Connect with us

Texas

Smith: Why Georgia’s school shooting verdict matters in Texas

Published

on

Smith: Why Georgia’s school shooting verdict matters in Texas


Tuesday, a Georgia jury reinforced a growing legal reality: Accountability in school shootings may not end with the shooter. Texans should take note.

Colin Gray, 55, faces up to 180 years in prison after a Barrow County jury found him guilty on more than two dozen counts, including second-degree murder. Prosecutors said he gave his son, Colt Gray, access to a semi-automatic rifle despite documented warning signs, including a prior law enforcement investigation into online threats attributed to the teen. Colt Gray is alleged to have killed two classmates and two teachers and wounded nine others at Georgia’s Apalachee High School in September 2024.

This is not the first time a jury has drawn that conclusion. In 2024, James and Jennifer Crumbley became the first parents in the United States convicted of involuntary manslaughter after their son carried out the Oxford High School shooting in Michigan. The Georgia verdict suggests the Michigan case was not an anomaly.

For decades, the national debate over school shootings has focused almost exclusively on the person who pulled the trigger, the weapon used or institutional failures. These verdicts shift attention upstream.

Advertisement

The pattern is consistent: leakage of threats, fixation on prior attackers, escalating instability — and access to firearms. According to the U.S. Secret Service’s National Threat Assessment Center, 76% of school attackers obtained their firearms from their home or from a relative’s home. Most often the weapons were legally owned. But when specific threats emerge and parents are formally notified of serious concerns, access can determine whether a crisis is contained or catastrophic.

Opinion

Get smart opinions on the topics North Texans care about.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

In both the Crumbley and Gray cases, authorities had documented troubling behavior. Parents were notified of credible warning signs.

Advertisement

I have studied this issue closely for nearly a decade — not as an abstraction, but as a father with two daughters in school at the time of the Parkland High School shooting in Florida in February 2018. That proximity drove me to speak with law enforcement, review research on targeted school violence and reach out to experts online.

I write this as a dyed-in-the-wool supporter of the Second Amendment. To be clear, responsible citizens have the right to defend themselves and their families. But rights do not erase responsibility.

Two verdicts in two states do not create a nationwide consensus. But they suggest that when documented warnings and weapon access intersect, juries may treat the resulting harm as foreseeable.

This is not a call for new laws, nor does it mean every parent of a struggling teenager faces criminal exposure. The line appears narrower: credible threats, formal warnings, unchanged access.

For Texans, where gun ownership rates are among the highest in the nation, that should matter.

Advertisement

After Uvalde, Texas focused on campus security. House Bill 3, passed in 2023, requires an armed security officer on every public school campus and increased funding for school safety. Many North Texas districts strengthened School Resource Officer programs and tightened controlled-entry protocols, adding layers between the parking lot and the classroom.

Those measures harden schools. These verdicts clarify responsibility inside the home.

The Second Amendment grants rights. It does not insulate negligence.

We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here.

If you have problems with the form, you can submit via email at letters@dallasnews.com

Advertisement



Source link

Texas

Deadly mass shooting in Texas

Published

on

Deadly mass shooting in Texas


  • U.S. Men’s National Team makes World Cup debut

    02:03

  • Great Americans: A conversation with Andrés Cantor

    03:44

  • Today Show Icon Gene Shalit Dies at 100

    01:47

  • Tornado outbreak devastates Midwest

    02:10

  • Now Playing

    Deadly mass shooting in Texas

    01:14

  • UP NEXT

    SpaceX makes history in largest ever initial public offering

    02:29

  • Mexico opens historic World Cup with a win

    01:44

  • Medicare Advantage plans slammed for denial rates

    02:48

  • California officer shoots colleague in ‘horseplay’ incident

    01:13

  • Severe weather pummels several states across Midwest

    01:33

  • Trump says deal with Iran could be signed in days

    02:14

  • Phil Mickelson banned from golf club over misconduct allegations

    01:29

  • Alarming video of cross burning in Chicago

    01:21

  • Protests erupt after brutal knife attack in Northern Ireland

    01:20

  • Pope Leo blesses world’s tallest church

    01:06

  • Urgent search for girl swept into ocean

    01:27

  • Bill Gates grilled by lawmakers over Epstein ties

    02:09

  • High security for NBA Finals game after clashes

    02:10

  • U.S. launches ‘self defense’ strikes on Iran after Apache helicopter shot down

    02:22

  • Key test for Democrats in Maine

    02:09

Nightly News

At least one person was killed and 10 injured in a mass shooting in Midland, Texas. NBC News’ Erin McLaughlin reports.

Advertisement

Nightly News

Hallie Jackson NOW

Hallie Jackson NOW

Hallie Jackson NOW

Play All



Source link

Continue Reading

Texas

‘It’s massive destruction’: outcry in Texas over waivers to allow border wall in Big Bend national park

Published

on

‘It’s massive destruction’: outcry in Texas over waivers to allow border wall in Big Bend national park


The Trump administration has waived a slew of environmental and historical preservation laws that would allow it to build a towering border wall that cuts through Big Bend national park, a vast protected wilderness in south Texas.

Congress poured a whopping $46.5bn for border wall construction into the “Big, Beautiful” bill last year, supercharging Donald Trump’s ambition to wall off the southern border with Mexico. The longest unwalled stretches lie along a roughly 500-mile (800km) section of west Texas that Customs and Border Protection calls the “Big Bend sector”.

That corridor includes some of the largest chunks of protected land in a state that is 95% privately owned, including Big Bend national park, Big Bend Ranch state park and Black Gap wildlife management area.

The prospect of marring those landscapes in the name of border security at a time of plummeting unauthorized immigrant crossings has drawn fierce backlash from a bipartisan group of local leaders and protest from public land users. The notion of walling off Big Bend national park has sparked the most fury. The 800,000-acre (325,000-hectare) expanse of Chihuahuan desert punctuated by the Chisos mountain range draws half-a-million visitors annually to hike, camp, stargaze and float the Rio Grande.

Advertisement

For months, CBP has sent mixed signals about its intentions for Big Bend national park, while limiting its comments about its plans to vague and infrequent statements. CBP updated an interactive map on its website in February to indicate that the agency planned to erect a steel bollard wall along the park’s river frontage, sparking an outcry from public land advocates, local business owners and elected officials.

A spring thunderstorm on the Rio Grande, which cuts through Santa Elena canyon, on 11 April 2026 in Big Bend national park. Photograph: John Moore/Getty Images

CBP later changed the map to show that it only intended to use detection technology along the length of the park’s border. The current iteration shows that the agency plans to build new roads along the length of the park’s southern border, along with four separate 4-6ft-tall barriers intended to stop incoming vehicles. CBP officials have rarely discussed their plans for the wall publicly.

The park’s advocates worry that an opaque agency with a massive war chest could still wreak severe damage on the most beloved park in Texas. The waiver that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published on Tuesday in the Federal Register empowers CBP to build seemingly whatever security infrastructure it wants in the park – from 30ft steel bollard fencing to unpaved roads.

The waiver casts aside protections outlined in major laws including the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act and many others. The Big Bend area is home to several endangered species, a struggling population of bighorn sheep and a large concentration of Native rock art and petroglyphs.

The US representative Lloyd Doggett, a Texas Democrat, criticised the move as ludicrous in a region where illegal border crossings are already rare. “Billions of taxpayer dollars are being wasted on this unnecessary project, as Big Bend’s rugged mountains make illegal crossings nearly impossible, with crossings in the area accounting for under half a percentage point of all illegal border crossings nationwide last year,” Doggett said in a statement.

Advertisement

Vehicle barriers and surveillance

The only infrastructure project formally proposed within the park itself so far is a 17-mile, non-contiguous “vehicle barrier system” in four separate locations, composed of steel rails and posts measuring 4-6ft tall, along with 205 miles of roads up to 24ft wide equipped with detection technology. The project also envisions the erection of utility poles, lighting and surveillance cameras. Two of the proposed vehicle barriers are located in the middle of the park’s river frontage, along with one on each end.

The vehicle barriers are enough to dramatically alter an otherwise wild landscape, according to Bob Krumenaker, former Big Bend national park superintendent.

“It’s massive impact, massive destruction,” said Krumenaker, who now heads a nonpartisan advocacy group called Keep Big Bend Wild. “You’re looking at some of the most remote parts of a remote national park.”

DHS has signed off on border wall-related waivers for other federally protected lands in the past, including Organ Pipe Cactus national monument, Buenos Aires national wildlife refuge and Coronado national memorial, all in Arizona. But Tuesday’s waivers marks the first time the agency has used that authority to install border security infrastructure in a national park, Krumenaker said.

Big Bend national park, 2015. Photograph: Inge Johnsson/Alamy

Like many other public land advocates, Krumenaker is concerned that CBP’s infrastructure development won’t stop with the vehicle barriers. Though he viewed a 30ft steel bollard wall as an unlikely “worst-case scenario”, the waiver’s broad authority makes it possible for the agency to add virtually any security infrastructure it wants in an area prized for its scenic beauty and wildness.

Advertisement

“Waiving the law undermines all credibility and makes them completely unaccountable to anyone,” Krumenaker said. “They don’t care about the impact on the environment. If they have, say, a fuel spill, they’re not subject to any laws – they’ve just waived the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act.”

“Their words, whether intended to be truthful or not, mean nothing,” he added.

In a statement, a CBP spokesperson said its border security infrastructure plans in “the areas adjacent to the Big Bend National Park and State Park are still in the planning stages, while CBP focuses on other higher priority locations”.

“CBP continues to coordinate with the National Park Service, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, and other federal and state agencies, throughout the planning of border barrier and technology deployments, in order to achieve Border Patrol’s operational priorities,” the statement said.

Border crossings remain low

The Big Bend sector of west Texas contains some of the longest stretch of terrain on the US-Mexico border that remain untouched by significant border wall and fencing. It is also one of the most remote, with steep cliffs and vast stretches of Chihuahuan desert on both sides of the border that make it unattractive as a crossing point.

Advertisement

DHS justified the waiver as an emergency measure necessary to contain illegal crossings in the area. But the area was always among the least-trafficked corridors of the southern border, and unauthorized immigrant crossings have plummeted since Trump re-took office in 2025. His administration has largely dismantled humanitarian protections that allowed some immigrants to gain entrance to the United States, while the Republican-backed Congress has heaped tens of billions of new dollars into border security and mass deportation.

Within Big Bend national park itself, border patrol made only 100 arrests in 2023, and 125 in 2024, according to data obtained by Krumenaker and shared with Public Domain. Those numbers likely continued to drop last year, after Trump took office and unauthorized crossings plummeted.

Local residents stage a weekly protest against proposed border wall construction, on 11 April in Terlingua, Texas. Photograph: John Moore/Getty Images

CBP commissioner Rodney Scott told the Washington Examiner last month that it would be “kind of silly to put like a 30-foot border wall on top of a 90-foot granite cliff”.

Big Bend national park’s scenic Santa Elena canyon cliffs, which are composed of limestone, in fact reach heights of 1,500ft.

Democrats in Congress have attempted to block DHS from using its funds from the “Big, Beautiful” bill to build barriers through Big Bend national park. But the measure, proposed by the representative Henry Cuellar of Texas, failed in an appropriations committee vote on Tuesday in the face of Republican opposition, according to the Texas Tribune.

Advertisement

The waiver has already prompted a legal challenge. The Friends of the Ruidosa Church, river guide Billy Miller and the Center for Biological Diversity updated an existing lawsuit on Thursday that challenges DHS border wall-related waivers of environmental laws in the Big Bend sector, arguing that they violate due process and other constitutional rights

“This is an attack on the integrity of the National Park Service itself,” said Laiken Jordahl, a national public lands advocate with the Center for Biological Diversity. “They have never waived these laws on a national park itself. If they’re willing to do this in a national park, where virtually no one is crossing the border, where won’t they?”

  • The story is co-published with Public Domain, an investigative newsroom co-founded by Roque Planas that covers public lands, wildlife and government



Source link

Continue Reading

Texas

Reunion Tower lights up Dallas for FIFA World Cup

Published

on

Reunion Tower lights up Dallas for FIFA World Cup


If you want to get into the FIFA spirit, all you have to do is look up.

Dallas’ Reunion Tower unveiled a new series of FIFA‑themed light shows Thursday night, kicking off a monthlong celebration as North Texas prepares to host nine FIFA World Cup matches at AT&T Stadium.

The displays are the work of Scott Ingham, who has spent the last four months designing graphics that will transform one of Dallas’ most recognizable landmarks into a tribute to the world’s biggest sporting event.

“That’s where the magic happens,” Ingham said from the control room where he programs the tower’s displays.

Advertisement

While most people see Reunion Tower as part of the Dallas skyline, Ingham sees hundreds of lights and millions of possibilities.

Bringing soccer energy to Dallas

Throughout the tournament, the tower will display FIFA graphics, soccer‑inspired animations, and, on match days at AT&T Stadium, the flags of the competing nations. Special displays are also planned whenever Team USA takes the pitch.

“The idea is that we can put Japan and Argentina and put their flag up and show it up,” Ingham said. “And so we can kind of maybe generate a little bit of excitement that way for the match.”

The displays are powered by a lighting system installed last year, representing one of the most advanced upgrades in Reunion Tower’s history.

“It is fun because we can do more,” Ingham said.

Advertisement

Years of planning behind upgrades

The project took years of planning and included about 13 prototypes before the final system was selected.

“We designed them, built them … and then we shipped the lights here, installed them,” he said.

The upgraded system features nearly nine miles of wiring. The fixtures themselves are also significantly lighter than their predecessors.

“The new one is half the weight and twice the size,” Ingham said.

The last major lighting upgrade at Reunion Tower came in 2012. The new technology allows for smoother animations, expanded color capabilities, and more detailed displays.

Advertisement

FIFA accelerates the transformation

Reunion Tower Vice President of Operations Shawn Miller said FIFA helped accelerate the project.

“We see guests from all corners of the earth every day, every month,” Miller said. “So with FIFA on the books, nine matches, we really, really wanted to show what Dallas is all about.”

Miller said visitors can expect to see nearly two dozen FIFA‑themed shows throughout the tournament.

“You’ll know when the tournament’s kicking off. You’ll know when there’s a match,” Miller said. “When the U.S. team’s playing, I would imagine you’ll see upwards to a dozen and a half, two dozen shows throughout the tournament.”

For Dallas, the displays represent more than entertainment. As the city prepares to welcome visitors from around the globe, Reunion Tower’s lights have become another way to say: Welcome to North Texas.

Advertisement

June schedule of light shows

Reunion Tower FIFA Light Show Schedule 

  • June 11: World Cup Kickoff 
  • June 12: USA World Cup Game 
  • June 14: Flag Day / Dallas World Cup Game: Netherlands vs. Japan 
  • June 17: Dallas World Cup Game: England vs. Croatia 
  • June 18: Red for the RedBall Project in partnership with the Dallas Arts District
  • June 19: USA World Cup Game 
  • June 21: Father’s Day 
  • June 22: Dallas World Cup Game: Argentina vs. Austria 
  • June 25: Dallas World Cup Game: Japan vs. Sweden and USA World Cup Game 
  • June 27: Dallas World Cup Game: Jordan vs. Argentina June 30: Dallas World Cup Game

Additional June light shows include Pride‑themed displays on June 5, June 6 and June 7.

Events planned on the Geo‑Deck

Reunion Tower is also hosting a series of events throughout June, many of which are included with general admission to the Geo‑Deck.

Upcoming activities include Lotería nights, silent discos, family programming, music bingo, painting classes, fitness events and special appearances from local guests.

A full list of events, ticket information, and the latest schedule updates can be found on Reunion Tower’s website.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending