Before calling for your general manager’s head, bemoaning the players your favorite team didn’t land, consider the bigger picture.

The three top left-handed starters discussed in trades – Tarik Skubal, Garrett Crochet and Blake Snell – did not move.

Hitters who might have shaken up the market – Vladimir Guerrero Jr., Luis Robert Jr., even Brent Rooker – also did not move.

It wouldn’t be fair to call it a “Dudline,” not when 60 trades were made in the final six days, including 32 on Tuesday before the 6 p.m. ET cutoff.

But think about it:

Who was the best starting pitcher traded? Jack Flaherty, who was not as big a prize as David Price was in 2014 and ‘15, Zack Greinke was in 2019 or Max Scherzer was in 2021.

The best relievers traded? Tanner Scott and Carlos Estévez, both of whom are enjoying fine seasons, but to many fans are relative unknowns.

The best hitters traded? Take your pick between Jazz Chisholm Jr., Randy Arozarena and Isaac Paredes, none of whom will be confused with Juan Soto, the prize of the 2022 deadline.

Some of this is luck of the draw. For whatever reasons, the crop of available players this season was just not all that stellar. But some of it also relates to the shift in trade dynamics that occurred when Major League Baseball adopted expanded playoffs in 2022. With 12 postseason spots available, more teams are in contention. And fewer teams are apt to be pure sellers.

MLB.com’s Mike Petriello put it well, saying on X, “I think we have to stop saying it’s a seller’s market, because with the expanded playoffs, there’s only a handful of teams really selling now, and it’s going to be like this every year.”

Call it an unintended consequence of the league’s decision to invite more teams to the October party. Some might argue the league should adjust by pushing the deadline to mid-August. The additional two weeks would allow more separation to occur in the standings and perhaps create clearer lines between buyers and sellers. But such a move would diminish the drama. Acquisitions would be less impactful. And for six weeks of a rental, teams would be even less reluctant to give up better prospects.

This deadline, for all of its oddity, did not lack intrigue. The Tampa Bay Rays made 10 trades, most of the sell variety, and still believe they might contend for a wild card. The Miami Marlins detonated their roster, also making 10 trades, starting with the Luis Arraez deal in early May. Their flurry resulted in 11 additions to their list of their top 30 prospects, according to MLB.com.

The Chicago Cubs’ trade for Isaac Paredes and the three-team deal between the Los Angeles Dodgers, St. Louis Cardinals and Chicago White Sox qualified as stunners, if not blockbusters. And San Diego Padres general manager A.J. Preller was his usual frenzied self, trading 12 prospects from the Top 20 list The Athletic’s Keith Law released in February , including nine of the top 11. (Shortstop Leodalis De Vries, 17, did not make Law’s list, having only signed in January; Law ranked him the game’s 39th best overall prospect in his latest Top 60).

Yet, for all the bodies flying, many teams were left wanting more.

The Baltimore Orioles determined none of the players available merited the sacrifice of their top prospects, one of whom, second baseman Jackson Holliday, hit a grand slam Wednesday in his first game back from Triple A.

Even two players below Baltimore’s top tier, infielder Connor Norby and outfielder Kyle Stowers, were possibly too high a price for lefty Trevor Rogers. And the Orioles’ biggest addition, right-hander Zach Eflin, through his career mostly has been a league-average starter.

The Cleveland Guardians and Milwaukee Brewers are practically mirror images in the game’s respective Central divisions, first-place teams with new managers and frighteningly thin starting pitching. Both had reason to be aggressive. Neither quite was, and not simply because of payroll considerations.

With a limited supply of starters available, the Guardians took chances on two pitchers coming off injuries who have yet to appear in a major-league game this season, lefty Matthew Boyd and righty Alex Cobb. The two starters the Brewers added, righties Aaron Civale and Frankie Montas, each had ERAs over 5.00 at the time they were acquired.

The Pittsburgh Pirates, too, did Pirates things, making a series of modest upgrades – infielder Isiah Kiner-Falefa, outfielder Bryan De La Cruz, lefty relievers Jalen Beeks and Josh Walker.

Ideally, they would have done more to capitalize on the ascent of rookie righty Paul Skenes, who gives them an excellent chance to win every five days. But again, the pool of available talent was not exactly teeming with difference makers.

Even certain high-revenue teams struggled to fill their needs.

The New York Yankees were left without a starting pitcher after failing to come to an agreement with the Tigers on Flaherty. The Boston Red Sox addressed their bullpen by adding Lucas Sims and Luis Garcia, but failed to acquire a right-handed hitting middle infielder and a starting pitcher in addition to James Paxton. The Dodgers settled for complementary offensive parts (Tommy Edman, Amed Rosario, Kevin Kiermaier) rather than land the impact hitter they desired.

On it went. The Texas Rangers, Kansas City Royals, Houston Astros and Yankees were shut out in their quests to land one more hitter. The San Francisco Giants added only Mark Canha while subtracting Jorge Soler. Most contenders filled their bullpen needs, but it’s not as if the 2016 versions of Aroldis Chapman and Andrew Miller were available. Some of the relievers, notably Estévez and Scott, should prove good additions. But the New York Mets, who kept their top prospects while adding four relievers as well as righty Paul Blackburn and outfielder Jesse Winker, were among the clubs that essentially just subbed out bodies in their bullpen.

This is not to make excuses for the teams that failed to do more. Preller, with his acquisitions of right-hander Dylan Cease in spring training, then Arráez in May, then relievers Jason Adam and Scott at the deadline, proved big moves are possible, if the head of baseball operations is daring enough.

Some teams, to be sure, warrant scrutiny. The White Sox, for failing to make a bigger score while parting with three major leaguers (Erick Fedde, Michael Kopech and Tommy Pham) in their deal with the Cardinals and Dodgers. The Oakland A’s, who could have exploited the hot relief market by trading Mason Miller, even after his pinky injury. The Minnesota Twins, for acquiring only Trevor Richards, a mediocre setup type. The Los Angeles Angels and Colorado Rockies, both of which limited their activity mostly to trading relievers.

The Angels, under owner Arte Moreno, operate in their own insular universe, with their long-term plan extending only to the next day’s lineup. The Rockies are just as bizarre, seeming to take pride in being conscientious objectors at the deadline.

The acts of those teams are tired. But for most other clubs, the deadline offered limited opportunity, one way or the other. Time will tell if the Astros overpaid for lefty Yusei Kikuchi, if Preller did the same for relievers Scott, Adam and Bryan Hoenig, if other teams, in trying to fix their bullpens, also went too far. But the high prices simply reflected supply and demand.

Just this once, cut your GM some slack. There was only so much quality to be had.

(Top photo: Rich Storry/Getty Images)

A terrifying scene unfolded on the pool deck of Paris La Defense Arena on Friday morning when a Slovakian swimmer collapsed after a qualifying heat of the women’s 200-meter individual medley. 

Tamara Potocka, who is making her Olympic debut in Paris, received medical attention after finishing seventh in the third heat of Friday’s prelims. 

According to reports, the 21-year-old swimmer appeared to collapse almost immediately after stepping out of the pool. She was almost immediately met by a half-dozen medical attendants and appeared to receive oxygen before eventually being carried off on a stretcher. 

The Slovakian Olympic team confirmed to The Athletic that Potocka, who is asthmatic, suffered an asthma attack, causing her to collapse after the heat. 

Medical personnel carry Tamara Potocka of Slovakia away on a backboard following the women’s 200-meter individual medley preliminary heats during the Paris 2024 Olympic Summer Games at Paris La Défense Arena. (Rob Schumacher-USA TODAY Sports)

Officials added that she was alert and received oxygen therapy, and she will continue to be monitored in the hospital.  

OFFICIALS ABANDON MEN’S SAILING MEDAL RACE DUE TO LACK OF WIND: ‘NEVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE IT’

Potocka finished with a time of 2:14.20 for a seventh place finish on Friday. It was not fast enough to advance her to the semifinals of the event, which eliminated her from the competition.

Medical personnel tend to Tamara Potocka of Slovakia on the pool deck in the women’s 200-meter individual medley preliminary heats during the Paris 2024 Olympic Summer Games at Paris La Défense Arena. (Rob Schumacher-USA TODAY Sports)

Potocka was competing in her first Olympic Games. She is a four-time 2024 European Championships finalist and made her debut in 2018 at the World Short Course Championships in China. 

Team USA has the most medals in swimming, with 20 in total. Australia currently leads with five gold medals in swimming. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter. 

UCLA is no longer on its way to the Big Ten.

It’s arrived.

What started as an exploratory conversation between Bruins athletic director Martin Jarmond and chancellor Gene Block in the fall of 2021 is no longer just a hypothetical solution to solidifying the school’s athletic future.

After more than two years of intense preparation, the school on Friday will celebrate its first day as an official member of its new conference. Athletic departments staffers will sign a giant banner commemorating the moment. Around 500 alumni are expected to attend a celebratory lunch. Football practice will be opened to donors and academic leaders from across campus.

“It’s a big day in our history,” Jarmond told The Times, “so we want to properly recognize it.”

The Bruins’ first game as members of the Big Ten comes Aug. 15, when their women’s soccer team plays Long Beach State. Their first conference game comes Sept. 13, when their men’s soccer team faces Northwestern. Their first conference football game comes Sept. 14 against Indiana, which will be making only its second trip to the Rose Bowl after having lost to USC on Jan. 1, 1968.

Jarmond is one of the last standing among the key early stakeholders as part of UCLA’s Pac-12 defection alongside USC (later to be joined by Oregon and Washington). Block has retired and Trojans athletic director Mike Bohn has parted ways with the school, leaving Jarmond to forge ahead alongside new USC counterpart Jennifer Cohen.

On the eve of UCLA’s first day in the Big Ten, Jarmond discussed the monumental move during a wide-ranging interview with The Times that has been edited for brevity and clarity.

How confident are you that UCLA is ready for this move?

Jarmond: “Very confident. We’re ready. We’ve had two years of preparation that has set UCLA up for success in the Big Ten transition. We’ve been very thorough in our approach and at the core of what we do, we’re here to develop young people and to win, and we’re committed to doing what it takes to attract and retain the best and the brightest, so I’m excited about [Friday] and I’m excited about the work and preparation that’s been put into place.”

What have been the final pieces to making sure the transition is as seamless as possible?

Jarmond: “Well, let me start from the beginning. We established three main priorities in July 2022 that guided our preparation, and in those areas we’ve been very successful. The first one, we wanted to integrate UCLA into the conference conversation and operations as quickly as possible. If you recall, for a couple of months we were working with the UC regents while responding to their questions and then in January 2023 we got Big Ten Conference leadership on campus for the first time and launched our integration for the next 18 months. And then by March 2023, we were in conference meetings and that really helped us learn how the Big Ten operated, what are some of the things that we needed to adjust and adapt.

“Our second priority was putting as much energy and focus in the scheduling piece to make it as fair and minimally disruptive as possible for our student-athletes. The big thing I want to make sure people understand, the change in travel is incremental, not seismic. The scheduling outcome is as good as we could have hoped for in this first season in the Big Ten. Most sports will have one to two trips — maybe — per year in a different time zone than the Pac-12 footprint. For example, women’s soccer student-athletes will only miss one more day of class versus Pac-12 travel. Women’s soccer only has two Big Ten regular-season trips out of the time zone — and only one of those happens when classes are in session, which will be Northwestern and Illinois. So that is huge. That’s a better outcome than what we even shared with the UC regents back a year and a half ago as far as what we were projecting some of the travel to be, and that was a credit to our team and working with the Big Ten and really pushing to make sure this was as minimally invasive as possible to our student-athletes and their academic pursuits.

“The third priority was involving departments, staff, coaches and student-athletes in as many elements of this transition as possible. Starting with the Big Ten announcement, we also launched a strategic planning process. I wanted to do them in tandem just so we could plan this new era and this new day together. We brought in more than 100 staff, student-athletes and coaches and we established student-leadership committees, conducted surveys and there was constant two-way communication and opportunities for input, and that was important to us.”

UCLA committed $10.32 million in additional support for its athletes as part of the conference switch. What are some of the ways that money is being spent?

Jarmond: “With charter flights, we implemented a travel review board with a comprehensive assessment of each team’s schedule to evaluate when and where to charter based on different factors — basically, flight distance, plane availability and exam schedules — to minimize missed class times and trips outside the Pacific time zone outside of the academic year, and we’re in the early stages of this. So far, women’s volleyball has been approved for four charter flights — something that’s never been done before — during the 2024 regular season, and we’ll be evaluating adding more as needed to benefit the students.

“Academically, we’ve increased spending in academic support by $1.5 million annually. We’ve added more learning specialists, we’re going to travel more people with teams to help with their academic pursuits and we’re going to schedule in ways that limit additional days away. In mental health, we’ve added at least $560,000 to the budget for next year and around $1 million per year over the last two years. What I’m really happy to see, we’ve built out the department – we went from one full-time staff member to a team of five or six people for mental health support, including four full-time psychologists. This is something that our student-athletes shared that they wanted, shorter wait times to see someone.

“The last part is nutrition – we’re going to be spending north of $4 million annually. Starting this fall, every student-athlete will get breakfast and lunch five days a week whereas they used to have to rely on campus meal plans and supplemental snacks, but they have such demanding class and practice schedules that we want to make it easy for them to get their nutrition. And we also have a performance nutrition staff that will be able to provide specific meal recommendations on the road to each team to best fuel our teams.”

What have you learned about the best way to handle all the extra miles your athletes and coaches will be traveling?

Jarmond: “It’s individualized, so we worked with our UCLA sleep clinic, bringing doctors into the process to guide us. They’re going to provide detailed guidance on departure times, dates and sleep scheduling for teams. They’re also providing overall sleep education to coaches and staff. So that’s going to be individualized and ongoing, based on the team.”

Have there been any unexpected hurdles as part of the transition, and if so how did you handle them?

Jarmond: “I thought some of my fellow Big Ten schools would be more excited about coming out to L.A. and the warm weather. I wanted to see a few more events — maybe neutral-site events — in L.A., but I think we’re still in the early stages of working through schedules and you’ve got to go through a year or two to see how things kind of shake out, but one thing that I was hopeful that we would have more events here on the West Coast.”

But you did have the Big Ten meetings out here, right?

Jarmond: “That’s right, we got them out to the Terranea Resort in Palos Verdes, which was nice, so I look forward to trying to get more events to the West Coast. The women’s and men’s basketball tournaments are going to come out to Las Vegas in 2027 and 2028, respectively, and that’s good to see because it makes it easier for our fans to really support our Bruins when it’s on the West Coast. But I want to say the Big Ten has been phenomenal to work with over these past two years. You know, I spent 15 years in the Big Ten before this, so just the relationships and the collaboration with the Big Ten and our team has been great and better than I expected, quite frankly.”

When will you know the exact amount of UCLA’s first media rights payment from the Big Ten?

Jarmond: “We’ll know later this fall. It’s a moving target, but usually they communicate that to the schools later in the fall when they have the actual numbers instead of the projections.”

How much can the move to the Big Ten help the UCLA athletic department get out of its $167.7 million budget deficit, and is there a timetable for getting back to operating in the black?

Jarmond: “We’re obviously going to bring in more revenue than we did the last few years going through the Pac-12, and being fiscally responsible is something that we pay a lot of attention to and that we focus on every year. At the same time, we have to balance that with a changing dynamic in college athletics. You know, two years ago, we weren’t talking about the House settlement [with the NCAA] and sharing up to $23 million a year in revenue with student-athletes. So if you’re going to have a cap of 22% of revenue that could be around that amount, you’ve got to balance what you’re going to do there with also being fiscally responsible and making sure we give our student-athletes a chance to be successful. So you’ve got to do both and we’re going to figure that out.

“But our fiscal situation is always something that we’re monitoring closely and we’re going to improve upon. It takes time, especially in a world where the whole model has changed just in the past few weeks.”

UCLA added California to its future football schedules at a time when the UC regents ordered UCLA to pay $10 million a year to its sister school to help bridge the gap in athletic revenue between the schools. What was the thinking there?

Jarmond: “I’m excited that we got them on the football schedule. We scheduled a four-game series starting in 2026 — and I know some of our fans are happy about that and some of our fans aren’t, but in the end I thought it was important to still play Cal because we want to have a presence in Northern California to see our Bay Area Bruins and also it’s important to a lot of families, that rivalry and that relationship. So I’m excited to play them, looking forward to that and I wish Cal well in the ACC.”

How will bowl payment shares work given that UCLA is now in the Big Ten but will keep its bowl tie-ins to the old Pac-12 bowls for the next two years?

Jarmond: “My understanding is that it will be similar to how it’s been in the past. If we were to get into one of the old Pac-12 bowls, that money would still go to the Big Ten and it would be facilitated to us and shared throughout the Big Ten.”

UCLA has announced that it expects to distribute up to $22 million a year to its athletes once revenue sharing starts in August 2025 as a result of an NCAA settlement agreement. What are your thoughts on how that money will be split among the school’s more than 600 athletes?

Jarmond: “This is a new day. Embracing change is the only way forward. You can’t romanticize, you have to modernize and that’s what we’re going to do here at UCLA. We’re going to share revenue with our student-athletes. We’re anticipating that the cap of 22% will probably land in the range of $21 million to $23 million per year — that’s the cap, that doesn’t mean you have to get up to that point, but we want to be competitive, we want to win, and so we’re going to put together three different models for campus to show what that could look like and there’s other factors we have to get more guidance on before we can solidify that. We have to see where the House settlement finalizes, we’ve got to see how Title IX impacts that and we’ve got to look at the roster size limits now because that’s going to require us to reduce the overall number of student-athletes we have, and then you’ve got to look at the Alston awards and NIL’s impact.

“I have a subset of our executive team that meets with me weekly and we are putting pencil to paper and modeling numbers, looking at financial aid, NIL — all of those things — to see what that could look like next year. But what I do is that we’re going to share revenue, we’re going to be aggressive, we want to support our student-athletes and we want to attract, retain and support the best and the brightest and we’re going to embrace that.”

Will athletes in the primary revenue-generating sports of football and men’s basketball get a bigger share of the revenue than their counterparts in other sports?

Jarmond: “I anticipate that just based on the House settlement and some of the models out there as far as how much revenue football is responsible for. We don’t have anything finalized, but I anticipate more revenue going to football and men’s basketball student-athletes simply due to the fact that they are responsible for more of the revenue based on the House settlement and the back pay for NIL and all those things.”

Would that raise any red flags with Title IX compliance?

Jarmond: “We have to get guidance on that; we don’t know that yet.”

How do you think the scholarship increases to 105 in football and 15 in men’s basketball will impact UCLA? Will the school fund all those football scholarships?

Jarmond: “We’re evaluating that. I don’t know if you’re going to see everybody go up to 105 and I don’t anticipate UCLA going up to 105 because one, that’s a significant financial outlay and two, the more scholarships that you increase and that go toward your cap, the less revenue you can share with student-athletes, so you want to have the flexibility to share revenue at the level you need. So we’re evaluating all that and it’s something we’re going to get more into as we go forward but the good news is we have time, we don’t have to make those decisions today.”

Will the House settlement fundamentally change the way your athletic department operates?

Jarmond: “Absolutely. You know, our model is changing. We’re going to have next year potentially up to $23 million that we’re going to divert to student-athletes, so when you have that situation you have to look at every aspect of your business and our team understands that. There are going to be some things that we were able to do previously that we’re not going to be able to do. We’re going to invest in areas now that we weren’t investing in before. This is going more to a pro model, so we’re looking at cap analysts, data analytics, people with expertise that maybe we don’t have in the department now that we have to utilize to make sure we’re making the proper evaluations when it comes to investment and allocation of resources on our teams and within our teams and that’s all of our sports but especially football and the basketballs. Make no mistake, this is going to change. We’re embracing change — that’s the only way forward.”

What’s your big-picture assessment of UCLA athletics and its future versus when you started the job in the summer of 2020?

Jarmond: “I’m more excited and encouraged about our future than I ever have been in my four-plus years here. We’re going to the Big Ten, we have a new football staff that has an energy and enthusiasm around the program, and in basketball and our Olympics sports, we’re firing on all cylinders. I know that we have a bright future and I’m excited. This has been such a Herculean task to get to the Big Ten and prepare the way we needed to to be successful and win on Day 1. We are going to win, we are going to compete and I’m as excited as I’ve ever been at UCLA about our future.”