Set offense has been hard to come by for No. 3-seed Maryland men’s lacrosse this season. The Terps have struggled to break down some of the nation’s elite defenses, leading to five single-digit scoring performances.
Maryland
No. 3-seed Maryland men’s lacrosse fends off No. 6-seed Rutgers with 13-10 win, advances to Big Ten semifinals
While that trend continued in Saturday’s Big Ten Tournament quarterfinal clash against No. 6-seed Rutgers, Maryland found goals through other avenues.
Brian Ruppel and the Terps’ defensive unit searched for quick outlets after gaining possession, and it worked to perfection. Maryland thrived in transition as the quick strike fueled it to a three-goal first-half lead.
While Rutgers’ offense found its groove in the second quarter, Maryland never relinquished its advantage. The Terps kept their season alive with a 13-10 victory at SECU Stadium; they will now face No. 2-seed Penn State in the conference tournament semifinals on Thursday.
“We get a stop and we can get it out. That’s a way we can spark transition and maybe get one that kind of sucks the life out of the other team,” defender Michael Alexander said. “That’s a goal, where you make a play, it swings the momentum in our favor.”
After enduring Maryland’s second scoreless quarter of the season in its last game, the Terps wasted no time getting on the scoresheet. The shot was created by the unlikelest of sources.
Henry Dodge corralled the opening faceoff and immediately tested Rutgers’ defense. The All-Big Ten first-teamer found an unmarked Leo Johnson on the right wing, who fired it into the far post just seven seconds into the game, giving Dodge his second point of the season.
“The faceoff guys do a great job, defense does a great job letting us settle into the game,” attacker Leo Johnson said. “It gives us a lot of confidence knowing that we’re going to keep getting the ball and keep getting opportunities.”
But the scoring quickly settled down after that.
Maryland’s offense sent waves of pressure at Scarlet Knights goalie Cardin Stoller, but the redshirt junior was up for the challenge. He managed five first-quarter stops and finished Saturday with 12 saves.
Even as the Terps secured the game’s first three faceoffs, they struggled to generate quality looks on frame. Maryland fired just 50% of its first-quarter looks on target, often sailing over the cage and never threatening Stoller.
Despite the Terps’ sluggish offensive performance, Brian Ruppel starred early on. He denied Rutgers’ first seven shots, aided by Maryland’s strong defensive performance — it only allowed long-range efforts.
“I thought [Brian] started super hot tonight. That was huge for us because he kind of bailed us out early,” head coach John Tillman said. “Offensively, we got 14 shots in the first. … We just didn’t can shots.”
Maryland’s near 15-minute scoring drought ended in the final moments of the first quarter. After a strong defensive stand, Trevor Owens heaved the ball across the field. Eric Spanos outmuscled his defender for the loose ball and buried a shot with three seconds remaining.
That goal propelled the Terps to a 2-0 lead at the conclusion of the first quarter.
After being held scoreless for 22 minutes, Rutgers’ offense awoke. The Scarlet Knights’ leading goalscorer, Colin Kurdyla, notched his first goal in three games, and Rutgers added a trio of second-quarter goals.
But Maryland’s supporting cast helped it keep pace. Jack Schultz recorded just his second goal of the season before AJ Larkin and Spencer Ford scored to keep the Terps’ two-goal advantage intact. Still, the 6-4 halftime lead was far from comfortable.
While the Terps rattled off three unanswered goals in the third quarter to open up a commanding lead, Rutgers didn’t waver.
Kurdyla and Scarlet Knights attacker David Carroll sparked the comeback with a trio of goals in a nine-minute span early in the fourth quarter. With just over four minutes remaining, Maryland’s lead was suddenly trimmed to two.
When the Terps needed an answer, Johnson stepped up, logging his ninth multi-score game of the season to halt Rutgers’ momentum.
Just 69 seconds later, Johnny Gardiner swung the ball to Braden Erksa behind the cage. Erksa wrapped around the crease and fired the close-range effort into the near post.
Those two goals stamped Maryland’s victory. Despite the Terps conceding double-digit goals for the first time since March 21, nine different goalscorers helped them survive Rutgers’ five-goal fourth-quarter.
“The fourth quarter [was] a little spotty there at times. Definitely some things you want to clean up, giving up five there,” Tillman said. “For the second quarter, some self-inflicted wounds that we just got to clean up.”
1. Extra possessions fuel Maryland. While the Terps’ offense has been far from efficient this season, it generated more looks through a dominant faceoff unit and extra effort. Maryland secured 20 of the game’s 27 faceoffs and added 29 ground balls to keep Rutgers pinned in its defensive half.
2. Spanos runs the show. During his time on the field this season, Spanos has typically operated as the team’s premier attacker. But on Saturday, the Tewaaraton Award nominee facilitated Maryland’s offense, dishing out a season-high three assists alongside two goals to guide the Terps to victory.
3. Redemption opportunity. Maryland suffered just two losses during conference play, and its first came in convincing fashion. The Terps’ four-goal loss to Penn State was its worst defeat of the regular season, despite a late-game comeback effort. Maryland gets its shot to avenge that loss on Thursday in the semifinals.
Maryland
Most Maryland sheriffs drop arrest agreements with ICE despite vows to fight a new state law – WTOP News
At least seven of the nine counties that had the so-called 287(g) agreements with Immigration and Customs Enforcement have pulled out of those plans.
Maryland sheriffs vowed to fight legislation, passed early in this year’s legislative session, prohibiting formal agreements between local police agencies and federal immigration officials, and giving sheriff’s departments 90 days to get out of any deal they were in.
But as the 90-day clock expires Monday, it turns out that at least seven of the nine counties that had the so-called 287(g) agreements with Immigration and Customs Enforcement have pulled out of those plans and an eighth said the agreement will not be enforced, even though it’s still on the books.
Most of the local departments dropped the 287(G) agreements either the same day or the day after Gov. Wes Moore (D) signed Senate Bill 245 and House Bill 444 into law Feb. 17. The emergency legislation took effect immediately upon his signature.
While they appear to have given up the 287(g) fight, however, sheriffs are still assessing a challenge to another immigration bill that passed during the waning hours on the last day of this year’s session: the Community Trust Act. It is one of several immigration enforcement bills the governor has yet to sign, with just one more bill signing scheduled for May 26.
The majority Democratic legislature and the supporters of the 287(g) ban argue it eliminates and distrust of police in communities where aggressive immigration tactics have been conducted and enforced by President Donald Trump (R) and his administration.
As of Sunday, according to ICE, the agency had 1,832 law enforcement agencies in 39 states and two U.S. territories signed on to participate in the 287(g) program. Seven of the nine Maryland counties – Allegany, Carroll, Cecil, Frederick, Harford, St. Mary’s and Wicomico – already informed the agency they had to terminate their partnerships due to the passage of the law.
“I thank you for your partnership since 2019 and your efforts to help me keep our communities safer,” wrote Cecil County Sheriff Scott Adams in a Feb. 17 letter addressed to Vernon Liggins, acting field office director in the Baltimore ICE office.
But the agency’s website lists two Maryland counties still participating: Garrett and Washington.
A representative from the Garrett County Sheriff Office didn’t respond to requests for comment Friday.
Washington County Sheriff Brian Albert said that because the 287(g) ban took effect immediately, the agreement “is pretty much null and void. We’re not participating in the 287(g) program. We just don’t have a lot of people with detainers on them that are processing through the jail. There’s not a large immigrant community here in Washington County.”
But Albert and some other sheriffs are assessing legal advice about the Community Trust Act.
Senate Bill 791, sponsored by Sen. Clarence Lam (D-Anne Arundel and Howard), which was made an emergency measure, would prohibit local or state police from holding a person for ICE, except in limited scenarios: If a person was convicted of a felony in the United States; is a registered sex offender; served between 12 to 18 months in a state prison; or committed an offense in another state and served at least five years in prison.
A major part of the bill requires federal officials to present a judicial warrant to hold someone, not just an administrative warrant.
One of the main complaints from Republican lawmakers and some sheriffs is the act will not only decrease cooperation with federal officials, but also force law enforcement agencies to follow both federal and state law they say conflict with each other.
“We’re sworn to uphold the constitution of the United States and the state of Maryland. The Community Trust Act puts us in a very tough predicament,” Albert said.
‘Have some standing’
Harford County Sheriff Jeffrey Gahler posted a video April 15 on social media urging the governor to veto the Community Trust Act.
“This legislation is a direct assault on public safety. It officially bans our law enforcement and correctional officers from communicating with our federal partners at the Department of Homeland Security,” Gahler said in video.
He reiterated that point said in an interview Thursday.
“The governor hasn’t signed it. We’re waiting on [whether] if he vetoes it, or allows it to become law after 30 days if he doesn’t veto it or sign it,” Gahler said. “We have talked with attorneys. We think we might have some standing. I hope we don’t get there. I hope he does the right thing and vetoes this terrible bill.”
But supporters have said the Community Trust Act closes a loophole that lets local law enforcement agencies and jails detain individuals based on their immigration status and administrative requests from ICE. It complements the passage of the 287(g) ban, they argue.
Another immigration-related bill awaiting the governor’s signature is the Data Privacy Act, which seeks to close loopholes in the state’s Public Information Act and prohibit a business from selling personal data of an individual “for the purpose of immigration enforcement.”
“The signing of these bills are going to be career defining for our governor and going to mark his legacy on immigration at a time when our communities are under attack,” said Cathryn Jackson, policy director for We Are CASA.
As for the 287(g) legislation advocates pushed for more than a decade to get, Del. Nicole Williams (D-Prince George’s) said “it’s a big deal.”
“It’s just really unfortunate we are in this political climate we are in today with a federal administration in trying to prevent people from obtaining the American dream,” said Williams, who sponsored the House version of the 287(g) legislation.
“It’s about people who are searching for a better life for their family. When we talk about American exceptionalism, our immigration system is a part of that,” she said.
Maryland Matters is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Maryland Matters maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Steve Crane for questions: editor@marylandmatters.org.
Maryland
Maryland Board of Elections pushes back on Trump’s claim of 500,000 fake mail-in ballots
The Maryland State Board of Elections (SBE) is denying President Trump’s claim that the state “just had 500,000 Fake Mail-In Ballots revealed,” saying that no “fake ballots” were distributed.
The SBE previously acknowledged an error by its mail-in ballot vendor that resulted in some voters receiving the wrong party ballot for the gubernatorial primary election. The president, in response, claimed on social media that Maryland “just had 500,000 Fake Mail-In Ballots revealed” and pushed for the passage of the Save America Act.
Maryland SBE mailed some voters the wrong ballots
The SBE said that more than 500,000 Maryland voters requested mail-in ballots. According to the SBE, the error only affects voters who were mailed a ballot before May 14, 2026.
However, the SBE said that while it is possible that “only a small number” of voters received the wrong ballot, because of the error, all voters must be sent a replacement ballot.
The board of elections said it is working with the vendor to send those replacement mail-in ballots.
Voters who requested and received their mail-in ballot online to print at home will not be impacted, according to the SBE. All impacted voters will be notified.
The Maryland primaries will be held on June 23, 2026.
After the error was acknowledged, Mr. Trump wrote on Saturday, “Maryland just had 500,000 Fake Mail-In Ballots revealed. We cannot, as a Country, put up with this any longer!!! Voter I.D., and Proof of Citizenship, must be approved, NOW. Crooked Mail-In Voting must be stopped!!! PUT IT ALL IN THE HOUSING AND FISA BILLS. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”
Jared DeMarinis, the Maryland State Administrator of Elections, told CBS News Baltimore that “I want to assure the President, voters, and the public that NO Fake Mail-in ballots were distributed.”
He added that the trusted source on election results is the State Board of Elections, “rather than a social media influencer.”
“The wording in President Trump’s post regarding Maryland’s election seeks to mislead, sow distrust, and create misinformation,” DeMarinis said.
DeMarinis said the SBE issued a statement acknowledging an error, and it continues to move quickly to engage all affected and concerned voters.
“The action taken for reissuance of ballots eliminates any doubt about the integrity or accuracy of mail-in voting,” DeMarinis said. “Maryland’s elections are verified, secure, and transparent. Mail-in voting is, and will remain, an integral part of the electoral process. Every eligible voter will get a chance to cast their ballot in their chosen manner and every voice will be heard.”
What is the Save America Act?
The SAVE America Act, or the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on Jan. 30, 2026.
The bill would require voters to provide proof of U.S. citizenship when registering, and would implement photo identification requirements for voting.
The bill would also prevent states from accepting and processing voting applications to register in a federal election unless the voter presents documentary proof of U.S. citizenship.
Proponents of the bill say it is aimed at preventing noncitizens from casting ballots. Some experts, however, say the bill could affect millions of Americans who don’t have access to certain documents, like a passport or their birth certificate, or who have changed their names.
Maryland
Maryland is resending thousands of mail-in primary ballots after a vendor mix-up – WTOP News
The State Board of Elections said some voters received the wrong party’s ballot because of a vendor error.
Thousands of Maryland voters are getting new primary election ballots in the mail because of an error in the first batch.
The State Board of Elections said some voters received the wrong party’s ballot because of a vendor error.
“It is possible only a small number of voters received the wrong ballot, and most voters received the correct ballot,” the board of elections said in a statement.
But all mail-in voters will be sent a replacement ballot.
“Mail-in voting is an integral facet of the electoral process. With over 500,000 voters requesting mail-in ballots, we want to eliminate any doubt in its integrity or accuracy … that is why I have arranged the sending of replacement ballots,” Maryland State Administrator of Elections Jared DeMarinis said.
The affected ballots were requested and mailed before May 14, more than a month before the state’s June 16 deadline for voters who wish to have their ballots mailed to them.
Voters who requested ballots that can be downloaded, printed and mailed were not affected by the error. They have until June 22 — the day before the state’s primary election — to request ballots by web delivery.
“Please be assured that we are actively answering phones and responding to emails and will remain transparent as we navigate through this situation,” DeMarinis said. “We will make every effort to ensure that everyone affected knows the situation and how to cast their ballot.”
Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.
© 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.
-
Arkansas4 minutes agoSalem Arkansas Man Seriously Injured in Saturday Crash – Ozark Radio News
-
California10 minutes ago$6 gas and refinery fears collide with California’s climate ambitions
-
Colorado16 minutes agoFrom home insurance to vacancy taxes: Bills that passed — and failed — this legislative session that western Colorado should know about
-
Connecticut22 minutes ago
Where to watch Connecticut Sun vs Portland Fire on May 18: TV channel, start time and streaming
-
Delaware28 minutes agoWho is Delaware’s all-time best girls basketball player? VOTE now
-
Florida34 minutes agoSouth Florida’s top deals: 5-acre dev site near the Everglades trades hands
-
Georgia40 minutes agoGeorgia softball dominates Clemson, advances to super regional
-
Hawaii46 minutes agoHomelessness drops 91% in Waikiki core | Honolulu Star-Advertiser