voted ballots out of the custody of election officials.

Earlier this year, the FBI under Trump seized the 2020 general election ballots from Georgia’s most populous county, which is heavily Democratic and has long been at the center of the president’s false claims that fraud cost him the race. The FBI and justice department also have sought records from previous elections in the largest counties in Arizona and Michigan.

Trump triggered a national redistricting frenzy ahead of the midterms when he urged Republicans in Texas and elsewhere to redraw their US House districts to help the party retain control of the closely divided chamber. Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Florida and Tennessee also have enacted new maps that could benefit Republicans, and Louisiana is expected to be next.

Republicans so far think they could gain as many as 14 seats from redistricting in November, while Democrats think they could gain six in California and Utah.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

Newsom to impose 100% tax on California payees of Trump’s $1.8bn fund

Published

on

Newsom to impose 100% tax on California payees of Trump’s .8bn fund


California governor Gavin Newsom is looking to thwart Donald Trump’s $1.776bn “anti-weaponization fund” by imposing a 100% tax on any payout received by state residents.

In May, the Department of Justice (DoJ) announced a fund to compensate alleged “victims of lawfare and weaponization”. It’s unclear who qualifies under this category.

The fund was the product of a settlement reached between Trump and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) – the agency the president sued over his leaked tax returns.

Critics, including Newsom, have slammed the fund as a “boondoggle” designed to divert money to Trump’s allies. Speculation has swirled that its benefactors could include the individuals who were arrested in the 6 January 2021 siege of the US Capitol. The Trump administration has described the rioters as patriots and since pardoned many who were charged in relation to the attack.

Advertisement

“People who assault cops and overthrow democracy don’t deserve a taxpayer-funded payday,” Newsom wrote in a Wednesday post to X, after announcing his plan at a news conference.

Five people appointed by the US attorney general will preside over the $1.776bn, which will be funneled from a fund typically used to pay court judgments.

Todd Blanche, the acting US attorney general, characterized the fund as an avenue “to make right the wrongs that were previously done”. Quarterly reports on who has received monetary relief and in what amount will be sent to the attorney general. Claims will not be processed after 1 December 2028, at which point any remaining amount will be returned to the federal government, according to the DoJ.

The DoJ did not immediately respond to a request for comment on how it would address Newsom’s proposed tax.

It’s the latest in a longstanding bitter feud between Newsom and Trump.

Advertisement

The two politicians have often traded jabs in the press and over social media. They are at odds on a number of issues in the Golden state including the federal deployment of ICE agents, how healthcare fraud has been handled and election integrity.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Opinion | Our house burned down but our mortgage didn’t. California fire survivors need time

Published

on

Opinion | Our house burned down but our mortgage didn’t. California fire survivors need time


By Rachel Jonas and Robert Fagnani, Special for CalMatters

The aftermath of the Palisades Fire, as clean-ups and infrastructure repairs begin, in Pacific Palisades, on Jan. 14, 2025. Photo by Ted Soqui for CalMatters

This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

Guest Commentary written by

Advertisement

We were supposed to celebrate our younger son’s first birthday in our backyard on January 11th, 2025. Instead, four days before his party, we watched the Palisades fire take our home. We’d packed what we could, put our kids in the car and drove to Tennessee to live with family because we had nowhere else to go.

Our house is gone. Our older son’s preschool is gone. The library, the restaurants, the small routines that made up a life are all gone. What remains is a mortgage on a property that no longer exists and a rebuilding process that every expert we’ve spoken to says will take two to four years, minimum.

We did not expect to become advocates. But in the months after the fire, we kept running into the same impossible questions from other families — questions about forbearance, credit and what their mortgage servicer was actually required to do. Nobody had clear answers, so we founded Disaster Mortgage Relief and have spent the past year listening to hundreds of families across the Palisades and Altadena navigate a financial system that was simply not built for what we are living through.

That experience is what brings us to Assembly Bill 1847. The California Bankers Association recently argued that this bill — which would extend and strengthen mortgage protections established under last year’s fire emergency mortgage relief law, AB 238 — could end up restricting access to credit. 

We want to engage with that, because we think it gets the situation almost entirely backwards.

Advertisement

AB 238 gave people whose homes burned up to 12 months of mortgage forbearance. But the rebuilding timeline in the Palisades and Altadena is not 12 months. Debris removal, utility restoration, insurance disputes, permit approvals, contractor shortages and construction inflation have made this a multi-year process for virtually everyone we work with. 

The original forbearance framework was built around a recovery timeline that does not exist in reality. Now that fire survivors’ forbearance periods are expiring, we are watching the consequences in real time: Families who were current on their mortgages before the January 2025 fire — who followed every rule — are seeing their credit scores fall by 200, 300, even 400 points. 

Some are being pushed toward foreclosure. Some are being handed balloon payments of $100,000 or more, due at the exact moment they are trying to finance construction.

This is not a story about irresponsible borrowers. These are teachers, small business owners, young families who made these neighborhoods what they were. Most still desperately want to come home. But the financial pressure is forcing many of them out for good.

We understand lenders need predictable rules and functioning credit markets. California cannot solve one crisis by creating another. But the greater threat to future lending is not temporary forbearance; it is mass borrower failure, collapsing credit, abandoned rebuilds and neighborhoods that never recover.

Advertisement

AB 1847 does not forgive debt. It does not eliminate lender rights. It does not tell banks they won’t be repaid. It allows payments to be deferred during rebuilding and moved to the loan’s back end. 

The CARES Act, which gave borrowers of federally-backed mortgages up to 360 days’ relief during the COVID-19 pandemic, demonstrated that similar structures were operationally feasible on a national scale. 

For many families, freeing up two or three years of principal and interest and applying that money to construction is the difference between rebuilding and permanently leaving. It requires no taxpayer money; it simply restructures debt that already exists so families have a realistic chance to come home.

In our case, my family is still in Tennessee, saving every dime we can to hopefully afford to rebuild the home we lost.

Climate events are no longer temporary and localized. They destroy entire communities at once and displace families for years. The financial infrastructure around homeownership needs to catch up to that reality.

Advertisement

The question before California is simple: when disaster survivors are trapped between a destroyed home and a mortgage system that no longer matches modern recovery, will we force families into financial collapse or adapt the system to the world we now live in?

This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending