Connect with us

Science

Two Private Moon Landers Are Launching at Once: What to Know

Published

on

Two Private Moon Landers Are Launching at Once: What to Know

A space twofer is scheduled to take place early Wednesday morning — two lunar missions for the price of one rocket launch.

A SpaceX Falcon 9 will lift off from the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida, carrying the Blue Ghost lander built by Firefly Aerospace of Austin, Texas, and the Resilience lander from Ispace of Japan.

The launch is scheduled for 1:11 a.m. Eastern time on Wednesday. Forecasts predict a 90 percent chance of favorable weather.

SpaceX will provide coverage of the launch on the social media platform X beginning about one hour before liftoff, or around 12:10 a.m. NASA will start a live video stream at 12:30 a.m. of Blue Ghost and the payloads it is carrying for the agency, which you can watch in the video player above. Ispace will provide coverage of its Resilience lander in English and Japanese starting at 12:20 a.m.

If needed, a backup launch time is available on Thursday at 1:09 a.m., although the weather is less favorable.

Advertisement

That is the result of fortuitous scheduling by SpaceX and not something that was planned by Firefly or Ispace.

Firefly had purchased a Falcon 9 launch to send its Blue Ghost lander to the moon. At the same time, Ispace, to save on the costs for the mission, had asked SpaceX for a rideshare, that is, hitching a ride as a secondary payload on a rocket launch that was going roughly in the right direction to get its Resilience lander to the moon. That turned out to be Blue Ghost’s trip.

“It was a no-brainer to put them together,” Julianna Scheiman, the director for NASA science missions at SpaceX, said during a news conference on Tuesday.

After the Falcon 9 rocket reaches orbit, the second stage will fire again for a minute so that it can deploy Blue Ghost in an elliptical orbit around Earth about one hour after launch. Then the rocket stage will fire once more, for just one second, to adjust the orbit for the deployment of Resilience about 1.5 hours after launch.

Firefly Aerospace is one of the new space companies that have popped up over the past few years. It has developed and launched a small rocket called Alpha several times. In 2023 Firefly demonstrated that it could prepare and launch a payload for the United States Space Force within days — a capability that the Department of Defense is looking to develop so that it could quickly replace satellites that come under attack.

Advertisement

Blue Ghost — named after a species of fireflies — is a robotic lander that Firefly has developed to take scientific instruments and other payloads to the surface of the moon.

This mission is headed to Mare Crisium, a flat plain formed from lava that filled and hardened inside a 345-mile-wide crater carved out by an ancient asteroid impact. Mare Crisium is in the northeast quadrant of the near side of the moon.

NASA will pay Firefly $101.5 million if it takes 10 payloads to the lunar surface, and a bit less if it does not fully succeed. The NASA payloads include a drill to measure the flow of heat from the moon’s interior to the surface, an electrodynamic dust shield to clean off glass and radiator surfaces, and an X-ray camera.

The lander will operate for about 14 days — the length of a lunar day — until darkness descends at the landing site.

This is Ispace’s second attempt to place a commercial lander on the surface of the moon. Its Hakuto-R Mission 1 lander tried to set down near the Atlas crater on the near side of the moon. But the landing software was confused when it passed over the crater rim, which is two miles higher than the surrounding terrain. The spacecraft ended up hovering far above the ground after thinking it had landed and then crashed when it ran out of propellant.

Advertisement

Resilience — also known as the Hakuto-R Mission 2 lander — is essentially the same design as the Mission 1 spacecraft, but with different payloads. Ispace officials said they were confident that the mistakes that led to the crash in 2023 had been fixed.

The payloads on Resilience include a water electrolyzer experiment, which splits the hydrogen and oxygen molecules, from the Takasago Thermal Engineering Company in Japan, and a small rover named Tenacious that was developed and built by Ispace’s European subsidiary.

Although this is not a NASA mission, it will collect two soil samples — one scooped up by the rover, the other just soil that settles on the landing pads — and sell them to the agency for $5,000 each.

The transactions have no scientific value, because the samples will remain on the moon. Instead, they are meant to help strengthen the view of the United States government that while no nation on Earth can claim sovereignty of the moon or other parts of the solar system under the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, nations and companies can own and profit from what they extract from the moon.

Resilience and Tenacious are also designed to operate for one lunar day, or 14 Earth days.

Advertisement

Blue Ghost should get to the moon first on March 2. For the first 25 days, it is to circle around Earth as the company turns on and checks out the spacecraft’s systems, before heading on a four-day journey to the moon. Then it will orbit the moon for 16 days before trying to land, 45 days after launch.

Resilience will take a longer, winding path that consumes less energy and propellant, gradually stretching out its elliptical orbit until the farthest point of the orbit reaches beyond the moon. As a secondary payload on the Falcon 9, it will need to perform a flyby of the moon to get into the correct position to be captured into lunar orbit.

The vehicle is to land on a plain named Mare Frigoris about four to five months after launch.

Both Blue Ghost and Resilience might be beaten by a spacecraft from Intuitive Machines of Houston that is not scheduled to launch until late February. Despite its later start, it will take a direct, quicker path to the moon.

Intuitive Machines placed Odysseus, its first lander, on the moon in a trip sponsored by NASA last year. It was still successfully able to contact Earth despite tipping over.

Advertisement

By hiring private companies, NASA hopes to send more devices to the moon at a lower cost to perform experiments and test new technologies. A second aim of the Commercial Lunar Payload Services program, or C.L.P.S., is to jump-start a commercial industry there that would not otherwise develop.

NASA officials expect failures along the way, and that is what has happened. The first C.L.P.S. mission by Astrobotic Technology of Pittsburgh suffered a catastrophic propulsion failure soon after launch and never made it close to the moon. The tipping of the second Intuitive Machine lander during the second C.L.P.S. mission prevented the scientific instruments aboard from collecting the data they were sent to measure.

The American subsidiary of Ispace is collaborating with Draper Laboratory in Cambridge, Mass., for a C.L.P.S. mission that is scheduled to launch next year.

Science

Chonkers the ‘Food-Motivated’ Sea Lion Plops Into San Francisco

Published

on

Chonkers the ‘Food-Motivated’ Sea Lion Plops Into San Francisco

A very large sea lion is drawing onlookers to a pier popular among both other sea lions and tourists in San Francisco, wowing visitors and catapulting him to online fame.

“POV: You pull up to the gym and see that one guy who’s just built different,” reads the caption on one video of the sea lion. Commenters across several Reddit threads dedicated to the mammal call him an “AbsoluteUnit,” “Harbor Master” and “Sir Chungus Maximus.”

But the name that has stuck is Chonkers — because, well, he is chonky.

Video posted on social media last month showed the sea lion leaping from the bay onto a pontoon full of smaller sea lions, who immediately scattered to make way. Chonkers, about two to three times as large, weighs about 1,500 to 2,000 pounds, according to experts. He has a light-tan coat and a boxy, bearlike head.

He is not a freak of nature. He is a Steller sea lion.

Advertisement

His species, unlike the California sea lions most typically found around San Francisco, rarely shows up at Pier 39 — a popular tourist spot near one end of Fisherman’s Wharf. There, thousands of the less sizable animals laze atop wooden floats installed for their rest.

Steller sea lions typically migrate farther offshore, said Laura Gill, the public programs manager at the Marine Mammal Center in Sausalito, which has been tracking Chonkers since March 13. She and other experts believe Chonkers most likely swam about 30 miles from a rookery in the Farallon Islands, making his way under the Golden Gate Bridge and into the San Francisco Bay.

The bay’s waters are more shallow than the open sea, Ms. Gill said, where sea lions can avoid predators and more easily track prey like anchovies and rockfish. The floating platforms, she added, are a comfortable alternative to the harsh ocean, where, in order to rest, a sea lion may have to haul itself onto jagged rocks.

“They can just rest on those platforms for hours, days at a time,” she added, “and not have to worry about the elements.” Though life is great at the dock, the journey there is long, which may deter other Steller sea lions, Ms. Gill said.

Steller sea lions are similar in appearance to California sea lions, but they grow much larger. Males can be up to 11 feet long and weigh up to about 2,500 pounds.

Advertisement

They usually forage at night, feasting on more than a hundred species of fish and cephalopods. But individual sea lions may adopt their own hunting strategies, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

“He’s kind of out of the ordinary,” Ms. Gill said of Chonkers. “He is probably just very food-motivated.”

On the Farallon Islands, Steller sea lions and their smaller counterparts, the California sea lion, compete intensely for food, Ms. Gill said.

“Chonkers is kind of just working smarter and not harder,” she added, “trying to find the easy, safe place where there’s less competition, less predators.” At Pier 39, Ms. Gill said, Chonkers is “king of the dock.”

Sheila Chandor, who has been harbor master at Pier 39 since 1985, said Chonkers had been visiting the pier for about 15 years, but had previously stayed just a day or two at a time.

Advertisement

“It was quite a spectacle to see this wonderful mammal,” Ms. Chandor recalled of the first time she saw him. This time, Ms. Chandor added, Chonkers had stayed far longer and appeared to have been joined by a juvenile Steller sea lion for a few days.

“I sort of hope we don’t end up with more,” Ms. Chandor said, noting that the wooden floats were built for California sea lions, which weigh up to about 700 pounds. (As it is, there is hardly enough space for all the animals, which regularly pile upon and push one another off the floats.)

“When he’s sitting on the dock, he’s so big compared to the others,” Ms. Chandor said. “He makes them all look like little kittens.”

“He’s such a big guy,” she marveled. “He’s truly huge.”

Ms. Chandor described international tourists, locals and other visitors coalescing at the pier on Wednesday morning in the hopes of witnessing the great beast.

Advertisement

“They didn’t know each other, but they were all saying, ‘Are you here to see Chonkers?’” she said.

Continue Reading

Science

Kiara Brokenbrough went viral for her $500 wedding. She died the day her son was born

Published

on

Kiara Brokenbrough went viral for her 0 wedding. She died the day her son was born

Kiara Brokenbrough’s 2022 wedding to Joel Brokenbrough drew national headlines for its elegant simplicity on a $500 budget.

Four years later, an Instagram post from her documented the couple’s baby shower, which was full of the creative details the social media influencer’s followers had come to expect. Photos showed a pickup basketball game with pink and blue jerseys, a heart-shaped white cake and a Bible in which guests were invited to highlight favorite passages for the pair’s first child. In one image, a radiant Kiara waved at the camera, Joel’s hands cradling her belly.

The March 22 post would be her last. Kiara, 32, died on March 30, the same day her son Jonah was born.

While the circumstances of her death remain private, a family representative told The Times that media reports stating that she died as a result of childbirth complications are not accurate.

Doctors successfully delivered Jonah “in a truly miraculous way,” Joel Brokenbrough, 34, wrote on Facebook, and the baby remains in stable condition in neonatal intensive care.

Advertisement

Her family is reeling from the sudden loss of a woman with a gift for making the people around her feel seen.

“She was just so pleasant. She had this smile and this poise about herself. She was confident, but yet she wasn’t arrogant,” a family representative said. “She always made you feel accepted and wanted.”

The daughter of Lori Gill Lacey and Ronald Draper, Brokenbrough grew up in the Pomona area. She and Joel met in 2017 and married five years later.

In a year when the flashy weddings of celebrity couples like Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez, and Kourtney Kardashian and Travis Barker, filled social media feeds, the ceremony Kiara planned caught people’s attention.

She found a dress for $47; he wore a $100 suit. They said their vows on a scenic overlook on Angeles Crest Highway, surrounded by a handful of family and friends.

Advertisement

The wedding went viral on social media and was featured on Good Morning America. It also spoke to who Kiara was as a person, family members said: beautiful, warm, thoughtfully attentive to details and focused on the things that matter most.

“We’ve gotten so far away from how weddings were something so simple as bride and groom coming together, bowing to God to stay together and vowing to each other to stay together,” she told The Times in 2022. “I wanted to look like myself and be myself.”

Kiara was awarded a master’s degree in digital media management from USC in May 2025 and opened a boutique marketing agency. Soon after, the couple temporarily relocated to West Virginia so Joel could take an assistant coach position on West Virginia State University’s men’s basketball team. When the season ended, they returned to the San Bernardino area and began to prepare for their son’s arrival.

Becoming a mother “is what she always wanted,” the family representative said, adding that Kiara “was very deep in her faith, to the very end. She never wavered.”

The family has started a GoFundMe for Joel and Jonah.

Advertisement

“No one will come between us or interfere with the bond we share or the purpose placed on our lives,” Joel wrote in an April 21 Facebook post dedicated to Jonah, who is continuing to make progress. “Prepare yourself, son. There is meaningful work ahead of us.”

Continue Reading

Science

Smog in Phoenix and Salt Lake City? The E.P.A. Is Blaming Asia.

Published

on

Smog in Phoenix and Salt Lake City? The E.P.A. Is Blaming Asia.

For decades, Phoenix has struggled with smog that gets trapped in its bowl-like topography and is detrimental to human health. In 2024, when the city failed to meet a federal air pollution standard, it risked being hit with stricter rules designed to force more aggressive pollution limits.

Then, President Trump returned to the White House. And now the Phoenix-Mesa region has gotten off the hook for an unusual reason: The Trump administration is blaming foreign countries for the pollution.

Without contaminants blowing in from Mexico and Asia, the reasoning goes, Phoenix would have been in compliance with federal pollution limits.

Other regions are now taking up that strategy. Last week, the Environmental Protection Agency accepted similar reasoning to propose that the area around Salt Lake City in Utah get a reprieve from stricter emissions rules governing vehicles, factories and power plants.

These places should not be penalized “due to foreign sources of emissions,” Lee Zeldin, the E.P.A. administrator, said on X. “Federal ozone air quality standards would have been met had it not been for emissions transported into the region from outside the U.S.”

Advertisement

Senator John Curtis, Republican of Utah, hailed the move. “For too long, Utah has faced the prospect of being penalized for air pollution we did not create and cannot control.

”The Utah Petroleum Association also lauded the E.P.A.’s moves. The oil and gas industry has been on the forefront of the move to shift the blame for smog away from local polluters and onto foreign countries.

Some environmental groups and experts say that argument is preposterous.

The Clean Air Act does allow regions to take account of cross-border emissions to avoid penalties for failing to meet federal air quality standards. But it was not meant for pollution from thousands of miles away, they say.

Moreover, accounting for emissions from elsewhere does not excuse local authorities from tackling local sources of pollution, said Abi Vijayan, a former E.P.A. lawyer who is now with the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group.

Advertisement

“You can’t point to some pollution blowing in from thousands of miles away, when there’s a lot more to do to cut local pollution,” Ms. Vijayan said. “This is going to mean more heart attacks, more lung disease, more asthma for the residents of Phoenix.”

The idea that pollution crosses international boundaries isn’t scientifically controversial. Ozone, the main ingredient in smog, is produced when nitrogen oxide combines with volatile organic compounds and is heated by sunlight. It can indeed travel thousands of miles, for example, carried by westerly winds across the Pacific Ocean, or across the border from Mexico.

Phoenix and Utah officials say that explains why, over the last two decades, ozone levels have risen despite local efforts to reduce the pollutants that form the thick haze. Both Phoenix and Salt Lake City have long received “F” grades from the American Lung Association for high levels of ozone.

“We’d done a great job in reducing those local emissions, almost cut them in half, but ozone concentrations were starting to increase again,” said Matthew Poppen, director of environmental planning at the Maricopa Association of Governments, which put together the analysis for the Phoenix metropolitan area. “That got us asking, ‘Hey, what’s going on?’”

Local officials commissioned an analysis that found that pollution from overseas, carried in particular by atmospheric currents in the case of Asia and by summer winds from Mexico, contributed an average of about 15 parts per billion of ozone. That bumped up the area’s average above the 70 parts per billion federal limit. Wildfires, as well as pollution from other states, also had an effect, they said.

Advertisement

The Northern Wasatch Front region in Utah, which includes Salt Lake City, reached a similar conclusion.

“It’s allowed us to understand what we can control locally, what can be done to improve things, but also that we shouldn’t over‑regulate,” said Bryce Bird, air quality chief at the Utah Department of Environmental Quality.

Advertisement

“Other areas in the West are seeing the same thing that we are: added local reductions aren’t resulting in a reduction in ozone,” Mr. Bird said. “There’s something else that’s driving that.”

Some experts doubted the significance of the findings.

“We’ve always known some pollution comes from abroad,” said Daniel Cohan, an expert in atmospheric modeling at Rice University. Still, “the levels that they’re claiming are contributed internationally are not particularly high,” he said.

“There’s nothing really unusual in seeing that level of ozone getting attributed to emissions from other countries,” he said. “These standards are based on air quality levels needed to protect human health. If everyone can point to international sources as a reason why their air doesn’t need to be clean enough, then we’ve undermined the entire meaning of the standards.”

Normally, a failure to meet federal ozone standards would trigger a downgrade in what’s known as the area’s nonattainment status, bringing a wave of tougher environmental regulations, including stricter federal permitting rules and a mandate to conduct more aggressive vehicle emissions testing.

Advertisement

Local industry groups have rallied in support of the effort by Arizona and Utah, highlighting the region’s data center construction boom.

“Arizona is now a global hub for advanced manufacturing and is a highly desirable location for artificial intelligence and computing related industries,” Danny Seiden, president of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said in comments submitted to the E.P.A. in December.

Tougher pollution controls were “not just a regulatory burden for local industries, but also an economic and strategic threat,” he said.

The stakes were high for health too, said Dr. Brian Moench, president of Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment, a nonprofit organization.

Ozone is a colorless, odorless gas that can harm the lungs, especially in children and older people, and can trigger a host of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. “Ozone is so potent, it doesn’t take much at all to have a profound impact on people’s health,” Dr. Moench said.

Advertisement

He pointed to a large study that found that being exposed to an increase of just 3 parts per billion of ozone for a duration of 10 years caused a loss of lung function and lung tissue equivalent to what would typically occur from smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for 29 years.

“It doesn’t matter if the ozone came from China,” Dr. Moench said. “If you’re breathing it, it’s doing the same harm as if it came from Salt Lake City.”

Over the past two decades, several other regions had made similar arguments against stricter regulations, including Imperial County, Calif., and El Paso, Texas.

But previous administrations had largely been skeptical. The Biden administration set a high bar for considering such arguments, including proof that the area was already doing everything it reasonably could to reduce pollution domestically. The arguments also tended to come from regions closer to the border.

In March, Senator Mark Kelly, Democrat of Arizona, hosted Mr. Zeldin at an air quality round table of local officials and industry representatives. “A key topic of discussion was the need to modernize E.P.A. guidance and cut red tape for local governments and businesses,” Mr. Kelly later said in a news release.

Advertisement

The following month, during a trip to Utah, Mr. Zeldin announced that he would repeal the Biden administration’s strict guidance, saying he was removing “cumbersome red tape.”

Some researchers pointed out the irony of the United States, currently the second-biggest polluter on the planet, pointing its finger at other countries.

In fact, dirty air from the United States can and does travel abroad, just as the United States receives pollution from across the globe, said Yuhang Wang, a professor in atmospheric science at Georgia Tech.

“What’s blowing in,” he said, “is also blowing out.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending