Connect with us

Arizona

Some Republicans want to mitigate Arizona abortion ban. Democrats call it backpedaling

Published

on

Some Republicans want to mitigate Arizona abortion ban. Democrats call it backpedaling


play

A handful of Arizona Republican lawmakers and officials called for action on Tuesday to mitigate the impact of a court decision reinstituting a 160-year-old ban on nearly all abortions in the state.

Former Gov. Doug Ducey, a Republican, called on officials to “address this issue with a policy that is workable and reflective of our electorate.”

Advertisement

Rep. Matt Gress, R-Phoenix, called on Republican leaders to immediately repeal the 160-year-old law, saying “the law cannot stand.” Sen. T.J. Shope, R-Coolidge, also called for a repeal of the law. Both lawmakers favored a ban on abortions after 15 weeks.

The statements, while made in reaction to a shocking court decision that will reverberate for months if not years, were dismissed by Democrats as GOP backpedaling.

The statements come during an election year in which Democrats have sought to make abortion rights a mobilizing issue to get voters to the polls. In addition to driving support for a state constitutional amendment on abortion rights, Democrats hope their policy positions will win favor with voters and tip the scales in competitive races on the ballot.

“Arizonans remember Gov. Doug Ducey and the Republican legislature pushing through a 15-week ban after Donald Trump was able to get Roe overturned,” Arizona Democratic Party Chairwoman Yolanda Bejarano said in a statement.

Advertisement

“Arizonans will usher in a pro-choice Democratic majority in our legislature, send Joe Biden back to the White House, and once again reject abortion extremism to secure the US House and Senate.” 

In 2022, while the U.S. Supreme Court was considering a case that later overturned abortion rights nationally, Arizona GOP lawmakers and Ducey enacted a ban on abortions after 15 weeks. It was more restrictive than what was allowed at the time in the Grand Canyon State, and supporters acknowledged it was a contingency plan to put a more stringent law in place if the U.S. Supreme Court permitted doing so.

Ducey said on social media Tuesday that he signed the 15-week law because it was “thoughtful conservative policy, and an approach to this very sensitive issue that Arizonans can actually agree on.”

“The ruling today is not the outcome I would have preferred, and I call on our elected leaders to heed the will of the people and address this issue with a policy that is workable and reflective of our electorate,” the former governor wrote.

Advertisement

Democrats say GOP backpedaling on Arizona abortion ban

Those words, however, drew the ire of Democrats who noted the 2022 law included language that it did not repeal the pre-statehood ban. The state’s top court relied on that language in upholding the 1864 law on Tuesday, banning abortions at any point in gestation except to save the life of the mother. A person who aids in an abortion can face prison time.

Also noted by Democrats were Ducey’s efforts to expand and pack Arizona’s top court when he was governor. Ducey in 2016 signed a bill to increase the court from five to seven justices — even though the justices opposed the expansion.

In his eight years as governor, Ducey appointed justices to five of the seven seats. The other two, who dissented from the majority decision on Tuesday, were named to the bench by former Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, also a Republican.

The Arizona Republic requested an interview with Ducey, but a representative declined, saying Ducey stood by the statement.

At a news conference on Tuesday with female Democratic lawmakers in the state, Sen. Eva Burch, D-Mesa, and Rep. Stephanie Stahl-Hamilton, D-Tucson, called out Republican lawmakers as they began releasing statements against the territorial ban.

Advertisement

Stahl-Hamilton specifically called out Gress, who sponsored “fetal personhood” bills in 2023 that would have allowed child support and tax credits to be paid during pregnancy, enhanced domestic violence penalties for people who assault pregnant women, and allowed pregnant women to use HOV lanes. Those bills were either vetoed by Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs or died in committee.

Gress disputed that those bills gave fetuses personhood rights akin to a separate state law dealing with abortion and shared a 2022 campaign flyer that says he opposes the pre-statehood abortion ban and supports exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the mother.

“This is about providing support, financial support and resources for women,” Gress said of his bills. “It’s about empowering women and protecting women. I’ve been pretty consistent in that.” 

Shope said the Arizona Supreme Court “ignored our legislative intent” in its ruling. Shope voted in favor of the 15-week law in 2022 and said he would work to repeal the 1864 law.

Burch shut down any idea of compromising with Republicans on ending the territorial ban in favor of the less strict 15-week ban.

Advertisement

“Am I willing to compromise the lives of pregnant people after 15 weeks to have the appearance of being diplomatic?” Burch asked. “Absolutely not.”

Burch made national headlines in March after revealing on the Senate floor that she was pregnant and obtained an abortion because her pregnancy was not viable.

Despite Republicans like Gress and Shope pledging support for the 15-week law instead of the 1864 ban, Burch said she doesn’t expect action from her Republican colleagues.

A bill to repeal the 1864 ban was introduced earlier this year and has made it nowhere in the GOP-majority Legislature. Lawmakers are convening once a week now and will have voting sessions on Wednesday.

“I really appreciate and respect my Republican colleagues; I co-sponsor bills with my Republican colleagues. We agree on some things, and we disagree on others,” Burch said. “Do I think that they are going to now become champions for reproductive health care because of this ruling and their fears about what the political consequences might be?

Advertisement

“Not even then, absolutely not.”

160-year-old law upheld: Abortion in Arizona set to be illegal in nearly all circumstances, state high court rules

Republic reporter Mary Jo Pitzl contributed to this article.

Reach reporter Stacey Barchenger at stacey.barchenger@arizonarepublic.com or 480-416-5669.

Reach reporter Reagan Priest at rpriest@gannett.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Arizona

Arizona is among the worst states to move to, study says. Here’s why

Published

on

Arizona is among the worst states to move to, study says. Here’s why


A new study has ranked Arizona as one of the worst states to move to for two years in a row, largely due to what it calls a poor quality of life.

The study conducted by Consumer Affairs analyzed the best states to move to in the United States, putting Arizona at the bottom of the list.

Before Arizonans get too defensive about the Grand Canyon State, Consumer Affairs used factors such as affordability, safety, economic strength and education to measure each state, leaving out factors like entertainment, retirement benefits and other considerations that may be important to people living here.

Advertisement

Popular states such as California and New York also landed at the bottom of the list due to their lack of affordability, even though they both have some of the best health care and education in the nation, Consumer Affairs noted.

Here’s why the study says you shouldn’t move to Arizona. Do you agree?

Why you shouldn’t move to Arizona

Arizona ranked No. 10 out of the worst states to move to, scoring especially poorly in quality of life.

Quality of life was measured by the state’s Social Progress Index, average air quality, weather, environmental protection and number of national parks. Due to Arizona’s extreme summers and Phoenix’s consistently poor air quality, it’s easy to see why Arizona ranked No. 44 in quality of life out of 50 states, even though the Grand Canyon is one of the most popular national parks in the nation.

Advertisement

However, Arizona also ranked poorly in other categories, sitting at No. 42 in health care and education, No. 41 in safety and No. 34 in affordability out of 50 states.

There was one category Arizona did impressively well in, ranking No. 5 in economic strength even as one of the youngest states in the country. Still, Arizona’s economic power wasn’t enough to boost its ranking.

Top 10 worst states to move to

Arizona wasn’t alone; some of the biggest states in the country were also considered the worst states to move to in 2026.

  1. New Mexico
  2. Louisiana
  3. California
  4. Arkansas
  5. Oklahoma
  6. Nevada
  7. Alaska
  8. Mississippi
  9. Oregon
  10. Arizona

Top 10 best states to move to

  1. Utah
  2. New Hampshire
  3. Idaho
  4. Minnesota
  5. Massachusetts
  6. Maine
  7. North Dakota
  8. Pennsylvania
  9. Iowa
  10. South Dakota



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arizona

WATCH: Arizona’s health insurance marketplace is seeing dropping enrollment

Published

on

WATCH: Arizona’s health insurance marketplace is seeing dropping enrollment


PHOENIX — Arizona’s ACA marketplace enrollment fell from 363,000 to just over 255,000 in a single year — a nearly 30% decline and the third-largest annual drop in the country.

Rising premiums and expired tax credits are driving the trend, with the average benchmark plan premium in Arizona now at $532 — up 30% from 2025.

In the player above, ABC15 Data Analyst Garrett Archer takes a look inside the numbers on how healthcare premiums are impacting health insurance enrollment.

This story was reported on-air by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

Advertisement

Want more news in your community? Add ABC15 as a preferred source on Google below:





Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona man pleads guilty after illegally living in forest for years among ‘1,000lbs of trash’

Published

on

Arizona man pleads guilty after illegally living in forest for years among ‘1,000lbs of trash’


A man in Arizona has pleaded guilty to violating federal fire restrictions and unlawfully residing in a national forest, after authorities said he spent years living at a makeshift campsite surrounded by what officials described as “approximately 1,000 pounds of trash”.

Mark Aaron Gatz was arrested on 25 June at his illegal campsite in Arizona’s Tonto national forest, according to court records. A United States Forest Service (USFS) officer wrote in documents submitted to court that Gatz had been operating an “illegal campsite” with a “hot wood burning campfire” despite fire restrictions and that he had told investigators that he had been living in the forest for about eight years.

The officer wrote that a records check found that Gatz had previously received multiple citations and was the subject of six outstanding federal arrest warrants for earlier violations, including for building fires during fire restrictions, constructing on national forest service lands, unsanitary conditions and occupying national forest as a residence.

Gatz “said that he knew about current fire restrictions but had to have fire to eat”, authorities said. The documents show that USFS officers made contact with Gatz multiple times over the last year or so, and issued him warnings as well as a violation notice for having campfires during fire restrictions.

Advertisement

Notes from officers’ previous encounters with Gatz earlier this year, submitted into the court docket, state that authorities observed “trash such as clothing, pans, tools, and plastic cups scattered throughout the campsite along with a structure that was four feet in height build using wood panels”.

During an encounter with Gatz in May, officers reported observing “approximately 1,000 pounds of trash” at the site, which they said included tires, plastic bags, trash bags, aluminum cans and other items. They also wrote that they found that the campfire site had been left unattended by Gatz the previous day while still hot.

In a separate report filed by law enforcement from an encounter in February, one officer wrote that “upon arrival at the camp, I was flabbergasted by the amount of debris in the area”.

Investigators said that during that encounter, the debris consisted of three ladders, six to eight totes “overfilled with debris”, five 55-gallon drums, eight tires, multiple bicycle frames, 5 gallons of motor oil, plywood and other “miscellaneous lumber”, and they wrote that trash was scattered over approximately half an acre of Forest Service land and creating what officers described as public safety concerns.

In a separate report from July 2025, officers said they observed what they described as a “large messy campsite” while patrolling the area due to complaints “from the district office abut one large messy camp”.

Advertisement

“There was roughly half an acre of resources ruined due to so much trash and goods on the ground for an extended period of time,” the officer wrote.

This week, after Gatz pleaded guilty, he was sentenced to time served and three years of probation, according to court records.

A representative for Gatz did not immediately respond to a request for comment.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending