DOJ has “enough evidence” to indict Trump, Alan Dershowitz says

Donald Trump’s former legal professional Alan Dershowitz mentioned Friday that the Division of Justice has sufficient proof to indict the previous president however does not anticipate it to occur.

The massive image: The Division of Justice launched a redacted model of the affidavit linked to the search warrant at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago house on Friday. The DOJ mentioned there was “possible trigger” to imagine that proof of obstruction might be discovered at Mar-a-Lago.

Driving the information: Dershowitz mentioned on Fox Information’ “Hannity” that “there may be sufficient proof right here to indict Trump.”

• “However Trump won’t be indicted in my opinion as a result of the proof doesn’t cross what I name the Nixon-Clinton requirements,” he mentioned.
• “The Nixon normal is, the case needs to be so overwhelmingly robust that even Republicans help it,” he mentioned. “And the Clinton normal is, why is that this case extra critical than Clinton’s case the place there wasn’t a legal prosecution?”
• He additionally advised Newsweek on Friday that “it seems like there could be sufficient for an indictment, however like possible trigger, an indictment is straightforward to get.”

Value noting: Dershowitz mentioned Decide Bruce Reinhart shouldn’t be blamed for approving the search warrant. He mentioned U.S. Legal professional Normal Merrick Garland ought to by no means have filed a search warrant to start with.

The intrigue: Dershowitz, who was a member of President Trump’s authorized group for the impeachment trial, has defended the previous president in a collection of opinion items over the FBI’s raid.

• He wrote for The Hill that the unredacted components of the affidavit didn’t do sufficient to justify the warrant.
• Dershowitz wrote for Newsmax that there’s a “get Trump” mentality based mostly on the worry of Trumpism. He mentioned this has weakened points of the Structure, too.

Go deeper: Learn the FBI’s redacted Mar-a-Lago search affidavit