North Carolina
What benefits and supports do teachers have in North Carolina?
In North Carolina, there were 90,638 teachers employed in public schools during the 2022-23 school year, according to recent data from the Department of Public Instruction (DPI).
During the State Board of Education’s biannual planning and work session on April 30-May 2 in Boone, Board members and DPI staff spoke at length about how to retain those teachers, as well as how to recruit others.
Specifically, the group talked about the goal of having “a highly effective teacher in every classroom,” which was laid out in the Leandro Comprehensive Remedial Plan.
“It’s hard to argue with the necessity of that,” said Rupen Fofaria, former EdNC reporter who now serves as the director of Board operations and policy. “We have so many amazing teachers, and the idea of a highly effective teacher in every classroom is realistic. …We know there’s work to be done and we don’t turn a blind eye to that, but I also see on visit after visit, educators showing up to work every day, giving their all for the students in their classrooms.”
According to DPI’s annual state of the teaching profession report, 11.5% of teachers left their role last school year. That is an increase from 7.8% of teachers who left teaching the year before.
At the same time, approximately 91% of respondents of the updated 2024 Teachers Working Conditions Survey strongly agreed or agreed that “overall, my school is a good place to work and learn.”
Roughly eight out of 10 respondents said they plan to continue teaching at their current school next year. Many respondents did ask for more differentiated professional development and “sufficient time to do their job.”
The survey, which was open from March 1 to April 5, was sent to 119,500 educators and answered by 102,082. DPI released preliminary findings from the survey on April 30, with plans to release a more detailed report in October.
“If teachers take the time to give us input to fill out a survey, we absolutely have to use the data to make better decisions about what’s going on in our schools,” DPI’s Dr. Jeni Corn told the Board at its April 30 meeting.
The Board discussed several benefits and supports for teachers in North Carolina, including parental leave, beginning teacher support, and supplemental funds. Below, you can find a look at the items discussed, and where teachers can find more information for each topic.
Parental leave policy
Last fall, the Board approved temporary administrative rules regarding the paid parental leave mandated by Senate Bill 20. That section requires a paid parental leave policy for all state agency, public school, UNC, and community college employees.
The General Assembly appropriated $10 million in recurring funds to DPI to fund substitute teachers during paid parental leaves. The law applies to requests for paid parental leave for qualifying events occurring on or after July 1, 2023.
Under the law, charter schools can choose whether or not to provide paid parental leave. Charter schools must opt in by Oct. 1 each year to receive reimbursement, DPI said.
Last week, the Board proposed a permanent rule on parental leave, including some changes. The permanent rule is expected to take effect on Oct. 1, 2024, following a period of public comment and a final vote from the Board in August.
The temporary policy allots up to eight weeks of parental leave for the parent who gives birth. It grants up to four weeks for other parents, including foster and adoptive parents, and legal guardians.
The permanent rule would divide the eight weeks of available leave to “birthing parents” as follows:
- Four weeks for mental and physical recuperation.
- Four weeks for bonding with the child.
The permanent rule would also limit parental leave when a child is placed up for adoption or into foster care to four weeks for birthing parents.
The updated rule would establish rules for miscarriages and stillbirths, listed in the screenshot below.

Under both rules, part-time, permanent employees have the same option on a pro-rata basis, up to eights weeks for a parent who gives birth and up to four weeks for any other qualifying event.
You can read the proposed permanent rule here.
State law says that school employees can use annual leave, personal leave, or leave without pay in addition to the new paid parental leave.
Here are few other important parts of the Board’s policy:
- Eligible employees include those hired to fill a permanent, probationary, or time-limited position. The leave will not extend to temporary employees or independent contractors.
- To be eligible, employees must have been employed by the public school unit without a break in service “for at least 1,040 hours within the previous 12-month period.” According to the rule, “the employee may aggregate periods of employment with different employers to satisfy this requirement,” with the exception of non-participating charter schools.
- Leave is available only one time during the same 12-month period for an individual employee.
- Both parents must be allowed to take the leave at the same time even if they work for the same employer.
Support for beginning teachers
The attrition rate for beginning teachers last school year was higher than the overall rate, according to DPI’s report, at roughly 15%. Beginning teachers are defined as teachers in their first three years on the job.
Among beginning teachers, turnover was highest for teachers with less than one year of experience, at 26.5%
“These trends highlight the importance of providing enhanced support for early-career educators, including those who enter the profession through the residency license pipeline,” said State Superintendent Catherine Truitt.
At the Board’s April 3 meeting, members said the state should increase starting pay for beginning teachers and support for college students pursuing teaching degrees. The 2023 state budget did give larger raises to beginning teachers, increasing base pay from $37,000 to $41,000 over the biennium.
Members also mentioned the need to strengthen policies like mentor support and manageable workloads for beginning teachers.
Last Wednesday, the Board heard a presentation from UNC Charlotte’s Cato College of Education: “Impacts of the North Carolina New Teacher Support Program on Beginning Teacher Retention.”
The North Carolina New Teacher Support Program (NTSP) is a statewide initiative of the University of North Carolina General Administration. The program, which partners with 10 public universities, focuses on personalized professional development, feedback, resources, and confidence-boosting among new teachers.
Since the program was founded in 2014, the program has supported 9,300 teachers across 750 schools.

Presenters Dr. Anne Cash and Dr. Kyle Cox said research shows that the program successfully reduces beginning teacher attrition. Their research suggests the NTSP is particularly beneficial for Black teachers and teachers in urban and suburban schools.
However, “its statewide infrastructure currently serves less than 10% of NC’s Beginning Teachers each year,” their presentation said.
According to the NTSP’s website, teachers are selected by partners to enroll in the program. At that point, beginning teachers can access professional development and instructional coaching through the program.
Each teacher is paired with an experienced, flexible coach, Cash and Cox said. However, coaches have high caseloads (1:30), the presentation said, and “limited time for planning or professional development, as necessitated by current funding mechanisms.”
The presentation made three recommendations:
- Increase recurring state-appropriated funds to support NC NTSP long-term sustainability and impact.
- Further engage NC NTSP as a partner to study and develop innovative solutions to the challenges experienced by beginning teachers.
- Support ongoing research on coaching practices that bolster retention and effectiveness across the pipeline.
DPI also has a “systematic structure of support for beginning teachers,” which encourages, among other things, an institutional plan of support, mentor support, professional development, and formative assessments.
However, according to DPI’s website, these supports are “understood and implemented at the local level.”
Last week, DPI’s Northwest Regional Director Stephanie Dischiavi gave the Board a presentation on the Beginning Teachers Support Program (BTSP).
“One primary and direct goal of the BTSP is to help new teachers improve skills and build confidence to become successful educators,” her presentation said. “BTs will only reach their fullest potential with systems of support from the state, school district, local school and quality mentors.”
You can find your regional facilitator’s contact information on DPI’s website.
Dischiavi’s presentation highlighted a few examples of districts implementing BTSP goals well.
- Caldwell County Schools offers a beginning teacher support program that includes a multi-day orientation for all beginning teachers, along with a mentor, observations, professional development, and “optimum working conditions.”
- Catawba County Schools also offers a support program for beginning teachers, which includes summer workshops (differentiated based on a teacher’s pathway), monthly seminars, and structured mentored support.
- Wilkes County Schools‘ plan includes beginning teacher orientation, mentor identification, buddy teacher assignments, professional development, and beginning teacher support services.
“Wilkes County Schools strives to help beginning teachers improve their skills and build confidence to become successful educators,” the district’s website says.
Finally, the Board also heard a presentation on TeachNC.org, “a centralized hub for prospective teachers to explore the profession and get free support on their journey to the classroom.”
Teach NC provides how-to guides, application checklists, fee reimbursements, and scholarships to future and new teachers. Since 2019, Teach NC has supported 5,985 future teachers, according to the presentation.
Advanced teachers, supplemental funds, bonuses
In North Carolina, teachers are paid according to a base monthly salary schedule that increases based on years of experience. You can view the updated salary schedules for 2023-24 on DPI’s website.
There are a number of supplements that can go on top of that base amount. Here is a list of state-funded supplements to the base salary schedule.
- Graduate degrees required for licensure. North Carolina no longer automatically pays teachers extra for having a master’s degree, unless the position requires that degree.
- National Board certification. Teachers with National Board certification receive a 12% salary supplement.
- Higher schedule placement plus an additional $350/month for school psychologists, speech pathologists, and audiologists.
- School counselors receive an additional $100/month.
- Bonuses for certain test scores or EVAAS growth scores.
- Advanced Teaching Roles.
- Working in smaller or lower-wealth counties.
You can read more about these bonuses and supplements here.
The Board’s discussions last week focused on the Advanced Teaching Roles (ATR) program and supplemental funds for small and low-wealth counties. The Board also discussed its report to the General Assembly on supplemental funds teachers receive from their district. These supplements vary widely across the state.
Advanced teaching roles
The ATR Supplement was established last year.
That new supplement programs award $10,000 per year to teachers designated as “Adult Leadership Teachers” in their district. A participating district can name up to 15% of its teachers as these leaders.
The ATR program also awards $3,000 annually for teachers designated as “Classroom Excellence Teachers,” which can make up 5% of teachers in each participating district.
According to DPI’s presentation, the purpose of the program is “to develop advanced teaching roles and organizational models that link teacher performance and professional growth to salary increases for classroom teachers in selected school administrative units.”
You can view approved school districts on DPI’s website. You can read Best NC’s 2022 policy brief on the program here.
Supplemental teacher funds
The teacher supplement assistance allotment was first established in 2021, and provides assistance for districts in providing a salary supplement to its teachers. Assistance is awarded based on a county’s tax base threshold.
In 2021-22, the statewide average local supplement was $5,123 and supplements ranged from $8,678 in Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools and $8,670 in Wake County Public Schools to $0 in four school districts: Caswell County Schools, Clay County Schools, Graham County Schools, and Swain County Schools.
Excerpt from EdNC’s March 2023 coverage of a BEST NC report
The teacher supplement assistance allotment’s stated goal is to help smaller counties be more competitive when it comes to teacher hiring. State funds are meant to increase the supplement offered to teachers. In other words, counties should not decrease their supplement contribution after receiving state funds.
In FY 2023-24, the state allocated $200 million to this fund.
Currently, four school districts are not eligible for the assistance based on the tax base threshold: Wake County Public Schools, Durham Public Schools, Guilford County Schools, and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools.
The 2023 report to the General Assembly on the program also identified Buncombe County and Asheville City schools as being ineligible.
You can view the most recent report here. The report shows the average supplement per district, along with the percentage of teachers receiving the supplement.
In FY 2023-24, the budget allocated $4.3 million for low-wealth and small county teaching bonuses. This program was established in 2021.
This bonus — which varies across the state — gives a signing bonus for teachers in eligible counties.
The state allocates up to $1,000 per teacher and requires a 1:1 local match in funding. This means teachers can receive up to a $2,000 signing bonus.
Retirement benefits
The Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System (TSERS) is a pension plan administered by the North Carolina Total Retirement Plans within the Department of State Treasurer (DST).
There are 302,293 active members in the system, and 246,374 retired members receive monthly benefits.
Membership in TSERS is automatic for eligible employees, which includes permanent full-time teachers, employees of a state-supported board of education or community college, and permanent employees of participating charter schools (and you work at least 30 hours per week for nine months per year).
You become vested in TSERS once you have completed a minimum of five years of membership service. This means that you are eligible to apply for lifetime monthly retirement benefits based on the retirement formula in effect at the time of your retirement and the age and service requirements described in this handbook, provided you do not withdraw or transfer your contributions. You may also be eligible for retiree health coverage.
Excerpt from TSERS handbook
You can retire with an unreduced service retirement benefit after you:
- Reach age 65 and complete five years of membership service.
- Reach age 60 and complete 25 years of creditable service.
- Complete 30 years of creditable service at any age.
You can retire early with a reduced retirement benefit after you:
- Reach age 50 and complete 20 years of creditable service.
- Reach age 60 and complete five years of membership service.
You can calculate an estimate of your final retirement benefit on page 11 of the TSERS handbook.
Historically, North Carolina teachers could receive state health benefits during retirement, but that benefit was recently removed. Teachers hired after Jan. 1, 2021 are no longer eligible for any state health benefits after retirement.
Last week, the Board and DPI staff heard from student panels about why young people are not going into the teaching profession.
One panelist, recent Appalachian State University graduate Shiloh Lovette, spoke about switching fields largely due to not getting paid for having a master’s, along with a change in health retirement benefits.
Lovette had wanted to be a teacher since she was a little girl. Now, she works in student affairs and higher education, and will graduate in May with a master’s in higher education.
“I heard frequently from current teachers, ‘there are some difficulties in this profession, but your benefits are great and you can retire and support yourself in that way,’” she said. “As a first-generation student, that’s something else that’s very important to me… and that was taken away.”
Several Board members said they were discouraged by Lovette’s story and would continue to advocate for better teacher pay with lawmakers.
Board Chair Eric Davis said the discussions were meant to contribute to “improving support and opportunities for educators in North Carolina’s public schools, who are so essential to the prosperity of our state.”
North Carolina
Disputes grow between NC Bar, legislative committee tasked with reforming it
A North Carolina legislative committee is drawing passionate support — and criticism — as it pushes forward with recommendations to inject more secrecy and politics into a group tasked with disciplining lawyers across the state.
The committee plans to meet again this week, fresh off a dramatic hearing Tuesday, during which members of the committee sniped at one another, at least one appeared to have had no idea they’d be asked to vote on one particularly contentious item, and security had to forcibly eject a former state lawmaker who had refused to stop yelling accusations from a podium.
The target of that speaker, as well as the committee he was addressing: the North Carolina State Bar, a regulatory board in charge of licensing and disciplining North Carolina’s lawyers.
It’s the central focus of the State Bar Grievance Review Committee, which has tussled with the Bar and its supporters in the state’s legal community as it has sought to investigate allegations of cancel culture against politically outspoken lawyers and as it has recommended other reforms or demanded political inquisitions.
The committee, created in 2024, is a rarity in North Carolina: It consists of zero members of the state legislature. It’s led by Larry Shaheen and former state Sen. Woody White, two GOP insiders close with Republican state Senate leader Phil Berger. It can’t make changes on its own but can recommend them to the state legislature for approval.
Some previous suggestions by the committee have won broad and bipartisan approval at the state legislature, such as limiting who can report lawyers to the Bar.
But its most recent proposals — including making lawyer discipline a more secretive process, controlled entirely by political appointees — has raised concerns inside the Bar, as well as with some of the lawyers who make a living fighting the Bar on behalf of their clients.
Some of the new changes Shaheen and others on the committee are backing would ban non-lawyers from being involved in hearings of the Bar’s Disciplinary Hearing Commission, which is tasked with deciding whether — and how harshly — to crack down on lawyers accused of things such as stealing clients’ money, sleeping with clients or abusing drugs or alcohol.
The committee also wants to staff the Disciplinary Hearing Commission entirely with political appointees — almost all of them Republicans — and decrease transparency in the process, making more details confidential.
The Bar has deep reservations about those and other proposed changes, saying they’ll harm its goal of protecting members of the public from predatory or simply bad lawyers. The committee has not asked for the Bar’s input during this process, and relations between the two groups have become strained.
State Bar Executive Director Peter Bolac told WRAL he questions the need for these changes, which he said appear to have been put together “without broader input or a comprehensive understanding of the State Bar’s work.”
Bolac was at the most recent hearing on the changes, but he wasn’t invited to speak — whether to provide his own presentation, or to answer questions and concerns. He told WRAL the committee should attempt to learn how the Bar works, first, before trying to change it.
“Without a clear and shared understanding of how the current system functions, it is difficult to engage in a meaningful discussion about potential improvements,” Bolac said. “Nevertheless, we remain willing to participate in thoughtful, good-faith dialogue aimed at strengthening the system.”
Shaheen says he knows firsthand how the process works, having served on Disciplinary Hearing Commission he and his committee are now targeting. And he sees it as his mission to drastically change the way it operates, saying he has lost friends because of his association with it. “I have several lawyers, who have been long term friends of mine, who have come to me and, because of some of the things said to them, feel like I’m the devil,” Shaheen said.
‘Radical changes’
The committee’s most recent meeting was just the latest in the committee’s years-long attempt to make reforms to the Bar.
Alan Schneider, who has represented more lawyers facing disciplinary hearings than perhaps anyone else in North Carolina, often finds himself at odds with the Bar. He previously gave a formal presentation to this same committee on suggestions to reform it.
But he says the latest suggestions, to ramp up the political appointments, go too far.
“There were problems in the past in terms of maybe old cases weren’t heard as quickly as they could,” Schneider said. “But the changes were made. The State Bar heard, and the State Bar has acted. What I’d like this panel to understand is the necessity for all these radical changes. I believe it is unnecessary.”
White and Shaheen said the changes are necessary. Shaheen said increasing political control over the Bar would increase accountability, by making members of the Bar answer to politicians who ultimately answer to the people.
Under the new proposal, 19 of its 26 members would be chosen by various Republican politicians and the remaining seven would be chosen by Democratic Gov. Josh Stein.
“To have more folks appointed by public officials, we want to create more accountability, to make sure that the process is not weaponized against attorneys,” Shaheen said at the committee’s meeting on Tuesday.
White defended the push for less transparency.
“Nowadays when you can weaponize allegations in a nanosecond and publish them, put them out in a political context … that is unfair, for a lawyer to be accused of something before he or she is convicted of it,” he said.
‘Such sweeping reforms’
The committee is set to meet again Wednesday. The committee hadn’t released information on what issues it plans to discuss, but it’s expected to be closely watched by the state’s legal community.
The relative lack of public notice on what this committee is considering also raised the ire of interested parties at last week’s meeting.
Jane Meyer, a Tharrington Smith attorney in Raleigh who also chairs the Bar’s disciplinary group, questioned why the proposals voted on Tuesday were only made public a few days beforehand, and with no opportunity for the Bar — or the general public — to respond.
White had originally attempted pushing through a vote Tuesday without allowing members of the public to speak. But he relented after Andrew Heath, a conservative lobbyist who serves on the committee, urged him to allow Meyer and other members of the public to have two minutes each to give brief comments.
“That troubles me — that such sweeping reforms are being considered without much study, and without asking for input,” Meyer told the committee.
Given the sweeping nature of their recommendations, Wake County District Attorney Colon Willoughby suggested the committee should “do a little bit more study and maybe get a little bit more information.”
Willoughby specifically criticized the proposal to make it harder for members of the public to learn about accusations against attorneys.
“We should not be trying to restrict and make things more confidential,” he said. “We should make it more open. The public needs to have quicker and more complete access. I think people find their lawyers now, not from their Sunday school class or their bowling league or their Lions Club, but through the internet searches. They want information.”
They were among the passionate speakers at the hearing, but perhaps not the most passionate.
Two-plus hours into its most recent hearing on Tuesday, former state Rep. Edwin Hardy had his mic cut off and then was escorted out of the room by security. He was several minutes into speaking during the open public comment period as his comments turned into a rant involving former President Barack Obama, the late Gov. Jim Hunt, allegations of political favoritism, cocaine usage and more.
Hardy, a Republican who used to represent Beaufort County in the state House, was the only one ejected — even though he was also one of the few speakers who appeared to support the committee’s goal of major overhauls to the Bar. His comments were in line with the allegations White, Shaheen and others have been claiming for years about cancel culture.
“I got very vocal online because Obama won,” Hardy told the committee. “… Well guess what: I was very vocal, and the day after Obama won reelection, I got a phone call and the Bar told me I had been randomly picked for an audit.”
State records show that that 2012 audit found Hardy had been using poor accounting practices with trust accounts where he held onto money for clients — including taking actions that “allowed entrusted funds to be disbursed in a manner not authorized by or for the benefit of the client.”
However, the Bar found he didn’t steal any of the money, and that there wasn’t any evidence of his clients being harmed by his trust fund missteps. It allowed him to continue practicing law.
North Carolina
2 Candidates Emerge in NC State’s Coaching Search
RALEIGH — NC State replaced Kevin Keatts with Will Wade in March 2025, introducing him 368 days ago in front of the Wolfpack community at Reynolds Coliseum. A little over a year later, Wade decided to leave his new program to return to LSU, the school that fired him for cause in 2022, beginning a long journey back to Power Four basketball.
Now, athletic director Boo Corrigan and the rest of the NC State administration must find a new leader for the men’s basketball program. To make matters more complicated, they won’t have a lot of time to do so, as the new head coach needs to be in place firmly before April 7, the day the transfer portal opens. However, early noise indicates the group in charge has eyes on two candidates.
Who are the candidates?
According to multiple reports, Corrigan and other power brokers at NC State zeroed in on Saint Louis head coach Josh Schertz and Tennessee associate head coach Justin Gainey as the primary two candidates for the opening. Both names were expected to be in the mix as soon as the Wade exit became more and more likely, although Corrigan shared no specific names during his Thursday press conference.
The NC State University Board of Trustees hosted an emergency meeting on Friday, with the primary subject being Wade’s buyout negotiation. Of course, speculation began quickly that there were discussions about the next coach of the Wolfpack, but that’s been confirmed not to be the case in the behind-closed-doors meeting for the board.
NC State Board of Trustees emergency meeting related to change in term of Will Wade’s buyout (from $5M to $4M, as AD Boo Corrigan said yesterday) not a new coach hire. Quickly went into closed session. No public business.
— Brian Murphy (@murphsturph) March 27, 2026
Even so, it seems as though NC State plans on making a strong push for Schertz first, despite his status as head coach at Saint Louis still and his recent agreement to a contract extension. That certainly makes things more complicated, but hiring Schertz would allow NC State to maintain any sort of positive momentum established by Wade and his regime in Raleigh. Still, Corrigan isn’t totally committed to a sitting head coach.
“I don’t think it has to be a sitting head coach at this point,” Corrigan said. “I think we want to find someone that knows how to coach and is a great coach, and has the ability to connect with people, both internal and external, with the players, be able to recruit. You have to be a good recruiter in this day and age.”
NC State will move as quickly as it possibly can, with Gainey and Schertz atop the list. That doesn’t rule out other options entirely, but all signs point to one of them being the most likely to be the next coach of the Wolfpack, ending the Will Wade era as quickly as it started.
North Carolina
NC offshore wind project canceled as $1B deal shifts investment to fossil fuels
A planned offshore wind project off North Carolina’s coast that could have powered roughly 300,000 homes has been scrapped after the federal government agreed to spend nearly $1 billion to halt its development, a decision that is drawing sharp reactions and raising questions about future energy costs in the state.
Under the agreement, the French energy company TotalEnergies will be reimbursed for leases it purchased in federal waters near Bald Head Island. In exchange, the company will redirect that investment into oil and natural gas projects, including liquefied natural gas (LNG) production.
The move comes as electricity demand in North Carolina and across the Southeast is rising, driven by population growth and the rapid expansion of energy-intensive data centers.
Energy analysts say removing a major potential source of power from the pipeline could have lasting implications.
“I think folks are trying to figure out how to reconcile this with the fact that we do need more electrons on the grid,” said Katharine Kollins, president of the Southeastern Wind Coalition. “Every state right now is looking at how we can develop more energy, not how we should be taking options off the table.”
The canceled project, known as Carolina Long Bay, was one of two offshore wind developments TotalEnergies had planned along the East Coast. The North Carolina portion alone would have generated about 1,300 megawatts of electricity and brought significant economic development to the region.
State leaders were quick to criticize the decision. In a post on X, Gov. Josh Stein said the Trump administration is “spending nearly $1 billion in taxpayer money to pay off a company to stop investments in the clean energy we need,” calling it “a terrible deal for the people of North Carolina and our country.”
The Interior Department, which negotiated the agreement, defended the move, saying offshore wind projects are too costly and unreliable to meet the nation’s energy needs. In a statement, officials said redirecting investment toward natural gas would provide “affordable, reliable and secure energy” while strengthening grid stability.
The debate reflects a broader divide over how to meet growing electricity demand while keeping costs down.
Offshore wind projects typically require high upfront investment but have no fuel costs once operational. Fossil fuel plants rely on fuel that can fluctuate in price.
“Using a billion dollars of taxpayer money to remove an option for North Carolina and then require that company to invest in LNG just doesn’t feel right,” Kollins said.
She and other advocates argue that offshore wind could help stabilize energy prices over time by diversifying the state’s power mix, particularly during periods of high demand or fuel volatility.
The federal government and industry leaders backing the deal say natural gas offers a more dependable source of power, especially as the grid faces increasing strain.
Part of that shift now points to LNG, which is traded on a global market. That means prices can rise or fall based on international demand, geopolitical tensions and export levels — dynamics that do not affect wind energy.
The cancellation also highlights uncertainty around offshore wind development in North Carolina. Duke Energy, the state’s largest utility, holds a neighboring lease in the same area but paused development last year as it reevaluated costs and policy conditions.
As state regulators and utilities map out how to meet future demand, the loss of Carolina Long Bay narrows the range of options.
For residents, the stakes may ultimately show up in monthly bills.
“When we limit our choices,” Kollins said, “we limit our ability to control costs.”
-
Sports1 week agoIOC addresses execution of 19-year-old Iranian wrestler Saleh Mohammadi
-
New Mexico7 days agoClovis shooting leaves one dead, four injured
-
Miami, FL3 days agoJannik Sinner’s Girlfriend Laila Hasanovic Stuns in Ab-Revealing Post Amid Miami Open
-
Tennessee6 days agoTennessee Police Investigating Alleged Assault Involving ‘Reacher’ Star Alan Ritchson
-
Minneapolis, MN3 days agoBoy who shielded classmate during school shooting receives Medal of Honor
-
Technology1 week agoYouTube job scam text: How to spot it fast
-
Politics1 week agoSchumer gambit fails as DHS shutdown hits 36 days and airport lines grow
-
Science1 week agoRecord Heat Meets a Major Snow Drought Across the West
