Connect with us

California

California, Minnesota move to protect women’s rights after Supreme Court decision

Published

on

California, Minnesota move to protect women’s rights after Supreme Court decision


1/4

Professional-choice advocates participate in a protest as they march to Metropolis Corridor after the U.S. Supreme Courtroom overturned Roe v. Wade, ending federal abortion safety and making abortion regulation a difficulty determined by particular person states on the U.S. Supreme Courtroom, in Los Angeles on Friday. Photograph by Jim Ruymen/UPI | License Photograph

June 25 (UPI) — Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz issued an govt order Saturday defending girls’s rights within the wake of the Supreme Courtroom’s jaw-dropping resolution to overturn the landmark Roe vs. Wade ruling constitutionally defending the suitable to hunt an abortion.

Abortion will stay authorized in Minnesota however neighboring states have already moved to make it unlawful together with South Dakota — which instituted a “set off ban” that went into impact mechanically with the Supreme Courtroom resolution.

Walz mentioned within the order that he’ll decline to extradite individuals accused of violating such legal guidelines criminalizing abortions.

Advertisement

The order additionally requires legislation enforcement businesses within the state to not help different states in looking for civil, prison or skilled sanctions towards those that present or search reproductive well being care providers in Minnesota “even when required to take action by legislation.”

“My workplace has been and can proceed to be a firewall towards laws that might reverse reproductive freedom,” Walz mentioned in an announcement.

“This order reveals our administration’s dedication to defending sufferers and well being care suppliers. Our administration is doing every little thing we will to guard people’ proper to make their very own well being care choices.”

His resolution got here after California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday signed laws that might assist defend sufferers and suppliers in California from anti-abortion legal guidelines in different states.

The California legislation will defend individuals within the state from civil legal responsibility for offering, aiding or receiving abortion care within the state as others like Missouri advance proposals to permit residents to sue Missouri residents who acquire or facilitate abortions in different states.

Advertisement

“With right this moment’s Supreme Courtroom resolution to hazard the well being and security of tens of millions of ladies throughout the nation, California should do every little thing it could to guard the basic rights of all girls — in California and past,” Newsom mentioned.

“We all know that states like Missouri are already concentrating on girls looking for abortions in states like California the place abortion stays authorized. This laws seeks to guard girls and care suppliers from civil legal responsibility imposed by different states.”

Oregon and Washington on Friday joined California in issuing a multi-state dedication to defend entry to reproductive well being care, together with abortion and contraceptives.

White Home Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre instructed reporters throughout a press gaggle on Saturday that President Joe Biden introduced two “concrete steps” his administration was taking utilizing his govt authority to guard girls within the wake of the choice.

Jean-Pierre reiterated that these steps included having the USA Division of Well being and Human Providers be sure that there are medicines permitted by the Meals and Drug Administration obtainable to girls “to guard that proper.”

Advertisement

“The opposite one was he gave his govt authority to the Division of Justice to be sure that we defend girls who journey to — as they make choices on their very own healthcare,” Jean-Pierre mentioned.

Jean-Pierre was requested about what the Biden administration can be doing to guard girls who cross state traces with such abortion remedy, which is now against the law punishable in some states.

“So, , state legal guidelines proscribing the suitable to journey will undoubtedly be challenged — proper? — in court docket. So, the DOJ will look to help the suitable to journey in acceptable circumstances,” she mentioned.

“Look, the Lawyer Basic’s assertion yesterday made it clear that the bedrock of constitutional rules help girls’s freedom to hunt care in states the place abortion stays authorized.”

Jean-Pierre added the Justice Division would defend girls in circumstances “the place they will.”

Advertisement

“It is a scary time. We perceive that. What occurred yesterday with the choice from the Supreme Courtroom is excessive. That call is excessive,” she mentioned. “That is a couple of constitutional proper that was supplied by the Supreme Courtroom virtually 50 years in the past.”

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a separate concurring opinion with the bulk opinion, which was written by Justice Samuel Alito, that the Supreme Courtroom ought to subsequent think about going after contraceptives and rights for LGBTQ individuals.

Jean-Pierre referred to as his feedback “chilling” however mentioned it was “a possibility to take motion” and inspired American voters to elect extra Democrats whereas taking pictures down recommendations that Biden broaden prime court docket.

“That’s one thing that the President doesn’t agree with. That’s not one thing that he desires to do,” she mentioned.

Jean-Pierre mentioned that no govt motion that Biden might take might fill the outlet within the legislation attributable to the Supreme Courtroom resolution and that the one significant motion can be for the U.S. Congress to enshrine Roe vs. Wade in federal legislation.

Advertisement

When requested about the potential for constructing abortion clinics on federal land in conservative states, Jean-Pierre mentioned that did not “have something to share on that particular query.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California doctor who drove Tesla off cliff with family inside won’t face trial, granted mental health diversion

Published

on

California doctor who drove Tesla off cliff with family inside won’t face trial, granted mental health diversion


The “suicidal” California doctor accused of intentionally driving his Tesla off a cliff with his wife and two young children inside won’t face trial for attempted murder as he is instead set to begin a mental health diversion program.

Dharmesh Patel, who was granted admission into the two-year program last Thursday at the San Mateo County Court, will remain in jail for “several weeks” before he’s released, the San Mateo District Attorney told NBC News.

The radiologist, who has spent the last 18 months behind bars. will be released from jail to his parent’s home where he will be ordered not to leave.

He will also have to report to court weekly for a progress report.

Advertisement

Patel will be ordered to be tested twice a week “to show medication compliance,” and will have to abstain from drugs and alcohol while also forfeiting his driver’s license and passport, the outlet reported.

Dharmesh Patel won’t face trial for his attempted murder charges after his admittance into a mental health diversion program. David G. McIntyre for NY Post

The doctor will return to court on July 1 where details of his release will be determined, a spokesperson for District Attorney Stephen Wagstaffe told NBC News.

Judge Susan Jakubowski granted Patel admission to the program while the DA’s office “intensely” opposed it.

The radiologist appeared “by all accounts a kind and loving” father, said Jakubowski on Thursday, adding that Patel would be better served in treatment than in jail, the Mercury News reported.

Last week’s ruling was made after evidence was found showing Patel has major depressive disorder.

Advertisement
Patel was accused of driving his Tesla Model Y off the 250-foot cliff off “Devil’s Slide” on Highway 1 and landing on the shore of the Pacific Ocean in Jan. 2023. AP
Miraculously, Patel, his wife and their two children — a 7-year-old daughter and 4-year-old son — all survived. Facebook/Neha Patel

In April two doctors testified in court that Patel suffered from “major depressive order” and experienced a “psychotic” break during the attempted murder-suicide on Jan. 2, 2023.

The Tesla Model Y plummeted off the 250-foot cliff off “Devil’s Slide” on Highway 1 and landed on the shore of the Pacific Ocean.

Miraculously, Patel, his wife and their two children — a 7-year-old daughter and 4-year-old son — all survived.

Patel was arrested and later charged with three counts of attempted murder. He initially pleaded not guilty to the charges saying the Tesla experienced a malfunction causing the car to careen off the cliff.

His wife Neha later told investigators her husband had suffered from depression before the crash.

Advertisement

“He’s depressed. He’s a doctor. He said he was going to drive off the cliff. He purposefully drove off,” Neha told rescuers.

During his testimony, psychologist Mark Patterson said Patel’s delusions were provoked by the nation’s fentanyl crisis, the war in Ukraine and feared his children could be kidnapped and molested, which appeared to have been connected to Patel’s worries about accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

In May, Neha Patel begged prosecutors to drop the charges and admit her husband into the program.

In April two doctors testified in court that Patel suffered from “major depressive order” and experienced a “psychotic” break during the attempted murder-suicide. AP
Neha Patel later told investigators her husband had suffered from depression before the crash. Facebook/Neha Patel

“We need him in our lives and it has been over a year and a half since my children or I have seen or spoken to Dharmesh,” she said.

The doctor was deemed a good candidate for the program because he’s at low risk of injuring anyone else and has shown progress with his treatment since the crash, Patterson said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California Shelves Repeal of 1950 Housing Law That Stoked Racial Tension | KQED

Published

on

California Shelves Repeal of 1950 Housing Law That Stoked Racial Tension | KQED


“While SCA 2 was one of many efforts to help address the housing crisis, the November’s ballot will be very crowded, and reaching voters will be difficult and expensive,” Allen said in a statement. “In addition, the legislature recently passed my SB 469, which substantially addresses some of the most significant concerns about how Article 34 might be impacting housing production.”

SB 469 clarifies that the use of state affordable housing dollars does not trigger Article 34’s requirement for voter approval. Allen said his focus is on determining whether these efforts are “making a significant dent in addressing the problem,” adding that quickly building more affordable housing is a priority.

Backed by the California Real Estate Association, the forerunner to the current California Association of Realtors, Article 34 was first adopted by voters in 1950. Realtors played on voters’ fears that affordable housing would lead to greater racial integration of exclusively white neighborhoods.

CAR issued a formal apology in 2022 for its past support of Article 34, with association President Otto Catrina condemning the actions and vowing to address the legacy of its “discriminatory policies and practices.”

Advertisement

The organization “remains a strong supporter of the repeal of Article 34 … which adds unnecessary hurdles and costs to the creation of affordable housing,” CAR spokesperson Sanjay Wagle said in a statement.

Wagle noted that a majority of Californians support repealing the provision but cited research showing a voter education campaign would be needed to explain the article’s effects.

“The cost of such a campaign in an election year with so many initiatives on the ballot made this campaign more costly and difficult, thus making it more logical to pursue a repeal on a future ballot,” Wagle wrote. “We thank Sen. Allen and Sen. Wiener for their efforts on this repeal effort and look forward to working [with] them and other stakeholders on this issue in the future.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Quarterback Commits to Penn State’s 2026 Recruiting Class

Published

on

California Quarterback Commits to Penn State’s 2026 Recruiting Class


Though Penn State has been busily filling its 2025 recruiting class in June, the program hasn’t stopped looking ahead. The Nittany Lions on Tuesday received a commitment from 4-star California quarterback Troy Huhn, who became the second player in Penn State football’s 2026 recruiting class.

Huhn (6-4, 205 pounds) will be a junior at Mission Hills High, just north of San Diego. He threw for 1,623 yards and 16 touchdowns as a sophomore last season. Huhn quickly built a strong offer sheet that included Michigan, Ohio State, Oregon, Texas, Auburn and Notre Dame, among many others. Huhn took an unofficial visits to Ohio State and Penn State in June, committing to the Nittany Lions two weeks after his trip.

Huhn is the 2026 recruiting class’ 10th-rated quarterback prospect, according to the 247Sports Composite, and a top-15 player in California. On3 ranks Huhn highest among the major recruiting services, slotting him at No. 60 nationally and sixth at quarterback.

Huhn, who committed to Penn State offensive coordinator Andy Kotelnicki and quarterbacks coach Danny O’Brien, spent time with head coach James Franklin during his unofficial visit. He told Sean Fitz of Blue-White Illustrated that Franklin made an impression.

Advertisement

“Coach O’Brien was great, but really my main thing when I was getting out there was to have more time with coach Franklin. They definitely gave that to me,” Huhn said in his interview with Blue-White Illustrated. “I really felt the love from coach Franklin. He’s very business, he’s awesome, he’s a funny guy. My mom loves him, he loves my mom. That relationship with him is now a lot better and I’m glad I got to spend that time with him.”

Huhn joins Harrisburg athlete Messiah Mickens on the ground floor of Penn State’s 2026 recruiting class. Mickens committed to Penn State in August 2023. Penn State had been recruiting several 2026 quarterbacks alongside Huhn. One of their targets, Dia Bell, recently committed to Texas.

Huhn’s commitment continued a prolific stretch for the Nittany Lions. Franklin and his staff have received commitments from five players in a four-day stretch. Four of them committed to Penn State’s 2025 recruiting class.

The most recent 2025 commitment belonged to Max Granville, a 4-star prospect from Texas and first-team all-state honoree as a junior. Granville, who will be a senior at Fort Bend Christian Academy, is rated as a 4-star linebacker according to the 247Sports Composite. However, the 6-3, 220-pound Granville projects at defensive end and was recruited by Penn State defensive line coach Deion Barnes. Granville chose Penn State after making an official visit to State College earlier in June. He also visited USC, Texas A&M and Oklahoma in June and took an official visit to Baylor in April.

Penn State opens the 2024 football season Aug. 31 at West Virginia. The game is scheduled for a noon kickoff on FOX.

Advertisement

More Penn State Football Recruiting

Penn State receives commitment from 4-star Maryland prospect

Advertisement

Versatile New Jersey prospect commits to the Nittany Lions

Former Penn State linebacker commit switches to Rutgers

AllPennState is the place for Penn State news, opinion and perspective on the SI.com network. Publisher Mark Wogenrich has covered Penn State for more than 20 years, tracking three coaching staffs, three Big Ten titles and a catalog of great stories. Follow him on Twitter @MarkWogenrich.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending