Connect with us

Maryland

Maryland lawmakers want limits on federal immigration enforcement

Published

on

Maryland lawmakers want limits on federal immigration enforcement


Armed, masked federal agents smashing car windows, ripping people from their vehicles. Protesters pepper-sprayed. A Minneapolis woman shot and killed by a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer.

And closer to home, agents shot a man during a confrontation in Glen Burnie and injured another, then later changed their story about what happened.

Images that have angered people across the country and the state have alarmed Maryland lawmakers. They’re drafting bills to protect residents from an increasingly violent mass deportation effort and send a strong message to Washington.

But critics say lawmakers’ focus on immigration could affect public safety and draw the attention of President Donald Trump’s administration, risking an ICE surge into Maryland.

Advertisement

Maryland lawmakers are following the lead of other states, seeking to ban agreements that let ICE work with local law enforcement and to stop federal immigration officers from concealing their faces.

“We’re moving forward because what we’ve seen has been unconscionable,” said Senate President Bill Ferguson, a Democrat representing Baltimore. Lawmakers will hear the mask and 287(g) ban bills Thursday.

But they’ll also consider a bill that would collect data on federal agents’ interactions with the public in order to digitally unmask them. There’s a pitch to cement the right to sue the federal government and bar immigration officers from state law enforcement jobs.

The Trump administration is challenging a California mask ban in court and it’s not clear how much states can limit federal agents.

The plans come as violent and deadly clashes between federal agents and the public have reached a boiling point, and just as the curtains have opened on the state’s 90-day lawmaking session.

Advertisement

Ferguson and his counterpart in the House, Speaker Joseline Peña-Melnyk, have declared their top priorities are banning contracts between federal immigration enforcement and local agencies, known as 287(g) agreements for a section of federal law, and prohibiting federal agents from wearing masks.

Unmasking agents will strengthen trust between law enforcement and residents, Ferguson said.

Maryland House of Delegates Speaker Joseline Peña-Melnyk holds her gavel at the State House in Annapolis last week. Peña-Melnyk has declared one of her top priorities will be banning contracts between federal immigration enforcement and local agencies. (Jessica Gallagher/The Banner)

“Immigrants deserve to live with dignity and respect,” said Peña-Melnyk, an immigrant from the Dominican Republic who has blasted agents’ treatment of the public. The Democrat represents parts of Anne Arundel and Prince George’s counties.

Gov. Wes Moore declined to weigh in on bills lawmakers have yet to debate, but the Democrat questioned why the federal officers need to “dress up” to do their jobs, and said he’s concerned about the behavior he’s seeing from ICE.

Advertisement

“They [ICE] don’t seem to care about violent crime and public safety,” Moore said. “Nor do they care about following the Constitution.”

Trump administration officials have continued to back agents’ tactics, and insist that allowing agents to pick up noncitizens who are being held in local jails keeps ICE from having to flood communities with patrols.

Democratic lawmakers say their proposals wouldn’t risk public safety or interfere with federal immigration enforcement.

Del. J. Sandy Bartlett speaks in the House chamber at the State House during the first day of the 2026 General Assembly session in Annapolis last week. (Jessica Gallagher/The Banner)

“We will always participate to solve crime and to get dangerous people off the streets,” said Sen. Will Smith, a Montgomery County Democrat and the Senate’s lead sponsor of the bill to ban the agreements. The measure is expected to breeze through the General Assembly. Del. Nicole Williams of Prince George’s County is the lead House sponsor.

Advertisement

Judiciary Chair J. Sandy Bartlett, an attorney, argued that state and local jurisdictions fund local public safety officers to protect the people within their purview. The federal government has its own budget for immigration enforcement. Her House committee will review the bill.

“They do not need our law enforcement to do their job,” the Anne Arundel County Democrat said.

Existing 287(g) agreements allow corrections officers at local jails to ask the immigration status of someone they’ve arrested. Officers can then flag ICE and hold noncitizens for the feds for up to 48 hours after arrest.

Critics of the agreements say they allow law enforcement to racially profile Marylanders arrested for unrelated crimes and sow fear of law enforcement. They also may extend someone’s detention after they would have otherwise been released before a court date.

Republican lawmakers and county sheriffs cautioned that ending the agreements could stoke retaliation.

Advertisement

Federal agencies could see the bans as “resistance,” said Sen. Bill Folden, a retired police officer who at one time served as a deputy sheriff in Frederick County, a jurisdiction that’s had a 287(g) agreement in place for nearly two decades.

“We need to be careful what we ask for,” he said. “Because we don’t want to see the model that we’re seeing in Minnesota.”

The ICE surge in Minneapolis has become a proving ground for how far the Trump administration will take its deportation efforts. A federal judge on Jan. 16 ordered ICE to refrain from detaining protesters or using pepper spray on people exercising their First Amendment rights.

Frederick County Sheriff Chuck Jenkins, Republican, explains his opposition to a Democratic-led effort to ban cooperative agreements between local jails and U.S. Custom and Immigration Enforcement.

Frederick County Sheriff Chuck Jenkins, a Republican, explains his opposition to a Democratic-led effort to ban cooperative agreements between local jails and U.S. Custom and Immigration Enforcement agents. (Brenda Wintrode/The Banner)

Harford County Sheriff Jeffrey Gahler called the agreements “an important public safety program,” that allow his officers to screen for someone’s immigration status inside jails. No contract in Maryland permits local officers to conduct immigration arrests.

Advertisement

Sheriffs in Allegany, Carroll, Cecil, Frederick, Garrett, St. Mary’s and Washington counties have also signed the voluntary agreements, according to the Department of Homeland Security. Many say they want the programs to continue.

Unmasking ICE

The ban on face coverings would extend to state, local and federal officers, with some exceptions, such as wearing surgical masks to prevent illness.

The digital unmasking bill, drafted by Del. David Moon, would allow the state to store data, such as location, license plate photos and cellphone video of an ICE officer’s actions, should a member of the public file a complaint against them.

At a time when there’s selective oversight for federal agencies, the Montgomery County Democrat said it’s imperative the state use “the resources at our disposal to ensure there’s at least the opportunity for accountability.”

Republican Del. Matt Morgan said lawmakers should first try to understand why the feds are wearing masks.

Advertisement

“They’re trying to protect those officers,” the St. Mary’s Republican said.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has said her officers face violence, threats and harassment while trying to do their jobs. Concealing their faces protects their identities, she said.

Suing ICE

Another early proposal will cement Marylanders’ ability to sue the federal government over civil rights violations. Democrat Del. Lorig Charkoudian of Montgomery County said her bill, dubbed the No Kings Act, will provide legal recourse where none currently exists.

Del. Adrian Boafo has pitched a bill that would disqualify immigration officers sworn in after Trump’s 2025 inauguration from getting jobs as state law enforcement officers.

The bill raises questions about whether someone’s past experience could bar them from future employment, said Nancy Modesitt, a University of Baltimore law professor who specializes in employment law.

Advertisement

But it’s emblematic of Democrats’ outrage after watching Trump’s immigration forces take the streets of American cities.

Boafo, a Prince George’s County Democrat, said those who applied to ICE after the agency used amped-up anti-immigration rhetoric to recruit applicants understood what they were signing up for.

Should the bill pass, he said, it will serve as “a reminder that we’re not going to forget what terror this has been for a lot of Marylanders.”





Source link

Advertisement

Maryland

Maryland to restore I-695 shoulders between I-70 and Stevenson Road starting April 20

Published

on

Maryland to restore I-695 shoulders between I-70 and Stevenson Road starting April 20


Drivers who travel the Baltimore Beltway between I-70 and Stevenson Road should prepare for overnight lane closures starting Monday night, April 20, as crews begin work to restore the roadway shoulders.

The Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration will begin removing and replacing pavement markings along sections of I-695 between I-70 and Stevenson Road as soon as 8 p.m. Monday night, April 20. The work is expected to be completed in early summer.

The pavement-marking work is part of the I-695 Transportation Systems Management and Operations project in Baltimore County. The project is intended to enable eventual part-time shoulder use during peak drive times and to facilitate final paving activities in that section of the job scheduled to start this summer.

Drivers can expect single-lane and double-lane closures, along with occasional triple-lane closures as needed, on the Beltway overnight between Sundays and Thursdays from 8 p.m. to 5 a.m. the next morning. Drivers are urged to stay alert, avoid distractions and plan for extra travel time on both southbound and northbound I-695 between the I-70 interchange and Stevenson Road.

Advertisement

Contractor crews will use digital message boards, temporary traffic signs and barrels to direct motorists through the work zone. Drivers are urged to obey posted speed limits and remain alert while traveling through the area. You can dial #77 on their mobile devices for roadside assistance.

More information on major State Highway Administration projects, news and travel updates is available at roads.maryland.gov.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maryland

Maryland Lottery Pick 3, Pick 4 results for April 16, 2026

Published

on

Maryland Lottery Pick 3, Pick 4 results for April 16, 2026


play

The Maryland Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at April 16, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Pick 3 numbers from April 16 drawing

Midday: 1-8-3

Evening: 2-1-0

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from April 16 drawing

Midday: 5-5-0-3

Advertisement

Evening: 3-7-9-9

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 5 numbers from April 16 drawing

Midday: 7-5-2-3-6

Evening: 7-8-8-4-8

Check Pick 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Cash Pop numbers from April 16 drawing

9 a.m.: 10

1 p.m.: 10

6 p.m.: 10

11 p.m.: 07

Check Cash Pop payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Bonus Match 5 numbers from April 16 drawing

03-17-21-26-29, Bonus: 16

Check Bonus Match 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning MultiMatch numbers from April 16 drawing

02-06-08-12-29-38

Check MultiMatch payouts and previous drawings here.

Keno

Drawings are held every four minutes. Check winning numbers here.

Advertisement

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

Maryland Lottery retailers will redeem prizes up to $600. For prizes above $600, winners can claim by mail or in person from the Maryland Lottery office, an Expanded Cashing Authority Program location or cashiers’ windows at Maryland casinos. Prizes over $5,000 must be claimed in person.

Claiming by Mail

Sign your winning ticket and complete a claim form. Include a photocopy of a valid government-issued ID and a copy of a document that shows proof of your Social Security number or Federal Tax ID number. Mail these to:

Maryland Lottery Customer Resource Center

1800 Washington Boulevard

Advertisement

Suite 330

Baltimore, MD 21230

For prizes over $600, bring your signed ticket, a government-issued photo ID, and proof of your Social Security or Federal Tax ID number to Maryland Lottery headquarters, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore, MD. Claims are by appointment only, Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. This location handles all prize amounts, including prizes over $5,000.

Winning Tickets Worth $25,000 or Less

Maryland Lottery headquarters and select Maryland casinos can redeem winning tickets valued up to $25,000. Note that casinos cannot cash prizes over $600 for non-resident and resident aliens (tax ID beginning with “9”). You must be at least 21 years of age to enter a Maryland casino. Locations include:

  • Horseshoe Casino: 1525 Russell Street, Baltimore, MD
  • MGM National Harbor: 101 MGM National Avenue, Oxon Hill, MD
  • Live! Casino: 7002 Arundel Mills Circle, Hanover, MD
  • Ocean Downs Casino: 10218 Racetrack Road, Berlin, MD
  • Hollywood Casino: 1201 Chesapeake Overlook Parkway, Perryville, MD
  • Rocky Gap Casino: 16701 Lakeview Road NE, Flintstone, MD

Check previous winning numbers and payouts at Maryland Lottery.

When are the Maryland Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 11 p.m. ET Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 11 p.m. ET Tuesday and Friday.
  • Pick 3, Pick 4 and Pick 5 Midday: 12:27 p.m. ET Monday through Friday, 12:28 p.m. ET Saturday and Sunday.
  • Pick 3, 4 and 5 Evening: 7:56 p.m. ET Monday through Saturday, 8:10 p.m. ET on Sunday.
  • Cash4Life: 9 p.m. ET daily.
  • Cash Pop: 9 a.m., 1 p.m., 6 p.m. and 11 p.m. daily.
  • Bonus Match 5: 7:56 p.m. ET Monday through Saturday, 8:10 p.m. ET on Sunday.
  • MultiMatch: 7:56 p.m. Monday and Thursday.
  • Powerball Double Play: 11 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Maryland editor. You can send feedback using this form.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Maryland

LDF Applauds Passage of Landmark Housing Legislation in Maryland

Published

on

LDF Applauds Passage of Landmark Housing Legislation in Maryland


Read a PDF of our statement here.

The Legal Defense Fund (LDF) today commended the Maryland General Assembly for passing the Fair Chance Housing Act (SB 937) and Fair Housing and Housing Discrimination – Regulations, Intent, and Discriminatory Effect (HB 573). Together, the passage of this legislation marks a significant step forward in ensuring that every resident in the state of Maryland has access to affordable and accessible housing in well-resourced neighborhoods of their choice, without unfair discrimination standing in their way.

SB 937 places limits on how landlords use criminal background checks, ensuring applicants are evaluated on their qualifications as tenants today, such as their ability to reliably pay rent and be a good neighbor, rather than their past. SB 937 is the most progressive statewide fair chance at housing legislation in the country. HB 573 strengthens state fair housing laws by codifying existing protections against policies that have unjustified discriminatory effects and by ensuring Maryland takes proactive steps to combat housing discrimination and overcome patterns of housing segregation.

LDF held briefings and information sessions for Maryland legislators to make the implementation and impact of these bills clear and provided oral and written testimony encouraging members to pass these critical pieces of legislation.

“While the Trump administration unlawfully abdicates its responsibilities to protect people in this country from discrimination, state legislative victories like this one in Maryland are especially significant,” said Demetria McCain, Director of Policy at LDF. “As we commemorate the 58th anniversary of the federal Fair Housing Act, these landmark pieces of legislation remind us that strong fair housing laws and practices are deeply necessary to ensure our communities have a roof over their head in a neighborhood of their choice. We applaud the Maryland General Assembly and Governor Wes Moore for safeguarding the public’s fair housing rights in this way.”

Advertisement

“The state of Maryland took a major step in opening doors to affordable housing for countless people across the state,” said David Wheaton, Assistant Policy Counsel at LDF. “We know that these pieces of legislation will have a tangible, positive impact on the lives of so many Black Maryland residents who face rampant discrimination and barriers to accessing housing in the state. This historic win would not have been possible without the advocacy, support, and deep commitment of community partners and social justice organizations. LDF will continue its work advocating to ensure Black people aren’t unnecessarily and unfairly blocked from fair and affordable housing across the United States.”

LDF partnered with the Vera Institute of Justice, Baltimoreans United in Leadership Development (BUILD), Public Justice Center, Life After Release, Out for Justice, and Maryland Legal Aid to support SB 937. Groups advocating for HB 573 included LDF, Economic Action Maryland, Maryland Legal Aid, Public Justice Center, Policy & Race Research Action Council (PPRAC), and Baltimore Regional Housing Partnership.

###

Founded in 1940, the Legal Defense Fund (LDF) is the nation’s first civil rights legal organization. LDF has been completely separate from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) since 1957, though it was founded under the leadership of Thurgood Marshall while he was at the NAACP. LDF’s Thurgood Marshall Institute (TMI) is a division of LDF that undertakes innovative research and houses LDF’s archive. In all media attributions, please refer to us as the Legal Defense Fund or LDF (do not include NAACP) and refer to the Institute as LDF’s Thurgood Marshall Institute or

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending