Connect with us

Maryland

Maryland Quietly Shelves Parts Of Genealogy Privacy Law

Published

on

Maryland Quietly Shelves Parts Of Genealogy Privacy Law


A WMAR-2 Information investigation has realized the Maryland Division of Well being quietly stopped implementing key components of a landmark privateness regulation meant to guard ancestry knowledge on-line.

The regulation, enacted final 12 months, was seen as a mannequin for different states seeking to set requirements for when regulation enforcement can faucet into DNA uploaded by Individuals researching their heritage.

“States that do not have a regulation like ours, it is type of the wild west,” mentioned Natalie Ram, regulation professor on the College of Maryland.

The state’s regulation set a number of the first limits within the nation on forensic genetic family tree, a method used sometimes to assist crack the hardest homicide and rape instances.

Advertisement

Authorities take DNA from a criminal offense scene, and if they can not discover a match to identified offenders in regulation enforcement databases, they examine the pattern to profiles for hundreds of thousands of Individuals whose DNA is on-line from ancestry analysis.

“Like the place I might go to attempt to discover my long-lost kinfolk, we might use precisely those self same publicly accessible instruments to attempt to discover out, whose DNA is that this?” mentioned Ray Wickenheiser, director of the New York State Police Crime Lab System.

Forensic genetic family tree has turn out to be a extra in style follow after 2018 when it helped catch Joseph DeAngelo, the infamous “Golden State Killer.”

However in contrast to a police search of a house or automobile, there have been nearly no requirements for when and the way regulation enforcement might dip into genetic family tree knowledge on-line.

Maryland’s regulation set a number of the nation’s first guardrails on the investigative software.

Advertisement

“It’s complete,” Ram mentioned. “It regulates the initiation of forensic genetic family tree, how it’s carried out.”

WMAR 2 Information investigation discovered, virtually a 12 months after the regulation turned energetic in October 2021, key items of it have but to roll out.

The Maryland Division of Well being has but to publish greatest practices and minimal {qualifications} for folks utilizing forensic genetic family tree.

In a required annual report, a department of the governor’s workplace did not disclose how usually regulation enforcement accesses ancestry knowledge, in addition to the variety of complaints.

The well being division additionally suspended a job drive engaged on the brand new rules, with out offering an evidence even to members of that job drive, together with Wickenheiser.

Advertisement

The Maryland Division of Well being wouldn’t reply WMAR 2 Information’ detailed questions concerning the lack of progress.

However emails obtained by means of state open data requests present by March, a choice had been made to cease implementing main components of the regulation.

Dr. Tricia Nay, director of the well being division’s Workplace of Well being Care High quality, wrote in a March 16 e-mail, “Sadly, OHCQ didn’t obtain any workers or funding for this invoice, so we’re unable to implement it at the moment.”

A well being division spokesman confirmed there are not any funds to assist the regulation this fiscal 12 months that runs by means of June 2023.

That got here as information to Ram, who labored with lawmakers to get the pioneering regulation on the books.

Advertisement

“That considerations me,” Ram mentioned. “I might wish to see this regulation carried out, and I hope that assets can be found to take action.”

The regulation has confronted different challenges, together with concern and opposition from a key well being division chief.

In an e-mail dated June 13, 2021, Paul Celli, public well being administrator for medical and forensic laboratories wrote, “I’m simply unsure the best way to go about getting began on all of this. The invoice tasked OHCQ with all this with zero session on it … I do not even agree with most of what is in it…”

Emails present that by this summer time, communication appeared to interrupt down between the Maryland Division of Well being and Maryland State Police, one other company additionally required to assist roll out the regulation.

“I nonetheless don’t know what MDH’s plan is in regard to the rules. They’ve gone silent and I’ve tried each avenue accessible to me to get some decision with out success,” reads a July 13 e-mail from Dan Katz, lab director for Maryland State Police.

Advertisement

Katz declined a request to be interviewed for this story.

Maryland Division of Well being spokesman Chase Cook dinner despatched a press release responding to WMAR 2 Information’ findings: “The Maryland Division of Well being has actively been working internally and with our accomplice state companies on implementation of this regulation, which we perceive has not been carried out wherever else in america. We are going to present additional updates as they turn out to be accessible.”

For now, ancestry web sites are setting their very own privateness guidelines.

Consumer phrases of companies for ancestry.com and 23andme.com say they received’t voluntarily share knowledge with regulation enforcement.

There are looser restrictions on GEDmatch.com, a free on-line ancestry database used to search out the Golden State Killer

Advertisement

The positioning has 1.8 million profiles.

Customers should opt-out if they do not need to share knowledge with police.

“For me, it’s important that Maryland proceed this,” Wickenheiser mentioned. “The earlier we will have these discussions and have these legal guidelines put in place, the higher it’s. We need to stop and resolve crime, and we additionally need to make it possible for we respect folks’s rights.”

A serious take a look at of how issues are stepping into Maryland is simply weeks away.

The regulation requires the well being division to determine licensing necessities for labs utilizing forensic genetic family tree by Oct. 1.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maryland

Sunny and much colder on Tuesday in Maryland

Published

on

Sunny and much colder on Tuesday in Maryland


Sunny and much colder on Tuesday in Maryland – CBS Baltimore

Watch CBS News


Sunny and much colder on Tuesday in Maryland

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maryland

Supreme Court declines to step into Maryland gun licensing and Hawaii climate change suits – SCOTUSblog

Published

on

Supreme Court declines to step into Maryland gun licensing and Hawaii climate change suits – SCOTUSblog


SCOTUS NEWS

The justices issued orders out of their private conference as scheduled on Monday morning. (Katie Barlow)

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a challenge to Maryland’s handgun licensing regime, as well as a pair of cases seeking to hold oil and gas companies responsible for damage caused by climate change. The announcement came as part of a list of orders released from the justices’ private conference on Friday. The justices granted three cases from that conference on Friday afternoon, and they did not add any additional cases to their docket for the 2024-25 term on Monday.

The justices denied review in Maryland Shall Issue v. Moore, in which gun-rights groups and gun owners challenged Maryland’s requirement that most residents obtain a license before buying a gun. They argued that because state law already requires them to undergo a background check to buy a gun, the license requirement (which includes another background check and a gun-safety course) imposes too heavy a burden on their right to bear arms.

Advertisement

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit upheld the law last year. It pointed to Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion for the court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, in which he indicated that laws requiring gun owners to undergo background checks or complete gun-safety courses will generally be constitutional under that decision’s new Second Amendment test.

The justices did not act on a petition seeking review of a ruling by the same appeals court upholding Maryland’s ban on assault rifles. The court will consider the petition in Snope v. Brown again on Friday, Jan. 17.

The justices also denied review in Sunoco v. Honolulu and Shell v. Honolulu, a pair of cases seeking to hold oil and gas companies responsible for their role in increased fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, which led to climate change-related property damage in Honolulu.

In June, the justices asked the Biden administration to weigh in on whether federal law bars the oil and gas companies’ state-law claims; in a brief filed in December, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar urged the justices to deny review. Prelogar told the justices that (among other things) at this time the Supreme Court lacks the power to review the Hawaii Supreme Court’s decision allowing the lawsuit to go forward.

Justice Samuel Alito did not participate in the Honolulu cases. Although he did not explain the reason for his recusal, the financial disclosure forms that Alito filed in 2023 indicated that at that time Alito owned shares in three of the energy companies involved in the cases. 

Advertisement

The court asked the federal government for its views in four new cases:

  • Fiehler v. Mecklenburg, a dispute over land ownership in Alaska that hinges on whether a state court has the power to correct a federal surveyor’s location of a water boundary.
  • Borochov v. Iran, in which the justices have been asked to decide whether the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act’s “terrorism exception” to the general rule of immunity for foreign governments in U.S. courts gives U.S. courts the power to hear claims that arise from a foreign state’s material support for a terrorist attack that injures or disables, but does not kill, its victims.
  • FS Credit Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, involving whether Section 47(b) of the Investment Company Act, which regulates investment companies like mutual funds and exchange-traded funds, creates a private right of action.
  • Port of Tacoma v. Puget Soundkeeper Alliance, in which the justices have been asked to decide whether a provision of the Clean Water Act allows private citizens to go to federal court to enforce state-issued pollutant-discharge permits that impose more stringent standards than the act requires.

This article was originally published at Howe on the Court. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Maryland

Some Maryland residents urged to conserve water amid rise in breaks, leaks due to freezing temperatures

Published

on

Some Maryland residents urged to conserve water amid rise in breaks, leaks due to freezing temperatures


BALTIMORE — WSSC Water is urging its customers in Montgomery and Prince George’s counties to conserve water amid an increase in water main breaks caused by frigid temperatures.

The company shared the alert on Sunday, Jan. 12, saying there are water main breaks in locations that have not been identified yet.

According to the company, there is no boil water advisory in place and water is safe.

On Monday morning, company officials said they are responding to 63 breaks and/or leaks.

Advertisement

Customers are urged to preserve water by taking the following steps:

  • Use water only as necessary; take shorter showers and turn off faucets immediately after use
  • Limit flushing toilets; do not flush after every use
  • Limit using washing machines and dishwashers

Following the aforementioned guidance could prevent a boil water advisory as crews continue to address leaks and breaks, officials said. The company has called on additional crews and contractors to search for unreported breaks.

Any broken or leaking water mains will be shut down before repair crews are dispatched, which could create longer repair times and water outages.

WSSC Water customers are urged to call the company’s Emergency Services Center at 301-206-4002 to report any running water or chlorine odors.

Baltimore Water Main Breaks

On Sunday, Jan. 12, Baltimore City Councilmember Odette Ramos reported a water main break in North Baltimore on Linkwood Road that left an apartment complex without water.

In a social media post, Ramos said water was being delivered to Hopkins House Apartments Sunday evening as the repair may take a long time.

Advertisement

According to data from the Baltimore City Department of Public Works (DPW), there were about 27 confirmed water main breaks in the city as of Monday morning. Data showed another 14 confirmed water main breaks across Baltimore County.

Freezing temperatures in Maryland

Maryland experienced freezing temperatures last week, along with a snowstorm that brought between 3 to 12 inches of snow to the region. Baltimore City saw about four inches of snow, while parts of the county saw between 3.5 to 7.5 inches, totals show.

Freezing temperatures caused dangerous conditions in the days following the heavy snowfall, and icy roads prompted school closures and delays across the state between Monday, Jan. 6, and Friday, Jan. 10.

Baltimore City issued a Code Blue Extreme Cold Alert through Saturday, Jan. 11 as wind chills dipped into the single digits for several days.

On Monday, temperatures in the Baltimore region ticked back up, though Arctic air is forecasted to return to the state by the middle of the week.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending