Connect with us

Sports

Hollinger: Of course the Lakers were going to draft Bronny and other NBA Draft takeaways

Published

on

Hollinger: Of course the Lakers were going to draft Bronny and other NBA Draft takeaways

It was a historic moment, setting up the first father-son combination in NBA history. But I wouldn’t quite go so far as to call it heartwarming.
More like: It is what it is.

Of course the Los Angeles Lakers were going to draft Bronny James if he was there with the 55th pick. Just call it Thanasis TakeTwoakounmpo: Selecting the younger James was an incredibly inexpensive insurance policy to keep potential free agent LeBron James in L.A.

Of course the Lakers weren’t going to mind the cost, not when the typical return on pick No. 55 is bupkes. If he turns into an actual player, so much the better, but that wasn’t the core part of the calculation here, even if no sane Laker staffer would say this in their out-loud voice.

Finally, the other part too many people missed: Of course James was going to be there for the Lakers to select with that pick. Usually agents have limited leverage to dictate a player’s landing spot on draft night, especially when it comes to second-rounders. But nothing about this case was usual.

In particular, I’ve had people ask me since midseason about what would happen if another team drafted the younger James and then tried to keep him as a hostage, theoretically forcing the Lakers to overpay to wrest him away. It would have been hilarious if the rival Boston Celtics, picking one choice ahead of the Lakers at 54th, selected him.

Advertisement

But in reality, Bronny wasn’t a valuable hostage because he had options. If an unwanted team had called his bluff, Bronny James could have played overseas or signed the one-year tender and waited out the team that drafted him or just plain sat out, knowing that A) he didn’t need the money and B) the Lakers would always be there waiting. Few other 55th picks can say the same thing.

GO DEEPER

Bronny James is now a Laker. Here’s what lies ahead in his NBA career

And with that … I’m already exhausted. Soon we’ll have breathless updates from his NBA Summer League games (remember, the Lakers are also playing in the California Classic ahead of summer league, so James would start playing July 6 in San Francisco against Sacramento), because Bronny James moves the needle.

But all I can think about is what an unfortunate circus it creates for a developmental teenage player who, while not without talent, is clearly a long way away. Most 55th picks don’t make it, and even the ones who do scrape out a tenuous existence as the E’Twaun Moores and Aaron Wigginses of the league. I’m not convinced this situation improves the younger James’ chances of being an exception.

Advertisement

On to my other big thoughts from the two-day NBA Draft extravaganza:

Luxury tax avoidance, Part 1

While the tax aprons of the new collective bargaining agreement have been the biggest story in the early days of the offseason, let’s not forget that scourge of yore: the plain ol’ luxury tax. Certainly a few NBA teams haven’t.

Sacramento traded itself below the tax line in a salary dump with Toronto that saw the Kings send the 45th pick (used on guard Jamal Shead) and a juicy Portland 2025 second-rounder to the Raptors. The Kings cut over $8 million in salary by sending Sasha Vezenkov and Davion Mitchell to Toronto for Jalen McDaniels, lightening a glut of superfluous backcourt players and adding a true four in the process.

I would argue the Kings might have given up on Vezenkov a year too soon — European imports often need a year to get their sea legs — but he was fairly duplicative of Trey Lyles. Sacramento now has $8 million in wiggle room under the tax line and at least two open roster spots; I’d expect a backup center to be one of them. If they wanted, the Kings could even go back over the tax line by using their entire non-taxpayer midlevel exception, though I wouldn’t bet on it.

For Toronto, Shead becomes an additional asset from the Pascal Siakam trade with Indiana this winter — the Raptors could make this trade because they had a $10 million trade exception left over from that deal.

Advertisement
go-deeper

GO DEEPER

What it was like for Raptors to have first the pick of the NBA Draft’s second round

Luxury tax avoidance, Part 2

In Portland, we had a combination salary dump and acquisition that got the Trail Blazers out of the tax and brought in a likely starter in Deni Avdija. The Blazers sent out the more expensive Malcolm Brogdon and created a $6.9 million trade exception, leaving Portland with a full boat of 15 contracts and $4.6 million in wiggle room below the tax line.


Malcolm Brogdon is headed to D.C. (Sarah Stier / Getty Images)

But this was expensive; the Blazers gave up the 14th pick in Wednesday’s first round (used by Washington on guard Bub Carrington) and an unprotected first in 2029 that is the second best of Portland’s, Milwaukee’s or Boston’s, plus two future second-rounders. Avdija is a good player on a sweet contract, just beginning a four-year, $55 million extension this fall, but the Blazers are likely to take their lumps again this coming season as basically the only team in the Western Conference without playoff aspirations.

The question now: Can Portland recoup those picks in deals for veterans Jerami Grant, Deandre Ayton or Anfernee Simons?

Luxury tax avoidance, Part 3

The Hawks dealt with their “problem” of winning the lottery and the higher salary that came with the No. 1 pick by trading AJ Griffin to Houston, putting the Hawks within easy hailing distance of the luxury-tax line and all but assuring the first apron won’t be an issue in the short term.

Advertisement

That’s likely all Atlanta needs for now, as any Trae Young or Dejounte Murray deal is likely to cut salary and get the Hawks the rest of the $3 million to $4 million in breathing room they need to get below the tax for the season.

Apron avoidance

Denver isn’t likely to end up all the way out of the luxury tax, but the Nuggets will end up surprisingly close. With Denver seeming likely to lose Kentavious Caldwell-Pope in free agency, and having surrendered three second-round picks to Charlotte just to drop a $5.2 million salary in Reggie Jackson, the Nuggets are right at the tax line.

Getting there has been a journey. The Nuggets have traded every draft pick they can legally trade, although they still can move some first-round pick swaps. Every future second is spoken for, and because of the Stepien rule, the Nuggets can’t trade a first until after the 2025 draft.

In fact, they technically traded a couple of their picks going to Charlotte twice. There is a low-but-not-zero probability that the 2029 and 2030 second-round picks the Nuggets gave to the Hornets would instead be needed to satisfy the terms of two previous trades with Oklahoma City, although it would only happen if the Nuggets picked in the top five three straight years from 2027 to 2029. That’s probably not worth the Hornets sweating, although it’s a fun topic for cap nerds.

Boldest move

Minnesota has no assets and somehow still traded into the lottery to grab Rob Dillingham with the eighth pick by sending San Antonio a pick swap in 2030 and its own first-round pick, top-one protected, in 2031.

Advertisement

The Wolves are deep enough into the tax that adding talent on the first year of a rookie contract had to be tempting, and this particular move solved three problems: a lack of shot creation in the second unit, a lack of a succession plan at point guard behind the 36-year-old Mike Conley and a lack of young talent on Anthony Edwards’ timeline. If Dillingham hits, they have all three.

Minnesota partly offset the salary cap cost by offloading little-used guard Wendell Moore, but the Wolves still are $27 million over the projected tax line — way past the second apron — with only 11 players under contract. It seems likely they’ll end up with a frozen 2032 draft pick and a huge tax bill this year, which is a scary place for a mid-size market team with an ongoing ownership dispute. But they have a contending team right now, and for the moment, at least, they’re spending to keep it there.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Analysis, fits for all 58 NBA Draft picks from John Hollinger and Sam Vecenie

This draft had questions

You know it maybe wasn’t a great draft when commentators discussing the top pick spew adjectives like “competent” and “complementary.” Was it the fate of the Hawks to finally win the draft lottery when the big prize was … adding some wing depth?

No, this wasn’t the Victor Wembanyama draft. The Minnesota-San Antonio transaction above was one of several that were indicative of a relatively low value being placed on picks in this draft, considered the weakest in years by many analysts. I mean, the Spurs really tapped out of the eighth pick to get a Wolves choice seven years from now and a possibly valueless swap six years out?

Advertisement

Yes, they did, and they weren’t the only ones who were quick to ask for the check and get in the valet line. Orlando bailed on the middle of the second round — pick No. 47 — without even getting a full draft pick; the Magic received second-round pick swaps from the Pelicans in the distant beyond of 2030 and 2031. Portland, as noted above, was willing to send the 14th pick to the Wizards in the Avdija trade despite being a rebuilding team itself. The Phoenix Suns only needed a top-45 protected 2028 second from Boston to move themselves from 56th to 40th.

An anticipated trade flurry in the early part of the draft never really materialized, in part, because nobody wanted what these teams were selling. Moving down is only a rewarding draft strategy if there are desperate suitors trying to move up. The 2024 draft wasn’t that kind of party.

Weirdest pick

I’m still scratching my head over the Milwaukee Bucks’ selection of A.J. Johnson with the 23rd pick. For starters, Milwaukee also had a pick at No. 33 that it used, and Johnson was highly likely to still be there at the top of Round 2.


AJ Johnson drives to the basket during a National Basketball League playoff game. (Mark Metcalfe / Getty Images)

Whether it was three, 23 or 53, Johnson failed to check some other key boxes for the Bucks. Milwaukee is a pretty extreme win-now team, and Johnson is a pretty extreme win-later pick given that he barely got minutes in the vastly worst Australian League this past season. He’s only 19 and 160 pounds; whatever he’s going to be, it will take a while to get here.

Johnson’s lack of shooting makes him a very difficult player to introduce into the Bucks’ Giannis-centric ecosystem. He would have to make considerable strides just to be playable in the Bucks’ best contention time frame, and he was picked high enough that it has real opportunity cost: Milwaukee easily could have selected a more ready player (such as Creighton shooter Baylor Scheierman, who went to Boston instead) or parlayed the pick into more veteran talent.

Advertisement

The Bucks at least made out better at pick No. 33, when they tabbed G League Ignite stretch big Tyler Smith. He’s another teenager who needs to refine his craft, but his skill level on offense could allow him to play a bit more regularly while he learns.

Most divisive pick

I’m not sure how Zach Edey is going to work out in Memphis, but I am very sure he will be among the league leaders in opinions between now and opening day. Adding to the mystery: Edey might not be available for summer league, as he’s joining the Canadian national team in training for the Olympics.

There are multiple elements to this discussion. First, the question of Edey’s ability to survive on defense in the NBA. While he was very effective playing drop coverage in the Big Ten, the speed and perimeter focus of the NBA will challenge him in ways college basketball couldn’t.

And second of all, there’s the fit issue of putting a Clydesdale out there with the greyhounds. Memphis wants to run, and Ja Morant and Co. may end up leaving Edey in the dust. The Grizzlies also seemed to be tilting toward a smaller, faster alignment with former Defensive Player of the Year Jaren Jackson Jr. playing center; adding Edey to the mix would push Jackson back to the four and leave Memphis bigger and slower.

How will it work out? We likely won’t get much information until October.

Advertisement
go-deeper

GO DEEPER

The IkoSystem: What exactly are the Grizzlies up to taking Zach Edey at the NBA Draft?

Best value

Utah grabbed the players I had ranked ninth and 12th on my board … with pick Nos. 29 and 32. Kyle Filipowski and Isaiah Collier both had weaknesses that turned off some scouts, but they were young, highly productive college players who were asked to fill big roles. I think each might be able to come in and play rotation minutes right away, although both players need to become more consistent from beyond the arc to become long-term pieces.

Worst value

Orlando gets it for the second year in a row. One year after drafting Jett Howard, my 38th-ranked player, at No. 11, the Magic took Colorado forward Tristan da Silva, my 51st-ranked player, at No. 18.

Da Silva, like Howard, offered some promise with a size-shooting combination, but the rest of his resume is deeply underwhelming. And unlike Howard, da Silva is also 23. As our Mike Vorkunov noted, the history of top-20 picks this old has been extremely disappointing.

(Top photo of Zach Edey: Grace Hollars / IndyStar / USA Today; top photo of Bronny James: Jeff Haynes / NBAE via Getty Images)

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sports

Paranoia, moles and 'poison coming from all sides' – inside Italy's awful Euro 2024

Published

on

Paranoia, moles and 'poison coming from all sides' – inside Italy's awful Euro 2024

Follow live coverage of France vs Belgium and Portugal vs Slovenia at Euro 2024 today

Luciano Spalletti still hadn’t found the Iserlohn mole.

“I don’t know how to answer that,” he apologised. “I hope you can give me a helping hand but I don’t know how to answer that question.” Searches in the Sauerland countryside where Italy were based for the Euros turned up nothing. Holes in the inner sanctum of Casa Azzurri, as the national team’s training centre is known, concerned him whether they were real or not. “There’s a Julian Assange in the dressing room. A striker would have been more useful, but there you go,” Corriere della Sera columnist Massimo Gramellini wryly observed.

After the 1-1 group stage draw against Croatia in Leipzig, Spalletti walked into the press conference with little of the euphoria one might expect after Mattia Zaccagni’s 98th-minute equaliser ensured Italy got out of the group of death. The afterglow instead lit his short fuse. He’d already clashed with Sky Italia analyst Paolo Condo over the perception his team were too cautious. “What do you mean caution?”

He’d bristled at a UEFA reporter who started a question about how losing to Croatia at the RB Arena would have been undeserved with the line: if you hadn’t scored that goal… Spalletti immediately cut in. “Lads, we had three or four big chances!” His hackles were up by the time he took his seat before the rest of the media. His Armani jacket no longer rested as it should on his shoulders. He left the impression of a man who believed everyone was out to get him. A lion surrounded by rifle-pointing big-game hunters.

Advertisement

When a radio journalist said it was his impression Spalletti had listened to his players and made a pact to change the system for the Croatia game, he was convinced someone must have passed on the information from inside Casa Azzurri. “Don’t claim this is your poetic licence,” he prickled. “This is just the weakness of those who are actually leaking things because there’s an internal environment and an external environment. If there are actually people leaking things from the inside-out then that’s someone who hurts the national team, whoever told you that hurts the national team.”

As a mood swing, the contrast in Spalletti’s state of mind on the eve of the tournament was stark. Before Italy’s opening game against Albania in Dortmund, he described the “happy, infectious, fantastic emotion” coursing through him. “It’s an emotion that doesn’t bring tension, it’s not necessarily toxic,” he said. Within a fortnight, however, he “felt that there’s this poison coming from all sides, and I inject myself with this poison”.


Spalletti was concerned about leaks from within his Italy camp (Jens Schlueter – UEFA/UEFA via Getty Images)

Watching in the front row was the president of the Italian Football Federation, Gabriele Gravina. He’d already had to remind Spalletti to go back out and thank the fans at the end of the game. Spalletti had walked straight down the tunnel at the full-time whistle. Gravina’s mediation didn’t end there either. In the early hours of the morning, the radio journalist received a phone call from an unknown number. It was Spalletti calling to apologise.

The tetchiness he displayed that night wasn’t out of character. Spalletti has been known to literally bang his head on the desk at questions he doesn’t like. He has made press officers squirm about how stories have made it into the papers. Maybe the four years he spent in Russia at Zenit Saint Petersburg led him to see spies everywhere. Maybe his experiences of having to be the guy who retired Francesco Totti at Roma and stripped Mauro Icardi of the captain’s armband at Inter inured him to how many briefings and counter-briefings people around teams and players do. “I’ve read I was too outspoken,” Spalletti conceded before Italy boarded a plane home.

The elation Zaccagni’s goal brought about wasn’t entirely snuffed out. It was reminiscent of Alessandro Del Piero’s World Cup semi-final goal against hosts Germany in 2006, a goal that sent Italy to Berlin, just as Zaccagni’s did for the round-of-16 game against Switzerland. But the intrigue surrounding the mole divided attention. Spalletti’s on-edge demeanour drew attention. His hope that the players would be more relaxed after emerging from the group of death because permutations such as only needing a draw against Croatia wouldn’t be running through their heads was self-defeated by the insinuation there was a traitor in their ranks. Much of Carlo Ancelotti’s success as a coach is attributed to his calmness under pressure. This was the opposite.

Advertisement

At his unveiling in September, Spalletti said: “I don’t know if I’ll be the best possible coach of the national team, but I’ll definitely be the best possible Spalletti.” After Italy’s exit, he admitted: “Clearly I wasn’t.” He wasn’t the Spalletti who won Napoli’s first league title since 1990, a feat only Diego Maradona was considered capable of. He wasn’t the Spalletti who led Roma to cups and a club-record points total. He wasn’t the Spalletti under whom four players finished top-scorers in Italy or the Spalletti who reinvented players and changed their careers. Asked if he could turn back time, he said: “That’s not a game I play, going over what might have happened.”

He wouldn’t have selected a different squad, for instance. As such, Italy’s elimination was met with schadenfreude by those he left out. Matteo Politano, the winger who won the league with Spalletti at Napoli, posted a shrugging emoji. The brother of Ciro Immobile, who started and scored in Spalletti’s first game in charge only to never appear again, wrote in an Instagram story: “Now you’ll have to find a different scapegoat”. None of the strikers Spalletti took to Germany scored. But this wasn’t like 1982 when Enzo Bearzot picked Paolo Rossi, who’d barely played for two years because of his implication in the Totonero scandal, over Roberto Pruzzo, the top scorer in Serie A.

Not one of the players who stayed at home would have dramatically moved the needle in Germany. Not 34-year-old Giacomo Bonaventura, the player Spalletti dubbed “our Bellingham”. Not Riccardo Orsolini. Not Manuel Locatelli. Not the suspended Sandro Tonali. Talent is still coming through. Before Italy’s final warm-up game against Bosnia, the under-17s did a lap of honour of the Castellani in Empoli. They are the European Champions, as are the under-19s. Even the under-20s finished runners up at the World Cup. But it remains to be seen how many of them step up or even get a chance at senior level.

“I attempted to rejuvenate the squad a bit,” Spalletti said. “Given that I’m staying, I will do even more so in future.”


Calafiori was one of Spalletti’s better selections (PChris Brunskill/Fantasista/Getty Images)

Gravina didn’t consider dismissing Spalletti. The presence of Max Allegri on the market changed nothing. “I’m pragmatic and think it is unthinkable to solve problems in times of difficulty by abandoning a project that we said from the start was a three-year project,” Gravina said. “You can’t think about abandoning a project after eight or nine months.”

Advertisement

Before Italy’s opening game against Albania, Spalletti claimed that a lack of time with the players couldn’t be used as an alibi because of the receptiveness he’d seen from them on the training ground. But it was an excuse he fell back on after elimination. “I haven’t had much time to get to know the players,” Spalletti lamented. “The previous coaches have all had 20 games to test and get to know them, some even 30. A few more games could have helped me.”

He has not been in the job a year and stepped in for Mancini at the end of August 2023, when Italy’s qualification for the Euros was in great jeopardy. “I came in when there was an urgent need for results and probably for what was needed at the time we were good up to a certain point, but we did not manage to grow within this mini-process and (against Switzerland) we took a major step backwards that cannot be accepted.”

Nine months actually boiled down to 70 days together between the winter qualifiers, March friendlies and warm-ups for this tournament. Could Spalletti have used them better? He did not take Gianluca Scamacca to the U.S. for the spring exhibition games against Ecuador and Venezuela. Players such as Locatelli and Bonaventura did go, only to fail to make the provisional 30-man squad for Germany. Torino duo Alessandro Buongiorno and Raoul Bellanova had been integrated into the international set-up and boarded the plane for the Euros but never played a minute.

In Buongiorno’s case, it was a surprise. He’d performed assuredly in the crunch qualifier against Ukraine and seemed set to start at the Euros, especially after Francesco Acerbi was ruled out through injury. Instead, Spalletti chose Riccardo Calafiori to play next to Alessandro Bastoni. It was one of the few inspired decisions he made. But Calafiori was uncapped until the warm-up games in June.

As for Bellanova, the main conclusion Spalletti drew from the Euros regarded intensity. Before the Spain game, he said, alluding to their wingers Nico Williams and Lamine Yamal: “If there’s a player who can sprint at 34kph and our quickest player goes at 29kph, then there’s a big gulf.” Bellanova is the quickest defender in Serie A. And yet Spalletti stood by Giovanni Di Lorenzo, his captain at Napoli, even after the Spain game when Williams ran over him again and again, even after a woeful season with his club.

Advertisement

Di Lorenzo, left, was run ragged by Williams (Kenzo Tribouillard/AFP via Getty Images)

He was one of four players who started every game for Italy at the Euros. Nicolo Barella was among them too. The all-action Inter midfielder didn’t receive the UEFA man of the match award against Albania. That somehow went to Federico Chiesa, a player Spalletti overhyped as “our (Jannik) Sinner” in reference to Italy’s world No 1 in tennis. But Barella stole the show with the finest goal Italy scored at the Euros besides Zaccagni’s against Croatia. It was a surprise he played at all after missing the fortnight of pre-tournament preparation with an issue in his quad. “I’ll spit blood for this shirt,” he said.

Going without Barella was impossible after his Albania performance. He is the highest-scoring active player on the squad, the only one in double figures for his country. However, if freshness was as critical to Spalletti as he repeated, he could perhaps have played Nicolo Fagioli earlier in the tournament. Barella’s experience was needed. Eleven players in the squad were 25 or under. Eleven had fewer than 10 caps. Spalletti’s wild card, Michael Folorunsho, the Hellas Verona box-crasher and scorer of goal-of-the-month winners, only made his debut for his country as a late sub against Albania. “In terms of average age, I think we were among the youngest of the top teams.” Only Turkey and Ukraine had younger XIs.

As the players stood in the tunnel and prepared to come out for the second half against Switzerland at the Olympiastadion, it was remarked upon how little they spoke to each other. There were no rallying cries, little in the way of leadership. “It’s clear that players of Chiellini and Bonucci’s calibre are hard to find,” Spalletti said. “We saw that in trusting Calafiori (who was suspended against the Swiss) we can find leaders, and that there’s leadership potential in how someone plays, not only speeches.”

His driving run and assist for Zaccagni against Croatia was what he had in mind. Calafiori showed character in going abroad (Basel in Switzerland) early in order to play regular first-team football when opportunities weren’t forthcoming in Italy. “Our under-19s prefer to be on the bench rather than play in leagues outside Italy that aren’t top-five leagues,” Spalletti complained. “We’re the team that actually needs some of our Italian players to go abroad and get some experience overseas for some of the top teams in European football.”

Anecdotally, Davide Frattesi turned down a move to the Premier League in order to join Inter last summer. He often sits on the bench for his club. Scamacca returned to Serie A after only a year at West Ham. Three players in Spalletti’s squad ply their trade in other countries. Two of them are goalkeepers: Gianluigi Donnarumma (Paris Saint-Germain) and Guglielmo Vicario (Tottenham). The other is Jorginho (Arsenal). Only by playing at a higher level will the players be able to match, set and sustain the intensity needed to be competitive.

Advertisement

Spalletti wants more players to play abroad, as Jorginho does (Image Photo Agency/Getty Images)

“Spalletti overrated the players he picked,” Fabio Capello said on Sky Italia. “He had his own ideas and wanted to play a certain style. But this is how good they are. This is how dynamic they are.”

Not very good. Not very dynamic.

That became clear against Spain when Spalletti predicted what would happen and did it anyway. He then spent the rest of the tournament playing around with the team as if it were a tricolour Rubik’s cube.

From Albania onwards, the same team never played more than 45 minutes together. There were changes at every half. He used 20 of 23 outfield players. It didn’t matter that the systems Italy deployed had been worked on in the March friendlies and the warm-ups. Every time felt like the first time for new XIs with new partnerships, no chemistry and no patterns of play. Players were given roles that took them out of position. Zaccagni didn’t start against Switzerland even after his goalscoring cameo in the Croatia game. Stephan El Shaarawy did instead. As was the case with Gianluca Mancini, Bryan Cristante and Fagioli, it was his first start of the tournament. And yet Spalletti hooked him at the interval for… Zaccagni.

Players couldn’t be confident of a place in an XI. They couldn’t be confident, full stop, after conceding in all four games. Against Croatia and Switzerland, they emerged for second halves looking even more nervous. As Spalletti assumed heavily caveated responsibility, he decried “a lack of personality”.

Advertisement

At the start of the tournament, he wished to be judged on how Italy played, not on results alone. There was a touch of arrogance when he spoke.

“If I’m the head coach of the Italian national team,” he said. “It’s because my teams… I probably shouldn’t say that… I’m better off not saying that.” It’s because they tend to play slick, progressive, attacking football in step with or even in anticipation of modern football trends. Not old-school Italian football. “Ever since I started coaching kids, what matters is winning. No,” he insisted. “What matters is playing good football.”

But what about tournament football? What about football that suits the players?

Sitting back and countering as Italy did in the distant past isn’t in his make-up. He was stubborn about it. “That’s not a brand of football I necessarily like to play, so it’s actually difficult for me to teach that and coach that as a result. I don’t know how to do it! I don’t know how to do that!” Spalletti said. This chastening experience means he may have to learn otherwise he might not be the right man for the job.

Gravina, the head of the delegation, Gianluigi Buffon, and Spalletti debriefed the team in the hours after their elimination. “We divided all our responsibilities equally,” Gravina said. The FIGC president also refused to resign as he did when Italy lost to North Macedonia and failed to qualify under Mancini. “Sixty-seven per cent of the players in Serie A are foreign,” he mitigated for Spalletti. “We’re strongly resisting the demands to free up more non-EU spots. Even Serie B clubs have requested to be allowed to add another non-EU slot. There isn’t the culture to realise that our academies are an asset with which to solve these problems.”

Advertisement

Milan have followed Atalanta and Juventus Next Gen in enrolling an under-23 team (Milan Futuro) in the third division to help expose young players to professional football earlier. This European Championship was the first time no Milan player formed part of an Italy squad at a major tournament since 1938.

That has to change and it probably will for two reasons. Francesco Camarda, who broke Paolo Maldini’s record as the youngest player ever to make his debut for Milan, was the star of the Under-17 European Championship-winning team. He could be the next big thing in Italian football although caution needs to be applied. El Shaarawy, Mario Balotelli, Nicolo Zaniolo and Federico Chiesa have all had too much hope pinned on them too soon. The other reason is the end of the Decreto Crescita, the tax break that allowed Italian clubs to attract foreign players such as Christian Pulisic. Italian clubs are now slightly more incentivised to invest in local talent. 

Structurally, however, Italian football has a lot to reckon with on and off the pitch, and the holes in need of plugging aren’t caused by moles and moles alone.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Watching Italy’s Euro 2024 exit in Bar Italia, the ‘heart’ of England’s Italian community

(Top image: designed by Dan Goldfarb; photos by Marco Steinbrenner/DeFodi Images, Maryam Majd, Maja Hitij – UEFA, via Getty Images)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

NFL great Shannon Sharpe reveals why he refuses to sleep at women's homes

Published

on

NFL great Shannon Sharpe reveals why he refuses to sleep at women's homes

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

It was early in Shannon Sharpe’s professional football career when he decided he was going to stop sleeping at women’s houses, and he revealed why in a recent podcast interview.

The Pro Football Hall of Famer joined former NFL quarterback Cam Newton on the “Funky Friday” podcast. He talked about two separate occasions in which he got caught up in unwanted drama with women.

Advertisement

Denver Broncos’ Shannon Sharpe (84) in action vs Kansas City Chiefs in 1996. (Damian Strohmeyer/Sports Illustrated via Getty Images)

The first instance, he told Newton, was right after the Denver Broncos selected him in the seventh round out of Savannah State. He said he returned to Georgia after the draft and got back into town late and didn’t want to scare his grandmother at home with a late arrival. 

He said he called a woman and asked whether she was dating anyone and, if not, if it would be OK for him to sleep over. Unfortunately, it didn’t go as planned.

“Cam, something told, ‘Boy, keep your clothes on.’ So, I got on shorts and I got on a T-shirt,” Sharpe said, painting the scene. “Man, have you ever had sleep paralysis? You can hear things, but you can’t move … . I can hear, and it’s getting louder, it’s getting louder, and they’re arguing. So, by this time – boom! The door flies off the hinges. … So, I’m jumping up like, ‘Hey what’s up, boy, what’s it about to be?’ I said, ‘Oh lord, he’s got some bodies on his resume.’ Yeah, I’m talking about those kind of bodies.’”

Advertisement

To his surprise, the man who entered the room where Sharpe was sleeping was a massive fan and told the tight end he gushes about his play on the football field to his friends.

Shannon Sharpe in Atlanta

Shannon Sharpe speaks onstage during the RenderATL Tech Conference at AmericasMart Atlanta on June 14, 2024. (Paras Griffin/Getty Images)

FORMER NFL QB JAMARCUS RUSSELL FIRED FROM COACHING JOB, AS LAWSUIT CLAIMS HE TOOK HIGH SCHOOL’S DONATION MONEY

Sharpe said the man told him he didn’t have a problem with him but with the woman they were both dealing with.

“I’m tired of this ‘B’ lying. I’m saying to myself, ‘Me, too.’ Cam, man, I put my shoes on and booked it out of there,” Sharpe said, adding that he didn’t learn his lesson.

In 1993, Sharpe said he went back to Savannah State for homecoming while the Broncos had a bye week. He said he called a woman to meet up with while he was in town.

Advertisement

“I set my stuff down. And I’m looking at the door handle, it’s turning. … Dude come in. He got that [AK-47]. Oh lord, have mercy. I said, ‘Lord.’ And he look at me, and he said, ‘My man.’ I said, ‘Yeah.’ He’s about to ask me if I’m Sharpe. I said, ‘Yeah.’ He said, ‘I thought so.’ I said, ‘My man, is this your people?’ He said, ‘Yeah. Two years,’” Sharpe explained.

“I said, ‘My man, I ain’t know.’ I said, ‘You know who I am now.’ I said, ‘Man, my bad. You saved me.’ Because if I had not been [interrupted], I ain’t telling this story right now.”

Shannon Sharpe in 1993

Denver Broncos’ Shannon Sharpe (84) in action during tackle vs Kansas City Chiefs. (Richard Mackson/Sports Illustrated via Getty Images)

Sharpe said he got in the car and started to drive away with his friend when he realized he had left his expensive jewelry at the house, and the man in question gave it back to him.

“I have not closed my eyes at another woman’s house in 31 years.”

Advertisement

Sharpe finished his career as a three-time Super Bowl champion and eight-time Pro Bowler. He played 12 years for the Broncos over two stints. He had two more years with the Baltimore Ravens.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Continue Reading

Sports

Bobby Bonilla Day: How his deferred contracts compare to Shohei Ohtani’s deal

Published

on

Bobby Bonilla Day: How his deferred contracts compare to Shohei Ohtani’s deal

We should all enjoy a Bobby Bonilla Day. But we don’t. Only one 61-year-old former ballplayer receives a payment of $1,193,248.20 from the New York Mets every July 1 through 2035.

Why? Deferred is the word.

It isn’t Shohei Ohtani money, but it’s something. The payments to Bonilla started in 2011, 10 years after he retired. He was a solid hitter, amassing 2,010 hits, 287 home runs and 30.2 wins above replacement during a 16-year career in which he played for seven teams, including a 72-game stint with the Dodgers in 1998.

But it was the Mets, for whom Bonilla played from 1992 to 1995 and again in 1999, who reached an agreement with him to defer his $5.9-million salary in 2000 and instead receive the yearly payments from 2011 to 2035.

Advertisement

Again, why? As in, why would the Mets agree to pay Bonilla more than four times what they owed him, albeit far in the future?

At the time, Mets owner Fred Wilpon had invested heavily with Bernie Madoff and was reaping annual gains of up to 15%. Turns out Madoff made off with $65 billion from nearly 5,000 investors and was sentenced to 150 years in prison. Wilpon, who would have turned a $49-million profit by 2035 on the $5.9 owed Bonilla in 2000 had he earned just 10% a year, lost a fortune.

From a baseball standpoint, the move was shrewd because the cash saved was used to sign Mike Hampton, Derek Bell and Todd Zeile, who helped the Mets to the National League pennant in 2000.

Roster-building considerations also prompted the Dodgers and Ohtani to agree to defer all but $2 million of his annual salary until after his 10-year, $700-million deal is completed. Ohtani will receive $68-million payments annually from 2034 to 2043, without interest.

The structure was Ohtani’s idea, allowing the Dodgers to free payroll to sign more star players over the next decade. Shortly after Ohtani signed, the Dodgers reached agreements with free agent pitcher Yoshinobu Yamamoto (12 years, $325 million), free agent outfielder Teoscar Hernandez (one year, $23.5 million) and trade acquisition Tyler Glasnow (five years, $136.5-million contract extension).

Advertisement

The Dodgers, in fact, have made Bonilla’s yearly deferred income look like chump change. Mookie Betts has $115 million of $365 million deferred, Freddie Freeman has $57 million of $162 million deferred and Hernández has $8.5 million of $23.5 million deferred.

Deferring salary is generally not a sound financial strategy for a player because of inflation, according to the Major League Baseball Players Assn. The “net present value” of a contract — how much a deal with deferrals would be worth if paid out in the present day — is significantly lower than the guaranteed total. The net present value of Ohtani’s $700-million contract is only $437.5 million, and only $46 million currently counts toward the Dodgers’ luxury tax threshold.

Players union chief Tony Clark told The Times during spring training that he has no problem with players agreeing to defer salary.

“We offer them perspective. We offer them history,” Clark said. “We offer them any information to help them make the best decision they can themselves.”

Bonilla’s deferred money and annual payments from the Mets — which continue through his 72nd birthday — are part of that history.

Advertisement

So is a lesser-known fact: A separate deferred-contract from the Baltimore Orioles that began in 2004 pays Bonilla $500,000 a year through 2029, boosting his yearly income from deferred salary to $1,693,248.20.

Continue Reading

Trending