Connect with us

California

California Dems follow Texas GOP into online speech battle

Published

on

California Dems follow Texas GOP into online speech battle


Californian Democrats seem headed for the same authorized battle dealing with Texas Republicans because the struggle over content material moderation performs out via state legal guidelines.

California’s transparency regulation, signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) final week, has the alternative intent as that of a regulation backed by Texas Republicans that’s set to enter impact after an appellate courtroom dominated Friday in favor of the state. 

However the {industry} teams opposing Texas’s regulation are tying the 2 collectively, arguing that each content material moderation legal guidelines are unconstitutional and will set harmful precedents that result in extra hate speech on-line. 

“No matter whether or not it’s a Democratic or Republican intent, the First Modification applies equally. And that is precisely the place these payments fail in defending the First Modification, and that is primarily authorities compelled speech,” mentioned Carl Szabo, vice chairman and common counsel of the tech {industry} group NetChoice.

Advertisement

Tech teams haven’t filed a go well with in opposition to the California regulation but, however signaled one could also be approaching. 

“I believe there are many individuals speaking to plenty of attorneys in regards to the clear constitutional failures of this laws,” Szabo mentioned. 

Adam Kovacevich, CEO and founding father of the tech group Chamber of Progress, mentioned the group is “definitely taking a look at potential authorized motion in opposition to” California’s transparency regulation. 

“I believe one of many issues price noting is that each Texas and the Florida Republican legal guidelines had transparency necessities just like that of the California invoice. And people have been written by MAGA state legislators, whereas the California invoice was written by progressive Democrats. Our view is that they’re all unconstitutional,” he mentioned. 

NetChoice and the Communications Business Affiliation (CCIA) sued Texas and Florida over payments that might limit firms’ means to take away customers or violative content material. 

Advertisement

California’s regulation, although, goals to crack down on hate speech by establishing regulation to advertise transparency by compelling tech platforms to publicly publish their insurance policies about hate speech and disinformation. It additionally requires firms to ship a report back to the state legal professional common about present phrases of service and knowledge on violations.

“California won’t stand by as social media is weaponized to unfold hate and disinformation that threaten our communities and foundational values as a rustic,” Newsom mentioned in a press release final week. “Californians need to understand how these platforms are impacting our public discourse, and this motion brings much-needed transparency and accountability to the insurance policies that form the social media content material we eat on daily basis.”

Democrats have lengthy been pushing for social media firms to take extra aggressive motion on hate speech and disinformation, however California’s new regulation is the strongest legislative motion taken thus far within the U.S.

Szabo argued that regardless of the regulation’s intent, it can in impact lay the groundwork to let unhealthy actors evade platforms’ guidelines. 

“Anybody who’s ever watched a heist film is aware of that the unhealthy actors have a look at the schematics of the constructing, they have a look at the safety they usually work out precisely work round it. 

Advertisement

What this invoice does is basically give the unhealthy actors all the data they should keep away from detection and keep away from the safety mechanisms social media platforms use each single day,” Szabo mentioned. 

In preventing the Texas regulation, {industry} teams discovered an ally amongst civil society teams, forming a uncommon joint entrance in a push to get the Supreme Court docket to briefly block the regulation in Could. 

The Florida and Texas legal guidelines have been crafted primarily based on Republican accusations that tech firms are censoring content material with an anti-conservative bias, and goal to forbid social media firms from banning customers primarily based on political beliefs. In doing so, critics say tech firms’ arms could be tied to take away hateful and extremist content material that violates their insurance policies. 

However some advocacy teams that supported the tech industry-led effort on the Texas invoice, just like the Anti-Defamation League, help California’s new regulation.

“We’ve got seen a number of state payments and a few state legal guidelines that search to infringe on a platform’s proper to average content material,” ADL know-how coverage and advocacy counsel Lauren Krapf mentioned, referencing the legal guidelines in Texas and Florida. 

Advertisement

“We enthusiastically welcome California’s different method to holding platforms accountable for his or her position within the proliferation of violence and extremism. [The law] approaches the difficulty by in search of accountability via transparency,” she added. 

In accordance with the ADL, considerations that {industry} teams are elevating in regards to the regulation giving unhealthy actors a peek right into a playbook to keep away from guidelines should not legitimate as a result of the disclosure relies on the platforms’ insurance policies, not specifics about phrases or phrases that might set off enforcement. 

The ADL additionally dismissed the priority by noting that unhealthy actors already do benefit from the platforms’ insurance policies in a means that proliferates hate on-line. 

As California’s new regulation heads towards a possible authorized battle, the struggle is predicted to warmth up over the Texas regulation, even after the fifth Circuit Court docket of Appeals dominated in favor of the state. 

The case is predicted to go to the Supreme Court docket once more, this time primarily based on its advantage.

“The regulation is basically unimplementable, there’s no means that the companies can really adjust to this request,” mentioned Kovacevich of the Chamber of Progress. 

“However I believe that if it’s allowed to remain on the books, it’s going to make the Texas web and probably the broader web type of a cesspool.”



Source link

Advertisement

California

California doctor who drove Tesla off cliff with family inside won’t face trial, granted mental health diversion

Published

on

California doctor who drove Tesla off cliff with family inside won’t face trial, granted mental health diversion


The “suicidal” California doctor accused of intentionally driving his Tesla off a cliff with his wife and two young children inside won’t face trial for attempted murder as he is instead set to begin a mental health diversion program.

Dharmesh Patel, who was granted admission into the two-year program last Thursday at the San Mateo County Court, will remain in jail for “several weeks” before he’s released, the San Mateo District Attorney told NBC News.

The radiologist, who has spent the last 18 months behind bars. will be released from jail to his parent’s home where he will be ordered not to leave.

He will also have to report to court weekly for a progress report.

Advertisement

Patel will be ordered to be tested twice a week “to show medication compliance,” and will have to abstain from drugs and alcohol while also forfeiting his driver’s license and passport, the outlet reported.

Dharmesh Patel won’t face trial for his attempted murder charges after his admittance into a mental health diversion program. David G. McIntyre for NY Post

The doctor will return to court on July 1 where details of his release will be determined, a spokesperson for District Attorney Stephen Wagstaffe told NBC News.

Judge Susan Jakubowski granted Patel admission to the program while the DA’s office “intensely” opposed it.

The radiologist appeared “by all accounts a kind and loving” father, said Jakubowski on Thursday, adding that Patel would be better served in treatment than in jail, the Mercury News reported.

Last week’s ruling was made after evidence was found showing Patel has major depressive disorder.

Advertisement
Patel was accused of driving his Tesla Model Y off the 250-foot cliff off “Devil’s Slide” on Highway 1 and landing on the shore of the Pacific Ocean in Jan. 2023. AP
Miraculously, Patel, his wife and their two children — a 7-year-old daughter and 4-year-old son — all survived. Facebook/Neha Patel

In April two doctors testified in court that Patel suffered from “major depressive order” and experienced a “psychotic” break during the attempted murder-suicide on Jan. 2, 2023.

The Tesla Model Y plummeted off the 250-foot cliff off “Devil’s Slide” on Highway 1 and landed on the shore of the Pacific Ocean.

Miraculously, Patel, his wife and their two children — a 7-year-old daughter and 4-year-old son — all survived.

Patel was arrested and later charged with three counts of attempted murder. He initially pleaded not guilty to the charges saying the Tesla experienced a malfunction causing the car to careen off the cliff.

His wife Neha later told investigators her husband had suffered from depression before the crash.

Advertisement

“He’s depressed. He’s a doctor. He said he was going to drive off the cliff. He purposefully drove off,” Neha told rescuers.

During his testimony, psychologist Mark Patterson said Patel’s delusions were provoked by the nation’s fentanyl crisis, the war in Ukraine and feared his children could be kidnapped and molested, which appeared to have been connected to Patel’s worries about accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

In May, Neha Patel begged prosecutors to drop the charges and admit her husband into the program.

In April two doctors testified in court that Patel suffered from “major depressive order” and experienced a “psychotic” break during the attempted murder-suicide. AP
Neha Patel later told investigators her husband had suffered from depression before the crash. Facebook/Neha Patel

“We need him in our lives and it has been over a year and a half since my children or I have seen or spoken to Dharmesh,” she said.

The doctor was deemed a good candidate for the program because he’s at low risk of injuring anyone else and has shown progress with his treatment since the crash, Patterson said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California Shelves Repeal of 1950 Housing Law That Stoked Racial Tension | KQED

Published

on

California Shelves Repeal of 1950 Housing Law That Stoked Racial Tension | KQED


“While SCA 2 was one of many efforts to help address the housing crisis, the November’s ballot will be very crowded, and reaching voters will be difficult and expensive,” Allen said in a statement. “In addition, the legislature recently passed my SB 469, which substantially addresses some of the most significant concerns about how Article 34 might be impacting housing production.”

SB 469 clarifies that the use of state affordable housing dollars does not trigger Article 34’s requirement for voter approval. Allen said his focus is on determining whether these efforts are “making a significant dent in addressing the problem,” adding that quickly building more affordable housing is a priority.

Backed by the California Real Estate Association, the forerunner to the current California Association of Realtors, Article 34 was first adopted by voters in 1950. Realtors played on voters’ fears that affordable housing would lead to greater racial integration of exclusively white neighborhoods.

CAR issued a formal apology in 2022 for its past support of Article 34, with association President Otto Catrina condemning the actions and vowing to address the legacy of its “discriminatory policies and practices.”

Advertisement

The organization “remains a strong supporter of the repeal of Article 34 … which adds unnecessary hurdles and costs to the creation of affordable housing,” CAR spokesperson Sanjay Wagle said in a statement.

Wagle noted that a majority of Californians support repealing the provision but cited research showing a voter education campaign would be needed to explain the article’s effects.

“The cost of such a campaign in an election year with so many initiatives on the ballot made this campaign more costly and difficult, thus making it more logical to pursue a repeal on a future ballot,” Wagle wrote. “We thank Sen. Allen and Sen. Wiener for their efforts on this repeal effort and look forward to working [with] them and other stakeholders on this issue in the future.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Quarterback Commits to Penn State’s 2026 Recruiting Class

Published

on

California Quarterback Commits to Penn State’s 2026 Recruiting Class


Though Penn State has been busily filling its 2025 recruiting class in June, the program hasn’t stopped looking ahead. The Nittany Lions on Tuesday received a commitment from 4-star California quarterback Troy Huhn, who became the second player in Penn State football’s 2026 recruiting class.

Huhn (6-4, 205 pounds) will be a junior at Mission Hills High, just north of San Diego. He threw for 1,623 yards and 16 touchdowns as a sophomore last season. Huhn quickly built a strong offer sheet that included Michigan, Ohio State, Oregon, Texas, Auburn and Notre Dame, among many others. Huhn took an unofficial visits to Ohio State and Penn State in June, committing to the Nittany Lions two weeks after his trip.

Huhn is the 2026 recruiting class’ 10th-rated quarterback prospect, according to the 247Sports Composite, and a top-15 player in California. On3 ranks Huhn highest among the major recruiting services, slotting him at No. 60 nationally and sixth at quarterback.

Huhn, who committed to Penn State offensive coordinator Andy Kotelnicki and quarterbacks coach Danny O’Brien, spent time with head coach James Franklin during his unofficial visit. He told Sean Fitz of Blue-White Illustrated that Franklin made an impression.

Advertisement

“Coach O’Brien was great, but really my main thing when I was getting out there was to have more time with coach Franklin. They definitely gave that to me,” Huhn said in his interview with Blue-White Illustrated. “I really felt the love from coach Franklin. He’s very business, he’s awesome, he’s a funny guy. My mom loves him, he loves my mom. That relationship with him is now a lot better and I’m glad I got to spend that time with him.”

Huhn joins Harrisburg athlete Messiah Mickens on the ground floor of Penn State’s 2026 recruiting class. Mickens committed to Penn State in August 2023. Penn State had been recruiting several 2026 quarterbacks alongside Huhn. One of their targets, Dia Bell, recently committed to Texas.

Huhn’s commitment continued a prolific stretch for the Nittany Lions. Franklin and his staff have received commitments from five players in a four-day stretch. Four of them committed to Penn State’s 2025 recruiting class.

The most recent 2025 commitment belonged to Max Granville, a 4-star prospect from Texas and first-team all-state honoree as a junior. Granville, who will be a senior at Fort Bend Christian Academy, is rated as a 4-star linebacker according to the 247Sports Composite. However, the 6-3, 220-pound Granville projects at defensive end and was recruited by Penn State defensive line coach Deion Barnes. Granville chose Penn State after making an official visit to State College earlier in June. He also visited USC, Texas A&M and Oklahoma in June and took an official visit to Baylor in April.

Penn State opens the 2024 football season Aug. 31 at West Virginia. The game is scheduled for a noon kickoff on FOX.

Advertisement

More Penn State Football Recruiting

Penn State receives commitment from 4-star Maryland prospect

Advertisement

Versatile New Jersey prospect commits to the Nittany Lions

Former Penn State linebacker commit switches to Rutgers

AllPennState is the place for Penn State news, opinion and perspective on the SI.com network. Publisher Mark Wogenrich has covered Penn State for more than 20 years, tracking three coaching staffs, three Big Ten titles and a catalog of great stories. Follow him on Twitter @MarkWogenrich.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending