Texas
Texas Supreme Court Justice John Devine narrowly survives heated primary centered on judicial ethics
Sign up for the We the Texans newsletter to receive twice-monthly updates on our year-long initiative dedicated to boosting civic engagement and chronicling how democracy is experienced in Texas.
In a surprise nail-biter, Texas Supreme Court Justice John Devine narrowly survived an unexpectedly heated GOP primary challenge that centered on questions about his judicial ethics.
Devine beat Second District Court of Appeals Brian Walker by 1 percentage point of the vote.
Three Supreme Court seats are open this year, but Devine was the only justice with a primary challenger. He will now face 281st District Judge Christine Vinh Weems in a November general election that could be equally heated — Democrats in the state have targeted the high court this year, hoping that backlash to rulings on abortion, the border and LGTBQ+ issues will mobilize enough voters to unseat incumbents on the all-Republican bench. And Devine, a former anti-abortion activist who has pushed back against gay rights, is likely to be a focal point of democrats’ strategy.
Devine entered the race with a clear edge, and with the backing of powerful conservative Christian groups and voters who’ve supported him for 30 years.
He has called church-state separation a “myth,” fought to have the Ten Commandments displayed in his Harris County district courtroom in the 1990s and, as a Tea Party-backed candidate for the Supreme Court in 2012, successfully campaigned on claims that he was arrested 37 times at abortion protests in the 1980s.
After initially dismissing the seriousness of Walker’s campaign, Devine faced a bruising final stretch of the primary in which his ethics took center stage. Walker, a 46-year-old Air Force veteran and one-term appeals court judge with little statewide name recognition, spent weeks blasting Devine for skipping half of oral arguments before the court to campaign this year. And he painted Devine as an unethical jurist who had used the bench to advance his ultraconservative religious views and political ambitions at the expense of his impartiality and the public’s confidence in the judiciary.
Walker reiterated those concerns on Wednesday morning.
“I’m very encouraged by the support I received and I pray that Judge Devine sees this as a referendum,” Walker told The Texas Tribune. “I hope he presses into his job all the more and strives to do it in a way that makes most Texans proud.”
Last month, The Texas Tribune published remarks from a September speech in which Devine railed against his fellow justices, saying they were “brainwashed” and cared more about abiding by legal processes than their “fidelity to the Constitution.” In the speech, he also claimed that the state’s all-GOP Court of Criminal Appeals was controlled by “RINOs” and “trans-Republicans.”
Weeks earlier, the Tribune also reported that Devine did not recuse himself when the court ruled in 2022 on a high-profile sex abuse lawsuit against his former colleagues, Southern Baptist leader Paul Pressler and his law partner Jared Woodfill. The plaintiff in the lawsuit was a former employee of Pressler and Woodfill’s firm who alleged that he was abused while working there — and at the same time as Devine. (Woodfill, who ran for a Houston seat in the Texas House with the backing of Attorney General Ken Paxton and other Republican leaders, lost handily to incumbent Rep. Lacey Hull on Tuesday).
Walker had banked on a surge of Election Day voters, hoping they’d be disenfranchised with Devine after a late flurry of concerns about his ethics. That strategy initially seemed to pan out: As vote tallies continued to trickle in through Wednesday morning, Walker slowly chipped away at Devine’s advantage from early and mail-in voting, and won by significant margins in major counties such as Dallas and Bexar. But it wasn’t enough to overcome Devine’s massive support in Harris County — his former home turf — where his 65% vote share neutralized Walker’s 51% advantage in all other counties combined.
Walker is a seventh-generation Texan who was first elected to the district court in 2020. He is a graduate of the University of Houston Law School and Dallas Theological Seminary, and previously served as the campaign manager for his father, Scott Walker, who was elected to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in 2016.
The Court of Criminal Appeals and state Supreme Court are Texas’ two highest judicial bodies, with the latter handling civil matters. No Democrats serve on either body.
Devine’s win came as the Court of Criminal Appeals faced its own upheaval on Tuesday night, the product of a yearslong effort by Paxton and his allies to remove judges who had voted that his office could not unilaterally prosecute local voting crimes. All three of the incumbent justices were soundly defeated by Paxton-backed challengers.
Voting FAQ: 2024 primary
-
What happens after the Texas primary election?
-
How are the runoffs and general election different?
-
What deadlines do I need to know to participate in the May local election?
-
What deadlines do I need to know to participate in the May primary runoffs?
-
What deadlines do I need to know to participate in the November general election?
-
Why does Texas have so many elections?
- Read more
We can’t wait to welcome you to downtown Austin Sept. 5-7 for the 2024 Texas Tribune Festival! Join us at Texas’ breakout politics and policy event as we dig into the 2024 elections, state and national politics, the state of democracy, and so much more. When tickets go on sale this spring, Tribune members will save big. Donate to join or renew today.
Texas
Jimbo Fisher’s $77 million buyout was money well spent for Texas A&M. Just look
Oklahoma Sooners doomed by slow start against Ole Miss Rebels | Rapid reaction
The Oklahoman’s Jenni Carlson gives her quick thoughts on OU’s 34-26 loss to Ole Miss in Week 9 of the 2025 college football season.
I hate to be a voice for the opulent, but if the money works, flaunt it.
All the way to the elite of college football.
So while Texas A&M was dismantling LSU 49-25 Saturday night and taking control of he SEC race, it was hard to not see it for what it was.
While the college football world is collectively sick over the financial waste of universities firing coaches and paying exorbitant buyouts (Penn State, Florida), Texas A&M is doing just fine, thank you. After two years ago paying the largest buyout in college football history.
That was Texas A&M at the end of the 2023 season, doing the utter unthinkable by firing Jimbo Fisher and giving him $77 million to please go away as fast as possible.
That was Texas A&M on Saturday night in LSU’s famed Death Valley, where dreams go to die. Unless you have a spare $77 million laying in the desk drawer.
Hey, you’ve got to spend money to make money, right?
Because that cash — the unimaginable buyout of a colossal mistake of a coaching hire — brought hardscrabble coach Mike Elko to College Station.
You’ve seen Elko by now. Looks like a short order cook, wears a t-shirt on the sideline — untucked because, well, of course it is.
He also has the best team in the best conference in college football 21 games into his buildout at historically underachieving Texas A&M. So underachieving, in fact, that the joke around the SEC is they’re not Texas A&M.
They’re Texas 8&5. Every flipping year — despite every possible advantage to winning.
That’s why it was so strange when Elko stood at the SEC spring meetings in Destin, Fla., five months ago, and said he really liked this team. No, you don’t get it, he said.
He really liked this team. As in, this team can win a championship.
And everywhere around the SEC, they laughed. Because they’ve watched Kevin Sumlin and Fisher since the Aggies rolled into the SEC in 2012.
They’ve watched the program waste one of the greatest talents in college football history (Johnny Manziel), and the greatest high school recruiting class in history (2022).
And frankly, they watched the same Texas A&M begin its first season under Elko by winning seven of eight games. Then lose four of its last five to finish — you guessed it — 8-5.
That’s what makes this season so impressive. It’s not just that Elko has this group of players executing at their collective ceiling and dominating the big, bad SEC, it’s the way they’re burying the narratives of the past.
The Aggies are soft. They’ll fold when it matters most. Punch them in the mouth, and they back down.
They had six sacks against LSU. They had more than 200 yards rushing and 200 yards passing and — get this — won despite being negative-2 in turnover ratio.
They had eight runs of at least 10 yards. Had five catches of at least 17 yards. That’s 13 explosion plays, if you’re counting at home.
They held LSU to 55 yards rushing on 25 carries, and forced talented quarterback Garrett Nussmeier into his worst game of the season. With each play that exposed LSU’s fraud season of hype, coach Brian Kelly’s ball cap spun in a crooked mess.
Let this sink in: Texas A&M, the perpetual underachievers for decades upon decades, outscored LSU 35-7 in the second half. The Tigers’ only touchdown came in garbage time from a backup quarterback throwing to a backup wide receiver — against the backup Texas A&M defense.
And Elko was livid.
Just like he was livid when the Aggies allowed 40 points to Notre Dame and first-year starting quarterback CJ Carr. Took the final drive of the game in South Bend to win that one, a road victory that can only be surpassed by winning in Death Valley for the fist time since 1994.
As LSU coach Brian Kelly walked off the field, LSU fans chanted “Fire Kelly.” Meanwhile, in their own corner of Death Valley, Elko and the players swayed and sang the Aggie War Hymn with the 10,000 or so fans who followed for the ride.
There’s nothing fluky about it. You’ve got to spend money to make money.
Or in this case, to make champions.
Matt Hayes is the senior college football writer for USA TODAY Sports Network. Follow him on X at @MattHayesCFB.
Texas
State to take control of Fort Worth ISD, sparking mixed reactions
Parents and teachers across Fort Worth ISD are reacting to news that the Texas Education Agency will take control of the district — a move that’s leaving many educators uneasy but giving some parents hope for change.
Longtime Fort Worth ISD teacher Kelsey De La Torre said the announcement immediately brought her to tears.
“Honestly, I read it today. I got the notification on my phone, and I glanced at it, and I got tears in my eyes,” De La Torre said. “Because it delivers a sense of insecurity and a sense of uncertainty in an environment where you need to be secure and certain.”
State plans leadership overhaul
Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath said the state will appoint a new board of trustees and begin a nationwide search for a new superintendent.
De La Torre worries that leadership changes at the top will trickle down to classrooms.
“The people who are basically giving us our materials, our instruction, our strategies, our resources — that will inevitably impact each and every one of us,” she said.
Parents see opportunity for change
While some teachers fear the change, others in the community see it as a much-needed reset.
Fort Worth parent Adrienne Alexander Haynes said she felt relieved when the news broke.
“I feel like we’ve been stuck in this position of asking for a bare minimum,” Haynes said. “With the state takeover, it’s almost as though we’re finally being rescued out of this hamster wheel that we’ve been in, in our education system.”
Other parents echoed that optimism.
“I’m excited for the future,” said Kathy Kessler, another Fort Worth ISD parent. “I’m excited that there are opportunities to try and make things better, where our kids are being more productive in school.”
Concerns about deeper systemic issues
Still, De La Torre — who also has three children in the district — said the state’s intervention doesn’t address the real barriers students face.
“We’re still going to have an issue with poverty. We’re still going to have an issue with students who are homeless. We’re still going to have an issue with kids who go home and don’t have any food,” she said. “When are we going to fix those issues? Because that’s what’s keeping kids from growing.”
Support for current superintendent
Both parents and teachers agreed on one thing — they want Superintendent Dr. Karen Molinar to stay in her role. Many believe she’s made significant progress in the short time she’s led the district.
Texas
David Pollack gives score prediction, winner in Texas A&M-LSU game
The buildup to Saturday night in Baton Rouge carries all the tension of a late-season crossroads game. Texas A&M enters unbeaten at 7-0, while LSU finds itself searching for answers after a frustrating loss to Vanderbilt. For the Tigers, it’s a must-win moment to salvage momentum before facing Alabama. For the Aggies, it’s a chance to validate their rise and break a three-decade drought in Death Valley.
On the See Ball Get Ball podcast, college football analyst David Pollack laid out his view of how the matchup will unfold, citing the trenches and quarterback play as decisive factors. He pointed to A&M’s pass rush and LSU’s injuries up front, particularly at left tackle, as key reasons for his pick. “But I’m going A&M, and I do think this is a super close game… 27–23 is what I wrote down,” Pollack said.
Pollack emphasized that while LSU has talent, its protection issues have left quarterback Garrett Nussmeier exposed. He also highlighted the contrasting defensive strengths, noting A&M’s ability to pressure quarterbacks and LSU’s elite secondary depth.
Pollack detailed his reasoning by breaking down what he called one of the nation’s most exciting matchups between wide receivers and defensive backs. “This might be the best showcase you will see all year of receivers versus DBs,” he said. He praised Texas A&M’s Mario Craver and KC Concepcion for their explosiveness and LSU’s coverage unit led by Javien Toviano and Ashton Stamps for their discipline on the perimeter.
Beyond the individual matchups, Pollack cited the Tigers’ mounting injuries and offensive inconsistency as major red flags. “Nussmeier’s dad-gum hobbling around. He needs pain medication every practice because you haven’t been able to protect him,” he said. “They’re so elite at pass rush. They’re so elite on third down.”
He also noted Texas A&M’s balance behind quarterback Marcel Reed and running back Rueben Owens. The Aggies rank second nationally in third-down defense and bring one of the SEC’s most efficient passing attacks into Baton Rouge. Despite LSU’s strong defensive ranking, Pollack questioned whether its front seven can hold up.
Pollack’s cohost Brent Rollins reminded listeners that LSU has won every home meeting in this series since 2017, but Pollack said he couldn’t back the Tigers given their health and form. He predicted a narrow 27–23 Aggie win and added that a loss could intensify pressure on head coach Brian Kelly.
Texas A&M will play LSU at Tiger Stadium on Saturday at 7:30 p.m. ET on ABC.
-
New York3 days agoVideo: How Mamdani Has Evolved in the Mayoral Race
-
World6 days agoIsrael continues deadly Gaza truce breaches as US seeks to strengthen deal
-
News5 days agoVideo: Federal Agents Detain Man During New York City Raid
-
News5 days agoBooks about race and gender to be returned to school libraries on some military bases
-
Technology6 days agoAI girlfriend apps leak millions of private chats
-
News6 days agoTrump news at a glance: president can send national guard to Portland, for now
-
Politics6 days agoTrump admin on pace to shatter deportation record by end of first year: ‘Just the beginning’
-
Business6 days agoUnionized baristas want Olympics to drop Starbucks as its ‘official coffee partner’