AUSTIN, Texas — House Speaker Dustin Burrows was elected speaker with the support of Democrats, who favored him over Mansfield Rep. David Cook.

“Make sure that our speaker is selected by the caucus, is selected by Republicans. And so that’s what we expect of each other. So I was disappointed in that,” said North Texas Rep. Andy Hopper.

Cook won the GOP House Caucus nomination, but Burrows continued his campaign for the chair. His success is a failure for farther right members of the party, who are now threating political retribution.

“We will see how our next primaries are going to be,” said Texas Republican Chair Abraham George.

Many supporters of Cook blame Burrows’ predecessor and ally Beaumont Rep. Dade Phelan for the impeachment of Attorney General Ken Paxton and failure to pass a private school voucher bill.

Under Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick’s leadership, the Senate acquitted Paxton and passed multiple versions of a school voucher plan.

“Patrick understands if he is going to get his legislation passed, he needs to work with the House of Representatives. He has to play the hand that he’s dealt,” said St. Edward University professor of political sciences Brian Smith.

Without Cook leading the House, Patrick is perceived to have less control over the lower chamber’s actions. Patrick said in a statement, “The voters will hold our new speaker accountable to keep his promise of being the most conservative speaker in Texas history.”

The House Democratic Caucus is taking credit for Burrows’ win. Houston-area Rep. Gene Wu, the chair, says they protected the integrity of the People’s House.

“I feel like there’s a glimmer of hope that Texas can move forward, and we can actually take care of business,” Wu said. 

Burrows expressed confidence in the House’s ability to govern.

“Our strength lies not in conformity, but in how we harmonize these diverse perspectives into service for this great state,” he said. 

Many of Patrick’s priorities are shared with Burrows, including school vouchers and decreasing property taxes.

“There’s certainly going to be friction, but because they’re both Republicans, there’s going to be a lot more that they agree on,” said Smith. 

Republicans in Burrows’ corner are confident in a more positive relationship between the two chambers.

“Policy is what brings us together. And I think that’s what’s going to happen this session,” said Frisco Rep. Jared Patterson.

Next week, the House will debate chamber rules, which will include who chairs committees. Lt. Gov. Patrick is vocally against minority party chairs, but Speaker Burrows signaled a willingness to work across the aisle.

AUSTIN, Texas – The new light rail system is on track to start construction in Austin in 2027. It is part of the project connect transit plan.

On Thursday, residents were able to get a look at images of the light rail stops across the nearly 10-mile stretch.

Austin Light Rail: New images, renderings provide insight into project

What is the Austin Light Rail?

What we know:

According to ATP, the Light Rail System will service an estimated 28,000 riders on a weekday.

A draft environmental impact statement highlighting the impact the light rail will have on traffic, property, acquisitions, air quality, and the environment was made available for residents to view. 

“We have a lot of new information to show. We’ve been working diligently over the past year and a half since we last had public meetings in February 2024. We’re here to show how we have worked that into the design and the analysis that is underway,” says ATP spokesperson Jennifer Pyne.

The Austin Transit Partnership set up a display that gives block-by-block visuals of the light rail system and the 15 stops along the 9.8-mile stretch.

“We are proposing a very reliable, frequent service that runs through the center of Austin to UT out East Riverside, down South Congress. The light rail project will include the introduction of light rail in the street, but also looking at how bikeways and sidewalks and trees would all fit into the streetscape as well,” says Pyne.

Local perspective:

The open house gave residents the opportunity to weigh in on the city’s decision to add the transit system that was approved by voters in 2020.

“I did not, although a lot of people I know did and that was to happen, but the current proposal is almost identical to the one that was rejected by the voters in 2014. I don’t really like the idea. I think, you know, the project is so expensive, and it will serve so few people that it’s really not worth that kind of investment,” says Austin resident Larry Acres.

“For the most part, I really like it. But there are still concerns about safety, about noise, about vibration and stuff like that. Austin is such a great area. Light rail would be fabulous. I just want to make sure we don’t rush into it,” says Austin resident Mary Fealkoff.

What’s next:

The feedback from the meeting will be used to add to the environmental impact statement for the project to receive federal funding.

AUSTIN, Texas – With wildfires still burning in California, Texas lawmakers are considering a plan to create a Lone Star Air Force to battle outbreaks here.

Operators of an aerial firefighting company came to the Capitol to help lawmakers get the idea off the ground.

The backstory:

More than 80 aircraft have been used to battle the wildfires in California. The fleet includes assets from Bridger Aerospace. Planes known as Super Scoopers were flown to LA from the company’s airbase in Montana.

“I think large fires are becoming more of an issue and year-round readiness is paramount,” said Sam Davis. 

Davis is the CEO of Bridger Aerospace. He was in Austin on Thursday not just to talk about the California fires. His company is trying to help Texas build its own “fire response” Air Force.

“What we want folks to know is that having these assets on contract or owned or operated by the state of Texas at their disposal is the first and foremost strategy of getting ahead of these fires, pre-positioning, responding quickly and doing what we call initial attack when these fires even high threat is in place. Having them at the ready is very key,” said Davis.

What happened during the Panhandle Wildfire hearings?

The backstory:

State lawmakers evaluated what went wrong during the February wildfires in the Texas Panhandle. The fire was the largest in state history.

The historic wildfires burned across more than 1.2 million acres, killing two people and thousands of livestock. Not to mention, the fire destroyed hundreds of properties and farmers’ livelihoods. 

“The big fire started when a power pole blew over, that started the Smokehouse Creek Fire. The other three fires were started in that old oil field that’s over 100 years old,” a speaker said.

The Panhandle Wildfire hearings last year is where the idea for a Texas Air Force was pitched. The recommendation came after landowners complained about the slow response, and how locally owned aircraft, at times, were grounded. 

What they’re saying:

The Thursday briefing at the Texas Capitol by Bridger Aerospace was for legislative staffers.

“So, the conversation is how do we get aircraft pre-positioned in the state of Texas? How do we get them responding on a very initial attack when this fire happens so we can work on keeping it small,” said Mel Holtz with Bridger.

The briefing is a chance to get out information ahead of any new hearings that may take place during the legislative session.

“I think it’s really important for the appropriators and for the emergency management people, including the governor’s office, to be engaged in these seminars, to see what their options,” said State Rep. Carl Tepper.

Tepper, a Lubbock Republican, indicated he is leaning toward some type of public private partnership.

“You don’t just jump in the aircraft and fight fires. The aircraft have very extensive maintenance schedules. The crews have very specialized training. There’s even X-rays. The aircraft are X-rayed regularly for cracks and structural integrity. So, there’s a lot that goes into this firefighting. And owning any aircraft, any aircraft owner will tell you there’s a lot of extensive maintenance. And so, the state needs to be careful and cautious about what type of contracts we enter into, what type of aircraft we buy, if we do indeed buy any,” said Rep. Tepper.

A spokesperson for State Senator Kevin Sparks (R) Midland sent FOX 7 a statement about the briefing.

“We have a responsibility to vet and utilize the latest tools and technology to better mitigate all types of natural disasters. The heroic efforts during the 2024 Texas Panhandle wildfires showed the need for greater investment in disaster response including ground and aerial support to protect our communities. By investing in these resources, the state can lead in wildfire preparedness and relief,” said Katie Fields, the Policy Analyst for Sen. Sparks.

An option also under consideration involves the state providing dedicated airfields and refueling pads for contracted aircraft. That kind of footprint is similar to a temporary site built at ABIA several years ago after a fire outbreak across central Texas.

“Selfishly, we want to see this done right, you know, at the state level. And I think this is the right way to see this done right. And take some of the no offense, but a little bit of the federal dysfunction out of the play,” said Davis.

What’s next:

There was no discussion on Thursday about how much this idea would cost Texas taxpayers. 

The recommendation from the Panhandle hearing suggested allocating $50 million for six aircraft. But that amount, like the plan itself, is far from being set.