Connect with us

Arizona

Federal grant could ring death knell for coal for rural Arizona power co-ops

Published

on

Federal grant could ring death knell for coal for rural Arizona power co-ops


play

Rural Arizona communities could drastically reduce their emissions as the state’s largest member-owned power cooperative moves to eliminate coal by 2028.

Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, which provides the large majority of power for all but one of Arizona’s rural power co-ops, has said it will eliminate the last of its dwindling coal consumption and construct four large renewable energy projects using money from the Biden Administration.

Advertisement

AEPCO was awarded access to $845 million in “Empowering Rural America” funds from the U.S. Department of Agriculture this month.

The cooperative uses coal in one of the six turbine units at its Apache Generating Station south of Willcox in Cochise County. AEPCO plans to eliminate coal from that turbine entirely by the end of 2027, transition the unit to natural gas and eventually reduce its use altogether as newer, cleaner natural gas units and renewable energy projects come online.

The transition will end coal’s nearly decade-long decline at AEPCO generating facilities since 2014 when it made up roughly 90% of the utility’s overall power production. 

In place of coal, AEPCO has relied increasingly on natural gas and renewable power sources. Using its newly awarded grant funding and other investments from partner organizations, AEPCO plans to add more renewable power facilities, which it expects will make up more than 60% of its overall production in 2031. AEPCO believes that development will mean a 70% reduction in its greenhouse gas emissions from 2022 levels.

Advertisement

”(The emissions reduction) is huge. This is huge for us,” AEPCO CEO Patrick Ledger said in an interview. 

Mohave power: A solar ban, a gas power plant and the rural retirees firing back at dirty energy

How rural co-ops help expand renewable power

The overall boost in power will trickle down to rural cooperatives throughout Arizona and neighboring states that buy power from AEPCO, which produces and transmits power, while member cooperatives receive and distribute it directly to customers.

Eric Hawkins, chief operating officer at Marana-based Trico Electric Cooperative, said the grant funding and new renewable projects will boost Trico’s renewable power production and help cut its 2016-2018 emissions in half by around 2027, five years earlier than its goal.

Advertisement

Since 2010, Trico has cut its share of coal-sourced power from 75% of its power mix to roughly 20%. Meanwhile, renewables have grown from less than 1% to 35% of its power portfolio.

Power cooperatives are member-owned non-profit electricity providers located largely in rural or semi-rural parts of Arizona. Together, cooperatives provide only a fraction of Arizona’s power, with the bulk coming from for-profit providers like Arizona Public Service and Tucson Electric Power.

Nonetheless, federal officials say rural power cooperatives are a key building block in a national transition to renewable power. Experts commonly agree that rural communities face unique challenges in transitioning to cleaner energy, including tough access to workforce and financial capital.

Rural-serving cooperatives have struggled to keep up with other power providers in transitioning to renewable sources. In 2022, coal accounted for 30% of co-ops’ power generation compared to 20% nationally.

Advertisement

Using $9.7 billion appropriated through the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Empowering Rural America program (New ERA) grants are designed to overcome those difficulties and spur clean energy projects in non-urban areas. The USDA approves grant proposals based on their ability to cut carbon emissions.

Money will help overcome limits on rural power co-ops

U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack and local officials gathered in Marana on Sept. 12 to highlight the awards and tout other USDA programs under the Biden Administration. The town hall event took place in a warehouse at Trico’s headquarters.

Vilsack spoke at a podium in front of a banner draped over the side of a Trico service truck that read: “Project funded by the Biden-Harris Administration’s Inflation Reduction Act — Investing in clean, affordable and reliable energy.”

“We wanted to make sure, in setting this up, that it was a strong, significant investment and message to rural America,” Vilsack said.

Advertisement

Ledger said the New ERA award will help AEPCO overcome some of the limitations inherent to rural power co-ops. In addition to grants, the award included a low-interest loan that AEPCO will use to refinance debt on its existing coal equipment. Outstanding debt is one of the largest barriers for rural cooperatives nationally when abandoning old coal infrastructure.

“By lowering the interest rate on that asset, you lower the cost to the membership, and presumably we can shift over some of what we are capable of collecting and moving that into the new resources like (a new solar project),” Ledger said.

Ledger said the award money has also motivated other local partners to fund future renewables projects. Altogether, AEPCO maintains that the New ERA grant has catalyzed $3 billion in investment toward these renewable energy projects.

AEPCO said it will use its New ERA money to build 800 megawatts of new renewable energy generation, which is equivalent to its entire existing generation capacity. The projects will include three large solar fields that will produce a combined 730 megawatts, as well as a 70 MW wind project.

One of the solar projects — Apache Solar II — is shovel-ready. AEPCO plans to build a second solar facility at an unfinalized location in Pinal County and a third at an unfinalized location within the state. Ledger said the location for the wind project is not yet final.

Advertisement

Grant funding will help fund the construction of solar battery projects with a combined storage capacity of over 2,910 megawatt hours.

Not all of AEPCO’s new projects will exclusively use renewable energy. The cooperative is also working on four new natural gas units meant to operate during cloudy days when the solar facilities can’t deliver enough power.

Two of those units, planned for construction in Mohave County, have triggered controversies among locals. Some residents believe the plants are poorly sited or altogether unnecessary.

As coal-sourced power has cratered throughout the country, many utilities filled the gap with more natural gas than renewables. While coal has dropped 57% since 2013, the country’s renewable power generation has risen by only 27%, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Meanwhile, natural gas-sourced power has grown 60% and now makes up a larger share of total U.S. power generation than renewables, which was not the case 10 years ago.

Power plant fight: In sunny Arizona, a relocated gas plant ignites questions over who profits and who pays

Advertisement

‘Vision of rural communities’

Burning natural gas emits about half the carbon dioxide as burning coal, but some climate experts worry that new natural gas production will lengthen the country’s reliance on fossil fuels and hamper progress toward a zero-emission energy economy. For some climate experts, it is better to keep coal plants running until utilities can replace them with renewables than to replace them sooner with natural gas facilities.

Although utilities are boosting their overall use of renewables, their power mixes could still change as they face new demands from strong economic growth and the urbanization of agricultural land throughout Arizona. Initially started by farmers and ranchers to provide electricity in overlooked areas, power cooperatives now count sprawling housing developments and energy-hungry industrial facilities among their customers.

“We still have some very rural areas that we serve. We also have some areas with a Ritz Carlton,” Hawkins said. “We’re also seeing a lot of interest from large commercial entities — potential data center sites and things like that — that could dramatically increase our amount to growth at any moment.”

At least for rural areas in Trico’s service area, renewables will be a strong competitor going forward. By building small solar projects and microgrids in rural communities, Hawkins explained, Trico will be able to keep those communities running if long-distance transmission lines go down in a storm.

Speaking in Marana on Sept. 12, Ledger argued that this kind of work, and the award money that could make it possible, has been the heart of rural cooperatives’ work since the beginning.

Advertisement

“It embodies a very democratic idea that with the right catalyst, with the right help, we can convert disadvantage — wide distances, smaller sizes, lower income — to advantage and that we can create lasting value in places that are remote,” Ledger said. “It represents an acknowledgment that our country values the vision of rural communities.”

Austin Corona covers environmental issues for The Arizona Republic and azcentral. Send tips or questions to austin.corona@arizonarepublic.com.

Environmental coverage on azcentral.com and in The Arizona Republic is supported by a grant from the Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust.

Sign up for AZ Climate, our weekly environment newsletter, and follow The Republic environmental reporting team at environment.azcentral.com and @azcenvironment on Facebook, X and Instagram.





Source link

Advertisement

Arizona

Which US states are most and least diverse? Here’s where Arizona ranks

Published

on

Which US states are most and least diverse? Here’s where Arizona ranks


Arizona appeared as one of the 10 states with major diversity in the United States in a September report by the financial company WalletHub where they ranked all states from most to least diverse. 

“The American narrative is a story of diversity,” said WalletHub in its report. And what is the clearest proof of this narrative? A record of data that doesn’t lie. 

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, from 2010 to 2020, the diversity index increased from 54.9% to 61.1%. But the growth doesn’t end there, as it is projected that by 2045 there will no longer be a single ethnic majority in the country. However, diversity varies from state to state and can be defined as something that goes beyond race, gender, or ethnicity. 

Advertisement

“Race and gender are probably the first things that come to mind when people think about diversity, but there’s plenty more that makes this nation diverse,” said WalletHub analyst Chip Lupo. “The most diverse states have above-average variety when it comes to people’s ages, birthplaces, languages, jobs, family structures and more.” 

To conduct their study, WalletHub compared the 50 states of the country across six key dimensions: socio-economic diversity, cultural diversity, economic diversity, household diversity, religious diversity, and political diversity. 

Do you know how diverse the state you live in is? Take a look at the results of WalletHub’s report. 

10 most diverse states in the United States 

The 10 most diverse states in the country, according to WalletHub are: 

Advertisement
  1. California 
  2. Texas 
  3. New Mexico 
  4. Florida 
  5. Nevada 
  6. New York 
  7. New Jersey 
  8. Hawaii 
  9. Maryland 
  10. Arizona 

10 least diverse states in the United States 

The 10 least diverse states in the country, according to WalletHub are: 

50. West Virginia 

49. Maine 

48. New Hampshire 

47. Vermont 

46. Montana 

Advertisement

45. Kentucky 

44. Wyoming 

43. Iowa 

42. Utah 

41. North Dakota 

Advertisement

40. Wisconsin 

How did they determine the most and least diverse states in the United States? 

To determine the most and least diverse states in the country, WalletHub compared all 50 states across six key dimensions: socio-economic diversity, cultural diversity, economic diversity, household diversity, religious diversity, and political diversity. 

These dimensions were evaluated using 14 relevant metrics on a 100-point scale (100 being the highest score). Then, a weighted average of all metrics was calculated to determine each state’s overall score, which was used to rank the states from most to least diverse. 

The metrics analyzed included: 

Socio-economic diversity

Advertisement
  • Household-income diversity 
  • Educational-attainment diversity 

Cultural diversity 

  • Racial and ethnic diversity 
  • Linguistic diversity 
  • Birthplace diversity 

Economic diversity 

  • Industry diversity 
  • Occupational diversity 
  • Worker-class diversity 

Household diversity 

  • Marital-status diversity 
  • Generational diversity 
  • Household-type diversity 
  • Household-size diversity 

Religious diversity 

  • Evangelical Protestant, Mainline Protestant, Black Protestant, Catholic, Orthodox Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, other or unaffiliated 

Political diversity 

  • Conservative, moderate, liberal, unclaimed 

What were Arizona’s results? 

Arizona occupied the 10th overall place in the list. In addition, other of its metrics and their respective placements were: 

  • Eighth in income diversity 
  • 19th in educational-attainment diversity 
  • 11th in Racial and Ethnic Diversity 
  • Ninth in linguistic diversity 
  • Third in birthplace diversity 
  • Ninth in industry diversity 
  • 30th in worker-class diversity 
  • 17th in marital-status diversity 
  • Sixth in generational diversity 
  • 10th in household-type diversity 
  • 10th in household-size diversity 

Reach out to La Voz reporter Paula Soria via email: psoriaaguilar@gannett.com. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona women’s basketball pulls away late to defeat Chicago State

Published

on

Arizona women’s basketball pulls away late to defeat Chicago State


The University of Arizona women’s basketball team (8-2) defeated Chicago State University (1-10) 89-70 on Monday, Dec. 15 in McKale Center. This marks the Wildcats’ second consecutive victory after snapping a brief losing streak last week. 

Graduate guard Mickayla Perdue delivered a remarkable performance for the Wildcats, scoring a career-high 34-points. Her shooting ability was on full display as she converted four 3-pointers from well beyond the arc. Perdue’s long-range accuracy not only increased Arizona’s scoring output but also created opportunities for aggressive drives to the basket. Her assertiveness resulted in frequent trips to the free throw line, where she shot 10-of-12 from the charity stripe. 

Redshirt junior combo guard Tanyuel Welch complemented Perdue’s efforts with an efficient double-double. Welch contributed 18 points and recorded 10 rebounds, showcasing her versatility on both ends of the floor. She was highly effective, shooting 70% from the field, which played a key role in helping the Wildcats maintain momentum and dictate the pace of the game. 

For the Cougars, sophomore guard Aiyanna Culver emerged as the offensive leader, finishing with a team-high 23 points. Culver demonstrated her shooting range by going 5- for-10 from 3-point territory, providing a consistent scoring threat and keeping Chicago State competitive throughout the contest. 

Advertisement

The Wildcats entered the game aiming to control the tempo and establish dominance from the outset. They capitalized on Chicago State turnovers to build a quick 7-0 lead. However, Arizona struggled with ball control in the second quarter, committing several turnovers that allowed Chicago State to close the gap. 

Later in the first half, graduate guard Noelani Cornfield made a significant impact with multiple key steals, finishing the game with five takeaways alongside frequent trips to the free throw line. Her efforts helped Arizona maintain momentum and secure a 45-33 lead heading into halftime.

Chicago State came out of halftime with a surge of energy, led by Culver’s three triples in the quarter. The Cougars had multiple offensive rebounds which led to extended possessions and second chance points which helped keep the lead within reach. 

The Wildcats went through a scoring drought during the first three minutes of the fourth quarter, which allowed the Cougars to reduce the deficit to just 2-points, their shortest gap since the opening tip. 

Arizona responded by ramping up the tempo and embarked on a decisive 26-9 scoring run, highlighted by 13 points from Perdue in the final period. During this stretch, Chicago State struggled taking care of the basketball, committing nine turnovers in the fourth quarter and totaling 30 for the game. 

Advertisement

Despite making several mistakes throughout the game, the Wildcats demonstrated tremendous resilience. Each time adversity struck, Arizona responded with tenacious defense and huge scoring runs. These efforts were largely fueled by the leadership and experience of their veteran players, who set the tone for the team. 

Looking ahead 

Arizona head coach Becky Burke will look for her team to clean up the turnovers as Arizona  prepares for its final non-conference matchup against Bellarmine University. The game is scheduled for Thursday, Dec. 18 in McKale Center and will be streamed live on ESPN+.


Follow the Daily Wildcat on Instagram and Twitter/X


 

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

AP men’s basketball Top 25: Arizona remains No. 1, Nebraska earns highest ranking since 1991

Published

on

AP men’s basketball Top 25: Arizona remains No. 1, Nebraska earns highest ranking since 1991


Arizona maintained its position as the No. 1 team in the Associated Press men’s basketball Top 25 on Monday, earning 42 of 61 first-place votes after a week that included a 96-75 win over No. 16 Alabama.

The Wildcats (9-0), one of seven undefeated teams remaining in Division I, already own five wins over high-major opponents.

There was little movement in the top 10 after a week with few upsets. Michigan (10-0), Duke (10-0), Iowa State (11-0) and UConn (10-1) remained Nos. 2-5, respectively. The only team to move up in the top 10 was No. 7 Gonzaga (10-1), which swapped places with No. 8 Houston (10-1) after adding another top-tier win over UCLA on Saturday.

The greater movement occurred between Nos. 10-25.

Advertisement

Nebraska (11-0) was the biggest riser, jumping eight spots to No. 15 after Saturday’s 83-80, buzzer-beating win over No. 18 Illinois. The Huskers, the lone power-conference team to never win an NCAA Tournament game, achieved their highest ranking since 1990-91, when they finished the season No. 11.

Illinois (8-3) and No. 23 Florida (6-4) were the biggest fallers, dropping five spots apiece.

Georgia (9-1) was the lone newcomer to the poll at No. 25, while UCLA (7-3) dropped out.

Here’s the full poll, along with my ballot:

Rank

Advertisement

  

Team

  

Record

  

Advertisement

Prev

  

CJ’s vote

  

1

Advertisement

9-0

1

2

2

10-0

Advertisement

2

1

3

10-0

3

Advertisement

5

4

11-0

4

3

Advertisement

5

10-1

5

4

6

Advertisement

10-1

6

6

7

10-1

Advertisement

8

7

8

10-1

7

Advertisement

10

9

9-1

9

9

Advertisement

10

9-1

10

8

11

Advertisement

9-1

11

11

12

9-1

Advertisement

14

15

13

10-0

15

Advertisement

12

14

8-2

17

14

Advertisement

15

11-0

23

13

16

Advertisement

7-3

12

17

17

8-3

Advertisement

19

16

18

8-3

13

Advertisement

18

19

7-3

16

21

Advertisement

20

7-3

20

20

21

Advertisement

8-3

21

NR

22

6-3

Advertisement

22

24

23

6-4

18

Advertisement

19

24

9-1

24

22

Advertisement

25

9-1

NR

25

NR

Advertisement

9-2

NR

23

Others receiving votes: USC 68, Iowa 47, Seton Hall 46, LSU 19, Kentucky 19, UCLA 16, Clemson 14, California 13, Saint Mary’s 12, Arizona State 5, Villanova 5, Notre Dame 4, Indiana 4, Miami (Ohio) 4, Miami (Fla.) 4, Utah State 2, Saint Louis 1, Wisconsin 1.

How good is Nebraska?

I caught Nebraska in person earlier this season when it beat New Mexico and Kansas State in Kansas City, Mo., and I’ve been a believer since. It’s a classic Fred Hoiberg team with a playmaking big, tons of shooting and awesome offensive execution. But what also stood out was how hard the Huskers played, and the defense is better than many of his best teams of the past at Iowa State.

Advertisement

The numbers are starting to back that up. The Huskers are up to 28th in adjusted defensive efficiency, the highest ranking ever for a Hoiberg defense. All this team was missing was signature wins, and it got two this past week, crushing Wisconsin 90-60 and then winning on the road at No. 18 Illinois on a last-second shot.

Arkansas could keep climbing

Arkansas fell out of my rankings for a few weeks early in the season because its computer numbers were bad after a few close calls against mid-majors. It was obvious the talent was there, but the Razorbacks just weren’t sharp early. They’re starting to play up to their talent, and I moved them up to 14th this week, which is one spot below where I had them in the preseason.

John Calipari’s best teams always have an NBA-level point guard, and he has one in Darius Acuff, who is averaging 17.7 points and 5.7 assists. Calipari also has three big wings who could develop into pros — Meleek Thomas, Karter Knox and Billy Richmond III — and as I wrote about in my weekly rankings, Trevon Brazile is playing the best ball of his career. This team is deeper and more talented than last year’s group, which got hot late and made the Sweet 16. Might still be a little low on this group.

Advertisement

Best team not ranked: Iowa

Iowa has yet to make the AP Top 25, but I’ve ranked the Hawkeyes the last three weeks and would argue their case was made even stronger last week in a loss. Iowa led Iowa State by 13 in the first half last Thursday at Hilton Coliseum and ended up taking a 4-point loss, which actually moved it up in the computer models. The Hawkeyes now rank 20th at KenPom and Bart Torvik, 19th in the NET and 21st at Evan Miya.

As the Hawkeyes proved against Iowa State, they are a tough out. Similar to Drake last year, Ben McCollum’s second Division I team gives nothing in transition, is hard to score against in the half court and is exhaustingly patient offensively waiting for a great shot to develop.

I can understand why my fellow voters aren’t there yet. With Ole Miss being a disappointment, you could argue Iowa is missing a signature win. The first opportunity is Jan. 3 when Iowa hosts UCLA.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending