Connect with us

Politics

‘Zuck Bucks 2.0’: Zuckerberg-funded group pushing millions to influence local election offices, report says

Published

on

‘Zuck Bucks 2.0’: Zuckerberg-funded group pushing millions to influence local election offices, report says

An $80 million initiative begun final spring to help election workplaces throughout the nation is the newest chapter in an ongoing effort by Fb founder Mark Zuckerberg to affect election officers, in response to a brand new report.

In April, a coalition of left-wing nonprofits led by the Heart for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), a Chicago-based group funded by Zuckerberg, launched the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence, whose acknowledged objective was to ship cash to election workplaces for coaching, tools, consulting and different sources.

Nevertheless, the Trustworthy Elections Venture (HEP) on Thursday launched a report along with the John Locke Basis that described the Alliance as “merely a continuation” of CTCL’s so-called “Zuck Bucks scheme,” a time period critics use to explain the personal funding of elections by left-wing donors in 2020.

CTCL issued about $400 million in grants through the 2020 election to fund quite a lot of work and tools. That included poll drop bins, voting tools, extra manpower, protecting gear for ballot employees and public schooling campaigns on new voting strategies, amongst different bills.

IN ARIZONA, VOTING MACHINE GLITCH GIVES WAY TO ELECTION INTEGRITY CONCERNS

Advertisement

Fb co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg is funding one other effort to affect native election workplaces. 
(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Photos)

Democrats defended the cash as essential to conduct the election safely through the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas Republicans famous a lot of the grants focused Democrat-leaning districts. In a number of states, counties that broke closely for Joe Biden acquired extra “Zuck Bucks” donations, in response to an evaluation by the Capital Analysis Heart.

Home Republicans present in an investigation that lower than 1% of the funds had been spent on private protecting tools. As a substitute, the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence seems to be one other effort by Zuckerberg and CTCL to affect native election operations, in response to critics.

“The work of the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence is Zuck Bucks 2.0, which is why they prevented states which have instituted bans on the personal funding of election administration,” Andy Jackson, director of the Civitas Heart for Public Integrity, mentioned in an announcement.

MONTANA MAY SHOW HOW ELECTION OFFICES ARE ‘ADDICTED’ TO PRIVATE MONEY LIKE MARK ZUCKERBERG’S, REPORT FINDS

Advertisement

Twenty-four states have enacted bans or restrictions on personal funding of native election workplaces. However the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence has been working to ingratiate itself with native workplaces.

In November, the Alliance introduced its first ten member workplaces — dubbed “Facilities for Election Excellence” — together with two counties in North Carolina, Brunswick and Forsyth. Different grant recipients on the record are from California, Connecticut, Illinois, Michigan and Nevada. Extra are anticipated to be added within the coming months.

The primary workplaces will obtain grants over a two-year interval main as much as the 2024 presidential election, CTCL Government Director Tiana Epps-Johnson advised The Related Press final month.

Epps-Johnson added that grant quantities will differ primarily based on the dimensions of every jurisdiction, from $50,000 for these with fewer than 5,000 registered voters to $3 million for these with greater than 1 million voters.

An election worker boxes tabulated ballots inside the Maricopa County Recorder's Office Nov. 9, 2022, in Phoenix.

An election employee bins tabulated ballots contained in the Maricopa County Recorder’s Workplace Nov. 9, 2022, in Phoenix.
(AP Photograph/Matt York)

Whereas the results of the Alliance’s creation stay to be seen, the HEP report says its actions present the group is working to focus on native election workplaces and affect their operations to push left-wing voting insurance policies.

Advertisement

HEP and the John Locke Basis used the report to focus on paperwork they obtained by public data requests that, they argue, present the Alliance “is definitely designed to systematically affect each facet of election administration in goal workplaces and push progressive voting insurance policies.”

MISSISSIPPI ELECTION OFFICIAL PLEADS GUILTY TO MISUSING PANDEMIC RELIEF MONEY

The report describes, for instance, how after the Alliance recruited its first members, it introduced plans to start charging workplaces to hitch. The Alliance additionally created “scholarships” to cowl these membership prices, that are immediately transformed into “credit” that member workplaces can use to purchase providers from CTCL and different Alliance companions.

“In consequence, workplaces obtain entry to funds they’ll spend solely on providers supplied by left-wing firms and nonprofits, fully outdoors regular public funding channels,” the report mentioned. “Primarily based on documentation obtained by the general public data course of, these providers vary from ‘authorized’ and ‘political’ consulting to public relations and steering on recruitment and coaching.”

In change for grants and providers, workplaces are anticipated to offer CTCL and its companions “substantial in-kind contributions,” assist the Alliance develop its programming and switch over data concerning their internal workings, in response to HEP. Such efforts are designed, partially, so election workplaces can work with the Alliance to develop and implement an “enchancment plan” that will change the way in which every workplace operates.

Advertisement
Maricopa County elections officials count ballots Nov. 4, 2020, at the Maricopa County Recorder's Office in Phoenix. 

Maricopa County elections officers rely ballots Nov. 4, 2020, on the Maricopa County Recorder’s Workplace in Phoenix. 
(AP Photograph/Matt York)

“Elections ought to be clear and accountable to the individuals. It doesn’t matter what it claims to be, the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence is nothing greater than a darkish money-fueled scheme to push liberal voting insurance policies and affect election administration in key states and localities,” Jason Snead, government director of HEP, mentioned in an announcement.

“This report ought to clarify {that a} personal funding ban, vigorous oversight and full transparency from officers are important to restoring belief in our election system and making it simpler to vote and more durable to cheat.”

Proponents of the Alliance have argued its deliberate investments — $80 million over 5 years — are mandatory to make sure a good voting course of.

“Each American voter, irrespective of their zip code, ought to have entry to a course of that’s honest and reliable,” Epps-Johnson mentioned on the time of the Alliance’s launch. “Sadly, years of under-investment means many native election departments typically have restricted capability and coaching. The U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence will carry collectively world-class companions in order that native election officers not must go it alone.”

Advertisement

The Alliance didn’t reply to a request for remark from Fox Information Digital concerning the report.

Politics

Popular Republican and Trump running mate contender makes first Senate endorsement in 2024 races

Published

on

Popular Republican and Trump running mate contender makes first Senate endorsement in 2024 races

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

EXCLUSIVE – Republican Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, who’s under consideration as former President Donald Trump’s running mate, is weighing in on the GOP Senate primary in a key battleground state.

Scott on Wednesday endorsed former Rep. Mike Rogers of Michigan, a former House Intelligence Committee chair who is the front-runner in the August Republican primary in the fight to succeed longtime Sen. Debbie Stabenow, a Democrat who is not seeking re-election this year.

Advertisement

The seat is one of a handful that Republicans are aiming to flip from blue to red in the autumn elections as they push to regain the Senate majority they lost in the 2020 cycle.

“Mike Rogers’ commitment to service has always been about putting the American people first. When Mike and I served together, he was a leader who delivered results and fought to expand opportunities for working families and those pursuing their American Dream,” Scott said in a statement. “I’m proud to endorse him to be Michigan’s next U.S. Senator because I know Mike will bring his servant leadership to the U.S. Senate.”

WHAT THE REPUBLICAN SENATE CAMPAIGN CHAIR TOLD FOX NEWS ABOUT WINNING BACK THE MAJORITY

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump looks to Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., during a Fox News Channel town hall Tuesday, Feb. 20, 2024, in Greenville, S.C. (AP Photo/Chris Carlson) (AP Photo/Chris Carlson)

Scott’s backing of Rogers, which was shared first with Fox News, is his first formal endorsement in a Senate race this election cycle, although he’s helped other Republican candidates raise money.

Advertisement

Rogers, an Army veteran and a former FBI special agent before serving in Congress, enjoys the backing of the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), which is the campaign arm of the Senate GOP. And in March, Rogers landed the endorsement of Trump, the party’s presumptive presidential nominee.

6 KEY SENATE SEATS REPUBLICANS AIM TO FLIP IN NOVEMBER 

“Senator Scott has been a tremendous champion for conservative values in the U.S. Senate and I’m honored to receive his endorsement,” Rogers said in a statement. “Together in the Senate we will work with President Trump to help Michigan families, lower the cost of gas and groceries, and secure the southern border.”

Rogers has also been endorsed in recent months by seven other Republican senators, as well as Mike Pompeo, who served as Secretary of State and CIA director in the Trump administration. He’s also been endorsed by former Detroit police chief James Craig, who backed Rogers after ending his own Republican Senate nomination bid earlier this year.

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump listens as Michigan Senate candidate former Rep. Mike Rogers speaks at a campaign rally in Freeland, Mich., Wednesday, May 1, 2024. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump listens as Michigan Senate candidate former Rep. Mike Rogers speaks at a campaign rally in Freeland, Mich., Wednesday, May 1, 2024. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya) (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)

As they work to win a Senate election in Michigan for the first time in three decades, Republicans were hoping to avoid a potentially costly and combustible primary.

Advertisement

But Rogers doesn’t have the field to himself.

The primary race also includes wealthy businessman and investor Sandy Pensler, who’s making his second run for office and has been spending big bucks to run ads targeting Rogers. Former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy endorsed Pensler.

Among the others running for the GOP nomination are former Rep. Justin Amash, who as an independent House member joined Democrats in voting to impeach then-President Trump in his first impeachment trial in 2019.

The state primary in Michigan will be held on August 6.

Advertisement

Scott, the only Black Republican in the Senate, ran unsuccessfully for the 2024 GOP presidential nomination but remains a very popular and influential figure in the party.

The senator, who was known for his ferocious fundraising as he cruised to a Senate re-election in 2022, has strong ties with many leading figures in the GOP donor class. The money raised two years ago served as a down payment for his 2024 national run.

Besides raising money for himself, Scott has also been very active in helping fellow Republicans running for office.

In the 2022 cycle, the senator raised nearly $1 million for other candidates and donated more than $1 million to down ballot races. And two outside groups aligned with Scott spent $13 million on top Senate and House races, while also transferring $5 million to the top super PAC supporting Senate Republicans.

A super PAC allied with Scott announced earlier this month it would spend $14 million to help Republicans grow support among Black voters.

Advertisement

Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more at our Fox News Digital election hub.

Continue Reading

Politics

Cost of bringing clean drinking water to California communities estimated at $11.5 billion

Published

on

Cost of bringing clean drinking water to California communities estimated at $11.5 billion

California has made significant progress helping small communities address problems of contaminated drinking water, but the costs of bringing safe tap water to hundreds of communities over the next five years will run more than $11.5 billion, according to a new state estimate.

In a newly released report, the staff of the State Water Resources Control Board estimated that at the start of this year approximately 913,000 Californians depended on public water systems that are failing to comply with drinking water regulations, while an additional 1.5 million people depended on water systems that are determined to be “at-risk.”

Officials carried out the assessment nearly five years after the state established the Safe and Affordable Funding for Equity and Resilience, or SAFER, drinking water program. They said in the report that under the program, the state water board has since 2019 given more than $831 million in grants for drinking water projects in disadvantaged communities, and that about 250 failing water systems serving more than 2 million people have come into compliance with drinking water standards.

“What our analysis has shown time and again is that the common denominator is size,” said Joaquin Esquivel, chair of the state water board. “Small systems struggle, especially in communities that have experienced discrimination and disinvestment, and their challenges will be amplified as weather grows more extreme, new contaminants emerge and costs increase.”

Aggressive and impactful reporting on climate change, the environment, health and science.

Advertisement

California declared access to clean, safe and affordable water a human right in 2012, but the state has faced significant challenges in developing policies and securing adequate funding to bring solutions for communities where people live with contaminated tap water.

In small rural communities across the state, the water pumped from wells contains harmful levels of contaminants including naturally occurring arsenic, bacteria from sewage leaks, nitrate from animal manure, fertilizers or other sources, and carcinogenic chemicals.

Not all systems that are deemed to be failing deliver water that is contaminated, but many of them have at least one contaminant at levels that violate safe drinking water standards.

Advertisement

According to state data, about 56% of the 385 failing water systems supply disadvantaged communities, and 67% of them supply majority communities of color.

“All of our current failing water systems are on track to come off the failing list,” said Kristyn Abhold, senior environmental scientist for the state water board. “They are working on long-term solutions, and our staff and funding resources are being targeted to the ones that are in most need.”

State water regulators have found that the vast majority of the failing water systems serve a small number of residents, while 98% of the state’s population receives water from sources and suppliers that meet drinking water standards.

For a water system to come into compliance with regulations, it takes not only funding but also planning, engineering work and permits, Abhold said.

State officials have assessed other communities that are at risk by analyzing the potential for water quality violations or water shortages, among other factors.

Advertisement

The number of people affected has fluctuated in recent months as some water systems have come off the list and others have been added. The state’s latest estimates show that 738,000 people currently receive water from failing systems, while more than 1.8 million people depend on 548 systems with drinking water supplies determined to be at risk.

The state’s report includes estimated costs for infrastructure solutions such as installing treatment systems, drilling a new well, or consolidating by connecting one water system to another.

The estimated costs of solutions in the latest report were substantially higher than previous state estimates. In a 2021 report, the state water board included a range of estimated costs up to $9.1 billion. Officials said they used new methods and improved data this time, including more water systems and risks in their analysis.

According to the report, the estimated costs of long-term solutions for failing and at-risk public water systems total $6.6 billion over five years, while the costs of solutions for “high-risk” small water systems and domestic wells total $4.9 billion.

Those combined costs, totaling more than $11.5 billion, would be significantly higher if loan repayment costs and operations and maintenance costs are included, the report said, pushing the total estimated cost of “achieving the human right to water” to $15.9 billion.

Advertisement

Officials projected that $2 billion in state grant funds will be available over five years, as well as $1.5 billion in state loans, leaving a substantial gap in available funding. Officials said a large portion of the money to address the problems may need to come from “local cost share” funds collected through rates, fees and taxes.

The report’s higher cost estimates were released amid discussions about budget cuts in Sacramento.

Citing recent cuts, more than 180 organizations, including environmental groups and other organizations, wrote to state leaders urging them to approve placing a $10 billion bond on the November ballot to provide “direct and meaningful investments in the California communities and natural resources most impacted by climate change.”

As part of that ballot measure, they called for including $1 billion for drinking water and wastewater infrastructure for communities and tribes.

Leaders of the groups wrote that “recent and proposed cuts to funding for such programs have prompted consensus that additional bond funding is necessary to ensure priority programs continue beyond this year.”

Advertisement

Jennifer Clary, California director for the group Clean Water Action, said: ”drinking water infrastructure isn’t a luxury item. Without these projects, thousands of Californians will continue to lack access to safe and clean drinking water.”

Clean water advocates have also voiced concerns as state officials have reviewed the costs of a program that provides household tanks and hauls water by truck to thousands of low-income families whose wells have gone dry.

More than 3,000 domestic wells have run dry throughout California since 2020, according to reports submitted to the state. Those with dry wells have started relying on water delivered by tanker trucks to fill their tanks, while also receiving bottled water.

Leaders of the nonprofit group Self-Help Enterprises, which manages the water-hauling effort, recently urged Gov. Gavin Newsom and other state leaders to reject proposals that would take away critical funding for the program. They wrote in a June 11 letter that taking away $17.5 million would “cut off access to water for more than 20,000 people who are still awaiting a permanent solution.”

The letter, which was first reported by the news site SJV Water, was also signed by leaders of other organizations, including the Community Water Center and Union of Concerned Scientists.

Advertisement

“The reversions of these funds will cut off access to water for more than 20,000 people who are still awaiting a permanent solution,” the groups said. “Cutting funding for such a crucial program would have devastating effects on rural and disadvantaged communities by immediately cutting them off from their sole source of water supply, and doing so with no warning.”

Leaders of some groups said later that the funding for the program has been restored.

Continue Reading

Politics

Mike Kennedy advances past crowded GOP primary to secure nomination for open Utah House seat

Published

on

Mike Kennedy advances past crowded GOP primary to secure nomination for open Utah House seat

Mike Kennedy on Tuesday won the Republican nomination for Utah’s 3rd Congressional District to replace outgoing Rep. John Curtis, R-Utah, becoming the immediate favorite to win the seat in November.

Kennedy beat fellow Republicans JR Bird, John Dougall, Case Lawrence and Stewart Peay in a packed primary pool for the district. Curtis is vacating his seat to run for U.S. Senate to replace outgoing Sen. Mitt Romney.

Kennedy, a state senator, had won the party’s nomination for the seat in April but faced challenges from other candidates who gathered signatures to be on the ballot. Peay had won the endorsement of Romney, who is also Peay’s wife’s uncle. Kennedy had won the endorsement of Sen. Mike Lee, who said he was needed to “fight against the Uniparty and help get this country back on track.”

‘SQUAD’ MEMBER FACES OUSTER FROM CONGRESS AS NEW YORK, COLORADO AND UTAH HOLD PRIMARIES ON TUESDAY

From left, JR Bird, John Dougall, Mike Kennedy, Case Lawrence and Stewart Peay, candidates in the Republican primary for Utah’s 3rd Congressional District, take part in a debate at the Eccles Broadcast Center in Salt Lake City on June 12, 2024. (Spenser Heaps/Deseret News via AP/Pool)

Advertisement

Bird, a mayor, emphasized his experience of running a small town as well as the importance of the energy sector and agriculture, according to the Deseret News.

Dougall, the state auditor, had run as an anti-MAGA candidate and had slammed some GOP legislation, including what he saw as an overly aggressive bill that tasks him with enforcing a ban on transgender-identifying individuals using restrooms that are inconsistent with their sex.

WATCH: THIS HOUSE PRIMARY IS MOST EXPENSIVE IN CONGRESSIONAL HISTORY

He has also been deeply critical of former President Trump. On Tuesday on X, he also questioned the “cavalier manner” of any official who swears to uphold the Constitution “then endorses Trump following January 6th.” He has advertised himself as “mainstream, not MAGA.”

At a debate this month, candidates split on the question of military funding to Ukraine as well as whether the federal government should explicitly ban abortion. Peay, Dougall and Case Lawrence – a trampoline park entrepreneur – had called on Congress to keep sending weapons to Ukraine to help it fend off the ongoing Russian invasion.

Advertisement

Bird and Kennedy disagreed, arguing that it was not beneficial to the U.S. to keep funding the Ukrainians, with the two calling for stronger sanctions and the seizure of Russian assets.

HEAD HERE FOR LATEST FOX NEWS REPORTING FROM THE PRIMARY CAMPAIGN TRAIL

Republican Utah Sen. Mitt Romney

Sen. Mitt Romney (Ting Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Kennedy will go on to face Democrat Glenn Wright in the November election, but the Republican is favored to win comfortably in a district that has voted Republican since 1997.

CLICK HERE TO GET FOX NEWS APP

Elsewhere in the state, Republican Gov. Spencer Cox, a major GOP Trump critic, held off a primary challenge from Phil Lyman, another 2020 election denier who easily won the state party convention.

Advertisement

The Associated Press and Fox News’ Paul Steinhauser contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending