Connect with us

California

California to vote on constitutional right to abortion

Published

on

California to vote on constitutional right to abortion


SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Californians are voting now by means of Election Day on whether or not to approve a state constitutional modification that will assure the proper to abortion and contraception, one in every of a number of measures on ballots nationwide this November to handle reproductive well being care following the U.S. Supreme Courtroom’s overturning of Roe v. Wade.

Proposition 1 is predicted to go within the closely Democratic state and was a part of a strong legislative bundle backed by Gov. Gavin Newsom to make sure California stays a haven for folks searching for abortion companies. Legislators positioned the measure to amend the structure on the Nov. 8 poll days simply after the court docket dominated in June that states might determine whether or not to permit abortion.

Polling exhibits excessive help for the measure — at the very least two-thirds of probably voters mentioned sure in two surveys — with minimal monetary opposition from the California Republican Get together and others who name the proposition costly, excessive and pointless.

However the measure’s supporters need to ship a convincing message that abortion is authorized and accessible in California, they usually hope a strong win will encourage different states additionally to enshrine the proper of their constitutions.

Advertisement

“The problem is we had a really brief runway, so it truly is about consciousness. We all know when individuals are conscious that abortion is on the poll, they’re prone to come out and vote for it,” mentioned Jodi Hicks, president of Deliberate Parenthood Associates of California, which helps the measure.

California joins Michigan and Vermont in asking voters in November to guard the proper to abortion. In Kentucky, voters will likely be requested to amend the state structure to declare there’s not a proper to an abortion. A measure in Montana asks voters whether or not to require medical care and remedy for infants born alive after an tried abortion.

The modification in California would declare that the state “shall not deny or intrude with a person’s reproductive freedom of their most intimate choices, which incorporates their basic proper to decide on to have an abortion and their basic proper to decide on or refuse contraceptives.”

Opponents say the measure was placed on the poll to attain political factors with ladies and drive voter turnout in favor of Democrats. Additionally they say the measure accommodates no gestational or viability limits on abortion, which means a fetus could possibly be aborted late in being pregnant despite the fact that it’s able to surviving outdoors the womb.

California regulation at the moment restricts abortion to solely earlier than a fetus is viable, which is often outlined as round 24 weeks of being pregnant. Abortions within the third trimester are uncommon, and in California, permitted provided that the mom’s life or heath is in danger.

Advertisement

“Californians don’t help late time period abortions,” mentioned Catherine Hadro, spokesperson for the No on Prop. 1 marketing campaign.

The measure’s supporters say a constitutional modification enshrining abortion can have no bearing on limits positioned on abortions by lawmakers.

“The structure has all the time meant to be a broad framework of rights and the Legislature decides the scope of the legal guidelines, this gained’t change what’s in statute proper now,” mentioned Hicks of Deliberate Parenthood associates.

A September survey by the Public Coverage Institute of California discovered 69% of probably voters would help the proposition, together with 33% of Republicans. An August ballot by the Institute of Governmental Research on the College of California, Berkeley, discovered that 71% of registered voters would vote sure.

Almost 40% of people that mentioned they might vote sure mentioned that abortion ought to be authorized in most, however not all, circumstances, mentioned Mark Baldassare, president and CEO of the Public Coverage Institute of California. It’s not clear how a lot opponents’ arguments will follow voters, if in any respect.

Advertisement

“That’s one thing folks will likely be asking about between now and Election Day, particularly these individuals who say it ought to be OK generally,” he mentioned.

Earlier than Roe was overturned, the overwhelming majority of abortions in the US — round 90% — occurred within the first trimester or at 13 weeks or earlier, mentioned Katrina Kimport, affiliate professor within the Division of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences on the College of California, San Francisco. An estimated 1% of abortions occurred at 21 weeks or later, she mentioned.

Girls who’ve abortions within the third trimester usually fall into one in every of two classes, she mentioned. They’ve both discovered new info, similar to a critical well being problem with the fetus that might not be ascertained in earlier trimesters, or they confronted insurmountable obstacles stopping them from getting an abortion earlier.

The U.S. Supreme Courtroom’s June determination in Dobbs may very well improve the variety of ladies searching for third-trimester abortions, she mentioned.

California’s abortion poll measure and new state laws defending abortion are all “useful however not ample,” mentioned Donna Crane, political science lecturer at San José State College and Menlo Faculty.

Advertisement

That’s as a result of Congress can all the time go a federal ban and the conservative U.S. Supreme Courtroom is prone to take up new conflicts that might lead to extra limitations, mentioned Crane, who served almost twenty years as strategist and lobbyist with NARAL Professional-Selection America in Washington, D.C. and helps Prop. 1.

“California can go regulation after regulation after regulation,” she mentioned, “and the federal regulation will all the time trump us.”



Source link

California

California doctor who drove Tesla off cliff with family inside won’t face trial, granted mental health diversion

Published

on

California doctor who drove Tesla off cliff with family inside won’t face trial, granted mental health diversion


The “suicidal” California doctor accused of intentionally driving his Tesla off a cliff with his wife and two young children inside won’t face trial for attempted murder as he is instead set to begin a mental health diversion program.

Dharmesh Patel, who was granted admission into the two-year program last Thursday at the San Mateo County Court, will remain in jail for “several weeks” before he’s released, the San Mateo District Attorney told NBC News.

The radiologist, who has spent the last 18 months behind bars. will be released from jail to his parent’s home where he will be ordered not to leave.

He will also have to report to court weekly for a progress report.

Advertisement

Patel will be ordered to be tested twice a week “to show medication compliance,” and will have to abstain from drugs and alcohol while also forfeiting his driver’s license and passport, the outlet reported.

Dharmesh Patel won’t face trial for his attempted murder charges after his admittance into a mental health diversion program. David G. McIntyre for NY Post

The doctor will return to court on July 1 where details of his release will be determined, a spokesperson for District Attorney Stephen Wagstaffe told NBC News.

Judge Susan Jakubowski granted Patel admission to the program while the DA’s office “intensely” opposed it.

The radiologist appeared “by all accounts a kind and loving” father, said Jakubowski on Thursday, adding that Patel would be better served in treatment than in jail, the Mercury News reported.

Last week’s ruling was made after evidence was found showing Patel has major depressive disorder.

Advertisement
Patel was accused of driving his Tesla Model Y off the 250-foot cliff off “Devil’s Slide” on Highway 1 and landing on the shore of the Pacific Ocean in Jan. 2023. AP
Miraculously, Patel, his wife and their two children — a 7-year-old daughter and 4-year-old son — all survived. Facebook/Neha Patel

In April two doctors testified in court that Patel suffered from “major depressive order” and experienced a “psychotic” break during the attempted murder-suicide on Jan. 2, 2023.

The Tesla Model Y plummeted off the 250-foot cliff off “Devil’s Slide” on Highway 1 and landed on the shore of the Pacific Ocean.

Miraculously, Patel, his wife and their two children — a 7-year-old daughter and 4-year-old son — all survived.

Patel was arrested and later charged with three counts of attempted murder. He initially pleaded not guilty to the charges saying the Tesla experienced a malfunction causing the car to careen off the cliff.

His wife Neha later told investigators her husband had suffered from depression before the crash.

Advertisement

“He’s depressed. He’s a doctor. He said he was going to drive off the cliff. He purposefully drove off,” Neha told rescuers.

During his testimony, psychologist Mark Patterson said Patel’s delusions were provoked by the nation’s fentanyl crisis, the war in Ukraine and feared his children could be kidnapped and molested, which appeared to have been connected to Patel’s worries about accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

In May, Neha Patel begged prosecutors to drop the charges and admit her husband into the program.

In April two doctors testified in court that Patel suffered from “major depressive order” and experienced a “psychotic” break during the attempted murder-suicide. AP
Neha Patel later told investigators her husband had suffered from depression before the crash. Facebook/Neha Patel

“We need him in our lives and it has been over a year and a half since my children or I have seen or spoken to Dharmesh,” she said.

The doctor was deemed a good candidate for the program because he’s at low risk of injuring anyone else and has shown progress with his treatment since the crash, Patterson said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California Shelves Repeal of 1950 Housing Law That Stoked Racial Tension | KQED

Published

on

California Shelves Repeal of 1950 Housing Law That Stoked Racial Tension | KQED


“While SCA 2 was one of many efforts to help address the housing crisis, the November’s ballot will be very crowded, and reaching voters will be difficult and expensive,” Allen said in a statement. “In addition, the legislature recently passed my SB 469, which substantially addresses some of the most significant concerns about how Article 34 might be impacting housing production.”

SB 469 clarifies that the use of state affordable housing dollars does not trigger Article 34’s requirement for voter approval. Allen said his focus is on determining whether these efforts are “making a significant dent in addressing the problem,” adding that quickly building more affordable housing is a priority.

Backed by the California Real Estate Association, the forerunner to the current California Association of Realtors, Article 34 was first adopted by voters in 1950. Realtors played on voters’ fears that affordable housing would lead to greater racial integration of exclusively white neighborhoods.

CAR issued a formal apology in 2022 for its past support of Article 34, with association President Otto Catrina condemning the actions and vowing to address the legacy of its “discriminatory policies and practices.”

Advertisement

The organization “remains a strong supporter of the repeal of Article 34 … which adds unnecessary hurdles and costs to the creation of affordable housing,” CAR spokesperson Sanjay Wagle said in a statement.

Wagle noted that a majority of Californians support repealing the provision but cited research showing a voter education campaign would be needed to explain the article’s effects.

“The cost of such a campaign in an election year with so many initiatives on the ballot made this campaign more costly and difficult, thus making it more logical to pursue a repeal on a future ballot,” Wagle wrote. “We thank Sen. Allen and Sen. Wiener for their efforts on this repeal effort and look forward to working [with] them and other stakeholders on this issue in the future.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Quarterback Commits to Penn State’s 2026 Recruiting Class

Published

on

California Quarterback Commits to Penn State’s 2026 Recruiting Class


Though Penn State has been busily filling its 2025 recruiting class in June, the program hasn’t stopped looking ahead. The Nittany Lions on Tuesday received a commitment from 4-star California quarterback Troy Huhn, who became the second player in Penn State football’s 2026 recruiting class.

Huhn (6-4, 205 pounds) will be a junior at Mission Hills High, just north of San Diego. He threw for 1,623 yards and 16 touchdowns as a sophomore last season. Huhn quickly built a strong offer sheet that included Michigan, Ohio State, Oregon, Texas, Auburn and Notre Dame, among many others. Huhn took an unofficial visits to Ohio State and Penn State in June, committing to the Nittany Lions two weeks after his trip.

Huhn is the 2026 recruiting class’ 10th-rated quarterback prospect, according to the 247Sports Composite, and a top-15 player in California. On3 ranks Huhn highest among the major recruiting services, slotting him at No. 60 nationally and sixth at quarterback.

Huhn, who committed to Penn State offensive coordinator Andy Kotelnicki and quarterbacks coach Danny O’Brien, spent time with head coach James Franklin during his unofficial visit. He told Sean Fitz of Blue-White Illustrated that Franklin made an impression.

Advertisement

“Coach O’Brien was great, but really my main thing when I was getting out there was to have more time with coach Franklin. They definitely gave that to me,” Huhn said in his interview with Blue-White Illustrated. “I really felt the love from coach Franklin. He’s very business, he’s awesome, he’s a funny guy. My mom loves him, he loves my mom. That relationship with him is now a lot better and I’m glad I got to spend that time with him.”

Huhn joins Harrisburg athlete Messiah Mickens on the ground floor of Penn State’s 2026 recruiting class. Mickens committed to Penn State in August 2023. Penn State had been recruiting several 2026 quarterbacks alongside Huhn. One of their targets, Dia Bell, recently committed to Texas.

Huhn’s commitment continued a prolific stretch for the Nittany Lions. Franklin and his staff have received commitments from five players in a four-day stretch. Four of them committed to Penn State’s 2025 recruiting class.

The most recent 2025 commitment belonged to Max Granville, a 4-star prospect from Texas and first-team all-state honoree as a junior. Granville, who will be a senior at Fort Bend Christian Academy, is rated as a 4-star linebacker according to the 247Sports Composite. However, the 6-3, 220-pound Granville projects at defensive end and was recruited by Penn State defensive line coach Deion Barnes. Granville chose Penn State after making an official visit to State College earlier in June. He also visited USC, Texas A&M and Oklahoma in June and took an official visit to Baylor in April.

Penn State opens the 2024 football season Aug. 31 at West Virginia. The game is scheduled for a noon kickoff on FOX.

Advertisement

More Penn State Football Recruiting

Penn State receives commitment from 4-star Maryland prospect

Advertisement

Versatile New Jersey prospect commits to the Nittany Lions

Former Penn State linebacker commit switches to Rutgers

AllPennState is the place for Penn State news, opinion and perspective on the SI.com network. Publisher Mark Wogenrich has covered Penn State for more than 20 years, tracking three coaching staffs, three Big Ten titles and a catalog of great stories. Follow him on Twitter @MarkWogenrich.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending