Connect with us

Dallas, TX

Does Zack Martin or Cowboys have upper hand in holdout leverage game?

Published

on

Does Zack Martin or Cowboys have upper hand in holdout leverage game?


Josh Ball started at right guard in the preseason opener.

The third-year pro was excited. He walked up to Mike McCarthy after the game and asked how it went.

“I got this new gig,” responded the Cowboys head coach, who called plays in the game for the first time in more than four-and-a-half years. “I’m kinda busy. Sorry.

“I didn’t get to watch all that.”

Advertisement

Cowboys

Be the smartest Cowboys fan. Get the latest news.

Now that McCarthy and the rest of his staff have had time to review the tape, they likely have come to the same conclusion as everyone else:

Ball is no Zack Martin.

Neither is anyone else on this roster.

Advertisement

Each passing day of Martin’s holdout increases his fine total — up to $900,000 and counting — and calls the exit strategy for both sides into doubt. Who blinks?

Back when the clock officially started on this impasse, the idea that the Pro Bowl guard wouldn’t be in the lineup when the Cowboys open the regular season against the New York Giants on Sept. 10 seemed far-fetched. Now, it’s becoming more difficult to determine how this will be resolved.

The organization is convinced it has all the leverage. With two years left on his contract, Martin’s only leverage — other than the fact he remains one of the NFL’s most dominant players at his position — is if the Cowboys’ already paper-thin depth in the offensive line falters or takes an injury hit in these final two preseason games.

Three weeks into this test of wills, let’s explore the leverage.

Martin is under contract. The deal made him the highest-paid player at his position when it was signed. He now ranks ninth.

Advertisement

He’ll be 34 years old when the contract ends.

Ranked by his current level of performance, Martin is much closer to one than he is nine when you look at the top guards around the league. But will he still rank that high at the end of this contract?

If Martin is simply seeking an adjustment for these final two seasons, there’s no financial incentive for the Cowboys to respond. If he’s unwilling to sign an extension, that would be an indication he’s leaning toward retirement at the end of the 2024 season, his 12th in the NFL. Why would Dallas give more money to a player who will be around for only two more seasons?

But then, what’s the incentive for the Cowboys to extend a lineman who would be 34 years old when that extension goes into effect?

Martin’s leverage? He remains the team’s best offensive lineman in a season where McCarthy has changed the protection scheme. You would be hard-pressed to identify the Cowboys’ best backup guard at the moment. Ball and Matt Farniok got most of those snaps in the loss to Jacksonville.

Advertisement

Now, put one of them into the starting lineup for Martin.

The Cowboys feel good about Tyler Smith at left guard. He did spend the majority of last year’s offseason working at the position.

But he’s never played guard in the NFL for a regular season game. And the moment Tyron Smith is injured — a reasonable assumption given he’s missed 33 games in the last three seasons and hasn’t played a full season since 2015 — Tyler Smith bumps back outside to left tackle.

Who are your starting guards in that scenario if Martin is still holding out?

And let’s go back to the right side. Say Ball does land the job. Remember, right tackle Terence Steele is coming off a torn ACL. Will he be at the top of his game to start the season?

Advertisement

Would you rather have Martin or Ball next to Steele as the tackle plays his way back into form?

Who would quarterback Dak Prescott prefer?

The Cowboys are dealing from a strong, contractual position in this impasse. But Martin has more leverage than the club care’s to concede.

It’s difficult to find a resolution at this stage. So the sides wait while Ball and others vie for a starting job with the Cowboys that has belonged to Martin since he came into the league nine years ago.

“This is good for us,” McCarthy said of the snaps being devoted to younger players. “It will pay dividends in the long run.”

Advertisement

This will pay dividends as long as Zack Martin is on the field when the season begins. If he’s not …

Well, then it’s hard to say either side has won.

Catch David Moore on The Ticket (KTCK-AM 1310 and 96.7 FM) with the Musers at 9:35 every morning and the Hardline several times a week at 4:35 p.m. during Cowboys training camp.

    Dirk Nowitzki is D-FW’s most beloved athlete of all-time, with no contemporary in sight
    Cowboys WR Michael Gallup explains reasoning behind his choice to wear No. 13

Find more Cowboys coverage from The Dallas Morning News here.



Source link

Advertisement

Dallas, TX

Cowboys coaching search: Could Jason Witten replace Mike McCarthy?

Published

on

Cowboys coaching search: Could Jason Witten replace Mike McCarthy?


Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones is exploring options for a new head coach following the departure of Mike McCarthy, and one name generating buzz is franchise legend Jason Witten. Known as the best tight end in Cowboys history, Witten has long been a favorite of Jones and is being considered for the high-profile role.

McCarthy and the Cowboys parted ways after five seasons, ending a tenure that included three consecutive 12-5 records but just one playoff win. The coaching search is officially underway, and Witten’s name has surfaced alongside other contenders.

Witten, an 11-time Pro Bowler and the franchise leader in games starts, receptions, and receiving yards, has deep ties to Dallas. While his coaching experience is limited to leading a private high school team to a state championship, his leadership qualities and familiarity with the organization make him a compelling, albeit unconventional, option.

If hired, Witten would follow a path similar to Detroit Lions head coach Dan Campbell, another former Cowboys tight end. Campbell transitioned to the NFL coaching ranks after years of assistant coaching experience, a step Witten has yet to take. However, Jones has a history of making bold decisions, and Witten’s intimate understanding of the Cowboys’ culture could give him an edge.

Advertisement

While some question whether Witten’s high school coaching background is sufficient preparation for the NFL, Jones values loyalty and passion for the franchise, qualities Witten embodies. His connection with the Cowboys and leadership on and off the field could make him an intriguing choice to guide the team into its next chapter.

Jones’ next coach will be his ninth. The first four were first-time NFL head coaches, starting with Jimmy Johnson when Jones bought the team in 1989. The former University of Miami coach won back-to-back Super Bowls before an acrimonious split with Jones, his college teammate at Arkansas.

Three of Jones’ past four hires had NFL head coaching experience, including Super Bowl winners Bill Parcells and McCarthy. The exception was former Dallas quarterback Jason Garrett, the longest-tenured coach under Jones at nine-plus seasons.

The Cowboys have yet to release updates on the search, but Jason Witten remains a name to watch as the process unfolds.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Dallas, TX

Dereck Lively Gets Key Ankle Injury Update For Dallas Mavericks

Published

on

Dereck Lively Gets Key Ankle Injury Update For Dallas Mavericks


About four minutes into the Dallas Mavericks’ recent contest against the Denver Nuggets, starting center Dereck Lively left the contest with an ankle injury.

Evidently, the Mavericks are already dealing with massive injuries to Luka Doncic and Kyrie Irving. Those two superstars lead the team and Lively is right up there as one of the more impactful players on the team.

However, just one day after the injury, Lively has already gotten X-ray updates back on his sprained right ankle, and it’s a bit of a relief for Mavericks fans. Chris Haynes provided the recent update.

“Dallas Mavericks center Dereck Lively II received an X-ray on his sprained right ankle and results were negative. No timeline established as of now,” Haynes reported.

Advertisement

The Mavericks are struggling to stay healthy, though doing so by April is the main goal and it’s just January. Lively has had issues remaining on the hardwood for the club in his inaugural two seasons, and it’s leaving some fans concerned.

READ MORE: Latest Timeline for Luka Doncic’s Return to Dallas Mavericks Revealed

Stick with CommanderGameday and the Locked On Commanders podcast for more FREE coverage of the Washington Commanders throughout the 2024 season.

Follow Kade on Twitter.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Dallas, TX

In messy city manager search, Dallas council failed in its fundamental job

Published

on

In messy city manager search, Dallas council failed in its fundamental job


The Dallas city manager search has unspooled in the chaotic style we’ve come to expect from this City Council. There was the ho-hum recruitment brochure draft featuring the wrong skyline. There was the council civil war over the timeline of the search and the flow of information about candidates. And nothing says “we’ve got our act together” like eleventh-hour candidate interviews the day before Christmas Eve.

When two original semifinalists and a former Dallas city official dropped out of the race, no one was surprised.

We wish the next city manager the best of luck because no amount of talent and hard work can overcome a fundamental flaw of this search, and that is the lack of formal, measurable goals by the City Council. Our city is about to hire its CEO, but its board of directors has no metrics to set expectations or hold that person accountable for the most important job in Dallas.

If you want to understand how dysfunctional the situation is, start with the fact that the council’s appointees — the city manager, city attorney, city secretary and city auditor — haven’t had a performance review in more than two years. Our last city manager, T.C. Broadnax, had his last evaluation in August 2022. He left in May 2024. Interim City Manager Kimberly Bizor Tolbert, the front-runner for the job, hasn’t had an evaluation since her appointment last spring.

Advertisement

Opinion

Get smart opinions on the topics North Texans care about.

The council has hired a consultant over the years to help conduct the evaluations of its appointees. But no consultant can fix this council’s main problem, and that is its inability to come together to develop a consensus around four or five priorities and the metrics to measure progress in those areas.

Even when performance reviews for council appointees were happening, the process was broken. The council’s consultant called council members individually to solicit feedback, with the consultant identifying “themes” shared verbally with the council, and with no particular comments attributed to specific people, according to a 2022 memorandum from Management Partners, the firm hired to do the work. The city manager and other appointees were “invited” to prepare a report on their accomplishments and goals for next year, with the potential for “refinements” based on council input.

There was no written report from the performance evaluation, other than any goals reports produced by the appointees.

Advertisement

It’s a shockingly wishy-washy approach to evaluating an employee, let alone a C-suite executive.

And don’t expect even a veneer of transparency for taxpayers. Last year, we requested Broadnax’s goal reports and were told by the city that there were no responsive records, only to hear a council member remind her colleagues last week that Broadnax produced a memo with his goals after his last performance review in 2022. City staff failed to release this memo in response to our request. Such a document should be public under the Texas Public Information Act.

Now, on the brink of hiring its next city manager, the council is panicking about the fact that it hasn’t evaluated its council appointees in a long time and that it has no measurable goals for any of them. The council committee whose job it is to codify the annual review process can’t seem to agree on how to move forward.

Mayor Pro Tem Tennell Atkins chairs the committee. In a December meeting, he led a discussion on next steps to resume performance reviews of council appointees. Council members learned that their previous consulting firm, Management Partners, had been acquired by Baker Tilly, the company that is leading the messy city manager search. But the woman who had worked closely with the council on previous performance reviews was no longer associated with either company.

The committee gave city staff mixed signals on how to proceed. Some council members said they wanted to continue working with the previous consultant. Others asked to hear from Baker Tilly. Some said they were dissatisfied with the previous consultant or concerned about Baker Tilly and wanted to hear from other vendors. Council members said to move quickly.

Advertisement

By the time the council committee picked the conversation back up this month, confusion reigned. Baker Tilly prepared a presentation that described a performance review process very similar to what the council had with its previous partner. Atkins indicated that the council was moving forward with Baker Tilly using an existing contract, and other committee members pushed back. Meanwhile, an assistant city manager and an assistant human resources director couldn’t answer a council member’s simple question about when the council appointees were last evaluated.

“Yes, we are overdue for these reviews, but I think that they should be pursued seriously with the appropriate time periods involved,” said council member Paul Ridley. “I don’t think we should out of convenience select someone who is doing other work for the city at the present time.”

Council member Jesse Moreno asked whether Baker Tilly would have a conflict of interest in facilitating the performance review of an executive the firm helped hire. A representative tried to assuage Moreno, but he is right to bring that up, given that Baker Tilly would be required to conduct a new search at no cost to Dallas if the city manager doesn’t last a year. Council members should be skeptical. (Keep in mind it was Baker Tilly that produced the hiring brochure for Dallas city manager. The cover photo was a shining image of the Houston skyline.)

The council now seems poised to consider other consultants for the performance evaluations. Council members should do their due diligence instead of repeating their sloppiness for the sake of comfort.

Hire a consultant, if you must, to moderate the conversation or offer pointers, but a management firm can’t do the hard work for you.

Advertisement

Outgoing council member Jaynie Schultz said it best: “This problem is ours as a council. We have not done our work. And so we can try spending all of our time diverting all the problem and the blame on Baker Tilly. … The delay is us, 100% us.”

The council’s job is not to run the city but to set clear, measurable expectations for the people it hires to do that. It’s telling that council members have relied on a consultant to remind them to perform a fundamental duty.

    Dallas was right to question University Park request for 18 acres
    Texas House speaker race is a GOP purity disaster

We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here. If you have problems with the form, you can submit via email at letters@dallasnews.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending