Connect with us

West Virginia

Texas Tech, Iowa State and West Virginia carrying the banner for holdovers in new-look Big 12

Published

on

Texas Tech, Iowa State and West Virginia carrying the banner for holdovers in new-look Big 12


STILLWATER, Okla. (AP) — Texas Tech leads several holdover programs standing tall in the new-look Big 12.

The conference has added eight schools the past two years, and several are affecting the race to reach the title game. But longtime members Tech, Iowa State and West Virginia are carrying the banner for the old guard, joining newcomers Colorado and BYU as unbeaten teams in conference play.

Texas Tech defeated Arizona 28-22 last Saturday to improve to 3-0 in the league. The Red Raiders’ conference wins have been by a combined 17 points, but those victories have them alone at the top of the standings. They have a week off before they host Baylor.

“We got to the bye, we put ourselves in a good position,” Texas Tech coach Joey McGuire said. “We’ve got to get healthy. We’ve got to fix some things, you know, and then we’ve got to go 1-0. … You can’t get ahead of your head of yourself. You’ve got to be in the moment.”

Advertisement

In 1996, four Texas schools from the old Southwest Conference and the Big 8 members merged to form the Big 12. Iowa State from the Big 8 and Texas Tech from the Southwest joined the Big 12 in its inaugural year. West Virginia joined the league in 2012.

None of the three have claimed a Big 12 title, but their chances of finally breaking through increased significantly when Texas and Oklahoma left for the Southeastern Conference in July. No. 1 Texas and No. 18 Oklahoma meet in Dallas on Saturday in a game that usually had Big 12 title implications.

Now, Iowa State at West Virginia has title implications, with both off to 2-0 starts in the league. Iowa State — at No. 11, the highest-ranked team in the Big 12 this season — rolled past Baylor 43-21 last Saturday while West Virginia knocked off Oklahoma State 38-14.

Iowa State’s offense has leaned on quarterback Rocco Becht. He’s passed for 1,173 yards and nine touchdowns this season.

Cyclones coach Matt Campbell said Becht is making smart decisions.

Advertisement

“It’s great to have great targets to throw to, but I think the ability to have the poise in the moment and be able to read the entire field … the thing that’s been fun about those — it’s not the first read, it’s the second, third or fourth read in the progression,” Campbell said. “It tells you his moxie and his growth.”

Iowa State leads the Big 12 in total defense, allowing just 271.6 yards per game.

West Virginia is fueled by a ground game that ranks third in the conference with 223 yards per game. Quarterback Garrett Greene and running backs C.J. Donaldson and Jahiem White have been a dangerous triple threat. The Mountaineers ran for 389 yards and had the ball for nearly 44 minutes on Saturday.

Oklahoma State entered the season as one of the favorites in the conference. The Cowboys have been tough to beat at home under coach Mike Gundy the past two decades, so the win was important to the Mountaineers.

“Against a team like this — even though the season may not be going for them like they would like it to, for us to come out like that for a full 60 minutes and play the way we did — that adds a lot of confidence, especially going to next week’s game with a really good team,” West Virginia linebacker Josiah Trotter said.

Advertisement

All three of Texas Tech’s Big 12 wins have come against newer conference members — Arizona State, Cincinnati and, most recently, Arizona on the road last Saturday.

Tahj Brooks leads the conference with 679 yards rushing, good for 135.8 yards per game. He ran for 128 yards and three touchdowns against Arizona. The Red Raiders are third in the league with 460.5 total yards per game.

The number that matters most to McGuire is the record.

“There have been dogfights,” the Texas Tech coach said. “I think that’s how the Big 12 is going to be every single week. And then we’ll be right there as far as, Iike — I mean, we’re OK playing these one-score games, and we’re going to play for four quarters.”

___

Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here. AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-football-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-football

Advertisement





Source link

West Virginia

As expected, buck harvest down significantly for 2025 – WV MetroNews

Published

on

As expected, buck harvest down significantly for 2025 – WV MetroNews


CHARLESTON, W.Va. — West Virginia deer hunters killed 33,775 bucks during the recently completed two week buck firearms season.

According to information released Tuesday by the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Greenbrier County was the top county in the state for bucks in 2025 with 1,730 killed during the gun season. Second was Preston County with 1,349, Randolph County 1,198, Hardy County 1,165 and Pendleton at 1,135. The rest of the top ten counties in order were Pocahontas, Monroe, Grant, Fayette, and Hampshire Counties.’

Click here to see county-by-county buck firearms season harvests for the last five seasons.

As predicted by the DNR prior to the season, the total harvest was 18.5 percent below 2024. All of the DNR’s districts registered a decrease in harvest, with the exception of District 4 which experienced a 7.5 percent increase compared to last year. The DNR predicted the lower harvest because of a major abundance of mast in the state. The conditions were such that deer didn’t have to travel far to find adequate food and therefore were not as exposed to hunters.

Advertisement

The agency acknowledged several counties along the Ohio River and central West Virginia experienced an outbreak of hemorrhagic disease in the early fall which also impacted hunter success especially in western counties of the state.

Several deer hunting opportunities remain for 2025. The state’s archery and crossbow season runs through Dec. 31, the traditional Class N/NN antlerless deer season will be open in select areas on public and private land Dec. 11-14 and Dec. 28-31, the muzzleloader deer season will be open Dec. 15-21 and the youth, Class Q and Class XS season for antlerless deer will be open Dec. 26-27 in any county with a firearms deer season.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

West Virginia

West Virginia American Water proposes $46 million rate hike affecting 172,000 customers

Published

on

West Virginia American Water proposes  million rate hike affecting 172,000 customers


A possible utility rate hike is being discussed for West Virginia American Water customers. It would affect 172,000 customers in 22 counties.

On Monday night, at a public hearing, only two people spoke out sharing their thoughts on the proposed hike.

“I’m here to ask the PSC to finally, once and for all, take care of the consumers of water by making sure the water company follows industry standards and international code,” WVAW customer, Howard Swint said.

According to a press release from West Virginia American Water, the new rates would be implemented in two steps with the first step of a $11 increase per month going into effect on March 1st, 2026.

Advertisement

The second step establishes final rates would be a $5 increase becoming effective on March 1st, 2027. Those numbers being based on the bill of an average residential customer.

“The system we’re hoping to get a hearing on today is terribly antiquated and it also has a lot of other shortcomings that cheat the water rate consumers by virtue of the fact that they’re putting band-aids on a system that should really be replaced. Now that’s going to require money, I understand that” Swint said.

In total, water rates would see a $46 million increase, and sewer rates would see a $1.4 million increase. According to the company, these increases would go towards making further improvements to their infrastructure.

“In downtown Charleston, last year it was flooded. We pay for that as consumers. We have to pay for that. It’s a system that’s antiquated that has to be fixed. So that requires money to bring it up to international code and industry standards. It’s something we all will pay less in the future for by virtue of having a system that’s reliable,” Swint said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

West Virginia

Governor says it is not appropriate to ask specifics of National Guard readiness with weapons – WV MetroNews

Published

on

Governor says it is not appropriate to ask specifics of National Guard readiness with weapons – WV MetroNews


West Virginia’s governor says it is inappropriate to ask questions about whether members of the National Guard patrolling Washington, D.C., are prepared to quickly and efficiently respond with firearms in case of attack.

Gov. Patrick Morrisey

“I can assure folks that the people that we send in — anytime you’re sending anyone potentially in harm’s way, you want to make sure that they’re fully prepared, they’re very well trained,” Morrisey said on MetroNews Midday.

In response to a question about Guard members’ readiness to defend themselves, he continued, “I can assure people that they are.”

More detail about defensive readiness than that, the governor went on to say, should be off limits to the public.

Advertisement

West Virginia National Guard members Sarah Beckstrom, 20, and Andrew Wolfe, 24, were shot Nov. 26 at the corner of 17th and I Streets NW. Beckstrom died on Thanksgiving Day, and Wolfe continues to recover from serious injuries.

A major with the National Guard who was nearby shot the suspect with his service weapon as the attacker was trying to reload his own gun, investigators said.

Authorities have said the suspect in the shooting, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, came around a corner, raised his gun and fired at Guardsmen who were gathered at the location near a Metro stop. He has been formally charged with murder.

Lakanwal, 29, drove from his home in the state of Washington. He had previously worked with CIA-backed counterterrorism units in Afghanistan known as Zero Units. He had a Special Immigrant Visa because of that work but apparently had significant struggles adjusting to life in the United States.

Advertisement

“This is a tragedy that resulted from an ambush. It was nothing to do with their readiness posture. So specialist Beckstrom was attacked from behind at point blank range by a member of a CIA backed paramilitary unit, you know, a terrorist. So this was really important,” Morrisey said on MetroNews Midday.

Warnings of possible danger

At least two memos introduced into evidence by attorneys representing the Trump administration in a federal court case challenging the presence of the National Guard in the nation’s capital make reference to potential danger for operations under Joint Task Force-D.C.

“JTC-DC service members may expect a heightened threat environment while supporting the “Make DC Safe and Beautiful” mission within the NCR,” according to an August advisory memo filed in the federal court case and referring to activity in the national capital region.

“Threat/nefarious actors engaging in grievance based violence and those inspired by foreign terrorist organizations may view the MDCSB mission as a target of opportunity. Additionally, civilian populations with varying political views may attempt to engage with JTF-DC SMs.”

Advertisement

On August 23, the commanding general of the D.C. National Guard gave an order allowing members supporting the mission in the district to carry their service-issued weapons after careful consideration of the security environment. Guard members on the mission were to carry M17 pistols, intended for personal protection.

In early December, after the shootings, the Pentagon reiterated The Pentagon that every National Guard member deployed in Washington D.C., would now be armed with live weapons.

An overriding question has been readiness to engage — whether the service weapons and ammunition were in position to be used quickly in case of attack.

COMMENTARY by T.J. MEADOWS: Did We Fail Our Guardsmen?

On statewide radio, the governor said the specifics of Guard’s access to weapons is not for the public to know.

Advertisement

“You know, it’s absolutely wrong to try to publicize everyone’s weapons readiness, sensitive operational information, if it could endanger the Guardsmen who are working in D.C. I think they are irresponsible questions, to be blunt. We have to protect our people,” Morrisey said.

“I don’t know why people would want to have everything about ‘This is exactly the operational information you need when you’re out in the field’ and you could subject our Guardsmen to harm. That’s outrageous, and I’m not going to do it.”

D.C. mission continues, and so do questions

On August 11, President Donald Trump declared a “crime emergency” for the District of Columbia, and just a few days later Governor Morrisey deployed 300 to 400 members of the West Virginia National Guard for support.

That developed as, on August 12, Leland Blanchard, interim commanding general of the D.C. National Guard, sent an email to James Seward, adjutant general of the West Virginia National Guard.

Advertisement

“Was told by SECARMY’s office that your governor has been in contact with SECARMY and may be willing to support ongoing operations in DC,” Blanchard wrote in an email that later appeared among the filings in the federal court case.

Blanchard went on to say work was still ongoing to determine tasks, “but wondering if you have some insights on number of personnel you might have to put against this mission once we get there.”

Seward responded to say, depending on orders and funding, that West Virginia could provide an estimated 500 to 600 Guard members. “Please let us know what we can do to help.”

The president’s emergency declaration, which placed the Metropolitan Police Department under federal direction, expired after 30 days, Sept. 10, but the National Guard presence continued.

About 2,000 members of the National Guard, overall, have been deployed to Washington, D.C., to patrol on the National Mall, in Metro public transportation stations and across D.C. neighborhoods.

Advertisement

Last month, the West Virginia National Guard announced participation in patrols in Washington, D.C., would continue until the end of the year. However, the mission was being scaled back.

About 160 West Virginia National Guard volunteers were approved to remain in D.C. All personnel not continuing as part of the D.C. Safe and Beautiful mission returned to West Virginia.

COMMENTARY by HOPPY KERCHEVAL: Governor Morrisey and the National Guard in D.C.

State Adjutant General Jim Seward

In a Dec. 1 press conference with the governor, Major General Seward of the West Virginia National Guard, said members “are trained professionals; they are deputized U.S. marshals in the district. When they’re on patrol they’re armed, and they are trained.”

That press conference included a question from MetroNews about what precautions or self-defense National Guard members were prepared to use as they were deployed to the city where crime emergency conditions were described as the basis from the outset.

The response was in general terms.

Advertisement

“These are people that are trained, and they have knowledge of the situation they’re going into. These are the same people going to all corners of the globe. They’re trained in terms of difficult circumstances,” Morrisey said, concluding “We believe they have the background and training to go in to Washington, D.C., to carry out the mission.”

The West Virginia National Guard specified in an August statement that members were providing support in “areas of sustainment, logistics, administration, public affairs and Joint Staff augmentation.

“Security missions include static and roving presence patrols.” That meant standing or walking in high-traffic areas and at Metro public transit stations along with assistance to U.S. Park Police.

The Democratic caucus in the state Legislature has formally requested an oversight hearing during January interim meetings to examine the circumstances surrounding the deployment of West Virginia National Guard members to Washington, D.C.

The proposed hearing would require testimony from leaders of the West Virginia National Guard and representatives from the Office of the Governor. Democrats say it is a necessary step to ensure future deployments are made lawfully, purposefully and with appropriate safeguards.

Advertisement
John Williams

“Our Guard members serve with honor. We owe them answers,” said Delegate John Williams, D- Monongalia.

“This tragedy demands a clear and factual review so that lessons are learned and protections strengthened moving forward.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending