West Virginia
If everyone else jumped off a bridge, would we? Keep West Virginia’s immunization policy strong • West Virginia Watch

Growing up, my mom had a signature response to my sister and me whenever we begged to do something just because “everyone else is doing it.” Her go-to line, like many of our parents of that time, was, “If everyone else jumped off a bridge, would you?” So goes the logic of many of our elected officials in the wake of Gov. Patrick Morrissey’s day one executive order 7-25.
The order directed the Bureau for Public Health to write a policy to permit non-medical exemptions to West Virginia’s child care and school immunization requirements. It claims, “No state action may substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion unless it is essential to further a compelling governmental interest.” A state delegate added on LinkedIn: “If you are concerned that the executive order allowing medical and personal exemptions for vaccines in West Virginia will put everyone in danger, consider this: every state surrounding us already offers exemptions.”
Yes — we as parents, teachers, health care providers, educators, school nurses, child care providers, working professionals, business owners, and West Virginia citizens are concerned about any changes to our policy (which already offers medical exemptions), and for good reason. To us, our kids, and our communities this concern falls firmly under the rubric of “compelling government interest.” Let us outline some of the reasons why:
- West Virginia leads the nation with its effective immunization policy, which has inspired other states to adopt similar measures (and on the flipside, no state has added non-medical exemptions through legislative action in more than 20 years). Our policy is highly effective for all West Virginians, moving the state’s immunization rates prior to the age of 5 (which is among the lowest in the nation) to some of the highest rates of immunization in the country for school-age children. High rates of immunization are essential to keep infectious diseases at bay. Our school immunization policy offers the crucial milestone for kids to catch up on protection as they enter the school system.
- Even one child’s immunization status can impact an entire community. Experts have explained to me that when our immunization rate is high enough to support herd immunity (for example, 95% of a population immunized to achieve herd immunity for measles), that helps prevent a disease from spreading. When every child who is medically able gets immunized, that protects not only that child but those around them in their schools and communities, too. This is particularly important in our child care facilities, where many babies and small children are too young to get certain shots, so they rely on those around them for protection. There are approximately 109,000 children under 5 years old in West Virginia. And that’s just our youngest vulnerable communities — there are even more who rely on protection from herd immunity (such as our elderly, pregnant and immunocompromised residents).
- For those with medical reasons not to be vaccinated, West Virginia currently has an effective process in place for medically necessary exemptions from the child care and school immunization policy.
Let’s also consider just a few examples among many that illustrate what our state is currently doing a great job of preventing:
- 83 young children died in the United States territory of Samoa in 2019 after relaxing legacy childhood immunizations for highly infectious diseases such as measles, pertussis and polio in the wake of government complacency, disinformation campaigns that sowed distrust in vaccines, and a suspension of routine immunizations schedules, leaving them unprepared and exposed when the disease returned on its shore from an infected traveler from New Zealand.
- Reports have shown that in surrounding states such as Ohio with lax immunization requirements, recent measles outbreaks not only put 35 young children in the hospital, but also cost the state an estimated $3.5 million to remediate 77 cases.
- Due to a measles outbreak in Washington state in 2019, approximately 800 children who were considered exposed had to stay home from school up to three weeks, devastating the local economy and working families’ access to child care and their ability to go to work.
- As of January 2024, in other states that allowed for these exemptions, several measles outbreaks in Chicago, New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania are already shattering records of this previously eradicated disease, with cases outpacing the entire year of 2023. Of these cases, 89% were unvaccinated; but the concerning statistic is the number of patients who had been vaccinated — 7% of the cases had one dose of the MMR vaccine and 4% of cases had two doses of the MMR vaccine.
- A man contracted polio in New York in 2022 after the United States had not seen a case in over three decades.
- As of December 2024, our neighboring state of Pennsylvania has the most cases of whooping cough in the nation (a disease that can be deadly, especially for babies), whereas West Virginia has the least.
- In 2019, while 31 states faced measles outbreaks and some saw polio cases, West Virginia had none.
Supporters who seek to change the school immunization policy to expand beyond non-medical exemptions often invoke a desire for religious or philosophical freedom. However, such freedoms have always been balanced against the risks they might pose to others. This nation was founded on the principle of a “social contract,” which underscores that a free and fair society depends on balancing individual liberties with collective responsibilities. To enjoy societal protections like security, health, education and survival, individuals must sometimes accept certain limits on personal freedoms to safeguard the health and safety of other citizens.
For example, a person of legal age can make the individual decision to drink alcohol, and they absolutely have the freedom to do that; this person does not, however, have the freedom to drive drunk due to the threat that the behavior poses to others on the road. Parents who choose not to vaccinate their children have access to alternative educational options and can exercise their constitutionally protected right to education; they simply cannot join our schools’ congregate settings to put others at higher risk of the contagious diseases that the school policy has protected against for decades.
As the president of the West Virginia Women’s Alliance (WVWA), a cross-partisan organization dedicated to lifting up women and children in West Virginia, I’ve had the privilege of engaging with West Virginians last year at over 20 events we hosted. From “House Parties” with working mothers and families to “Cocktails and Conversations” with candidates and elected officials from both sides of the aisle, we were able to share our top concerns and hear their vision on how to make West Virginia a place we can all thrive.
We also participated in numerous symposia, forums, conferences, and events to learn about our most pressing issues and explore areas of opportunity to improve outcomes for all West Virginians. One common thread we continue to encounter is the deeply shared pride in our state and how much we all sincerely want West Virginia to win. In countless conversations, we have heard and continue to hear that keeping the child care and school immunization policy the way it is, nation leading and paving the way for other states, is a top desire across the state. In fact, many of these supporters are leaders from various churches who also advocated for former Gov. Jim Justice to veto a bill last year that would have also altered the policy, as they also wish to protect kids and vulnerable populations.
In this era of deep political polarization, the WVWA is working to bridge divides and encourage bipartisan collaboration to address the urgent challenges facing our state, especially those impacting quality of life for West Virginia women and children. While we have seen notable economic development wins and other advancements, several significant issues remain that demand our collective focus and cooperation. Addressing these pressing problems will require innovative ideas and a united effort.
Among these challenges, West Virginia currently ranks:
- 49th in GDP
- 50th in 10 year job growth rate
- 49th in personal income
- 49th in venture capital investments
- 48th in 25-year housing appreciation
- 49th in workforce participation
- 3rd in the nation for numerical population loss (with an expected loss of 150,000 people by 2040 for a projected population of 1.6 million)
- 49th in 4th grade reading and math
- 48th in 8th grade math
- 49th in 5th grade reading
- 51st in the nation with 2019 SAT scores
- 49th in the nation for percentage of population with a bachelor’s degree or more
- 49th in median household income
- 56th in female headed families living in poverty
To our elected West Virginia leaders and representatives, we sincerely ask you: please slow down before making a decision on any policy to weaken these requirements for your younger fellow citizens and constituents who cannot vote, who cannot donate to your campaign, who do not have lobbyists to come meet with you, who do not have a voice or power but who deserve our care and protection all the same.
Do not allow the statistics at the beginning of this article to only be numbers on a page but take time to read the articles and look at the pictures outlining the helplessness and despair of the many families who needlessly lost a child due to government complacency. With stakes as high as these, do not act with impunity but peer out from partisan foxholes, review data and reviewed evidence, and reply on subject matter experts and doctors who have spent decades of their lives after taking the Hippocratic Oath “to do no harm” to inform your decision — not on debunked fringe theories, unsubstantiated claims or dogmatic ideologues.
While strong political parties are vital to our democracy, they should not function as rigid monoliths. Every elected representative has a duty to serve as a thoughtful steward for their constituents, prioritizing their well-being through informed and discerning decisions. True leadership requires the courage to rise above the loudest voices, to carefully consider verifiable facts, and, most importantly, to adapt and change one’s mind when the evidence demands it. If any voices should guide your decision, let it be the tragically too-late pleas from the parents of needlessly lost children, the chorus and refrain of “God, why? Why, my baby?”
To my fellow West Virginian parents, families and neighbors: it is never too late to stand up for our kids and communities. Reach out to your representatives. Call them, email them, and set up meetings with them. Engage respectfully, as the art of civil discourse and constructive debate has unfortunately become rare but remains essential for achieving the best outcomes through collaboration and compromise.
Differing party affiliations or stances on issues should not make you disloyal or sworn enemies. With stakes as high as these, we should heed the words of others who have experienced the consequences of poor policy decisions. After experiencing the devastation of the measles deaths in neighboring Samoa, the governor of Hawaii Josh Green said, “Vaccines and public health vaccination programs are not just medical interventions; they are also moral imperatives. They embody our commitment to saving lives, ending disease, and protecting the health and well-being of future generations.”
This is not a time for apathy but a call to action to make our state the best it can be — not just for those with resources or power, but also for those who need our support the most. In the words of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., whose legacy continues to inspire so many, “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.”
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

West Virginia
What Kansas football coach Lance Leipold saw on targeting calls during win against WVU

The Topeka Capital-Journal’s Jordan Guskey talks Kansas football win
Check out what The Topeka Capital-Journal reporter Jordan Guskey had to say following Kansas football’s Big 12 Conference win against West Virginia.
LAWRENCE — Kansas football’s 41-10 victory against West Virginia this past weekend saw a pair of players ejected due to targeting calls, one on each side.
In the second quarter, WVU nickel/safety Fred Perry was disqualified because of a hit he made on KU quarterback Jalon Daniels. In the third quarter, Jayhawks safety Devin Dye was disqualified for a hit he made on a Mountaineers running back Cyncir Bowers. Holistically, Kansas football coach Lance Leipold acknowledged Saturday the calls were made in the interest of player safety.
But while Leipold thought Dye’s ejection was unfortunate, Perry’s led to a little longer of a conversation postgame. That’s because after the hit, some pushing and shoving ensued until players from both teams were separated. Kansas offensive lineman Kobe Baynes, who appeared to shove Perry right after the hit on Daniels, would eventually be called for a late hit.
Leipold, at one moment concerned the situation would get out of hand, was glad to see it get settled as quickly as it did. Although he understands a player’s desire to defend their teammate, he called for composure in all situations. He called it a tough situation for officials to handle.
Here are a few more takeaways from the Big 12 Conference matchup between the Jayhawks (3-1, 1-0 in Big 12) and Mountaineers (2-2, 0-1).
Why Trey Lathan was selected to be Kansas’ 4th captain for game
Kansas has three lead captains this season in Daniels, offensive lineman Bryce Foster and defensive end Justice Finkley, but each game there’s a fourth “rotational” captain who is honored as well. Against West Virginia, that individual was linebacker Trey Lathan. Lathan, who finished the game with three tackles, a sack, a tackle for loss and an interception, transferred to KU during the offseason from WVU.
Leipold acknowledged Lathan’s past stop in his college career with the Mountaineers did play a factor in the decision. However, Lathan’s also someone he felt has been playing well and become more confident. Lathan is also someone he felt had become a more vocal leader within the defense and is well respected.
Kansas’ offensive line doesn’t allow any sacks
West Virginia’s defense collected six sacks against Pittsburgh just the week before this matchup. But by game’s end against the Jayhawks, the Mountaineers didn’t have a single sack. So, it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that Leipold was pleased with the protection Kansas’ offensive line gave Daniels and for how Daniels at times escaped pressure.
On film, Leipold had seen an impressive defense that was athletic up front. It could use multiple looks and was aggressive. But KU proved capable of stymying that aspect of WVU’s defense.
West Virginia’s tempo offensively doesn’t prove to be much of a factor
Leipold thinks Kansas’ defense can get better at playing against tempo, based on what he saw against West Virginia. However, considering how well the Jayhawks played and what he heard as the game unfolded, he thought they did well. Physical play and quality tackling helped force numerous punts and stops as KU took control of the game.
Jordan Guskey covers University of Kansas Athletics at The Topeka Capital-Journal. He was the 2022 National Sports Media Association’s sportswriter of the year for the state of Kansas. Contact him at jmguskey@gannett.com or on Twitter at @JordanGuskey.
West Virginia
Between The Eers: Serious Issues Mounting for West Virginia’s Rushing Attack

Injuries are piling up for the West Virginia Mountaineers early in the season, particularly in the running back room. To everyone’s surprise, Tye Edwards was unable to play this past weekend against Kansas, and despite being a game-time decision for that game, his status for this week’s matchup versus Utah remains in question.
“Hopeful might be too much,” Rodriguez responded when asked about Edwards’ status. “I’m more… he’s probably still doubtful right now with his hip pointer. He’s trying to. It’s not where he’s wanting to sit out. He’s a kid that really wants to play.”
Rodriguez also noted that Cyncir Bowers is in the concussion protocol and is also questionable for Saturday’s game.
So, what in the heck do the Mountaineers manufacture a rushing attack against a Utah defense that allows just over 110 yards on the ground per game? It’s a great question, especially given the Mountaineers’ offensive line struggles.
As far as available backs, WVU will have Clay Ash, Diore Hubbard, Tyler Jacklich, and Andre Devine. Those four have combined to rush for 127 yards on 38 carries, averaging 3.3 yards per tote. Ferris State transfer Kannon Katzer is still working his way back from injury, but his status as of this morning is unknown. If it is just those four aforementioned backs, WVU may have to get creative with Rodney Gallagher III and maybe go as far as starting Jaylen Henderson at quarterback to make Utah respect the threat of him pulling it and keeping it.
On today’s episode of Between The Eers, I discuss this huge problem the Mountaineers may have in the run game.
If you haven’t yet, please go over to our YouTube page, West Virginia On SI (@SI_WVU), and subscribe. You’ll get a notification the second a new episode of Between The Eers, The Walk Thru GameDay Show, or Mountaineer Postgame drops.
Recent Between The Eers episodes:
WVU’s Painfully Bad Offense Needs to Make Some Changes
Did One Game Flip the Narrative on WVU Entering Big 12 Play?
A Night West Virginia Needed
West Virginia Found Its Identity in Backyard Brawl Win
MORE STORIES FROM WEST VIRGINIA ON SI
Rodriguez Candid on Why WVU’s Offense is Struggling and What Must Change
Why Scotty Fox Didn’t Play vs. Kansas and What He Needs to Do to Take the Next Step
Rich Rodriguez Shares His Message to the Team Following Embarrassing Loss to Kansas
Offensive Line Shakeup Could Be Coming Soon for West Virginia Football
Everything Rich Rodriguez Said on His Radio Show Monday Night Following Kansas Loss
West Virginia
Pat Narduzzi Complains About ‘Lopsided’ Penalties in Loss to West Virginia

West Virginia sent Pitt home with an overtime loss and will have bragging rights in the Backyard Brawl for the next four years. Following the game, Pitt head coach Pat Narduzzi met with reporters, discussing several different topics such as quarterback play, the lack of a run game, officiating, WVU’s offense, and more.
The one thing that stood out most, though, was his take on the officiating.
“Whew. You guys watched the game, I don’t know. There was some stuff out there, but we’ll look at the videotape. Not happy with that at all. 14 penalties, a little lopsided there. Eli got punched, got his helmet ripped off, punched in the face; no call there. We had somebody get spit in the face, too, but things didn’t go our way.”
To be honest, I truly don’t understand how Narduzzi can be upset with the officiating. Many of those 14 penalties were clear and preventable penalties, whether it was a false start, a hold, defensive pass interference, or offside. There were only maybe two that were 50/50.
But let’s not forget how Pitt caught a break at the end of the first half. Nicco Marchiol ran the ball up the middle for a first down, slid, and was hit late. The flag was dropped, but the officials said that because there was no time left on the clock, the half was over. I’ll need a better description from a rules analyst to explain this one because I don’t understand how the half can just end on that. I assumed there would either be one untimed down or Pitt would have to be penalized on the kickoff to start the second half. Neither happened.
What about the MarShon Oxley sack in the third quarter that was flagged for unsportsmanlike conduct when all he did was stand up and walk away? That not only bailed Pitt out, but they would score a touchdown on that drive just a few plays later.
How about the first half when linebacker Ashton Woods was ejected for targeting on what appeared (by every angle shown) to be a clean shot?
There were also multiple times where Pitt defenders arrived way too early on a pass and should have been flagged for defensive pass interference. Instead, the flag remained tucked into the official’s waist pocket.
The penalties West Virginia had were way more costly and timely than those Pitt was guilty of.
MORE STORIES FROM WEST VIRGINIA ON SI
Sunday Morning Thoughts: Grit, Guts, and Glory
Stock Up, Stock Down: Major Movement Following West Virginia’s Win Over Pitt
Quick Hits: Rich Rodriguez Discusses Final Scoring Drives, Tye Edwards Big Night and More
Three Rapid Takeaways from West Virginia’s Backyard Brawl Win
Mountaineer Mantrip: Backyard Brawl Edition
-
Finance1 week ago
Reimagining Finance: Derek Kudsee on Coda’s AI-Powered Future
-
World1 week ago
Syria’s new president takes center stage at UNGA as concerns linger over terrorist past
-
North Dakota1 week ago
Board approves Brent Sanford as new ‘commissioner’ of North Dakota University System
-
Technology1 week ago
These earbuds include a tiny wired microphone you can hold
-
Culture1 week ago
Test Your Memory of These Classic Books for Young Readers
-
Crypto1 week ago
Texas brothers charged in cryptocurrency kidnapping, robbery in MN
-
Crypto1 week ago
EU Enforcers Arrest 5 Over €100M Cryptocurrency Scam – Law360
-
Rhode Island1 week ago
The Ocean State’s Bond With Robert Redford