California
California threatens Tesla with 30-day suspension of sales license for deceptive self-driving claims
SAN FRANCISCO — California regulators are threatening to suspend Tesla’s license to sell its electric cars in the state early next year unless the automaker tones down its marketing tactics for its self-driving features after a judge concluded the Elon Musk-led company has been misleading consumers about the technology’s capabilities.
The potential 30-day blackout of Tesla’s California sales is the primary punishment being recommended to the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles in a decision released late Tuesday. The ruling by Administrative Law Judge Juliet Cox determined that Tesla had for years engaged in deceptive marketing practices by using the terms “Autopilot” and “Full Self-Driving” to promote the autonomous technology available in many of its cars.
After presiding over five days of hearings held in Oakland, California in July, Cox also recommended suspending Tesla’s license to manufacture cars at its plant in Fremont, California. But California regulators aren’t going to impose that part of the judge’s proposed penalty.
Tesla will have a 90-day window to make changes that more clearly convey the limits of its self-driving technology to avoid having its California sales license suspended. After California regulators filed its action against Tesla in 2023, the Austin, Texas, company already made one significant change by putting in wording that made it clear its Full Self-Driving package still required supervision by a human driver while it’s deployed.
“Tesla can take simple steps to pause this decision and permanently resolve this issue — steps autonomous vehicle companies and other automakers have been able to achieve,” said Steve Gordon, the director of the California Department of Motor Vehicles.
Tesla didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.
The automaker has already been plagued by a global downturn in demand that began during a backlash to Musk’s high-profile role overseeing cuts in the U.S. government budget overseeing the Department of Government that President Donald Trump created in his administration. Increased competition and an older lineup of vehicles also weighed on Tesla sales, although the company did revamp its Model Y, the world’s bestselling vehicle, and unveil less-expensive versions of the Model Y and Model X.
Although Musk left Washington after a falling out with Trump, the fallout has continued to weigh on Tesla’s auto sales, which had decreased by 9% from 2024 through the first nine months of this year.
Despite the slump and the threatened sales suspension in California, Tesla’s stock price touched an all-time high $495.28 during Wednesday’s early trading before backtracking later to fall below $470. Despite that reversal, Tesla’s shares are still worth slightly more than they were before Musk’s ill-fated stint in the Trump administration — a “somewhat successful” assignment he recently said he wouldn’t take on again.
The performance of Tesla’s stock against the backdrop of eroding auto sales reflects the increasing emphasis that investors are placing on Musk’s efforts to develop artificial intelligence technology to implant into humanoid robots and a fleet of self-driving Teslas that will operate as robotaxis across the U.S.
Musk has been promising Tesla’s self-driving technology would fulfill his robotaxi vision for years without delivering on the promise, but the company finally began testing the concept in Austin earlier this year, albeit with a human supervisor in the car to take over if something went awry. Just a few days ago, Musk disclosed Tesla had started tests of its robotaxis without a safety monitor in the vehicle.
California regulators are far from the first critic to accuse Tesla of exaggerating the capabilities of its self-driving technology in a potentially dangerous manner. The company has steadfastly insisted that information contained in its vehicle’s owner’s manual on its website have made it clear that its self-driving technology still requires human supervision, even while releasing a 2020 video depicting one of its cars purportedly driving on its own. The video, cited as evidence against Tesla in the decision recommending a suspension of the company’s California sales license, remained on its website for nearly four years.
Tesla has been targeted in a variety of lawsuits alleging its mischaracterizations about self-driving technology have lulled humans into a false of security that have resulted in lethal accidents. The company has settled or prevailed in several cases, but earlier this year a Miami jury held Tesla partly responsible for a lethal crash in Florida that occurred while Autopilot was deployed and ordered the automaker to pay more than $240 million in damages.
California
Raman closes in on Pratt as more votes in L.A. mayor’s race are tallied
Los Angeles City Councilmember Nithya Raman cut deeper into the lead of reality television personality Spencer Pratt on Saturday, as his lead slimmed to just a single percentage point.
Pratt fell to just over 27% of the vote while Raman jumped up to slightly over 26%, according to the results from the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder. Pratt now leads Raman by just 7,494 votes.
“We’ve seen Nithya Raman catching up on every update and the last two in particular she’s accelerated,” said Paul Mitchell, vice president of the bipartisan voter data firm Political Data Inc. “She’s continued to gain at a rate that means she will eventually catch up unless Pratt starts getting some ballots coming in that are either geographically or demographically better for him.”
Democratic consultant Michael Trujillo, who doesn’t represent anyone in the mayoral race, said the results suggest Raman will surpass Pratt as more votes are counted.
“I think it’s over,” Trujillo said. “It appears Nithya will be in the runoff. Pratt doesn’t appear to be growing much more.”
The second-place finisher in the mayoral primary will face Mayor Karen Bass in a Nov. 3 runoff. On election night Tuesday, the Associated Press determined that Bass had secured enough votes to qualify for the runoff.
Pratt has been in second place since then, but Raman has gradually eroded his lead as mail-in ballots have been counted. The updated vote tally released Thursday showed Pratt with 29% of the vote and Raman with 23%.
With Friday’s update, Raman’s share had risen to 25% and Pratt’s shrank to 28%, for a 3 percentage point gap.
In the most recent batch of mail-in ballots counted, Raman received 23,514 votes, while Pratt gained 10,336.
Election analysts expected Raman to gain ground as the mail-in ballots were tallied, reasoning that many left-of-center voters — Raman’s base — held onto their mail-in ballots until the last minute as they waited to choose between Democratic gubernatorial candidates. They also say younger, more progressive voters tend to hold onto their ballots longer generally.
Although the mayor’s race is nonpartisan, Pratt is a Republican in a city that is overwhelmingly dominated by Democratic voters and elected officials.
A poll by the UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies, which was co-sponsored by The Times, had Pratt running in third place behind Bass and Raman.
The poll of 1,351 likely voters conducted May 19-24 had Bass with 26% support, Raman with 25% support and Pratt with 22% support, with a 3% margin of error.
Los Angeles voters have become accustomed to seeing election results change as late-arriving ballots are tabulated. In the 2022 mayoral primary, real estate developer Rick Caruso led the pack for about a week before Bass pulled ahead.
Pratt was favored in many of the same neighborhoods that voted for Caruso, according to a Times analysis of precinct-level returns provided by the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder on Wednesday, when an estimated 62% of the projected vote had been counted. Raman, by comparison, made inroads in progressive areas dominated by Bass four years ago.
Pratt, whose Pacific Palisades fire home burned in the January 2025 fire, was strong there and on the Westside, as well as in the San Fernando Valley communities of Encino, Woodland Hills, Chatsworth and Sunland-Tujunga.
Raman dominated precincts known for their progressive politics, particularly those with younger people in renter-heavy neighborhoods stretching from Hollywood to Highland Park, including her home base of Silver Lake.
Mail-in ballots with an election day postmark will continue to be accepted by county election officials through Tuesday.
California
Kars4Kids jingle can stay on California airwaves, court rules
The familiar Kars4Kids jingle will continue playing across California for now after a state appeals court sided with the charity in its ongoing legal fight over the ads.
On June 4, a California appeals court ruled that Kars4Kids can keep airing its advertisements in the state while it challenges a lower court decision that found the commercials deceptive.
The order temporarily pauses a judge’s ruling that would have prohibited the New Jersey-based vehicle donation charity from running the ads in their current form. The appeals court did not address the merits of the case, which remains under review.
The decision marks an important victory for Kars4Kids, whose fundraising operation relies heavily on the nationally recognized “1-877-Kars4Kids” advertising campaign. For now, the well-known jingle will remain on California airwaves as the nonprofit pursues its appeal.
Kars4Kids welcomes ruling
“Kars4Kids applauds (the) court ruling allowing its ads to continue airing in California while the appeals process continues,” the organization said in a statement provided to USA TODAY.
“Kars4Kids’ programs benefit a wide array of children and teenagers in California and beyond. The uninterrupted airing of its ads will enable the charity to continue funding its programs for children and families.”
The organization said it believes the trial court’s findings were flawed and intends to pursue a broad appeal.
What the lawsuit alleged
The case was brought by California resident Bruce Puterbaugh, who said he donated a vehicle believing the charity primarily benefited needy children, and was unaware of its ties to Oorah, an Orthodox Jewish outreach organization based in New Jersey.
In May 2026, Orange County Superior Court Judge Gassia Apkarian ruled that Kars4Kids’ advertising violated California’s false advertising and unfair competition laws because it failed to adequately disclose the organization’s religious affiliation and where donated funds ultimately go. The judge ordered the ads removed in their current form and awarded Puterbaugh $250 in restitution.
Broader debate over the charity
Kars4Kids has rejected the ruling, arguing on its website that the court overlooked evidence showing that donations support mentoring programs, educational assistance, summer camps and grants to nonprofit organizations, including some in California.
The dispute has renewed scrutiny of Kars4Kids’ fundraising practices. A recent investigation by the Asbury Park Press, part of the USA TODAY Network, found that the charity has faced scrutiny in multiple states over disclosure practices and spent $41.5 million on advertising in 2024, more than it distributed to Oorah that year. Charity officials have defended those expenses as necessary to generate vehicle donations that fund their programs.
Contributing: Joe Strupp, Asbury Park Press, part of the USA TODAY Network; USA TODAY reporter Drew Pittock
Reporter Anthony Thompson can be reached at ajthompson@usatodayco.com, or on X @athompsonUSAT.
California
2 California men charged in alleged ISIS support scheme
Three U.S. citizens were arrested Friday and accused of conspiring to provide material support to the Islamic State group, including raising money to purchase drones and rocket-propelled grenades allegedly intended for attacks against American service members deployed overseas.
The suspects were identified as Bisaam Ghafoor, 21, of Leawood, Kansas, Elias Shamsaldeen, 21, of Porterville, California and Bereen Dzayee, 25, of Lakeside, California.
According to a criminal complaint filed in the District of Kansas, the three men conspired to provide material support to ISIS by collectively sending more than $2,000 to a person they believed was a member of the terrorist organization.
Federal authorities allege that from at least February 2025 through June 2026, the defendants communicated through Discord chats, voice calls and other messaging platforms about plans to support ISIS through personnel, services and financial contributions.
Investigators said the men pledged allegiance to ISIS and its leader and exchanged messages in social media groups that promoted violence on behalf of the organization.
The complaint alleges that Ghafoor said it would be “sick” if his name could be written on a drone used in an attack against Americans. Dzayee allegedly suggested that U.S. Special Forces personnel should be among the targets of drone attacks.
Authorities also said Shamsaldeen expressed a desire to stab and injure a U.S. service member. According to the complaint, Ghafoor stated that he had always wanted to kill a female soldier by beheading and added, “I wish I could kill 300,000,000 Americans.”
Investigators allege that Ghafoor’s name was written on the projectile of a rocket-propelled grenade that was purportedly intended for use in an overseas attack against U.S. military personnel. Shamsaldeen allegedly provided money intended for the purchase of drones that were to be used to attack and kill American service members deployed abroad.
The complaint further alleges that the defendants and others discussed traveling outside the United States to fight on behalf of ISIS and, in some communications, expressed a willingness to die for the organization.
“This administration has put terrorists, cartels, and gangs on notice,” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement. “Today’s arrest of three individuals who allegedly conspired to provide material support to ISIS makes clear our commitment to taking down terrorist networks — anywhere.”
FBI Director Kash Patel said the suspects allegedly pledged allegiance to ISIS, plotted attacks and targeted U.S. service members, adding that the arrests prevented further acts of violence.
Assistant Attorney General for National Security John A. Eisenberg said the defendants are accused of supporting a “ruthless terrorist organization” and helping fund plans to kill American service members overseas.
The investigation was conducted by FBI Joint Terrorism Task Forces in Kansas City, San Diego and Sacramento, with assistance from FBI field offices in Richmond and Newark.
The three men are charged with conspiracy to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization.
-
Mississippi4 minutes agoMississippi Insurance Commissioner discusses homeowners insurance, mitigation program
-
Missouri7 minutes agoNorth Harrison graduate honored when inducted into the Missouri Hall of Fame – Bethany Republican-Clipper
-
Montana12 minutes agoOPINION: We aren’t mad enough about PFAS in Montana’s rivers
-
Nebraska19 minutes ago68th Nebraska Shriners Bowl
-
Nevada22 minutes agoGolden Knights recover for 2OT victory against Hurricanes in Game 3 of Cup Final | NHL.com
-
New Hampshire27 minutes agoFrom farm to… freezer? A new approach could help close N.H.’s local food gap. – The Boston Globe
-
New Jersey34 minutes ago7 Of The Most Welcoming Towns In New Jersey
-
New Mexico37 minutes agoGender-affirming care protected in New Mexico — but not always easy to access