Connect with us

South-Carolina

SC leads nation in school book bans after board votes to remove 10 more titles

Published

on

SC leads nation in school book bans after board votes to remove 10 more titles


COLUMBIA, S.C. (WIS) – Following a vote that removed ten more books from public schools across the Palmetto State, South Carolina is now the state with the most state-mandated public school book bans in the United States.

The South Carolina Board of Education met on Tuesday to discuss the removal of ten more books from public schools across the Palmetto State. The titles are as follows:

  • “Collateral” by Ellen Hopkins
  • “Empire of Storms” by Sarah J. Maas
  • “Half of a Yellow Sun” by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie
  • “Hopeless” by Colleen Hoover
  • “Identical” by Ellen Hopkins
  • “Kingdom of Ash” by Sarah J. Maas
  • “Last Night at the Telegraph Club” by Malinda Lo
  • “Living Dead Girl” by Elizabeth Scott
  • “Lucky” by Alice Sebold
  • “Tricks” by Ellen Hopkins

This latest round of removals brings the total number of books banned from South Carolina public schools to 21, surpassing Utah’s 17 books that have been removed from their schools.

The board initially met to discuss these materials on Tuesday, April 1 but decided to postpone the vote after several board members expressed hesitancy about recent applications of Regulation 43-170, a rule that allows the State Board of Education to have the final say in local disputes over what materials are appropriate.

“I am concerned about potential abuses of a process that we intended to be fair and equitable,” said board member Maya Slaughter during the April meeting.

Advertisement

Despite the concerns voiced during the April meeting, only two board members, David O’Shields and Tony Vincent, dissented during Tuesday’s vote.

Regulation 43-170 bans “instructional material [that] is not ‘age and developmentally appropriate’ for any age or age group of children if it includes descriptions or visual depictions of ‘sexual conduct.‘”

If a citizen has a complaint about a book found in public school libraries and classrooms, the regulation allows them to send a form to the Instructional Materials Review Committee (IMRC), who review the complaint and submit a recommendation to the state board.

After receiving the recommendation from the IMRC, the State Board of Education then votes to accept or deny it. Under Regulation 43-170, the board is not required to read the books before making their vote.

All 10 of the most recently banned materials had been reviewed at the Beaufort County local board before being kicked up to the state board, as the complaints for the titles were all submitted by one woman from Beaufort County.

Advertisement

“The state is continuing to leave educational decisions for all students up to one parent,” said Josh Malkin, Advocacy Director for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of South Carolina. “This is problematic and counter to the foundational democratic ideals of public education.”

Regulation 43-170 went into effect in June 2024 and has been used frequently since then, though not without controversy.

Malkin and other critics of the regulation have argued that one individual should not have the power to influence reading access for the entire state while the legislation’s proponents believe it’s a valuable way to protect children.

The 11 books that had been previously removed by the board include:

  • “A Court of Frost and Starlight” by Sarah J. Maas
  • “A Court of Mist and Fury” by Sarah J. Maas
  • “A Court of Thorns and Roses” by Sarah J. Maas
  • “A Court of Wings and Ruin” by Sarah J. Maas
  • “Damsel” by Elana Arnold
  • “Ugly Love” by Colleen Hoover
  • “Normal People” by Sally Rooney
  • “The Perks of Being a Wallflower” by Stephen Chbosky
  • “All Boys Aren’t Blue” by George M. Johnson
  • “Flamer” by Mike Curato
  • “Push” by Sapphire

In addition to the 21 removals, access to “Crank” by Ellen Hopkins has been restricted. The book remains in high school libraries, but a parent or guardian must fill out an opt-in form for a student to borrow it.

As a response to Regulation 43-170, several Democratic State House representatives spoke in February about a “Freedom to Read” bill focused on access to books in public school libraries across South Carolina.

Advertisement

Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with WIS. For more free content like this, subscribe to our email newsletter, and download our apps. Have feedback that can help us improve? Click here.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

South-Carolina

Why are flags flying at half-staff in South Carolina on Thursday?

Published

on

Why are flags flying at half-staff in South Carolina on Thursday?


COLUMBIA, S.C. (WCBD) — South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster has ordered that flags be flown at half-staff on Thursday at all state buildings, grounds, and military installations. The action is part of the observance of Peace Officers Memorial Day, a day honoring the “service, bravery and sacrifice” of law enforcement officers killed or injured in […]



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Planning your trip to Greenville, South Carolina

Published

on

Planning your trip to Greenville, South Carolina


It takes nearly 9 hours to get to Greenville, South Carolina, by car, but now your next southern adventure is just a direct hop away on Breeze Airways. So if you’re thinking about booking a trip to Greenville, travel blogger Karyn Locke is sharing some things you need to check out.



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Lawmakers seek investigation into South Carolina’s latest firing squad execution

Published

on

Lawmakers seek investigation into South Carolina’s latest firing squad execution


COLUMBIA, S.C. — Two South Carolina legislators have requested an investigation into the state’s firing squad execution last month after lawyers for the inmate said his autopsy showed the shots nearly missed his heart and left him in extreme pain for up to a minute.

The Democratic and Republican representatives asked the governor, the prison system and leaders in the state House and Senate for an independent and comprehensive review of the April 11 execution of Mikal Mahdi.

They also want the firing squad removed from the methods of execution that an inmate can choose until an investigation is complete. Condemned prisoners in South Carolina can also choose lethal injection or the electric chair.

Reps. Justin Bamberg and Neal Collins wrote in their letter that the request doesn’t diminish the crimes Mahdi was convicted of, nor was it rooted in sympathy for the 42-year-old inmate. Mahdi was put to death for the 2004 shooting of an off-duty police officer during a robbery.

Advertisement

“This independent investigation is to preserve the integrity of South Carolina’s justice system and public confidence in our state’s administration of executions under the rule of law,” they wrote.

Bamberg, a Democrat, and Collins, a Republican, are deskmates in the South Carolina House.

Prison officials say the execution was conducted properly

Prison officials said they thought the execution was properly conducted. House and Senate leaders did not respond. Republican Gov. Henry McMaster said he sees no need to investigate.

“The governor has high confidence in the leadership of the Department of Corrections. He believes the sentence of death for Mr. Mahdi was properly and lawfully carried out,” spokesman Brandon Charochak wrote in an email.

Even without an investigation, what happened at Mahdi’s execution may get hashed out in court soon. A possible execution date for Stephen Stanko, who has two death sentences for murders in Horry County and Georgetown County, could be set as soon as Friday. He would have to decide two weeks later how he wants to die.

Advertisement

Mahdi had admitted he killed Orangeburg Public Safety officer James Myers in 2004, shooting him at least eight times before burning his body. Myers’ wife found him in the couple’s Calhoun County shed, which had been the backdrop to their wedding 15 months earlier.

Just one autopsy photo

The autopsy conducted after Mahdi’s execution raised several questions that the lawmakers repeated in their letter.

The only photo of Mahdi’s body taken at his autopsy showed just two distinct wounds in his torso. A pathologist who reviewed the results for Mahdi’s lawyers said that showed one of the three shots from the three prison employee volunteers on the firing squad missed.

The pathologist who conducted the autopsy concluded that two bullets entered the body in the same place after consulting with an unnamed prison official who said that had happened before in training. Prison officials said all three guns fired and no bullets or fragments were found in the death chamber.

“Both bullets traveling on the exact same trajectory both before and after hitting a target through the same exact entrance point is contrary to the law of physics,” Bamberg and Collins wrote.

Advertisement

Shots appeared to have hit low

In the state’s first firing squad execution of Brad Sigmon on March 7, three distinct wounds were found on his chest, and his heart was heavily damaged, according to his autopsy report.

The shots barely hit one of the four chambers of Mahdi’s heart and extensively damaged his liver and lungs. Where it likely takes someone 15 seconds to lose consciousness when the heart is directly hit, Mahdi likely was aware and in extreme pain for 30 seconds to a minute, said Dr. Jonathan Arden, the pathologist who reviewed the autopsy for the inmate’s lawyers.

Witnesses said Mahdi cried out as the shots were fired at his execution, groaned again some 45 seconds later and let out one last low moan just before he appeared to draw his final breath at 75 seconds.

Little documentation at the autopsy

Bamberg and Collins said Mahdi’s autopsy itself was problematic.

The official autopsy did not include X-rays to allow the results to be independently verified; only one photo was taken of Mahdi’s body, and no close-ups of the wounds; and his clothing was not examined to determine where the target was placed and how it aligned with the damage the bullets caused to his shirt and his body.

Advertisement

“I think it is really stretching the truth to say that Mikal Mahdi had an autopsy. I think most pathologists would say that he had ‘an external examination of the body,’” said Jonathan Groner, an expert in lethal injection and other capital punishments and a surgeon who teaches at Ohio State University.

Sigmon’s autopsy included X-rays, several photos and a cursory examination of his clothes

Prison officials have used the same company, Professional Pathology Services, for all its execution autopsies, Corrections Department spokeswoman Chrysti Shain said.

They provide no instructions or restrictions to the firm for any autopsy, she said.

The pathologist who conducted the autopsy refused to answer questions from The Associated Press.

Advertisement

Bamberg and Collins also want the state to allow at least one legislator to attend executions as witnesses.

State law is specific about who can be in the small witness room: prison staff, two representatives for the inmate, three relatives of the victim, a law enforcement officer, the prosecutor where the crime took place, and three members of the media.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending