Earlier this month, I finally achieved the elusive goal I had set for myself in Bungie’s Marathon. I collected six of the game’s rarest items, allowing me to attempt and then successfully clear the raid-style Compiler boss. I felt a massive weight lift off my shoulders — nearly 185 hours of playtime and I had managed to complete Marathon’s pinnacle activity. A day later, I took my first break from the game.
Technology
Welcome to the public domain, Mickey Mouse
It’s finally happened: after nearly a century, Mickey Mouse has slipped off Disney’s copyright leash. The first versions of the iconic cartoon character, seen in Steamboat Willie and a silent version of Plane Crazy, enter the public domain in the US on January 1st, 2024. (An early version of Minnie Mouse is also fortunately included.) There’s still a complicated mess of protections around Mickey, but today is a moment public domain advocates have awaited for decades — and there are plenty of other exciting new entries as well.
Duke Law School’s Center for the Study of the Public Domain, as usual, has a roundup of prominent works whose copyright protections lapse in the US today. The list includes sound recordings from 1923 and works in other media that were published in 1928. Among other things, that covers:
You can find a slew of public domain sound recordings for download at the Library of Congress National Jukebox. And if you’re inspired by the above media or any other works entering the public domain this year, Techdirt will be hosting its sixth annual Public Domain Game Jam to celebrate making games based on them.
For ongoing characters like Mickey Mouse, of course, copyright law is particularly complicated. The public domain version of the character doesn’t include significant design changes made in later works, like Sorcerer’s Apprentice Mickey from Fantasia in 1940. And you can’t produce a work that falsely represents itself as a Disney production or a piece of official merchandise, since Mickey Mouse is also a registered Disney trademark. Duke Center for the Study of the Public Domain director Jennifer Jenkins has a far more comprehensive explanation of the law on Duke’s blog.
The public domain is supposed to be the final destination of any copyrighted work — it’s part of a compromise that acknowledges the benefits of letting artists and thinkers control and profit from their work in the short term while freely building on each other’s ideas in the long term, a balance Disney itself relied upon when making fairy-tale adaptations like Snow White and Cinderella. (It’s also a vital factor in letting archivists preserve old media after its creators die or can no longer be found, since it allows making copies without legal concerns — and only a tiny sliver of copyrighted works remain commercially valuable for the entire term of protection.) But it was frozen for 20 years in the US thanks to the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, which was derisively dubbed the “Mickey Mouse Protection Act” for delaying Steamboat Willie’s entry into the public domain. Though despite the nickname, Disney was far from the only company lobbying for its passage.
The result is that Mickey Mouse has become a symbol of extended copyright protections and (with varying degrees of fairness) Disney’s vested stake in intellectual property law. When Disney angered Republican politicians by criticizing Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” law, for instance, Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) proposed a nigh-nuclear IP law rollback in the name of stripping “woke corporations like Disney of special copyright protections.” We may well see legal fights over the precise limits of public domain Mickey, the way we have other characters like Sherlock Holmes — but today, it’s a good day to think about new uses for old media.
Technology
QR code email scam targets employee reviews
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
We received an email that looks like an official HR notice about a performance review. It mentions pay updates, benefits and a deadline. There is also a QR code to access your file.
The message claims to come from an internal HR office. Instead, it pushes us to scan a QR code to access your appraisal. That setup is a classic phishing move. In many cases, these scams try to move you off your computer and onto your phone, where it is harder to verify links.
So, let’s break down what stands out and why this message should absolutely not be trusted.
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
FAKE TRAFFIC VIOLATION TEXT SCAM USES QR CODES TO STEAL PAYMENT INFO
A fake HR performance review email uses a QR code to push employees toward a phishing page designed to steal login details. (Kurt “Cyberguy” Knutsson)
QR code email scam red flags you should notice
This email is built to feel routine and urgent at the same time. Take a closer look, and the red flags start to add up.
Red flag #1: The sender’s email does not match the company’s
The message shows “CyberGuy” as the sender. The actual email address is mario@toituresphenix.com. That domain has nothing to do with the brand it claims to represent. This is one of the biggest warning signs. Legitimate companies send HR notices from their own domain. If the domain looks unrelated, treat it as suspicious right away.
Red flag #2: The email creates urgency with a deadline
The email says you must act by May 15, 2026. Deadlines push people to react fast. Scammers rely on that pressure, so you skip basic checks. Real HR systems do use deadlines. The difference is how they deliver them. They do not rely on a random email with a QR code.
Red flag #3: The QR code is the main call to action
The message tells you to scan a QR code to access your file. That is a newer phishing tactic called “quishing.”
Why it matters:
Most companies will send a direct link or ask you to log in through a known portal. They do not force QR-only access for something as sensitive as compensation details.
Red flag #4: The greeting is generic instead of personal
The email starts with “Dear Techtips.” It looks like a mailing list or placeholder. Legitimate HR messages usually address you by your full name. They often include employee-specific details that scammers cannot easily fake.
Red flag #5: The email uses vague HR system language
The email mentions a “secure HR access system” but never names it. There is no recognizable platform like Workday or ADP. That vagueness is intentional. It avoids giving you something you can verify.
Red flag #6: The branding looks real yet feels off
There is a Microsoft logo in the message. That does not mean Microsoft sent it. Logos are easy to copy. The layout tries to mimic a corporate notice. Still, the formatting feels generic. Real internal emails usually follow a consistent company template you have seen before.
Red flag #7: The high-importance flag adds pressure
The message is marked as high importance. That visual cue pushes urgency again. Scammers stack these signals so you feel like you cannot ignore the message.
Red flag #8: The instructions bypass normal login habits
Instead of telling you to log into your HR portal, the email asks you to scan and access a file directly. That isn’t how sensitive employee data is handled. Companies want you inside a secure login system, not opening a file from a QR code.
FBI WARNS OF QR CODE SCAM DISGUISED IN MYSTERY PACKAGES
QR code phishing scams can hide suspicious links, making it harder for users to verify the destination before opening it. (Hispanolistic/Getty Images)
Why QR code phishing scams are growing fast
QR codes feel safe because we see them everywhere. Restaurants use them. Airlines use them. That familiarity lowers your guard. Scammers take advantage of that trust.
They embed malicious links inside codes so you cannot preview them easily. Once you scan, you may land on a fake login page that looks real. From there, it is a quick path to stolen credentials.
What happens if you scan a malicious QR code
If the QR code leads to a phishing page, a few things can happen:
- You enter your login details and hand them over
- Malware downloads silently to your device
- The page asks for more personal information
In some cases, attackers use the stolen login to access company systems or your email account. That can lead to more attacks against your contacts.
Ways to stay safe from QR code email scams
These scams rely on speed and distraction. Slow things down, and a few simple checks can protect your data.
1) Do not scan unexpected QR codes
If an email pushes you to scan a code, pause. Go to the official website yourself instead of using the code.
2) Check the sender’s domain carefully
Look past the display name. Verify the full email address. If it does not match the company, do not trust it.
3) Use your normal login path
Access HR systems by typing the URL you already know or using a saved bookmark. Avoid links and codes in emails.
4) Watch for generic greetings
Messages that avoid your real name should raise suspicion. That is often a sign of mass phishing.
BE AWARE OF EXTORTION SCAM EMAILS CLAIMING YOUR DATA IS STOLEN
Employees should access HR systems through official portals instead of scanning QR codes or clicking links in unexpected emails. (gpointstudio via Getty Images)
5) Confirm with your company
If something feels off, ask your HR team directly. Use a known contact method, not the one in the email.
6) Use strong antivirus software
Strong antivirus software can block malicious links, flag phishing pages and stop malware before it installs. Get my picks for the best 2026 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android & iOS devices at Cyberguy.com
7) Consider a data removal service
Scammers often use personal data found online to make emails feel more convincing. A data removal service can reduce your exposure by removing your information from broker sites. Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting Cyberguy.com
8) Keep your devices and apps updated
Security updates patch known vulnerabilities. Turn on automatic updates so you are always protected.
9) Enable two-factor authentication
Even if your login gets stolen, a second verification step like two-factor authentication (2FA) can stop attackers from getting into your account.
Join CyberGuy Live: Lock Down Your Phone in 30 Minutes (Saturday, June 13, 10 am ET)
Your phone holds your email, passwords, photos, banking apps and personal data. In this free, live online class, Kurt the CyberGuy will walk you step by step through simple phone security fixes you can do in real time. You’ll learn how to improve your privacy settings, spot the latest phone scams, use trusted security tools and walk away with a simple checklist to stay protected. Register here: CyberGuyLive.com
Kurt’s key takeaways
Phishing emails keep evolving. Today, it is a QR code tied to a fake HR notice. Tomorrow, it could be something else that feels just as routine. The safest thing to do is simple. Do not trust the path an email gives you when sensitive information is involved. Use your own path instead.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
If a message asks you to act fast with a QR code, would you stop and verify it first or trust it because it looks familiar? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
Technology
Marathon’s second season is a chance for Bungie to turn things around
I had been playing Marathon virtually every day since it launched in March, and I needed to put it down. Treating a Bungie game like it’s a grueling second job is nothing new. Certainly not for me or the many fellow Destiny players that cut their teeth on repetitive level grinds, randomized gear chases, and the difficult raid encounters of Bungie’s prior looter shooter. I have thousands of collective hours in the Destiny franchise. So I knew to expect from Marathon something generally familiar: a game with which I would develop an addictive and complicated relationship, equally defined by love and frustration. But I wasn’t prepared for just how quickly I’d go through the stages of that relationship.
I’ll admit: Characterizing how you play an online video game as if it’s a toxic relationship is probably an indication that the problem is more with me than the game. But my experience is not unique — three months since Marathon’s launch, its player numbers have plummeted, and its abrasive nature, complex risk-and-reward systems, and sometimes excruciating difficulty are starting to grate on diehard players, too.
Marathon puts unreasonably tall walls in front of its players
The magic of Bungie game design is marrying deep systems with unparalleled gunplay and incredible art direction. When all three work in concert, it’s exhilarating, a near-perfect loop of minute-by-minute sensation inside of a long and rewarding arc of self-directed mastery and aspiration. Marathon nailed the gunplay and the art. But its systems, combined with the high-stakes lose-it-all nature of extraction shooters, keep putting unreasonably tall walls in front of its players.
Season 2 is just a few days away, slated for June 2nd. It will involve a complete reset of every player’s progression: All loot will disappear, faction levels will be reset, and players will be asked to start over again from scratch. It’s also a chance for Bungie to reset the narrative around Marathon.
For the company, the stakes could not be higher. Earlier this month, Bungie announced that it would cease active development on Destiny 2, ending a definitive chapter in the studio’s post-Halo history after more than 12 years. Fans are understandably upset, and many are now directing their ire at Marathon, claiming it pulled resources away from continuing Destiny 2 or from kickstarting a full-fledged Destiny 3. Bloomberg has since reported that Bungie is now planning layoffs as part of the decision to end development on Destiny 2.
The studio’s future now depends more than ever on the success of Marathon, a game that has been defined, almost immediately after launch, by its lackluster performance. The longevity of the live-service title has become the central point of anxiety and contention within the Marathon community, as players debate what went wrong, what could fix it, and whether this downward spiral is an existential threat to their favorite new hobby. It has gotten so extreme that the game’s official subreddit has now banned all discussion about player numbers except those made in a single megathread now dedicated to the subject. Now, Destiny’s demise has only exacerbated every conversation about Marathon and its future.
Image: Bungie
As someone who’s gone all in on Marathon, I feel confident I can diagnose at least one of the central issues at play. Marathon is simply too demanding: It requires too much time, too much wasted effort, and far too much failure. It is simply too hard, not just for new players, but for everyone. Yes, the game has a problem bringing in new people, but it also treats those that do stick around with increasing levels of disregard. I want to feel like the time and effort I dedicate to Marathon is being rewarded, and often I am disappointed.
Every online multiplayer game has to contend with the tension between courting and keeping casual players and maintaining a competitive atmosphere and high skill ceiling. Yet I’ve never seen a game accelerate from its honeymoon phase into struggling to survive this quickly. Visit the game’s Reddit community and you’ll see players penning multi-hundred-word personal essays, analyses, and straight-up confessionals about what they think is wrong with Marathon. These players are not the problem. Marathon has serious flaws that inhibit its ability to be enjoyed like a normal video game.
Marathon has serious flaws that inhibit its ability to be enjoyed like a normal video game
In many ways, the extraction genre Marathon occupies is built on failure. You cannot let so-called “gear fear” — the anxiety of losing rare and hard-fought items — control your experience. You’re conditioned to not care about the guns and mods you lose, the time you waste, and the opportunities you squander because of bad luck or another better team or a lobby of high-level streamers. One tiny split-second decision can ultimately ruin an entire run, and that’s just how it goes. What one team does to you, you can always do to another. A free kit in Marathon can also turn into a backpack of purple gear if you play your cards right.
Yet Marathon takes these genre staples several steps too far. It does with the soul-killing brutality of its ranked play (which is also plagued by cheating, including teams collaborating over proximity chat); the incomprehensible uphill battle of its complex and confusing progression system; its stinginess around upgrade materials; and its overreliance on randomness.
Marathon also gets harder the longer you play, thanks to features like level-based matchmaking and by increasingly upping the ante of the risk-reward loop required for high-level activities. Take for instance the vaults needed to access the Compiler boss. Each one requires a key that must be earned from another map, meaning you must fight other teams for it and successfully exfil. You then must take that key into the endgame Cryo Archive map to attempt to unlock a vault, an elaborate puzzle room that broadcasts your location to nearby teams and invites them to try and take you down. You must do this six times, with six different vaults of increasing complexity, to even access the Compiler, which itself requires a rare consumable keycard upon every attempt. This is so grueling that high-skill players are selling Compiler runs on eBay.
The game’s progression and loot system ensure that the less you play, the lower your chances of survival, a problem that compounds as a season drags on because other players quite literally have better stats, better guns, and more funds to purchase items necessary for success, like healing consumables and ammo. One particularly mind-boggling design choice is a season-long grind to unlock the ability to simply purchase purple shields, a feat I have yet to accomplish after more than 200 hours. The more you feel like each run is fruitless — a slot machine pull at best and an inevitable failure at worst — the more likely you are to give up. This shrinks the player base even further and accelerates what some in the community have come to call Marathon’s “skill-based death spiral.”
The more you feel like each run is fruitless — a slot machine pull at best and an inevitable failure at worst — the more likely you are to give up
Bungie, to its credit, has gone to great lengths acknowledging Marathon’s shortcomings. Game director Joe Ziegler penned a refreshingly reflective and self-aware season 1 postmortem. He called the game “overwhelming to learn,” admitted that its overall vibe was too intense, and said it was “hard to find that chill moment in Marathon” that would make it a place you wanted to hang out in, instead of one that singularly rewarded ruthless competition.
The developer has also promised major changes in season 2. In one particularly telling blog post, Bungie said progression in Marathon “should feel more like a staircase where you take one step after another, not like a wall you must climb.” With season 2, Bungie promises to speed up that faction progression, move runner upgrades to a new buildcrafting system called the Cradle, and enact a slew of changes designed to make the game feel more intuitive and rewarding and at the same time less brutal.

Perhaps the most monumental change on the way is the addition of experimental queues that will reduce or remove competitive PvP, in a bid to win over Destiny fans. It’s also an acknowledgment that though Marathon does exist primarily as an extraction shooter, the game may need to move, and do so quickly, beyond the limitations of the genre to achieve something even remotely close to the mass appeal of Destiny. And in a sign of just how serious Bungie is taking these issues, it announced that it would offer the game for free to all players for the first week of season 2, with your progress carrying over if you buy a copy of Marathon.
These are all great starts, and if Bungie is able to make the core loop of Marathon feel quicker, less punishing, and more streamlined, I have no doubt I’ll want to sink back in. Whether these changes will be enough to bring in jaded Destiny fans or players who steadfastly profess that extraction shooters are just not for them is a big question mark. What I do know is that Marathon is a game with an amazing foundation that deserves a fighting chance to become something greater, especially now that the studio has wagered more of its future on the game. The ingredients are all there — Bungie just needs to stop getting in its own way.
Technology
Humanoid robot cleans first US apartment
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A humanoid robot just walked into someone’s San Francisco apartment and cleaned it. Yes, really.
Gatsby, a local robotics startup operating under West Egg Labs, says it has completed the first consumer home cleaning by a humanoid robot in the United States. The customer came from Gatsby’s San Francisco waitlist, was picked at random and booked the cleaning through the company’s iOS app.
With Gatsby, instead of buying a pricey robot for your home, you book one when you need it, much like ordering a ride or food delivery from an app.
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
HOME ROBOT AUTOMATES HOUSEHOLD CHORES LIKE ROSIE FROM ‘THE JETSONS’
The robot cleaning service raises new questions about privacy, trust and accountability as humanoid robots enter private homes. (Gatsby / Kurt “Cyberguy” Knutsson)
What Gatsby’s humanoid robot cleaning service does
Gatsby describes itself as an on-demand cleaning service in San Francisco that uses humanoid robots instead of human cleaners. You open the iOS app, pick a time and a robot shows up to clean your apartment.
This is not a robot vacuum. Gatsby says it uses full-size humanoid robots that walk through the apartment and handle chores such as dishes, surfaces, floors, making the bed and folding laundry.
The price is also part of the hook. Gatsby says it charges a flat $150 per clean, regardless of apartment size. That means a studio and a penthouse cost the same, with no tips, hidden fees or surcharges, according to the company. Gatsby compares that with typical San Francisco apartment cleaning services, which it says often run from $150 to $300. Gatsby says the robot cleaned the customer’s entire apartment on its own, with no human cleaner physically inside the home. The company also says a typical cleaning takes about 3 hours. One recent San Francisco cleaning ran from 8:42 a.m. to 11:47 a.m., with one robot and no human cleaner physically present.
No human cleaner, but there is a key detail
Gatsby says no human cleaner is physically present during the clean. For anyone who has ever cleaned frantically before the cleaner arrives, that may sound appealing. However, that does not necessarily mean there is no human involvement at all. Gatsby says harder tasks can be handled through remote human teleoperation, while routine work is autonomous. So, while a person may not be standing in your apartment, the service may still involve remote human help.
That detail does not erase the milestone. But it does change how people should think about privacy, trust and what “autonomous” really means inside a home.
Why Gatsby chose house cleaning first
Cleaning makes sense as a starting point because almost everyone has some relationship with it. Some people hate it. Some people outsource it. Others squeeze it in late at night because the day got away from them.
Gatsby founder and CEO Aron Frishberg frames housework as more than an annoying chore. He sees it as a time problem that falls hardest on people who are already stretched thin.
“Housework is the largest unpaid job in human history, and it falls hardest on the people with the least time to give,” Frishberg said. “Right now, somewhere, there’s a parent scrubbing floors who would rather be with their kid. A worker mopping after a sixteen-hour shift. We’ve mapped every neuron and synapse in a fruit fly’s brain, yet we still clean our homes the same way our ancestors did hundreds of years ago. We didn’t build this to clean apartments, we built it to give that time back to humanity.”
Gatsby is taking a robot-agnostic approach
Many humanoid robot companies want to build and sell the machine itself. Gatsby is trying a different route. The company says it is building the consumer distribution layer for humanoid robotics. In other words, Gatsby wants to be the app and service layer that connects customers with whichever humanoid robot performs best.
That could be smart if the robotics market keeps changing quickly. A better robot may arrive six months from now. A cheaper one may show up after that. Gatsby wants the flexibility to swap in stronger hardware while keeping the same app, booking flow and service model. The company describes itself as robot-agnostic. That means Gatsby is not betting everything on one robot body. It wants to work with multiple robot makers as the technology improves.
5 WORRISOME PRIVACY CLAUSES HIDDEN IN SMART HOME DEVICES
Gatsby says it completed the first consumer home cleaning by a humanoid robot in the U.S. at a San Francisco apartment. (Gatsby / Kurt “Cyberguy” Knutsson)
The humanoid robot still raises big questions
Home cleaning is brutally hard for robots. Apartments are messy, unpredictable and full of awkward objects. A robot has to deal with chairs, cords, clutter, pets, tight corners and the occasional pile of laundry that nobody wants to discuss.
Gatsby says the robot can handle tasks that go well beyond vacuuming, including dishes, surfaces, floors, bed-making and laundry folding. That sounds impressive. It also raises the bar for reliability. A robot that handles one apartment is a milestone. A robot that can clean many different homes, day after day, without awkward failures is a much bigger challenge.
The privacy angle people should not ignore
Letting any cleaner into your home requires trust. With robots, that trust gets more complicated. Gatsby markets the service as a way to avoid having a stranger physically inside your home. Still, remote assistance raises its own privacy questions. Customers should know what remote operators can see, how home data is handled and whether any video, audio or mapping information is stored.
That does not mean Gatsby is doing anything wrong. It simply means consumers should ask direct questions before letting any connected robot into a private space. Before booking any robotic home service, read the privacy policy, check what data the app collects and think about what parts of the home you are comfortable exposing to a connected device.
What happens if something breaks?
This may be the first question many people ask. A humanoid robot walking through an apartment sounds convenient until you picture it bumping into a lamp, knocking over a vase or dropping a dish.
Gatsby says customers are covered if the robot damages anything during a cleaning, with the company promising to replace items the robot breaks. That is a helpful promise, but customers should still review the fine print before booking.
Robots entering homes may need the same kind of trust-building that ride-sharing and food delivery needed years ago. People want convenience, but they also want accountability when something goes wrong.
Why this could shake up home services
If Gatsby can make this work reliably, the impact could stretch beyond spotless counters. A $150 robot cleaning visit could appeal to busy parents, older adults, people with mobility challenges and anyone who wants help without coordinating with a human cleaner. It could also put pressure on traditional cleaning services, especially in expensive cities where household help already costs a lot.
At the same time, this raises labor questions. Human cleaners already work in a tough market. If robot cleaning becomes cheaper and more convenient, workers could feel that shift first. The near-term reality may be less dramatic. Robots may handle basic tasks while humans continue to do deep cleaning, delicate work and jobs that require judgment. But Gatsby’s first consumer cleaning shows that home robotics has moved from showroom fantasy into someone’s actual apartment.
IS THIS ROBOT AFTER OUR HOSPITALITY, RETAIL AND HEALTHCARE JOBS?
Gatsby says its humanoid robots can handle chores such as cleaning dishes, floors, surfaces, bed-making and laundry folding. (Gatsby / Kurt “Cyberguy” Knutsson)
Where Gatsby is available now
For now, Gatsby says the service is available only in San Francisco. The company has a waitlist for other cities. That limited rollout gives Gatsby a chance to test the service in real apartments before expanding. It also gives customers, competitors and privacy experts time to see how this model works outside a carefully controlled launch.
What this means to you
For now, this is mainly an early look at where home services may be headed. If you live in San Francisco, Gatsby may already be on your radar. If you live elsewhere, the bigger takeaway is that consumer robots are starting to arrive as services rather than expensive gadgets you have to own.
That could make robot help more accessible. It could also make it easier for companies to test new technology inside real homes. So, treat this as promising but early. Ask practical questions before you get excited. How does the robot enter and leave? What happens if it breaks something? Can a remote operator see inside your home? Does the company record video? Who handles problems if the cleaning falls short? Those answers will matter as much as the robot itself.
Join CyberGuy Live: Lock Down Your Phone in 30 Minutes (Saturday, June 13, 10 am ET)
Your phone holds your email, passwords, photos, banking apps and personal data. In this free, live online class, Kurt the CyberGuy will walk you step by step through simple phone security fixes you can do in real time. You’ll learn how to improve your privacy settings, spot the latest phone scams, use trusted security tools and walk away with a simple checklist to stay protected. Register here: CyberGuyLive.com
Kurt’s key takeaways
Gatsby’s first humanoid robot cleaning feels like one of those tech moments that sounds funny until you realize it may become normal. A robot showing up to scrub an apartment still feels strange. Then again, so did getting into a stranger’s car through an app. The big question is whether Gatsby can turn a clever first cleaning into a service people actually trust. Price helps. Convenience helps. But homes are personal spaces, and consumers will need more than a shiny robot and a slick app. If Gatsby can deliver clean rooms, clear privacy rules and dependable service, it could change how people think about housework.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Would you let a humanoid robot into your home to clean? Let us know by writing to us at CyberGuy.com
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
-
Sports2 minutes agoRoman Reigns domesticates Jacob Fatu to retain World Heavyweight Championship at WWE Clash in Italy
-
Technology7 minutes agoQR code email scam targets employee reviews
-
Business14 minutes agoMove over, Grogu. Internet culture soars as ‘Backrooms’ and ‘Obsession’ top the box office
-
Entertainment17 minutes agoReality star Matt Brown of ‘Alaskan Bush People’ is found dead, family confirms
-
Politics32 minutes agoDespite Trump’s recent insistence, in-person voting does exist in Los Angeles
-
Sports44 minutes agoYoshinobu Yamamoto helps Dodgers deliver a birthday win for Dave Roberts
-
World52 minutes ago“Crime hotspots”: Why violence at German stations
-
News1 hour agoFamily visitation partly restored at New Jersey ICE facility after week of protests