Louisiana

Supreme Court won’t review conviction of Louisiana man sentenced to death for role in prison escape | CNN Politics

Published

on




CNN
 — 

The Supreme Courtroom will let stand the conviction of a Louisiana inmate who was convicted of homicide and sentenced to dying for his function in an tried jail escape involving 5 different inmates.

The justices declined on Monday to take up the attraction filed by the inmate, David Brown.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by her liberal colleagues Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, dissented from the court docket’s 6-3 determination to not hear the case.

Advertisement

Louisiana requested the court docket to reject Brown’s place, emphasizing the grisly nature of the homicide of Captain David Knapps, who was bludgeoned to dying within the restroom of the Louisiana State Penitentiary throughout the tried escape in 1999. In response to court docket paperwork, the inmates “deliberate to detain sure corrections officers who they believed have been unlikely to battle again, take their uniforms, gown because the officers, after which go away the jail within the officers’ uniforms.”

Brown had argued that he was a part of the escape – however not the homicide – of the corrections officer and stated the state suppressed proof that will have helped him. Legal professionals for Brown stated a co-defendant confessed that he and one other inmate dedicated the homicide.

Brown had requested the excessive court docket to take up the case to look at whether or not the state violated Brady v. Maryland, a 1963 Supreme Courtroom determination that established that the prosecution should flip over all proof that would exonerate a defendant.

“We’ve got repeatedly reversed decrease courts – and Louisiana courts, specifically – for comparable refusals to implement the Fourteenth Modification’s mandate that favorable and materials proof within the authorities’s possession be disclosed to the protection earlier than trial,” Jackson wrote in dissent.

Within the case at hand, the Louisiana Supreme Courtroom stated that the failure to reveal the confession didn’t violate Brady as a result of the opposite inmate who confessed by no means stated that Brown was not current.

Advertisement



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending

Exit mobile version