Connect with us

Alaska

Iditarod returns to 16-dog teams

Published

on

Iditarod returns to 16-dog teams



Sled dogs at the ceremonial start of the 2018 Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race, the last time teams were allowed to have 16 dogs each. (Alaska Public Media/KNOM photo)

The Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race will once again allow up to 16 dogs per team in the thousand-mile race to Nome.

Race officials made the announcement in a media briefing Wednesday in Anchorage, where the race kicks off with a ceremonial start Saturday.

The Iditarod had set the limit at 14 dogs per team just five years ago after considering the expense of flying dogs back from the trail and to make it easier for smaller kennels to race in the Iditarod.

Advertisement

The thought at the time was also that it would be easier for each musher to take care of two fewer dogs, said longtime Iditarod Race Director Mark Nordman.

“Yeah, definitely, there was some talk that, you know, with 14, people can control them a little better,” Nordman said. “But really, and it’s always in the figures of how many dogs were dropped, the percentages just didn’t change.”

In the early days, Nordman said, the Iditarod didn’t have a limit on the number of dogs in each team. Then the limit was 20 for a number of years until the more modern era, when it first went to 16, he said.

The decision to return to allowing 16 dogs per team came after a vote in Nome among 2023 Iditarod finishers that showed their support, Nordman said. The Iditarod’s Rules Committee took up the proposal and approved it, as did the Iditarod Trail Committee, which finalized the decision, he said.

Meantime, Iditarod teams competing in this year’s race are expecting bare ground on a section of trail north of the Alaska Range called the Farewell Burn, despite record-breaking snow in Southcentral Alaska this winter.

Advertisement

That’s mostly a concern for the mushers and their sleds, not so much for the dogs, Nordman said.

“Their footing is great. It’s, ‘Hey, it’s summertime, let’s go for a run!’ and so they take off,” he said. “The dogs are fine. I don’t worry about the dogs going across there. It’s the mushers that can get flipped and turned and have to be very awake.”

Nordman attributed the lack of snow in some sections to high winds and mid-winter warm-ups, but he said the rest of the trail is looking great until the teams reach the Bering Sea coast, where storms have broken up sea ice. He said the trail might need to be rerouted to go overland near Elim.

The 2024 Iditarod begins with the ceremonial start in Anchorage on Saturday and the restart in Willow on Sunday, when the race clock begins ticking. A winner is expected in Nome early the week of March 10.


Advertisement

a portrait of a man outside

Advertisement

Casey Grove is host of Alaska News Nightly, a general assignment reporter and an editor at Alaska Public Media. Reach him at cgrove@alaskapublic.org. Read more about Casey here

Advertisement





Source link

Alaska

I Took My First Alaskan Cruise—Here Are 7 Packing Mistakes You Should Avoid, and What to Bring Instead From $8

Published

on

I Took My First Alaskan Cruise—Here Are 7 Packing Mistakes You Should Avoid, and What to Bring Instead From


A travel writer shares the 7 biggest mistakes they made when packing for an Alaskan cruise—and the smart solutions they recommend instead. Here, shop their go-to travel essentials, including a puffer jacket, binoculars, Samsonite luggage, and more, starting at just $8 from Amazon.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

For 70 years, they were believed to be mammoths… but no, they were whales. Two “megafauna” vertebrae in Alaska have been relabeled, and history is changing in 2026

Published

on

For 70 years, they were believed to be mammoths… but no, they were whales. Two “megafauna” vertebrae in Alaska have been relabeled, and history is changing in 2026


For more than 70 years, two heavy fossil vertebrae in a museum drawer in interior Alaska were proudly labeled as woolly mammoth. New tests now show they belong to whales instead, forcing scientists to rethink a small but eye-catching piece of the mammoth extinction story.

The bones were collected in the 1950s near Dome Creek, north of Fairbanks, roughly 400 kilometers, or about 250 miles, from the nearest coastline.

Learning that these fossils came from ocean animals has raised a basic question that would puzzle any road trip planner looking at a map of Alaska today; how did whale bones end up so far inland?

From field discovery to museum drawer

In the early 1950s, naturalist Otto Geist found the vertebrae while working in gold mines near Dome Creek and sent them to the University of Alaska Museum of the North. Curators cataloged the round bone disks as mammoth remains, based on their appearance and the well-known presence of Ice Age giants in the region.

Advertisement

For decades, the fossils rested out of sight in collection drawers while visitors focused on full skeletons and tusks under bright gallery lights. It is the kind of small label most museum goers accept without a second thought as they stroll past the glass cases. 

Radiocarbon dates that broke the mammoth timeline

That quiet routine changed when the Adopt a Mammoth project invited members of the public to sponsor radiocarbon dating of stored specimens, including these two vertebrae. When a team led by Matthew Wooller at University of Alaska Fairbanks checked the results, the dates came back between roughly 1,900 and 2,700 years old.

Those numbers created a serious mismatch, since woolly mammoths on mainland Alaska are thought to have disappeared around 13,000 years ago. If the dates had truly belonged to mammoths, the bones would have represented the youngest known fossils of the species in this part of the world by many thousands of years.

At first, researchers considered the possibility of a technical error in the dating process. The more they studied the data, though, the more it looked as if “something was amiss” with the old mammoth label rather than with the lab work itself.

Illustration of a woolly mammoth skeleton, the extinct Ice Age giant whose fossils were long studied across Alaska and the Arctic.

Isotopes and DNA reveal two ancient whales

The team then measured stable isotopes of nitrogen and carbon in the bone material to see what kind of food the animals once ate. The chemical pattern matched marine food webs rather than the grasses and shrubs a grazing mammoth would have relied on, a red flag that pointed toward the ocean.

Advertisement

That clue pushed the scientists to extract fragments of ancient DNA from the fossils. Genetic tests showed that one vertebra came from a common minke whale and the other from a North Pacific right whale, both large whales that normally spend their lives in saltwater.

Knowing the bones came from whales also meant the radiocarbon ages needed a correction, since ocean animals can appear older on paper because of the way carbon cycles through seawater. After adjusting for this marine effect, the team estimates that the whales lived roughly 1,100 and 1,800 years ago, long after mammoths had vanished from the mainland.

A whale mystery in the middle of Alaska

One puzzle remains, and it is the part that keeps the story from feeling too tidy. Dome Creek sits about 400 kilometers from the coast on a small stream that today could barely float a fishing raft, which makes the idea of a whale swimming there hard to picture. 

The study outlines several possibilities, including whales that traveled far inland along major rivers and died there, or bones that ancient people carried from the shore to use as tools or building material. The authors point out that both ideas have practical limits, especially for a massive right whale that feeds on plankton not found in rivers.

For the most part, the simplest explanation may be a human one rather than a natural one, a basic cataloging mistake when the fossils entered the collection, since Geist gathered bones from both inland and coastal sites and the wrong box may have been marked with the Fairbanks location.

Advertisement

In everyday terms, it is a reminder that even expert labels can age badly and that revisiting old collections with new tools can flip a neat story on its head.

The official study has been published in the Journal of Quaternary Science.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Police looking for man considered ‘armed and dangerous’

Published

on

Police looking for man considered ‘armed and dangerous’


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – The Anchorage Police Department is looking for help finding 61-year-old Mathew Thomas Becker.

If you see him, “do not attempt contact with him,” APD said.

Mathew Thomas Becker(From APD)

Instead, call 911 to report his location.

“He is considered armed and dangerous,” APD said.

Advertisement

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending