Connect with us

North Carolina

Why three NC medical students think an anti-DEI bill would be a disaster for medicine • NC Newsline

Published

on

Why three NC medical students think an anti-DEI bill would be a disaster for medicine • NC Newsline


Washington, Hyde, Gates, and Yancey are four of the North Carolina counties without a single pediatrician, OB-GYN, or psychiatrist. This is not uncommon — 20 of our state’s counties lack a pediatrician, 26 lack an OB-GYN, and 32 lack a psychiatrist.

These provider shortages disproportionately impact rural and low-income communities and would likely worsen under a new proposal introduced by eastern North Carolina Congressman Greg Murphy.

Misleadingly entitled the “Embracing Anti-Discrimination, Unbiased Curricula, and Advancing Truth in Education (EDUCATE) Act,” the bill would block U.S. medical schools from receiving federal funding if they support Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)-related policies or programs.

At present, DEI offices support medical education pipeline programs that train low-income and rural students, who are more likely to return home to practice medicine. 

Advertisement

Also on the chopping block: medical education programs for underrepresented students, patient advocacy initiatives and health equity certifications, needs-based scholarships, and LGBTQ+ affirming care training. 

North Carolina is a diverse state with diverse needs. Beyond enhancing our medical education, DEI initiatives improve the quality of care for our patients. As medical students enrolled in three of our state’s medical schools, we believe the EDUCATE Act would harm our patient communities and should not win approval. 

When our medical workforce is diverse, our patients thrive. Research shows that patient satisfaction and key clinical outcomes such as cholesterol screening rates and medication adherence improve when healthcare providers share the same racial or ethnic background as their patients.

Over the last decade, North Carolina has become significantly more racially and ethnically diverse, particularly with the growth of our Hispanic and Asian populations. Following the Supreme Court’s ban on affirmative action, DEI programs at medical schools are even more important to ensure that the state develops qualified medical students who are representative of our population. 

In addition to improving medical education, DEI offices offer many programs that improve the health of communities. DEI outreach and pipeline programs connect students who are underrepresented minorities in medicine, of low socioeconomic status, and from rural areas to academic enrichment resources that support them in becoming qualified medical school applicants and future doctors. Such programs are critical to addressing primary care shortage areas, as physicians from underserved communities are more likely to work in these communities.

Advertisement

Health providers can also partner with DEI offices to educate their colleagues about the specific needs of individual communities and to advocate for increased patient access to high-quality care. DEI programs support collaboration between medical student groups, hospital leadership, and patient communities in organizing training sessions that enhance care for marginalized patient groups. Such sessions foster the growth of high-quality patient-physician partnerships and are associated with improved patient satisfaction. DEI offices also catalyze health professional involvement in initiatives that seek to improve the health of all patients and students, regardless of their demographic characteristics.

Critics of DEI initiatives claim that they could lead to harmful consequences for patients under the false assumption that DEI casts aside merit and “admits students based on their race, gender, or religion.” What these critics fail to acknowledge, however, is that all medical students undergo an extremely rigorous admission selection process and are required to meet the same academic and clinical standards to become licensed physicians.

Other critics argue that DEI places an undue burden on physicians to fix larger social issues. Yet, omitting education about the social factors affecting health would be a disservice to patients whose social needs may influence their most optimal treatment plans. We support a medical curriculum that is evidence-based, comprehensive, and factual. 

From fostering the growth of qualified medical school applicants to advocating for the health needs of marginalized patient populations, DEI initiatives benefit the health workforce and patients alike. The Association of American Medical Colleges, American College of Physicians, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recently released statements in opposition to the EDUCATE Act. As concerned future physicians who recognize the need for DEI programs in North Carolina and nationwide, we urge members of the United States Congress to oppose the EDUCATE Act. 

This essay reflects the individual views of the authors and does not represent the views of their medical institutions.

Advertisement



Source link

North Carolina

North Carolina lawmakers react to Venezuela strikes, Maduro capture

Published

on

North Carolina lawmakers react to Venezuela strikes, Maduro capture


ASHEVILLE – Expressing a range of support and skepticism, North Carolina lawmakers are reacting to react to the United States bombing of Venezuelan military sites and the capture of President Nicolas Maduro on Jan 2.

The morning of Jan. 3, President Donald Trump announced that the United States had captured Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife and bombed military sites in the country’s capital, Caracas. During a press conference in the early afternoon, Trump said the United States would “run” the country until a new leader could be appointed. Congress had not been told about the operation due to concerns lawmakers would “leak” information, Trump said.

According to USA TODAY, citing CNN reporting, a plane carrying Maduro and Flores landed at Stewart Air National Guard Base in New York the afternoon of Jan. 3.

Advertisement

Republican Sen. Ted Budd of North Carolina expressed support for the president’s actions in a statement on social media, calling Maduro “an illegitimate dictator who has long been wanted in the U.S. on charges of narco-terrorism, corruption, & drug trafficking.”

“These actions are within the President’s Article II authority & send a clear message to America’s enemies our nation will not allow threats to our safety & security to continue unchecked,” Budd, who serves on the Senate Armed Services Committee, wrote on X Jan. 3.

As of 5 p.m. on Jan 3., Republican Rep. Chuck Edwards, who represents much of Western North Carolina, had not yet released a statement on the events in Venezuela. On Jan. 1, Edwards published an op-ed in the Washington Times in support of Trump’s directive to strike boats off the coast of the Latin American country. The president has said the boats facilitated “narcoterrorism.”

Advertisement

The Citizen Times has reached out to Edwards’ office and the office of Republican Sen. Thom Tillis, who has also not yet issued a statement on the president’s actions. Tillis is not seeking re-election.

Adam Smith, a former Green Beret running against Edwards in the Republican primary for North’s Carolina 11th Congressional District, said Maduro’s arrest “represents a decisive and long-overdue action in defense of the Western Hemisphere and the security interests of the United States and its allies.”

Democrats skeptical of legality

In a statement on X, North Carolina Rep. Deborah Ross for the Second Congressional District, said that Trump, while acting “without regard for the constitution and without considering the long-term consequences for our security or our democracy” sought to capture a “despot who stole elections, imprisoned his political opponents, and trampled on the rights and dignity of his people.”

“Using military force to remove a foreign head of state unquestionably requires congressional authorization. Trump ignored that requirement, once again thumbing his nose at our constitution and Congress. At a minimum, Congress must be fully and transparently briefed and then take appropriate action,” Ross wrote in her statement.

Advertisement

Though former governor and North Carolina Democratic Senate Candidate Roy Cooper has not released a statement on Maduro’s capture, Republican Senate candidate Michael Whatley said he supported Trump’s decision in a post on X.

“He has taken decisive and aggressive action to dismantle the criminal networks responsible for addiction, violence, and death no matter where they operate or how powerful they claim to be,” Whatley said. “I am proud to support a President who will stop at nothing to protect our people and hold those who traffic death into our country fully responsible.”

As protests were expected across the country the afternoon of Jan. 3, around 75 protestors gathered in Pack Square Plaza in Asheville around 2:30 p.m. holding signs that said “no blood for oil” and “stop bombing Venezuela.”

Protestor Jeffrey DeCristofaro said he had been planning to rest on Jan. 3 but came to the protest after he felt Trump’s actions were “more than just illegal, but dangerous.” Given the lack of details on the future of the conflict, the strikes have made him feel uneasy.

Advertisement

“I didn’t know what to make of it,” DeCristofaro said of Trump stating the United States would “run” Venezuela. “I’m kind of walking a tightrope between passionate anger and cynical exhaustion.”

Holding a sign stating “money for people’s needs, not the war machine,” Anne Turnbow-Raustol said she attended the protest amid what she felt was “hypocrisy” by the Trump administration, comparing Trump’s decision to capture Maduro as similar to how the Venezuelan president operates.

“I don’t think any of it is legal,” Turnbow-Raustol said.

Advertisement

This story will be updated.

Reporting contributed by Cybele Mayes-Osterman, Davis Winkie, Francesca Chambers, Bart Jansen, Hannah Phillips, Jeanine Santucci, Eduardo Cuevas, Mike Snider of USA TODAY

Will Hofmann is the Growth and Development Reporter for the Asheville Citizen Times, part of the USA Today Network. Got a tip? Email him at WHofmann@citizentimes.com or message will_hofmann.01 on Signal.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Carolina

How to watch Penn State Nittany Lions: Live stream info, TV channel, game time | Dec. 29

Published

on

How to watch Penn State Nittany Lions: Live stream info, TV channel, game time | Dec. 29


The North Carolina Central Eagles (4-10) and Freddie Filione V’s Penn State Nittany Lions (8-4) hit the court at Bryce Jordan Center on Monday, Dec. 29, beginning at 1 p.m. ET.

We provide more details below, and that includes how to watch this game on TV.

Here is what you need to prepare for Monday’s college basketball action.

Penn State vs. North Carolina Central: How to watch on TV or live stream

  • Game day: Monday, December 29, 2025
  • Game time: 1 p.m. ET
  • Location: University Park, Pennsylvania
  • Arena: Bryce Jordan Center
  • TV Channel: BTN
  • Live stream: Fubo – Watch NOW (Regional restrictions may apply)

Check out: USA TODAY Sports Coaches Poll

Watch college basketball on Fubo!

Advertisement

Penn State vs. North Carolina Central stats and trends

  • Penn State is averaging 78.2 points per game (173rd-ranked in college basketball) this season, while surrendering 74.9 points per contest (222nd-ranked).
  • The Nittany Lions have struggled to accumulate rebounds this season, ranking 20th-worst in college basketball with 28.6 boards per game. They rank 109th by allowing 29.4 rebounds per contest.
  • Penn State ranks 249th in college basketball with 13.5 dimes per contest.
  • The Nittany Lions rank 10th-best in college basketball by averaging only 9 turnovers per game. In terms of forced turnovers, they rank 159th in college basketball (12.3 per contest).
  • This year, Penn State is draining 6.8 threes per game (276th-ranked in college basketball) and is shooting 34% (181st-ranked) from three-point land.
  • The Nittany Lions rank 324th in college basketball by allowing 9.4 three-pointers per game, but they are allowing a 37.8% shooting percentage from beyond the arc, which ranks ninth-worst in college basketball.
  • Penn State is attempting 38.7 two-pointers per game this year, which account for 65.8% of the shots it has attempted (and 75.9% of the team’s baskets). Meanwhile, it is attempting 20.1 three-pointers per contest, which are 34.2% of its shots (and 24.1% of the team’s buckets).

Penn State vs. North Carolina Central Odds and Spread

  • Spread Favorite: Nittany Lions (-22.5)
  • Moneyline: Penn State (-12500), North Carolina Central (+2600)
  • Total: 149.5 points

NCAA Basketball odds courtesy of BetMGM Sportsbook. Odds updated Monday at 2:23 a.m. ET. For a full list of sports betting odds, access USA TODAY Sports Betting Scores Odds Hub.

Watch college basketball on Fubo!

Follow the latest college sports coverage at College Sports Wire.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

How North Carolina’s Offense Looked in December

Published

on

How North Carolina’s Offense Looked in December


While the North Carolina Tar Heels’ defense has been the most consistent feature of the team, the offensive operation has been up and down throughout the course of the season.

Advertisement

Those struggles extended into December, but with Seth Trimble returning to the lineup, there have been glimpses of what the offense can be when at full strength. The veteran guard had missed nine consecutive games, dating back to early November. Trimble had not played since Nov. 7 against the Kansas Jayhawks.

Advertisement

Let’s take a closer look at how North Carolina’s offense performed in the month of December.

Assessing the Tar Heels Offense in December

Advertisement

Dec 22, 2025; Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; North Carolina Tar Heels guard Seth Trimble (7) drives during the second half against the East Carolina Pirates at Dean E. Smith Center. Mandatory Credit: Scott Kinser-Imagn Images | Scott Kinser-Imagn Images

Through the first six games of this month, North Carolina is averaging 79.1 points per game, which is inflated by a 99-point outing against East Carolina this past Monday. The scoring output has not been the issue for Tar Heels. The problem has been the team’s slow starts, specifically when Trimble was not in the lineup.

Advertisement

Dean Smith Center | Grant Chachere, North Carolina Tar Heels On SI

Advertisement

While speaking with the media earlier this month, head coach Hubert Davis discussed North Carolina’s sluggish starts and how it was becoming problematic.

  • “I don’t want them to take time because every team is different,” Davis said. “When you go into conference play, everybody has a way that they play on both ends of the floor. I don’t want to get off to slow starts. I felt like we did. It wasn’t just defensively. I didn’t feel like we were sharp on the offensive end. I think the first 12 shots that we took, seven of them were from three.”

Dec 22, 2025; Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; North Carolina Tar Heels head coach Hubert Davis talks with guard Kyan Evans (0) during the first half against the East Carolina Pirates at Dean E. Smith Center. Mandatory Credit: Scott Kinser-Imagn Images | Scott Kinser-Imagn Images

  • “I thought on both ends of the floor it took us a little while to get into the rhythm, and once we did, which it started with us defensively, I felt like it translated on the offensive end as well,” Davis said.

  • “No, I don’t. I wouldn’t necessarily say that we’ve consistently gotten off to slow starts,” Davis said. “I would say that at times we haven’t been consistent at the beginning, where we’ve gotten off to a fast start and then we had a four- or six-minute lull on both ends of the floor. We allow a team to come back. We’re in a situation where maybe we could extend the lead.”

Advertisement

Dec 16, 2025; Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; North Carolina Tar Heels head coach Hubert Davis looks on during the second half against the ETSU Buccaneers at Dean E. Smith Center. Mandatory Credit: Scott Kinser-Imagn Images | Scott Kinser-Imagn Images

It is difficult to say that North Carolina has completely figured it out in Trimble’s first two games back in the fold, as the Tar Heels were lackluster in the first half against Ohio State, but were firing on all cylinders against East Carolina. It is somewhere in the middle, but conference play will reveal exactly where this offense stands. Overall, the offensive performance was a mixed bag in December.

Advertisement

Please follow us on X when you click right HERE! Please make sure you follow us today on our Facebook page when you click right HERE!

Advertisement

Never again miss one major story related to your beloved Tar Heels when you sign up for our 100% FREE newsletter that comes straight to your email with the latest news. SIGN UP HERE NOW



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending