Connect with us

Technology

PopGrip JumpStart review: what if a battery bank were also a PopSocket?

Published

on

PopGrip JumpStart review: what if a battery bank were also a PopSocket?

We’re smack in the midst of new telephone season and getting near the time when a few of us are going to have to begin worrying about want lists and stocking stuffers, so I wish to take a look at an adjunct which may be on some folks’s radar: the PopGrip JumpStart, a $35 battery financial institution that attaches to your telephone by way of PopSocket’s fast launch mechanism and gives round a 50 % cost by way of a built-in Lightning or USB-C cable.

Once I first heard about it, I hoped that the JumpStart could be each a superb battery financial institution and a great way to carry my telephone. Sadly, I discovered that it was comparatively mediocre on the first job and worse on the second, making it a bit unclear who precisely this product is for.

$35

PopSockets’ 2200 mAh battery financial institution that attaches to the again of your telephone, and that can be utilized as a grip.

I’ll say just a few good issues earlier than I actually dig in, although. The JumpStart is a really good object, manufactured from a textured plastic formed into just a little ovular puck with the basic PopSocket sleeve on the again. On the highest of the puck is a single button, which you click on to begin charging and which has a light-weight that acts as an influence indicator.

Advertisement

Once you connect it to PopMount 2 merchandise (aka those with the replaceable tops), it clicks into the mount with a satisfying sound. Nevertheless, when you pop it out, it spins freely, so the puck can find yourself perpendicular to your telephone. I couldn’t work out any use for it doing this; it’s far too distinguished to behave as a kickstand, and it doesn’t actually change the expertise in the event you’re holding your telephone in panorama as a substitute of portrait. The one factor the spinning did was annoy me and infrequently detach the JumpStart from the telephone.

Image showing the JumpStart’s integrated Lightning cable, which has been slightly removed from its holder.

The built-in cable is about nearly as good because it may very well be.
Photograph by Mitchell Clark / The Verge

The built-in Lightning or USB-C cable (you purchase it with one or the opposite) is round seven inches lengthy and feels surprisingly sturdy. I’d anticipated that it could come unfastened and flop out of its slot, however that didn’t turn into the case in any respect. If something, it’s nearly a bit too troublesome to deploy; I actually needed to dig my nails in and pull. However whereas I’m blissful PopSockets is utilizing a superb cable, I actually want the JumpStart simply used wi-fi charging, like different mountable battery banks from Anker, Otterbox, and Apple.

In idea, the built-in cable would make the JumpStart extra handy than having to hold round an exterior battery financial institution and corresponding twine, however I truthfully discovered myself wishing I had gone with the latter answer every time I used to be simply attempting to make use of my telephone. The JumpStart’s bulk made it troublesome to get my telephone out and in of my pocket (an issue that’s even worse while you’ve received the cable plugged in), and it made the telephone very uncomfortable to carry, even once I was utilizing it like an enormous PopSocket.

1/2

The JumpStart provides fairly a little bit of bulk to your telephone — that’s all the time the case while you add further battery, however this type issue feels notably inelegant.
Photograph by Mitchell Clark / The Verge
Advertisement

The plain answer is to only take the JumpStart off once I’m not utilizing it and put up with the more serious ergonomics whereas I’m charging. The issue with that’s that it critically cuts down on the comfort issue as a result of it means I’ve to hold the JumpStart round with me in both a pocket, bag, or purse if I wish to use it once I discover myself operating low on juice. And if I’ve to hold one thing exterior round anyhow, I’d in all probability wish to go together with one thing that would present a bit extra energy.

Based on PopSockets’ web site, the JumpStart has roughly 2,200mAh of capability. In my testing, that was sufficient energy to take my telephone from round 15 % cost to round 80 % (there was one outlier the place it solely managed to spice up my telephone by 40 %, however that was a worst-case state of affairs the place I used to be utilizing GPS whereas charging within the chilly). Your mileage might range, although, as a result of my iPhone Mini 12 has an itsy-bitsy battery. I don’t anticipate you’d get as many share factors with a bigger telephone.

To be clear, that’s undoubtedly sufficient energy to get you out of a jam in the event you all of a sudden end up with a lifeless battery. However personally, it is simply not well worth the annoyance of both having to maintain monitor of the JumpStart or attempting to make use of my telephone with a cumbersome spinny factor on the again. That’s very true since my telephone helps MagSafe, which means I may use Anker’s $50 wi-fi charging battery financial institution with over double the capability — there’s even a model with a built-in PopSocket, although that does value extra.

Image of the JumpStart’s USB-C port, with the accessory extended into the holding position.

I respect the USB-C and passthrough charging — however I don’t respect how a lot the JumpStart swivels round once I’m attempting to make use of it.
Photograph by Mitchell Clark / The Verge

I do assume the mix of an excessive amount of bulk to be snug whereas not being cumbersome sufficient to actually cost up your telephone is sort of a disgrace as a result of PopSockets clearly put some effort into this factor. Regardless of which model you get, you cost the JumpStart by way of USB-C, a boon for anybody who’s aggravated at Apple for sticking with Lightning on its telephones. It additionally helps passthrough charging, which means it may cost your telephone whereas it is plugged into the wall — I’ve two devoted energy banks from Anker and Mophie that don’t have that function.

On the high, I mentioned I’m not fairly positive who that is for. The one exception is somebody completely devoted to the PopSocket way of life who can’t reside with no grip on the again of their telephone and who both doesn’t wish to use MagSafe or has a telephone with out it (aka the Android telephones PopSockets targets with the USB-C model of the accent). However I feel anybody else will in all probability wish to take a look at different, extra conventional battery banks or go together with the even newer magnetic tech.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Technology

Samsung confirms Unpacked for early July

Published

on

Samsung confirms Unpacked for early July

Samsung’s summer Unpacked is officially on, starting at 10AM ET on Wednesday, July 9th. The invitation features a jazzy little bop and the words “Ultra Unfolds,” so I think it’s safe to assume we’re getting that foldable Ultra phone the company previously hinted at.

The invitation seems to suggest a thinner device, or at least that’s how I’m reading it. That would line up with some of the rumors, and super-thin foldables has certainly been a trend so far this year. I’ve wedged plenty of chunky foldables into the side pocket of my yoga pants, so I for one would welcome this development.

Per usual, Samsung is offering a little incentive to reserve a device for pre-order ahead of the big reveal: $50 in credit to use at Samsung.com. That’ll cover a chunk of the cost of a case for a foldable phone, which run between $85 and $100 for the Galaxy Z Fold 6 on Samsung’s website right now. If the Ultra comes with an Ultra price tag, it might be worth shelling out a little more to protect it from the wear and tear of daily use. Just a little free advice.

Continue Reading

Technology

Top 5 scams spreading right now

Published

on

Top 5 scams spreading right now

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Lately, I’ve had way too many calls on my shows from people who have lost thousands (sometimes hundreds of thousands) to scams. These are so cleverly evil, it’s like Ocean’s Eleven but starring a dude with three Instagram followers and a ChatGPT subscription. 

Last chance to enter to win $500 in giveaway. Enter now!

You see, we’re way past scam emails from sketchy Nigerian princes. Today’s scams are slick, personalized and powered by scary-good tech like AI voice cloning and deepfakes. And yep, people fall for them every single day.

DON’T SCAM YOURSELF WITH THE TRICKS HACKERS DON’T WANT ME TO SHARE

Advertisement

Here are today’s scummy front-runners, plus how to protect your cash, pride and sanity:

Scam calls – employing things like AI voice clones – are becoming all too common these days. (Thomas Trutschel/Photothek via Getty Images)

1. The AI voice clone

This one’s horrifying because it sounds like someone you trust. Scammers grab a clip of your child’s, spouse’s, boss’ voice from social media, podcasts or even your voicemail.

Then they call your mom, your grandpa, your partner: “Hi, it’s me. I’m in big trouble. I need money. Don’t tell anyone.” It’s not them. It’s AI. And it works because it feels real. 

Advertisement

Anthony in Los Angeles was deceived by scammers who used AI to replicate his son’s voice. Believing his son was in distress, Anthony transferred $25,000 to the fraudsters.

If you get a call like this, call or text the person. Try someone they live or work with.

IF YOU DON’T KNOW ABOUT THESE VIDEO TOOLS, YOU’RE ALREADY BEHIND

 2. ‘Your bank account’s frozen’

You get a text or call from your “bank,” and the number looks legit. They say your account is locked due to suspicious activity and you need to confirm your info.

Advertisement

Stop right there. That link? Fake. The person on the phone? Also fake. 

Charles in Iowa lost over $300,000. Always open your bank’s app or type the web address in yourself. Never tap the link they send.

sad older woman

Phony claims of frozen bank accounts and crypto-crazy online “friends” are other ways scammers have found to cause financial grief. (iStock)

3.  Crypto investment ‘friend’

This starts on Instagram, Facebook or LinkedIn. Someone friends you, chats you up, gains your trust, then casually mentions they’re making a fortune in crypto.

They even offer to show you how. Suddenly you’re handing over money or access to a wallet, and poof, it’s gone. A couple in Georgia lost $800,000 after falling victim to a cryptocurrency scam. Just because someone’s friendly doesn’t mean they’re honest.

Advertisement

Don’t fall for a stranger friending you on social media. If you’re lonely, volunteer somewhere.

THE $40K SCAM THAT ALMOST GOT ME + 3 MORE SPREADING NOW

4. Gold bar scam

You get a call from someone claiming to be with the FBI or your bank’s fraud team. They say your money’s at risk, and you need to withdraw it, convert it into gold bars and turn it over for “safekeeping.”

A 72-year-old retiree from New Hampshire was scammed into purchasing $3.1 million worth of gold bars and turned it over to the scammer. Yes, it sounds insane, but it’s happening, and people are losing everything. Come on, you know that real law enforcement doesn’t operate this way.

Advertisement
Gold bars

Calls claiming you need to convert money to gold are an out-there, but real, threat. (JUNG YEON-JE/AFP via Getty Images)

5. Vet emergency

A neighbor’s crying. Your dog’s been hit by a car. They rushed your fur baby to the vet and paid the bill. You owe them $1,200. But wait … your pup is fine, snoring on the couch. 

You’ve been pet-shamed into Venmoing a scammer.

If any of this sounds familiar, your gut is whispering danger or you’re not sure what might be happening in a situation, reach out to me. I’ll help you figure out what’s real and what’s a scam. Better to ask than get burned. I won’t judge you, I promise.

Advertisement

Get tech-smarter on your schedule

Award-winning host Kim Komando is your secret weapon for navigating tech.

Copyright 2025, WestStar Multimedia Entertainment. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Technology

Tesla’s robotaxi is live: here are some of the first reactions

Published

on

Tesla’s robotaxi is live: here are some of the first reactions

Tesla finally did the damn thing. The company launched its hotly anticipated robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, on Sunday, June 22nd — and we’re now starting to see some of the first reactions roll in.

But first, we have to get a few important caveats out of the way. Tellingly, the service is not open to the general public, nor is it completely “unsupervised,” as Elon Musk once promised. The vehicles will include Tesla-employed “safety monitors” in the front passenger seat who can react to a dangerous situation by hitting a kill switch. Other autonomous vehicle operators would place safety monitors in the driver or passenger seats, but typically only during the testing phase. Tesla is unique in its use of safety monitors during commercial service.

The rides are limited to a geofenced area of the city that has been thoroughly mapped by the company. And in some cases, Tesla is using chase cars and remote drivers as additional backup. (Some vehicles have been spotted without chase vehicles.)

The service is invite only at launch, according to Tesla’s website. A number of pro-Tesla influencers have received invites, which should raise questions about how unbiased these first critical reactions will be. Tesla hasn’t said when the service will be available to the general public.

The limited trial includes 10-20 Model Y vehicles with “Robotaxi” branding on the side. The fully autonomous Cybercab that was first revealed last year won’t be available until 2026 at the earliest. The service operates in a small, relatively safe area of Austin from 6AM to 12AM, avoiding bad weather, highways, airports, and complex intersections.

Advertisement

Despite those hours, the robotaxi service seems to have gotten off to a slow start. Several invitees had yet to receive the robotaxi app by 1PM ET on Sunday. Sawyer Merritt, who posts pro-Tesla content on X, said he saw 30 Waymo vehicles go by while waiting for Tesla’s robotaxi service to start. Musk posted at 1:12PM that the service would be available later that afternoon, adding that initial customers would pay a “flat fee” of $4.20 for rides — a weed joke with which Musk has a troubled history.

While riders waited, the company published a new robotaxi page to its website detailing a lot of the rules and guidelines of the service. Visitors are invited to sign up for updates about when Tesla’s robotaxi service may come to their area. (Musk has said there could be up to a thousand robotaxis on the road “in a few months.”)

After finally being granted access to the app, Merritt posted an image of the service area map, which appeared to cover a small area bordered by the Colorado River to the north, Highway 183 to the east, Highways 290 and 71 to the south, and Zilker Part to the west.

And then the rides began — and they appeared to be mostly uneventful. Several invitees livestreamed themselves summoning their first cars, interacting with the UI, and then arriving at their destination. Several videos lasted hours, as the invitees would conclude a trip and then hail another car immediately after. One tester, Bearded Tesla Guy, described the app’s interface as “basically Uber.” Many had some difficulty finding the pickup location of their waiting Tesla robotaxi.

“This is like Pokemon hunting,” one person on Herbert Ong’s livestream said, “but its robotaxi hunting.”

Advertisement

Once inside, the Tesla-employed safety monitor would ask the riders to show their robotaxi apps to prove their identities. Otherwise the safety monitors kept silent throughout the ride, despite riders trying to get them to talk. I’m assuming that Tesla will need to come up with some other way to identify their riders if they plan on removing the safety monitors from the passenger seat. Waymo, for example, asks customers to unlock their vehicle through the ridehail app.

The rear screen instructs the riders to fasten their seatbelts, and after pressing an animated “start ride” button, the vehicle gets underway. Riders can also start the ride from a similar button in the app. Since riders are registering for the robotaxi app using their preexisting Tesla profiles, they’re greeted with their preferred music apps on the rear screen with all their playlists and saved tracks.

The front display shows a visualization similar to consumer vehicles using Tesla’s Full Self-Driving feature — even though Musk had said the robotaxis are running on a special version of FSD that’s not available to the average Tesla owner. There are “pull over,” “stop in lane,” or “support” buttons on the center display. Another tester, Chuck Cook, said the visualization lacked some of the controls that a normal Tesla might have.

Pressing the support button places the rider in a queue as they wait for the remote operator to connect. On Cook’s livestream, it took approximately two minutes before an operator finally connected. “We appreciate you calling in,” the operator said (though the cellular connection was poor). “We’re here for any issues to support your ride.”

Throughout the various trips, the robotaxis encountered a bevy of normal situations, like U-turns, speed bumps, pedestrians, construction, and more. The vehicles maintained speeds of about 40 mph or slower. Common words to describe the ride was “smooth,” “great,” and “normal.” One tester said on X that they got the robotaxi to “mess up” in a way that required the remote operator to help out — though they declined to describe it as a disengagement.

Advertisement

Ashok Elluswamy, the head of the company’s self-driving team, posted a photo of several dozen people in a room with 10 large monitors on the wall showing live camera feeds from several vehicles. “Robotaxi launch party,” Elluswamy wrote.

Where Tesla goes from here is the real challenge. Musk has said he also wants to launch a robotaxi service in California, where the regulatory process is a lot more complex than Texas. And even though he has said he wants to take things slow, he also claims that Tesla will have over a thousand driverless vehicles on the road “within a few months.”

Meanwhile, Waymo is operating more than 1,500 driverless vehicles in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix, and Austin — with plans to expand to Atlanta, Miami, and Washington, DC in the near future. The Alphabet-owned company has said it will grow its fleet to 2,000 vehicles by next year.

Continue Reading

Trending