Connect with us

Tennessee

Patients sue Vanderbilt for releasing transgender clinic records to Tennessee AG – Tennessee Lookout

Published

on

Patients sue Vanderbilt for releasing transgender clinic records to Tennessee AG – Tennessee Lookout


Vanderbilt University Medical Center failed in its duty to protect transgender patients, caused them serious harm and violated state law and its own privacy policies when it yielded to demands from the Tennessee attorney general to turn over private medical records, a lawsuit filed Monday claims.

The lawsuit, filed by two patients seeking class action status, accuses VUMC officials of failing to push back on a series of  demands for records from the hospital’s transgender clinic by Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti — which first came last November but only emerged publicly last month.

Detailing Tennessee’s recent history of laws aimed at curtailing LGBTQ+ rights, the lawsuit contends that Vanderbilt should have pushed back on Skrmetti’s demands, but did not

“VUMC was aware of the parade of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation in Tennessee over the past few years,” the lawsuit said. “Against that backdrop, its failure to safeguard the privacy of its patients is particularly egregious.”

Advertisement

Patients, the lawsuit said, now “feel for their safety.”

People should be able to feel comfortable sharing their personal medical information with their doctors without fear that it will be handed over to the government. Vanderbilt should have done more to protect their patients.

– Tricia Herzfeld, attorney for patients

Advertisement

A statement released Tuesday by VUMC said the hospital system was “legally compelled to produce patient records.”

“The Tennessee Attorney General has legal authority to require that VUMC provide medical records that are relevant to a billing investigation of this nature,” the statement said. “We hope to reassure our patients and our employees that the decision to release patient records for any purpose is never taken lightly, even in situations such as this where VUMC was legally compelled to produce the patient records. ”

Skrmetti has called his demands part of a “run-of-the-mill fraud investigation” into potential billing irregularities. Yet the records his office has sought, in demand letters served on VUMC in November and March, encompass all levels of transgender care, including un-redacted medical records; staff, volunteer and doctor resumes; communications with outside therapists and emails sent by members of the general public to an LGBTQ questions portal. The demands also included records of individuals who were referred to the transgender clinic but never became patients.

VUMC has not yet directly responded to questions about which records it turned over to the attorney general, and those it has not.

Advertisement

In its Tuesday statement, VUMC said that its “legal counsel are in on-going discussions with the Attorney General’s office about what information is relevant to their investigation and will be provided by VUMC.”

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti. (Photo: tn.gov)

The lawsuit alleges that VUMC breached its contract with patients by failing to safeguard their medical records, then failing to promptly notify them when they had been provided to the attorney general.

It wasn’t until the demand letters were filed in an unrelated lawsuit last month that patients received messages from VUMC that their medical records had been released to the attorney general.

“People should be able to feel comfortable sharing their personal medical information with their doctors without fear that it will be handed over to the government,” said Tricia Herzfeld, the patients’ attorney. “Vanderbilt should have done more to protect their patients.”

Nashville attorney Abby Rubenfeld is also representing the patients.

Advertisement

The lawsuit seeks a declaration that VUMC violated its own privacy policy, a declaration that its current privacy policy fails to adequately inform patients of their rights, and an injunction preventing VUMC from disclosing similar records again without assessing whether the request is made lawfully — and without redacting identifying information.

The lawsuit also claims that VUMC violated state laws, including the state’s patient privacy protection act, its consumer protection act, violated patient’s right to privacy and negligently inflicted emotional distress.

Vanderbilt class action complaint



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Tennessee

RTI Reaction: Tennessee Wins Top 25 Rivalry Battle Against Georgia in Knoxville | Rocky Top Insider

Published

on

RTI Reaction: Tennessee Wins Top 25 Rivalry Battle Against Georgia in Knoxville | Rocky Top Insider


Tennessee Basketball
Photo via Tennessee Athletics

No. 6 Tennessee now has back-to-back wins under its belt after a 74-56 win over No. 23 Georgia Wednesday night in Knoxville.

The Vols trailed the Bulldogs by one point heading into the halftime break but turned up the heat in the final 20 minutes. Tennessee erupted on a 20-4 run to start the second half of play and kept Georgia far away from striking distance through the final buzzer.

Jordan Gainey put up a sneaky 19 points on Wednesday to lead all scorers but Zakai Zeigler wasn’t far behind with 16 points of his own, much of which came in the second half. Special recognition goes to Tennessee guard Jahmai Mashack, who punished a Georgia defense that left him open with 11 points on 5-of-5 shooting from the floor.

After the game, RTI’s Ric Butler and Ryan Schumpert broke down their thoughts on Tennessee’s rivalry win in the RTI: Reaction show from the arena floor.

More from RTI: Three Quick Takeaways As Dominant Second Half Propels Tennessee Past Georgia

Check it out below:

Advertisement

RTI: Reaction



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tennessee

Sources: Vols, DC Banks reach contract extension

Published

on

Sources: Vols, DC Banks reach contract extension


The Tennessee Volunteers and defensive coordinator Tim Banks have agreed to a contract extension, sources told ESPN on Wednesday.

Banks led one of the country’s top defenses in 2024. The Vols held 11 of their 13 opponents under 20 points on defense and finished fifth nationally in yards per play allowed (4.56).

Banks received interest from multiple teams and coached this season on a contract that expires at the end of January. His new deal will pay him in the $2 million range annually, sources told ESPN, after he made $1.5 million this season.

A finalist for the Broyles Award as the top assistant coach in college football this season, Banks has been with Josh Heupel all four seasons at Tennessee after coaching under James Franklin at Penn State for five seasons.

Advertisement

Banks, 53, could be without one of his top players for part of next season. Cornerback Jermod McCoy, an ESPN second-team All-American, underwent surgery after tearing an ACL while training at his home in Texas, school officials said.

McCoy will miss spring practice, and his rehabilitation and recovery will determine whether he can get back in time for the start of the 2025 season.

The transfer from Oregon State was a key part of Tennessee’s defense as a sophomore and one of the top returning defensive backs in college football. He tied for the team lead with four interceptions, led the team with nine pass breakups and finished third with 44 total tackles. His 90.3 coverage grade by Pro Football Focus ranked fifth nationally among cornerbacks during the regular season.

Tennessee tied for seventh nationally with 11 touchdown passes allowed in 13 games.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tennessee

Tennessee House GOP poised to pass ‘two-strike’ rule to remove disruptive protestors

Published

on

Tennessee House GOP poised to pass ‘two-strike’ rule to remove disruptive protestors


play

Tennessee Republicans are poised to pass new rules that would allow House Speaker Cameron Sexton to ban a spectator from the House gallery for the entirety of the legislative session, an escalation of public protest guardrails the GOP supermajority has implemented in the last two years.

The new two-strike rule allows the speaker to order anyone in the gallery removed for disorderly conduct. If a person is removed once, they will be blocked from returning to the gallery for that day and the next legislative day.

Advertisement

Once a person is deemed disorderly and removed a second time, though, they can be prohibited from the gallery “for any period up to the remainder” of the legislative session.

Sexton could also immediately ban someone for “especially egregious conduct.”

Republicans also gave initial passage Tuesday in the House Rules Committee to a new three-strikes provision that would block a disorderly member from the House chamber, as well.

How Sexton, R-Crossville, might define disorderly or “especially egregious” conduct is fully at his discretion, a point House Democrats have repeatedly criticized over what they argued was inequitable application of the rules. Democrats have argued that by holding supermajority the GOP has total power to define what is and is not considered out of order.

Advertisement

The new rules package come amid several sessions of heated public pushback, typically sharply critical of House Republicans, that first began as gun control protests in the wake of the 2023 Covenant School shooting.

Since then, House Republican leadership has implemented increasingly stringent speaking rules for members, instituted certain signage bans for members of the public and blocked off one-half of the public House gallery for ticketed entrance.

Rep. Yusuf Hakeem, D-Chattanooga, was one of the three Democrats on Tuesday’s House committee that voted against the rules package.

Advertisement

“If the representative can’t be heard, if they can’t express themselves, and then the people are being put out, who are you listening to?” Hakeem asked Rep. Johnny Garret, R-Goodlettsville, who presented the GOP rules package.

Garrett, an attorney, likened the House chamber to a courtroom. Public access does not mean there aren’t rules to follow, he argued.

“Courts in the state of Tennessee are wide open, you and I can walk in and observe,” Garrett said. “But we do not have the constitutional right to scream bloody murder inside a courtroom. That judge would slap us with contempt and throw us in jail.”

Under the new three-strikes rule for House members, a representative who is “called to order” for breaking House rules, which the rules package also refers to as “unruly behavior,” will at first face a limit on their speaking time. For the second transgression, the member would be silenced for two legislative days.

Advertisement

A third transgression could trigger total removal from the House chamber for three legislative days.

Garrett said the House would set up a remote voting chamber in a committee room to allow the member to cast votes.

The remote voting rule appears targeted at Rep. Justin Jones, D-Nashville, who frequently clashes with Sexton and other House Republicans on the chamber floor.

Jones demurred Tuesday when asked if he felt the remote voting punishment was aimed at him but described the rules package overall as “authoritarianism without guardrails.”

“It’s going to impact the right of the public to be here in this building, going to impact their rights and their ability to show up in the capital,” Jones said.

Advertisement

In other rule changes, House members’ bill allowance will drop over the next two years. Members previously could file 15 bills each but would be held to 12 bills in 2025. Next year, the bill allowance would drop to 10 per member. Committee chairs and other leadership would have a higher allowance.

Republicans voted down all rules changes proposed by Democrats, including one brought by Jones to curtail conflicts of interest between lawmakers married to lobbyists.

Republicans also blocked a ban on guns in committee rooms. Firearms are currently banned from the state Capitol but allowed in the adjoining office building.

The new rules package must be adopted by the full House before any changes go into effect, but Republicans easily have the votes to pass the package.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending