Dallas mayor and manager truce isn’t the progress city needed

After a couple of years of battering each other’s egos, Mayor Eric Johnson and Metropolis Supervisor T.C. Broadnax have ultimately determined it’s time to work collectively for the betterment of town.

This comes after a dramatic couple of weeks that noticed Johnson unsuccessfully maneuver to have the Metropolis Council fireplace Broadnax, one thing Broadnax deftly deflected to place Johnson on the defensive with a Metropolis Council he had been patching issues up with.

Now all’s properly or at the least it’s going to be, or so we’re instructed.

That’s high quality so far as it goes, assuming it goes very far, but it surely isn’t actually what town wants now or what it has wanted these previous few years.

To recap: After the failed try and oust Broadnax, he and Johnson “introduced that they’ve reached an settlement for shifting ahead collectively,” in response to a joint press launch that learn one thing like an essay the principal ordered up after a schoolyard tussle.

Johnson softened, however didn’t retract, his sense that Broadnax isn’t getting the massive issues proper in managing town and he nonetheless desires change, though perhaps now, he simply desires Broadnax to vary.

Broadnax, in the meantime, needed to eat a smidgen of crow by saying every thing he’s completed isn’t as much as his personal requirements. However he’s pleased with what he’s completed. However he can do higher.

Johnson, in flip, acknowledged that being metropolis supervisor is admittedly, actually laborious. And on and on it went for six pages.

There was scant substance, primarily round agreements, in precept, to make vital enhancements in vital areas like fixing the damaged allowing system and making Dallas safer. These had been obscure and normal.

Broadnax provided probably the most quantifiable assurance when he pledged to decide to better accountability by releasing particulars of a 100-day plan to “deal with most of the high-priority focus areas of the Metropolis Council.”

We stay up for seeing that and to seeing measurable targets connected to it.

However all of this obscures one thing vital. What we actually want as a metropolis is a severe, sober evaluate of town supervisor’s efficiency and a choice from the council whether or not he was getting the job completed and what to do if he wasn’t.

Had such a evaluate occurred as scheduled on the finish of the month, it could have uncovered main deficiencies in how our metropolis operates. The council might have acted just like the board of administrators that it primarily is beneath our constitution and both determined to take away the supervisor or set forth clear, measurable requirements for him to fulfill in a specified time period.

The truth that it’s laborious to think about one thing like that occuring means that we don’t simply have a administration downside, we have now a political downside.

The query is how that will get addressed.

We welcome your ideas in a letter to the editor. See the rules and submit your letter right here.