Connect with us

Alaska

Bristol Bay salmon would benefit from added protection in federal law • Alaska Beacon

Published

on

Bristol Bay salmon would benefit from added protection in federal law • Alaska Beacon


As we write, tens of millions of salmon are swimming their way back to Bristol Bay. And for the second year running, those who work the 15,000 jobs the salmon provide each year can celebrate that the proposed Pebble mine no longer threatens to contaminate the headwaters of the greatest wild sockeye salmon fishery in the world. 

At least for now. 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued Clean Water Act protections for this amazing fishery in January 2023. That news was welcomed by residents of the region and scores of businesses that are reliant upon the Bristol Bay fishery, along with its $2.2 billion annual economic impact. Since then, Pebble and the state of Alaska have filed four lawsuits in an attempt to keep this ill-conceived, acid-producing mine on life support. Math and science aren’t on their side — not only would the mine irreversibly harm a fishery that could, if not contaminated, continue to produce and provide jobs for centuries to come, but the state of Alaska made a basic math error in one of its lawsuits, leading it to inflate the amount they’re suing American taxpayers for by $630 billion. Clearly, those seeking to exploit Bristol Bay at the risk of its sustainable fishery aren’t taking “no” for an answer.

Fortunately, on May 1, Rep. Mary Peltola introduced the Bristol Bay Protection Act in the U.S. House of Representatives. This bill would codify EPA’s Clean Water Act protections, which protect the headwaters of Bristol Bay, where the Pebble deposit is located, from mining activity. Rep. Peltola’s bill makes the protections Tribes, fishermen and Alaskans fought for in a decades-long battle over the fate of the world’s greatest sockeye salmon fishery more difficult to overturn by administrative action alone. Thank you, Rep. Peltola, for this much-needed legislation. 

Advertisement

We’ve each been involved in Bristol Bay’s fishery for decades, one in the lodge business and one running a commercial fishing and direct marketing business. One of us brings people to the fish and the other brings the fish to people. Between the two of us, we’ve got nearly 70 years of hard-won experience in Bristol Bay.  We’re not antidevelopment. We’ve both worked in Alaska’s oil fields. And we’ve both traveled to our nation’s capital to testify in front of Congress about the wonders of Bristol Bay and how it’s too valuable to risk losing. 

The proposed Pebble mine is an issue that not only cuts across party lines: it obliterates them.  The late Sen. Ted Stevens called Pebble the “wrong mine in the wrong place,” and Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan have both expressed their opposition to Pebble. The Army Corps of Engineers denied a key Pebble permit in 2020, during the Trump administration. These are historic positions for Alaska politicians to take, but facts, science, and public opinion are in Bristol Bay’s corner.  In addition to Alaska’s leaders (absent our current governor, Mike Dunleavy), the last three presidents of the United States have all taken actions to protect Bristol Bay and prevent the advancement of the Pebble mine. The EPA began its Clean Water Act review under Obama; the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers denied Pebble’s permit under Trump; and the EPA finalized Clean Water Act protections under Biden. Rep. Peltola’s bill is the next,  desperately needed step. It also reflects that the majority of Alaskans have consistently opposed this uniquely dangerous project.

For roughly 20 years, the dark cloud of uncertainty that Pebble cast over the region has united local residents, subsistence, recreational and commercial fishers. That coalition, born in Bristol Bay, is backstopped by organizations, businesses and individuals from coast to coast. Over the course of this campaign, more than 4 million public comments have supported protections for Bristol Bay. Whether you’re a catch and release angler, a big game hunter, someone who loves watching the brown bears snatch salmon mid-air, or whether you just enjoy eating delicious, nutritious wild Bristol Bay sockeye, all those who have spoken in favor of protecting this amazing region can support the Bristol Bay Protection Act.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement

Alaska

Alaska, Trump Administration Settle Biden-Era Oil, Gas Plan Case

Published

on

Alaska, Trump Administration Settle Biden-Era Oil, Gas Plan Case


Alaska agreed to settle with the Interior Department on Monday over a Biden-era plan aimed at restricting drilling and leasing, a deal that could expand the state’s oil and gas development.

The state and the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority in consolidated cases agreed to drop the suit if Interior offered a written admission that its approval of the Biden-era plan was flawed and violated the 2017 Tax Act.

The 2024 plan included restrictions such as protecting more than 1 million acres of coastal plains. According to the proposed agreement, that move eliminated interest in a Jan. 6, 2025 …



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Kei to stay, new Alaska law makes import vehicles roadworthy

Published

on

Kei to stay, new Alaska law makes import vehicles roadworthy


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Kei trucks and other K-class vehicles are now road legal in the state of Alaska following the passage of SB 239.

The small Japanese import vehicles have drawn a following among owners who say the compact trucks and vans can handle more than their size suggests.

Since kei trucks are imported vehicles that do not meet federal motor vehicle safety standards, they must be at least 25 years old to be brought into the country, per the Imported Vehicle Safety Compliance Act of 1988.

Chris Blankenship drives a 1995 Suzuki Carry and has owned it for about two years after buying it from a previous owner in Tok.

Advertisement

“You don’t need a full-size American truck to do a lot of stuff,” Blankenship said.

He uses the truck for everything from groceries to camping.

“You can do so much with them. I have mine with a cargo carrier on it, the GoPros, the Starlink. I have a truck bed tent for it too,” Blankenship said.

Before SB 239 was passed, Alaska did not align with the federal 25-year import rule.

“Over the decades before, SB 239 came along, folks that would import them thinking that the state would follow the federal 25-year law,” Blankenship said.

Advertisement

While the vehicles could be imported, they couldn’t be registered.

“But before the bill was passed and signed into law, the state of Alaska says, ‘no, you can’t do it,’” he said.

SB 239 was passed last June, aligning Alaska with the federal law and allowing kei trucks that meet the age requirement to be registered as fully road legal.

Blankenship bought his truck in-state and does not have the original import form needed to register it under the new law. To obtain the paperwork, he must take the vehicle out of the state into Canada and back.

“And they’ll check it over, look at the paperwork and do their stamp and go, welcome to the U.S.,” he said.

Advertisement

He is also looking for others in the same situation.

“I’m trying to find out who’s all in the same boat. Because maybe we can drive up there and do them all at once,” Blankenship said.

Prior to the law change, Blankenship’s truck was registered as an all-purpose vehicle, similar to an ATV, allowing for “limited on-road operation,” according to the Alaska DMV.

“It says up to the discretion of law enforcement if they want to pull you over and give you a ticket, tow it, whatever. But I’ve had so many different law enforcement at the city, state and federal — they’re like, ‘we love these things.’ I’ve had folks say, ‘Hey, can I buy it? Can you find one?’” Blankenship said.

Owners say the trucks draw attention from other drivers as well.

Advertisement

“Folks will look at you, they will grin, they will laugh, they’ll say cute truck, they will ask about it,” Blankenship said.

Blankenship said his F350 with a plow has largely been replaced by the kei truck in his daily routine.

“It’s just a really fun truck to drive. My 2000 F350 that has the big plow on it — that stays parked like 99% of the time now, and I drive this,” he said.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Copyright 2026 KTUU. All rights reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

A frozen ground under Alaska’s tundra looks like ordinary soil from above, but scientists have put a $43 trillion price tag on what happens when it thaws

Published

on

A frozen ground under Alaska’s tundra looks like ordinary soil from above, but scientists have put a  trillion price tag on what happens when it thaws


Stand on the tundra in Alaska and it looks like nothing special.

A vast, flat plain of amber grass, shallow ponds, and dark soil stretching to the horizon.

No obvious drama, no visible crisis.

But a few feet below your boots, something has been building for millennia, and scientists have finally put a dollar figure on what happens when it wakes up.

Advertisement

The ground beneath the Arctic has been keeping a secret for millions of years

Permafrost is frozen ground, soil and rock locked in ice for thousands of years across Alaska, Canada, Siberia, and the high Arctic.

It covers roughly a quarter of the land in the Northern Hemisphere.

Most Americans have never thought about it for a single second.

Permafrost contains about 1,700 gigatons of carbon in the form of frozen organic matter, accumulated over countless millennia of dead plants and animals that never fully decomposed.

That is roughly twice the carbon currently in the entire atmosphere above us.

Advertisement

Think of it as a freezer the size of a continent, stocked with centuries of biological material that simply never had the chance to rot.

For as long as the ground stayed frozen, that carbon stayed locked away, harmless and invisible.

Something is going wrong with the world’s largest freezer

The Arctic is warming roughly four times faster than the global average.

As the ground softens, the organic matter inside it begins to rot.

Permafrost releases both carbon dioxide and methane as it thaws, through rotting organic matter, collapsing terrain, and waterlogged soils where methane-producing microbes thrive.

Advertisement

That methane detail matters more than most people realize.

Methane is over 80 times more effective than carbon dioxide at trapping heat over a 20-year period.

Wildfires are accelerating the process further, scorching the insulating layer of moss and peat that once kept the frozen ground shielded from summer heat.

And once those gases escape, there is no putting them back.

The tundra is already changing in ways you can see from the ground

Across Alaska, roads are buckling and tilting where the ground beneath them has shifted.

Advertisement

Strange new lakes are appearing on the tundra, formed as the frozen ground collapses inward.

Scientists call these thermokarst lakes, and they are spreading.

In some Alaskan villages, houses are sinking and cracking as if the earth beneath them is slowly giving way.

Wooden boardwalks that once crossed stable ground now lean at odd angles, and in a handful of communities, entire buildings have been condemned.

This is not a future warning, it is already happening across the far north.

Advertisement

A study on permafrost and the remaining carbon budget found that including permafrost thaw in climate models meaningfully reduces the allowable carbon budget for avoiding dangerous warming targets.

Scientists ran the numbers and the total came out to $43 trillion

Greenhouse gas emissions from thawing Arctic permafrost could result in an additional $43 trillion in economic impacts by the end of the twenty-second century, according to research from the University of Cambridge and the National Snow and Ice Data Center.

That figure is not the cost of fixing permafrost.

It is the added damage thawing permafrost would layer on top of every other climate cost humans are already calculating.

To put it in scale: the University of Cambridge researchers note that the $43 trillion comes on top of more than $300 trillion in climate-change costs already projected by existing models, meaning permafrost alone could add roughly 13 percent to the total bill.

Advertisement

The NOAA summary of the research makes clear that most existing climate models do not yet fully account for this feedback loop.

A more recent analysis by Woodwell Climate Research Center sharpens that picture further, finding that abrupt thaw and Arctic wildfires together shrink the remaining carbon budget faster than gradual models predict.

The frozen ground was never just scenery, it was a climate vault, and it is now unlocking.

There is still time to slow the key that is turning in the lock

The picture is serious, but it is not hopeless.

Thawing is projected to affect 50 percent of near-surface permafrost at 1.5 to 2 degrees of warming, and up to 90 percent at 3 to 5 degrees.

Advertisement

That gap between those two numbers is the reason every fraction of a degree still matters enormously.

Scientists studying how the 2023 heat record overshot predictions are applying the same urgency to permafrost feedback, working to get these carbon costs into the models governments actually use.

Research teams are experimenting with methods to actively protect permafrost, from restoring grasslands that insulate the frozen layer to tracking thaw rates using satellites.

In places like Juneau, where a glacier burst open for the third summer in a row, residents are already living inside the feedback loops science is still racing to measure.

The ordinary-looking ground beneath the Arctic tundra turned out to be one of the most consequential things on Earth.

Advertisement

And the price of ignoring it was frozen in plain sight all along.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending