Science
Louis Pasteur’s Relentless Hunt for Germs Floating in the Air
Louis Pasteur was at his most comfortable when working in his Paris laboratory. It was there that he had some of his greatest scientific triumphs, including experiments that helped confirm germs can cause disease. “Everything gets complicated away from the laboratory,” he once complained to a friend.
But in 1860, years before he became famous for developing vaccines and heating milk to kill pathogens, Pasteur ventured to the top of a glacier, on a remarkable quest for invisible life.
He and a guide began at the base of Mont Blanc in the Alps, hiking through dark stands of pines. Behind them, a mule carried baskets of long‑necked glass chambers that sloshed with broth. They ascended a steep trail until they reached Mer de Glace, the sea of ice.
The wind blew briskly over the glacier, and the vale echoed with the sound of frozen boulders crashing down the slopes. Pasteur struggled to make out the path in the glare of sunlight bouncing off the ice.
When the scientist reached an altitude of 2,000 meters, he finally stopped. He removed one of the glass chambers from the mule’s pack and raised it over his head. With his free hand, he grabbed a pair of tongs and used them to snap off the end of the neck. The cold air rushed inside the container.
The sight of Pasteur holding a globe of broth over his head would have baffled other travelers visiting Mer de Glace that day. If they had asked him what he was doing, his answer might have seemed mad. Pasteur was on a hunt, he later wrote, for “the floating germs of the air.”
Now, 165 years later, scientists around the world hunt for floating germs. Some study how coronaviruses wafting through buses and restaurants spread Covid. Spores of fungi can travel thousands of miles, infecting people and plants. Oceans deliver microbes into the air with every crashing wave. Even clouds, scientists now recognize, are alive with microbes.
The sky’s ecosystem is known as the aerobiome. In Pasteur’s day, it had no name. The very idea of living things drifting through the air was too strange to imagine.
But Pasteur began to wonder about the possibility of airborne life when he was a little-known chemist teaching at the University of Lille in France. There, the father of one his students approached him for help. The man owned a distillery where he used yeast to turn beet juice into alcohol. But the juice had inexplicably turned rancid.
Inspecting the liquid under a microscope, Pasteur discovered dark rods — bacteria rather than yeast — in the sour vats. The discovery helped him work out a theory of fermentation: Microorganisms absorbed nutrients and then produced new compounds. Depending on the species, they could turn butter rancid or grape juice into wine.
The discovery won Pasteur a prestigious new post in Paris. In his account of the discovery, Pasteur suggested in passing that the bacteria might have floated through the air and settled into the vats. That notion earned him an angry letter from Félix‑Archimède Pouchet, one of France’s leading naturalists.
Pouchet informed Pasteur that the microorganisms Pasteur discovered had not dropped into the vats from the air. Instead, the beet juice had spontaneously generated them. “Spontaneous generation is the production of a new organized being that lacks parents and all of whose primordial elements have been drawn from ambient matter,” Pouchet had written earlier.
Pasteur coolly replied that Pouchet’s spontaneous generation experiments were fatally flawed. The conflict between Pasteur and Pouchet prompted the French Academy of Sciences to announce a contest for the best study addressing whether spontaneous generation was real or not. What started as a private spat had turned into a public spectacle. Pasteur and Pouchet both signed up to compete for the prize of 2,500 francs.
The public eagerly followed the competition, struggling to imagine either view of life. Spontaneous generation had the whiff of blasphemy: If life could spring into existence, it did not require divine intervention. But Pasteur’s claim that the atmosphere teemed with germs also strained the 19th‑century mind. A French journalist informed Pasteur that he was going to lose the contest. “The world into which you wish to take us is really too fantastic,” he said.
To prove that his world was real, Pasteur set out to pluck germs from the air. Working with glassblowers, he created flasks with narrow openings that stretched for several inches. He filled them with sterile broth and waited to see if anything would grow inside. If the necks were pointed straight up, the broth often turned cloudy with microorganisms. But if he sloped the necks so that the openings pointed down, the broth stayed clear. Pasteur argued that germs in the air could drift down into the flasks, but could not propel themselves up a rising path.
When Pouchet heard about Pasteur’s experiments, he sneered. Did Pasteur really believe that every germ in decaying organic matter came from the air? If that were true, every cubic millimeter of air would have been packed with more germs than all the people on Earth. “The air in which we live would almost have the density of iron,” Pouchet said.
Pasteur responded by changing his hypothesis. Germs were not everywhere, he said. Instead, they drifted in clouds that were more common in some places than others.
To prove his claim, Pasteur took his straight-necked flasks out of his lab and began collecting germs. In the courtyard of the Paris Observatory, all 11 of his flasks turned cloudy with multiplying germs. But when he traveled to the countryside and ran his experiment again, more of his flasks stayed sterile. The farther Pasteur got from human settlements, the sparser airborne life became. To put that idea to an extreme test, Pasteur decided to climb Mer de Glace.
His first foray to the glacier ended in failure. After holding up a flask, he tried using the flame from a lamp to seal its neck shut, but the glare of the sun made the flame invisible. As Pasteur fumbled with the lamp, he worried that he might be contaminating the broth with germs he carried on his skin or his tools. He gave up and trudged to a tiny mountain lodge for the night.
He left his flasks open as he slept. In the morning they were rife with microorganisms. Pasteur concluded that the lodge was packed with airborne germs that travelers had brought from around the world.
Later that day, Pasteur modified his lamp so that the flame would burn bright enough for him to see it under the glacier-reflected sun. When he climbed back up Mer de Glace, the experiment worked flawlessly. Only one of the flasks turned cloudy with germs. The other 19 remained sterile.
In November 1860, Pasteur arrived at the Academy of Sciences in Paris with the 73 flasks he had used on his travels. He entered the domed auditorium, walked up to the table where the prize committee sat, and laid out the flasks. The judges peered at the broth as Pasteur described his evidence, saying it gave “indubitable proof” of floating germs in inhabited places.
Pouchet refused to accept the evidence, but nevertheless withdrew from the contest. Pasteur was awarded the prize.
Still, the two continued to spar. The rivalry remained so intense that the Academy set up a new commission to evaluate their latest experiments. Pouchet dragged out the proceedings, demanding more time for his research.
Pasteur decided to seize public opinion and put on a spectacle. On the evening of April 7, 1864, in an amphitheater filled with Parisian elites, Pasteur stood surrounded by lab equipment and a lamp to project images on a screen. He told the audience it would not leave the soiree without recognizing that the air was rife with invisible germs. “We can’t see them now, for the same reason that, in broad daylight, we can’t see the stars,” he said.
At Pasteur’s command, the lights went out, save for a cone of light that revealed floating motes of dust. Pasteur asked the audience to picture a rain of dust falling on every surface in the amphitheater. That dust, he said, was alive.
Pasteur then used a pump to drive air through a sterile piece of cotton. After soaking the cotton in water, he put a drop under a microscope. He projected its image on a screen for the audience to see. Alongside soot and bits of plaster, they could make out squirming corpuscles. “These, gentlemen, are the germs of microscopic beings,” Pasteur said.
Germs were everywhere in the air, he said — kicked up in dust, taking flights of unknown distances and then settling back to the ground, where they worked their magic of fermentation. Germs broke down “everything on the surface of this globe which once had life, in the general economy of creation,” Pasteur said.
“This role is immense, marvelous, positively moving,” he added.
The lecture ended with a standing ovation. Pasteur’s hunt for floating germs elevated him to the highest ranks of French science.
By the time he died 31 years later, Pasteur had made so many world-changing discoveries that his many eulogies and obituaries did not mention his trip to Mer de Glace.
But scientists today recognize that Pasteur got the first glimpse of a world that they are only starting to understand. They now know that life infuses the atmosphere far more than he had imagined, all the way to the stratosphere. Our thriving aerobiome has led some scientists to argue that alien aerobiomes may float in the clouds of other planets. Ours is not the only world that seems too fantastic to believe.
Science
What My Father’s Experience Taught Me About Memory and the Brain
A couple of years ago, in the middle of the night, I crept downstairs to find my father sitting at the kitchen table, sobbing like a child.
My mother was beside him, trying to comfort him, an activity that took up more and more of her time. He was 87 and had dementia. It wasn’t unusual to find him upset or confused. But on this night, something seemed to be happening to him in real time — in 1941.
He was 6 years old, and was leaving Pittsburgh, the only home he had ever known, for an Air Force base in San Antonio, where his father had been ordered for duty. He and his parents were traveling there by train, transferring in Chicago.
It was the beginning of a lonely, difficult time for my father’s family, moving between Air Force bases in the South, where landlords sometimes turned them away because they were Catholic. An only child, he had been allowed to take one pet with him, a canary he was carrying in a birdcage.
As they were changing trains in Chicago, the bottom fell out of the cage. The canary flew out, up into the vaulted atrium of the station’s Great Hall. There was no way to get the bird — there was no time, they had to board a train to Texas. So my 6-year-old father shuffled after his parents, holding an empty cage.
In the years that had elapsed, he had negotiated arms treaties with the Soviets, had advised presidents, had served as a U.S. ambassador, all with the same watchful, wisecracking reserve. I thought I knew who he was. I could count on one hand the times I had seen him cry. Now here he was, sobbing over the canary as if it were yesterday.
This was all, it seemed, because of his brain. He had fallen hard in their house in Washington, D.C., smacking his head on the hardwood floor. Blood rushed into spaces in his brain, and cells starved of oxygen began to die. Eventually, he was diagnosed with vascular dementia, which is most often caused by strokes.
For five years after that, my parents lived with my family outside Boston, and we learned firsthand how brain injury affects behavior. My father recovered in some ways, but he became chaotic, his thoughts broken into mirror shards.
The biggest problem was that he had no idea where he was. Specifically, he did not know why he was living with us in Massachusetts, and no matter how many times we tried to remind him, over and over, he tried to leave. We would catch him packing the car, and gently — or not so gently — guide him back into the house.
This child-father was full of surprises. He bought surprising things: Five laptops! A cruise on the Norwegian fjords! Recurring $2 donations to every Democrat running for any office, anywhere! Once, in a weeklong cascade of Amazon deliveries, we received seven identical birdbaths from China.
Science
Dirty mind? Study suggests gut movement may flush excess material from our brains
With each step you take, coordinated contractions in your abdominal muscles help keep you stable and upright.
Now, new research finds that those gentle changes in tension and pressure also affect your brain, and may play a role in the organ’s overall health.
Imaging in humans and other animal species has long shown that the brain gently moves inside the fluid-filled skull cavity, but it’s never been clear what, exactly, is propelling this motion, said neuroscientist Patrick Drew, a Penn State University professor and associate director of the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences.
Using advanced imaging, Drew’s team observed mice brains before and after the animals began walking. They realized that the brain actually moved just milliseconds before a mouse took a step — the brief moment when the animal’s abdominal muscles contracted in preparation for movement.
To test the observation, they strapped pressure sensors around the bellies of lightly anesthetized mice and observed the brain when slight pressure was applied only to the abdominal muscles. The same motion followed. Breathing or cardiac activity didn’t trigger the same response.
The connection, Drew and his colleagues determined, is the vertebral venous plexus, a network of veins that connects the abdomen to the spine in mice and humans alike.
“It’s like a hydraulic system. It really is very much like the jacks that push your car up, or something that an excavator might have,” Drew said. “Whenever you tense those muscles, which you do whenever you make a movement … that pushes blood into the spinal cord, it increases the pressure on your brain, and it moves your brain forward.”
The paper, which was published April 27 in Nature Neuroscience, answers a puzzling question about the mechanism controlling this long-observed cerebral movement.
It also puts forward hypotheses about why this belly-brain choreography exists.
Drew and his team ran computer simulations of fluid’s motion in and around mouse brains. The kind of contraction generated by walking moves cerebrospinal fluid out of the brain, leading Drew to hypothesize that the mechanism plays an important role in flushing out protein waste and other unnecessary material.
“It’s more speculative, but using simulations, we can see that this sort of motion should drive fluid movement and could help clear waste in the brain,” Drew said.
In future research, Drew said, the team would like to explore whether the brain is detecting these mechanical signals, and how physical conditions like obesity affect the hydraulic relationship between the abdominal muscles and the brain.
These current findings clarify the relationship between the brain and physical movement, illuminating fundamental mechanics that can apply to other research, said Michael Goard, an associate professor at UC Santa Barbara who studies sensory and spatial processing.
“He did, what I think is a very thorough job figuring out what’s causing this movement in the case of locomotion and tying down the mechanical elements,” Goard said.
Science
The Longevity Secrets Helping Athletes Blow Past the Limits of Age
The assessment covers seven simple movements — various lunges, jumps and timed balances — and produces a player score relative to the rest of the league and the player’s own history. The report also includes “jump” and “landing strategy” metrics that chart the distribution of force across a player’s hips, knees and ankles, and it translates arcana like “max ankle dorsification angle” into the lingua franca of basketball: “how small your ankle angle can get like when you get low on a quick first step.” The file, which a player can access throughout his career, regardless of team, is meant to give him information about how hard he can push his body — and, just as critically, when it’s time to ease off.
“When you’re younger, there’s days you can take as many — for us — baseball swings as you want,” New York Yankees first baseman Paul Goldschmidt, who is 38, told me. We were talking in mid-February at the team’s spring training facility in Tampa, Fla., as he was getting ready for eight straight months of baseball. “As you get older, there’s times when rest is more important than work.”
For some athletes, the right biometric data presented in the right context represents “permission to rest,” says Ana Montero, a co-founder of Atlas, a San Francisco-based company that makes brain-wave-scanning, behind-the-ear wearables about the size of Mentos candies. “It’s quantifiable evidence that is showing you: Dude, today — or right now — is not the day. Go to the gym, go for a walk, go for whatever it is. And then coming back and actually seeing that you’ve bounced back.”
The Atlas device gathers several types of data, including electroencephalography, or EEG, which measures electrical activity in the brain, and galvanic skin response, or G.S.R., which is what a polygraph test measures. That data is sorted into five categories (among them agility, vitality and stress) and then delivered with advice through a smartphone app.
“There’s always some noise in brain activity because neurons are not perfect chips or transistors,” André Marques-Smith, Atlas’s other co-founder, says. “So mistakes get made.” He adds that what causes neurons to lose their precision are things that we’re all familiar with: fatigue, stress, anxiety, hunger, aging. Tom Ryan, the N.B.A.’s senior vice president of basketball strategy, says Launchpad chose Atlas because it was eager to find a device that collected this sort of data in real time. If it works the way it’s supposed to, then a vet like Goldschmidt will know exactly when he’s good for some extra batting practice and when he should take a nap instead.
-
Hawaii5 minutes agoConstruction of Portuguese center in Hilo finally underway – West Hawaii Today
-
Illinois17 minutes agoIllinois fines multiple Springfield-area nursing homes
-
Indiana23 minutes ago
Republican primary voters sent dangerous message to America | Opinion
-
Iowa29 minutes agoHarkin backs Turek for Iowa Senate
-
Kansas35 minutes ago
Kansas Lottery Pick 3, 2 By 2 winning numbers for May 7, 2026
-
Kentucky41 minutes agoReal estate sales in Jefferson, Bullitt and Oldham counties, Oct. 20-26, 2025
-
Louisiana47 minutes agoBehind the Curtain: How Louisiana’s Parole System and Courts Shape Who Goes Free | The Lens
-
Maine53 minutes agoShenna Bellows will fight for Maine as governor | Opinion